Please delete

[nethead]

This is pittyful to watch, the entire thread should be removed.

+1

I would also like to see the whole thread removed as soon as Nethead does the right thing by sending the money back.

The information i have about your bussiness will never be removed. I will add them later. Bussiness names, not full contact info, and how you penetrate sensitive information.

[MemoryDealers]

The point is, blockchain is a site you back which supports anonymity. By posting his info and declaring yourself part owner you were simultaneously pointing out that you have access to records that can track people, and showing that you can access them at any time for someone requesting them such as the authorities. Nethead wont do the right thing, he has 9 posts assuming its not just a puppet, just scam tag him and move on, dont wreck your reputation for 50 dollars.

All the information I posted here came from Bitcoinstore.
None of it came from Blockchain.info (until after the scammer posted it himself)

[ThomasV]

I would also like to see the whole thread removed

No way. Everyone should see how Roger is destroying his business for few bucks.

it's not just going to hurt his business, it will also hurt blockchain.info, and Bitcoin. please remove the thread ASAP

[MemoryDealers]

I would also like to see the whole thread removed

No way. Everyone should see how Roger is destroying his business for few bucks.

Do you deny that he owes me the money?

[jasinlee]

The point is, blockchain is a site you back which supports anonymity. By posting his info and declaring yourself part owner you were simultaneously pointing out that you have access to records that can track people, and showing that you can access them at any time for someone requesting them such as the authorities. Nethead wont do the right thing, he has 9 posts assuming its not just a puppet, just scam tag him and move on, dont wreck your reputation for 50 dollars.

All the information I posted here came from Bitcoinstore.
None of it came from Blockchain.info (until after the scammer posted it himself)

I am aware, I read the thread. But that does not matter, that is not what people will remember. It brings into question things like are the anonymous addresses actually anonymous? If the owners get raided for whatever reason will they just turn on all their users? I agree he owes you, but it is not worth it.

[ribuck]

Why is the "secret phrase" stored unhashed anyway? That's just asking for trouble.

[MemoryDealers]

I would also like to see the whole thread removed

No way. Everyone should see how Roger is destroying his business for few bucks.

it's not just going to hurt his business, it will also hurt blockchain.info, and Bitcoin. please remove the thread ASAP

No sensitive information from Blockchain was posted by anyone other than the blockchain account owner.

[nethead]

I would also like to see the whole thread removed

No way. Everyone should see how Roger is destroying his business for few bucks.

it's not just going to hurt his business, it will also hurt blockchain.info, and Bitcoin. please remove the thread ASAP

I will make a new thread on this subject later, and i want this information i will post to stay online

[nethead]

I would also like to see the whole thread removed

No way. Everyone should see how Roger is destroying his business for few bucks.

Do you deny that he owes me the money?

I DENY IT! IM SAYING THIS 3 PAGES NOW

[MemoryDealers]

It brings into question things like are the anonymous addresses actually anonymous? If the owners get raided for whatever reason will they just turn on all their users? I agree he owes you, but it is not worth it.

I think it was not clarified:  the address the extra bitcoins were sent to are not an anonymous address that is part of Blockchain's mixer,  it was just a normal address in his blockchain wallet.

[DannyM]

So I guess passphrase information in blockchain.info is not hashed?

[Bitcoinin]

All the information I posted here came from Bitcoinstore.
None of it came from Blockchain.info (until after the scammer posted it himself)

The point, though, is that all of this got drug out into public because of the initial post.  It is reflecting poorly on the store, Blockchain.info, possibly Blockchain.info's wallet security, the other Bitcoin businesses you're connected to, the importance your businesses place on privacy/anonymity, and the professionalism of Bitcoin businesses in general.

[nethead]

It brings into question things like are the anonymous addresses actually anonymous? If the owners get raided for whatever reason will they just turn on all their users? I agree he owes you, but it is not worth it.

I think it was not clarified:  the address the extra bitcoins were sent to are not an anonymous address that is part of Blockchain's mixer,  it was just a normal address in his blockchain wallet.

Give proof of it as i requested earlier. Sadly i havent saved a screenshot of it as i normaly do for payments
What i got from you was only my 32.something btc.

Please put an end to it, as i have to leave in about half an hour to 45 mins

[BadBear]

Dang, guess I won't be using blockchain.info anymore 

[ThomasV]

Roger, can you please cool down, blank your first post, and seek a better outcome than a flamewar?

I don't want the next news article about Bitcoin to be entitled "In the lawless Bitcoin world, business owners seek revenge by publishing customer information"

[greyhawk]

Wait, wait, wait. So Roger Ver has access to see users wallet passwords in plaintext? So he can theoretically log in to any account on Blockchain.info and send himself whatever he wants? Blaming it on "hackers"? Is that what is happening here?

[MemoryDealers]

So I guess passphrase information in blockchain.info is not hashed?

No passphrase information was leaked or is even available.

If I knew his passphrase,  I could have logged into his account,  and taken my money back.

This is not possible by design with blockchain.

[nethead]

As soon as this ends i give up the bitcoin idea entirely

All my bitcoins will be given away
I will start a thread sometime later today or max tommorow, This right here got me

[MemoryDealers]

Wait, wait, wait. So Roger Ver has access to see users wallet passwords in plaintext? So he can theoretically log in to any account on Blockchain.info and send himself whatever he wants? Blaming it on "hackers"? Is that what is happening here?

NO,  this is not possible.

If it was,  I could have just taken my money back,  and none of this would have been an issue.

[MemoryDealers]

Roger, can you please cool down, blank your first post, and seek a better outcome than a flamewar?

I don't want the next news article about Bitcoin to be entitled "In the lawless Bitcoin world, business owners seek revenge by publishing customer information"

Done.