[ANN]pledge for the release of 100% faster cuda 7.5 nvidia miner for neoscrypt

[antantti]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.
You made this disabled guy very happy.

Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

I'm happy when tbearhere is happy 

3505 x 2 = 7010 that's where that 7GHz comes from.

PS. All my 970's do at least +500 on memory, 4000 x 2 = 8000Mhz and they are happily hashing ETH 22MH each. 980ti should do more.

Did you check power consumption of 970's during mining eth?

From 600W@83MH to 1000W@110MH. 5x970 + some other stuff, TDP is the limiting factor. I'm using Genoil's cuda miner.

link please? ...

#crysx

https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum

[tbearhere]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.
You made this disabled guy very happy.

Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

I'm happy when tbearhere is happy  

3505 x 2 = 7010 that's where that 7GHz comes from.

PS. All my 970's do at least +500 on memory, 4000 x 2 = 8000Mhz and they are happily hashing ETH 22MH each. 980ti should do more.

I went from +150 to +400 on memory and gained another 100 kh/s on each card on lyra2v2.
Thx

[thefix]

I just sent a small contribution to the Neoscrypt pot and sent a PM with the transaction info.

Thank you for all your work!

Nice to see things getting closer to the goal!

[djm34]

I just sent a small contribution to the Neoscrypt pot and sent a PM with the transaction info.

Thank you for all your work!

Nice to see things getting closer to the goal!

Thanks a lot for your support,
djm

ps: still not on target, please continue to donate, still one week left !!!
(for info, there were rather big donations, but small number of donations (less than 20ppl), do these 100's of neoscrypt user not donating
a thing just expect to get it for nothing ?? paid by these 20 donators    )

[ghostlander]

Well, 2+ BTC is a good donation flow anyway. I've got less than 0.05 BTC from 3 donators on NSGminer this month. May buy me a few drinks in a dodgy boozer and that's all.

[thefix]

I just sent a small contribution to the Neoscrypt pot and sent a PM with the transaction info.

Thank you for all your work!

Nice to see things getting closer to the goal!

Thanks a lot for your support,
djm

ps: still not on target, please continue to donate, still one week left !!!
(for info, there were rather big donations, but small number of donations (less than 20ppl), do these 100's of neoscrypt user not donating
a thing just expect to get it for nothing ?? paid by these 20 donators    )

It appears that many of the neoscrypt users are expecting to get it for nothing and that is unfortunate. If the 100+ users made small contributions the funding would be over in a day.

I will have some more to donate to the project in three days and encourage others that have not donated to donate now.

[sp_]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

[djm34]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

Thanks for the donation
djm

[djm34]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

what is that 0.1btc "nofee" (can't find that... ) ?

also considering the btc has decreased a lot, take 2.5btc as a lower limit... 

[sp_]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

what is that 0.1btc "nofee" (can't find that... ) ?

also considering the btc has decreased a lot, take 2.5btc as a lower limit... 

I was thinking about this transaction that was sendt without a fee. (slow confirmation). Looks like it has been confirmed now:

weird i sent it. Maybe cause i closed my client 2 sec after.
Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 1/11/2016 08:39
To: DJM neo 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.10000000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00011999 BTC
Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000

https://blockexplorer.com/tx/6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64

ok, it is one of those... (not your fault), there are transactions which are sent with minimum amount fee and take up to a few days to validate (should be ok by the end of the pledge though... )

[djm34]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

what is that 0.1btc "nofee" (can't find that... ) ?

also considering the btc has decreased a lot, take 2.5btc as a lower limit...  

I was thinking about this transaction that was sendt without a fee. (slow confirmation). Looks like it has been confirmed now:

yes it was confirmed long ago actually... so still missing 0.2btc
oh that's what bensam promised to give if he was getting it in advance... but now he is just waiting for the free release as usual...  

and again I want to emphasize, that as usual, it is always the same people who donate... there are about 200ppl on nicehash alone who are mining neoscrypt...  and they won't even come here to thank those who pay for them...  
(sure I shouldn't care as long as I get what I ask, but still... we all speak of community, while in fact it is dominated by a bunch of suckers whose only contribution to that so called community is to dump on the head of those who really contribute to the community...)

So thanks to those who donate and support the "cause" and "you know what" to the others  

[pallas]

And... That's why a lot of devs do private miners.

[djm34]

And... That's why a lot of devs do private miners.

I know... 

[sp_]

In the beginning 1 GHASH of neoscrypt was paying 10BTC, and now it's only paying 2.5BTC.
Djm34: If you want to earn money on your kernals you should release them when they are hot. (People will donate for an increase in the most profitable algos.) I just did 20% faster keccak, but nobody cares because it is not profitable.

[djm34]

In the beginning 1 GHASH of neoscrypt was paying 10BTC, and now it's only paying 2.5BTC.
Djm34: If you want to earn money on your kernals you should release them when they are hot. (People will donate for an increase in the most profitable algos.) I just did 20% faster keccak, but nobody cares because it is not profitable.

lol thanks for the advice... but I don't want to beg like you do every single day  

and even when it was paying 10btc (must be around the time I released the first version), I raised only around the same, so it doesn't really matter.

[bathrobehero]

The problem is (as always) that all of us here are only a tiny fraction of all miners and some miners are not even familiar with bitcointalk or they might not even speak English. And then there are miners who just don't care and don't want to donate. If those people could be taxed somehow, the devs would have much more budget that would allow them to spend more time coding which would be beneficial to everyone.

The funny thing is, that while fee based miners were discussed a lot in the past and rejected at every occassion, nicehash basically acts like the ultimate fee based miner because they do get some money off of people who never donate (while allowing lazy/plug&play miners to profit which is bad for everyone else but that's another story). So maybe nicehash should push more money towards the devs or maybe the devs should make their own multipool or something...

[ldw-com]

So maybe nicehash should push more money towards the devs or maybe the devs should make their own multipool or something...

Great idea but i believe there have been plans for this. Not from the devs directly but from other community members. + there even is an address where you can mine to. But than again, that isn't exactly what you mean.


Lots of idea's but it always ends up the same.

[djm34]

The problem is (as always) that all of us here are only a tiny fraction of all miners and some miners are not even familiar with bitcointalk or they might not even speak English. And then there are miners who just don't care and don't want to donate. If those people could be taxed somehow, the devs would have much more budget that would allow them to spend more time coding which would be beneficial to everyone.

The funny thing is, that while fee based miners were discussed a lot in the past and rejected at every occassion, nicehash basically acts like the ultimate fee based miner because they do get some money off of people who never donate (while allowing lazy/plug&play miners to profit which is bad for everyone else but that's another story). So maybe nicehash should push more money towards the devs or maybe the devs should make their own multipool or something...

or do like a few pools (which I forgot the names) were collecting a fee for the devs (that pool for primecoin).
I think we will arrive to the miner with dev fee (but again GPL discussion and so on... to never have to release the code... or after a certain delay at least)

[sp_]

Please support this opensource project guys. Just a few dollars left..

[Vita1ico]

One question, what is the hash output expected to 970 + 960?
Today I get to 970 + 960  0.950Mhs(0.600Mhs+0.350Mhs)