[ANN]pledge for the release of 100% faster cuda 7.5 nvidia miner for neoscrypt

[djm34]

update: the miner is now released and can be found here:  https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases

Hello,

I am about to release a new version of ccminer supporting neoscrypt, it is around 25% faster than the sp/pallas version compiled with cuda 6.5
and around 100% faster when compiled with cuda 7.5

This is a co-joint effort between myself and Nicehash which will contribute to the pledge as well

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Donation will have to be made exclusively to that btc address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
(careful it is a new address, not the old one, one should already consider that 0.1btc has been donated)

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

If the pledge is successful both windows and linux version (the source) of ccminer will become available.

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Current speed of the miner:

The hashrate given in the image is for ccminer compiled with cuda 6.5, I am also planning to retune the miner with cuda 7.5
At the moment the hashrate for the 750ti is mostly unchanged while the 980's lose around 40kh/s.



Thanks in advance for your participation.  

here the link to the blockchain explorer where you can check the advancement of the pledge: https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw (+0.1btc)


ps: this thread is self moderated (assuming I have time and not in a troll mood  ), off-topic trolling won't be permitted

[1714795421]

1714795421

[1714795421]

1714795421

[1714795421]

1714795421

[chrysophylax]

Hello,

I am about to release a new version of ccminer supporting neoscrypt, it is around 50% faster than the previous version.
This is a co-joint effort between myself and Nicehash which will contribute to the pledge as well

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Donation will have to be made exclusively to that btc address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
(careful it is a new address, not the old one, one should already consider that 0.1btc has been donated)

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Current speed of the miner:
(statistics for the other cards will be added very soon)
980:   850kh/s was 630kh/s

Thanks in advance for your participation.  

ps: this thread is self moderated (assuming I have time and not in a troll mood  ), off-topic trolling won't be permitted

nice djm34 ...

will this mean that it will be windows based only though? ... if so - good luck - i will not participate ...

if its linux based ( private or public - fully open source ( so we can compile our own ) ) - then i will be interested AND participate in the dontion / pledge ...

tanx mate ...

#crysx

[djm34]

Hello,

I am about to release a new version of ccminer supporting neoscrypt, it is around 50% faster than the previous version.
This is a co-joint effort between myself and Nicehash which will contribute to the pledge as well

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Donation will have to be made exclusively to that btc address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
(careful it is a new address, not the old one, one should already consider that 0.1btc has been donated)

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Current speed of the miner:
(statistics for the other cards will be added very soon)
980:   850kh/s was 630kh/s

Thanks in advance for your participation. 

ps: this thread is self moderated (assuming I have time and not in a troll mood  ), off-topic trolling won't be permitted

nice djm34 ...

will this mean that it will be windows based only though? ... if so - good luck - i will not participate ...

if its linux based ( private or public - fully open source ( so we can compile our own ) ) - then i will be interested AND participate in the dontion / pledge ...

tanx mate ...

#crysx

if it is released, it will be open sourced, hence there will be a Linux version. 

[chrysophylax]

Hello,

I am about to release a new version of ccminer supporting neoscrypt, it is around 50% faster than the previous version.
This is a co-joint effort between myself and Nicehash which will contribute to the pledge as well

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Donation will have to be made exclusively to that btc address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
(careful it is a new address, not the old one, one should already consider that 0.1btc has been donated)

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Current speed of the miner:
(statistics for the other cards will be added very soon)
980:   850kh/s was 630kh/s

Thanks in advance for your participation. 

ps: this thread is self moderated (assuming I have time and not in a troll mood  ), off-topic trolling won't be permitted

nice djm34 ...

will this mean that it will be windows based only though? ... if so - good luck - i will not participate ...

if its linux based ( private or public - fully open source ( so we can compile our own ) ) - then i will be interested AND participate in the dontion / pledge ...

tanx mate ...

#crysx

if it is released, it will be open sourced, hence there will be a Linux version. 

yay ...

thats exactly what i wanted to hear ...

ill be hashing for the donation next week ... when i get all my personal stuff stabalized this week ...

ill even start a hashing link for the pledge ( using your btc address you quoted in the op - and on nicehash ) if miners prefer to donate hash ... but mining at the moment is quite slow ...

tanx djm34 ...

#crysx

[ldw-com]

I hope the source is worth 2.5BTC.

Because at this moment, X11 is worth a lot more for every miner out there.

But i know, no linux version.

[chrysophylax]

I hope the source is worth 2.5BTC.

Because at this moment, X11 is worth a lot more for every miner out there.

But i know, no linux version.

yup - hence the questions ...

#crysx

[djm34]

I hope the source is worth 2.5BTC.

Because at this moment, X11 is worth a lot more for every miner out there.

But i know, no linux version.

as I said, there will be a linux version however the speed enhancement is for neoscrypt not x11

[ldw-com]

I hope the source is worth 2.5BTC.

Because at this moment, X11 is worth a lot more for every miner out there.

But i know, no linux version.

as I said, there will be a linux version however the speed enhancement is for neoscrypt not x11

Mmm, i never said that it was for X11, i just said that X11 is worth mining. Neoscrypt isn't. Even with a 50% speed improvement.

And i seriously doubt that you will make it to 2.5 with donations. "Miners and donating, haha"
I do hope so for you though.

[sp_]

A 50% faster Neoscrypt kernal is more profitable than the opensource x11 kernal.

A single 980ti card will make around 1.5-2$  / day  with this code (with the current prices)

I will support this and donate..

[dodgrad]

A 50% faster Neoscrypt kernal is more profitable than the opensource x11 kernal.

A single 980ti card will make around 1.5-2$  / day  with this code (with the current prices)

I will support this and donate..

How much more energy does not new miner use? If it is 50% more energy, then there is no use.

[mickiya]

Has the miner been released to paying third party? Or is a farm already mining with the miner?

[pallas]

A 50% faster Neoscrypt kernal is more profitable than the opensource x11 kernal.

A single 980ti card will make around 1.5-2$  / day  with this code (with the current prices)

I will support this and donate..

How much more energy does not new miner use? If it is 50% more energy, then there is no use.

50% more power is not possible, the opensource neoscrypt kernel is already using more than x11 or quark ;-)

[djm34]

A 50% faster Neoscrypt kernal is more profitable than the opensource x11 kernal.

A single 980ti card will make around 1.5-2$  / day  with this code (with the current prices)

I will support this and donate..

How much more energy does not new miner use? If it is 50% more energy, then there is no use.

the power consumption will be slightly higher,usually the main problem with memory hard algo is that they get stuck
at low tdp value. Here the new code allows to reach higher TDP values. (however it is something you adjust)

[djm34]

Has the miner been released to paying third party? Or is a farm already mining with the miner?

No this miner has never been released. It is well known that I don't release easily my new code

[antantti]

158c88ff57ea5bf03f8c4ba255e147042afe0e8c005a3175fb51a5453f71497f

Good work, djm!

[jakals]

i hope it'll be cuda 2.1 compatible

[djm34]

i hope it'll be cuda 2.1 compatible

I might look into it, however I don't know if it is possible (it uses many instructions which are available to sm 3.5 and higher).

[djm34]

158c88ff57ea5bf03f8c4ba255e147042afe0e8c005a3175fb51a5453f71497f

Good work, djm!

thanks a lot, however please send transaction Id in private message, rather than posting them here.
 

[bathrobehero]

I'm also interested though I'm curious about the speed of other cards (750 Ti, 970) and what happens if the goal is not met.

While the speed increase is massive, and even if it's 50% more across the board I'm only in with 0.05 (if I get numbers on other cards) because unfortunately the profitability of this miner is entirely dependent on the profitability of one coin, Feathercoin which is only going down since July.
Sure, there's Phoenixcoin, Orbitcoin, Ufocoin and Halcyon but they are completely negligible in every respect.

[pallas]

As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.

[djm34]

As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.

don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote)

[Al_may]

As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.

don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote)

with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt

[Grout]

87a38017a306d45152261735da5a2c21473bd7891886783cd960b05bb2f45a67
Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)

[djm34]

As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.

don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote)

with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt

ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)

[jakals]

As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.

don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote)

with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt

ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)

will you look at adding support for cuda 2.1 djm ? or is it not applicable

[djm34]

87a38017a306d45152261735da5a2c21473bd7891886783cd960b05bb2f45a67
Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)

Thanks for your support, can't promise much on the trolling part though   (which is usually a reaction on something I consider as trolling)
Djm

[pallas]

As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.

don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote)

with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt

ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)

Hmmmm no.... your version should do 650-700 while mine does 560 on the 970.

[djm34]

As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.

don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote)

with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt

ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)

will you look at adding support for cuda 2.1 djm ? or is it not applicable

I can look, however I can't promise; I tried on the previous version and didn't succeed.

[djm34]

No. After Djm34 has released his new sourcecode I will add a few percent and add it to my fork as I usually do. Then you can donate.

thank you for allowing me to test the moderation 

[ldw-com]

Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there! 

[djm34]

Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there!  

tbh, considering the pledge only started yesterday, this is rather good (and someone donated 0.1btc before the start of the pledge)

[ldw-com]

Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there!  

tbh, considering the pledge only started yesterday, this is rather good (and someone donated 0.1btc before the start of the pledge)

Ah okay! That's better! Well, if you keep this thread alive, i'm sure you'll make it Good luck!

[djm34]

Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there! 

tbh, considering the pledge only started yesterday, this is rather good (and someone donated 0.1btc before the start of the pledge)

Ah okay! That's better! Well, if you keep this thread alive, i'm sure you'll make it Good luck!

Thanks 
djm

[bathrobehero]

Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC?

[djm34]

Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC?

Those numbers are with OC actually, overclocking the memory clock helps a bit like with all memory hard algo.
Regarding the 970, I don't have one... so it is difficult to say...

[chrysophylax]

Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC?

Those numbers are with OC actually, overclocking the memory clock helps a bit like with all memory hard algo.
Regarding the 970, I don't have one... so it is difficult to say...

djm34 ...

is there a way we can gauge how far into the pledge we are as time goes on? ...

maybe an update in the op once every few days or something? ...

#crysx

[djm34]

Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC?

Those numbers are with OC actually, overclocking the memory clock helps a bit like with all memory hard algo.
Regarding the 970, I don't have one... so it is difficult to say...

djm34 ...

is there a way we can gauge how far into the pledge we are as time goes on? ...

maybe an update in the op once every few days or something? ...

#crysx

sure, just need to use the block explorer: https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw (+0.1btc actually)
I can add that link to the OP

[djm34]

As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.

don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote)

with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt

ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)

Hmmmm no.... your version should do 650-700 while mine does 560 on the 970.

ok I did a few check with the sp/pallas version (74), this new version is "only" 25% faster at this point.

[pallas]

Djm34, does this version work fast on cuda 7.5? How does it compare to itself compiled on 6.5? Thanks.

[Grout]

87a38017a306d45152261735da5a2c21473bd7891886783cd960b05bb2f45a67
Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)

Thanks for your support, can't promise much on the trolling part though   (which is usually a reaction on something I consider as trolling)

Dammit! Refund please! :-D

[chrysophylax]

Djm34, does this version work fast on cuda 7.5? How does it compare to itself compiled on 6.5? Thanks.

i can fully test this compiled with 7.5 on fedora 23 x64 ...

if you want to test it - i will allocate the miners for the donation link and add more to the pledge ...

just a thought you might want to ponder ...

#crysx

[sp_]

You should change the title to 25% faster neoscrypt miner for nvidia cards

[djm34]

You should change the title to 25% faster neoscrypt miner for nvidia cards

yeah probably...
concerning cuda 7.5, I didn't have time to do any optimisation and  for the moment, the sm 3.5 (780ti), doesn't work with it.
the 750ti reports roughly the same hashrate and the 980 are reporting 800kh/s rather than 850kh/s with cuda 7.5

testing right now the sp 78 compiled with cuda 7.5, I get 98kh/s with the 750ti (still getting with with mine 200kh/s) so I guess I am 100% faster with cuda 7.5  

ok updated the title: [ANN]pledge for the release of 100% faster cuda 7.5 nvidia miner for neoscrypt
(yeah well...  , I won't mention the fact that with sp miner, I can't run my 2 980 at the same time)

[djm34]

a few numbers from the pledge: So far 0.55btc has been collected (only from a small number of rather large donator).
so we are about 0.95btc from the goal.
It would be good at that point if small miners were also starting to send a little to the pledge.
The point here is to have contribution from as many members as possible of the community.
Time for people to wake up. If the pledge does,'t reached its goal, it will most likely be released as private...

[chrysophylax]

a few numbers from the pledge: So far 0.55btc has been collected (only from a small number of rather large donator).
so we are about 0.95btc from the goal.
It would be good at that point if small miners were also starting to send a little to the pledge.
The point here is to have contribution from as many members as possible of the community.
Time for people to wake up. If the pledge does,'t reached its goal, it will most likely be released as private...

try 1.95btc left djm34 ...

ill be placing a couple of miners to the pledge this week ...

come on miners - lets get some bits of btc to this ...

look at it as a donation - but with an end result AND a much faster miner ...

#crysx

[nicehash]

Here is our 1 BTC donation: https://blockchain.info/tx/c12965a4b44d6a8ce4fd9900376e38ebfd6f812155401434eaf20641543f7a22

Now there is actually only 1 BTC left to fill the goal. Keep on mining and support the devs!

Best regards,
NiceHash.

[chrysophylax]

Here is our 1 BTC donation: https://blockchain.info/tx/c12965a4b44d6a8ce4fd9900376e38ebfd6f812155401434eaf20641543f7a22

Now there is actually only 1 BTC left to fill the goal. Keep on mining and support the devs!

Best regards,
NiceHash.

now THATS awesome ...

edit - ive now put some hash towards it also - and will leave for a few days to pledge ...

if miners wish to join me - i can setup a link to mine to via quark ( or algos that nicehash support upto quark ) and we can all mine together to reach another 0.95btc ...

let me know ...

we can watch the progress here ...

https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw&a=12&l=0 ... this is a part of the hashrate of thefarm ...

#crysx

[sp_]

Here is our 1 BTC donation: https://blockchain.info/tx/c12965a4b44d6a8ce4fd9900376e38ebfd6f812155401434eaf20641543f7a22
Now there is actually only 1 BTC left to fill the goal. Keep on mining and support the devs!
Best regards,
NiceHash.

now THATS awesome ...
#crysx

I belive only 0.9BTC is missing. Djm34 recieved 0.1 outside the blockchain. (in another account).

[chrysophylax]

Here is our 1 BTC donation: https://blockchain.info/tx/c12965a4b44d6a8ce4fd9900376e38ebfd6f812155401434eaf20641543f7a22
Now there is actually only 1 BTC left to fill the goal. Keep on mining and support the devs!
Best regards,
NiceHash.

now THATS awesome ...
#crysx

I belive only 0.9BTC is missing. Djm34 recieved 0.1 outside the blockchain. (in another account).

its 0.95btc left sp ...

not much at all ...

#crysx

[sp_]

0.9BTC...

https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw

[chrysophylax]

0.9BTC...

https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw

ok ... correct ... my apologies ...

0.1btc your way for the private too ... mining for that one as we comment ...

#crysx

[djm34]

0.9BTC...

https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw

yep, it is going rather nicely 

[chrysophylax]

0.9BTC...

https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw

yep, it is going rather nicely 

so is the mining mate ...

https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw&a=12&l=0 ...

#crysx

[serg_25]

Hi djm.
i read this thread and want to participate here, but can you please specify, based on my results what i can expect:
I have 2 750Ti and with sp_mod ver 74 6.5 cuda i can make 200 and 201 kh/s on both cards.
in this case, what speed up i can expect?
P.S. your version is for 6.5 cuda or 7.5?

[sp_]

100% faster would be 200khash  

But I guess his kernal will do around 125 on the same clock you use. +25%

[serg_25]

100% faster would be 200khash  

But I guess his kernal will do around 125 on the same clock you use. +25%

seems like you miss read my answer.
i have 200 kh\s on both card with your miner. It means that my hashrate is 401-403 kh'\s.

Code:

GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 201 (T= 50C F= 34% C=1407/2750)

[chrysophylax]

100% faster would be 200khash  

But I guess his kernal will do around 125 on the same clock you use. +25%

seems like you miss read my answer.
i have 200 kh\s on both card with your miner. It means that my hashrate is 401-403 kh'\s.

Code:

GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 201 (T= 50C F= 34% C=1407/2750)

then you mean 200kh on 'each' card ...

...

#crysx

[sp_]

djm34 claims 100% faster. That will give you around 400Khash per card and 800 in total hashrate.
But I belive his kernal will be around 25% faster. 250khash per card. 500 total hashrate.

core: 1407 Mhz
memory:  2750(*2) Mhz

[chrysophylax]

djm34 claims 100% faster. That will give you around 400Khash per card and 800 in total hashrate.
But I belive his kernal will be around 25% faster. 250khash per card. 500 total hashrate.

core: 1407 Mhz
memory:  2750(*2) Mhz

this should be good eitherway sp - as the kernel will be available and easily adoptable into one miner with all the other algos - if im not mistaken? ...

#crysx

[djm34]

djm34 claims 100% faster. That will give you around 400Khash per card and 800 in total hashrate.
But I belive his kernal will be around 25% faster. 250khash per card. 500 total hashrate.

core: 1407 Mhz
memory:  2750(*2) Mhz

read the last few posts, you get me confused  

I said 100% faster compared to your version running cuda 7.5 which you must admit runs like crap 
and since development effort should go toward cuda 7.5, that's why I modified the title this way  (yeah well )

But yeah compared to the version running cuda 6.5 it is "only" 25% faster. (it is also much more stable than your miner... as far as
my machine is concerned)

[chrysophylax]

djm34 claims 100% faster. That will give you around 400Khash per card and 800 in total hashrate.
But I belive his kernal will be around 25% faster. 250khash per card. 500 total hashrate.

core: 1407 Mhz
memory:  2750(*2) Mhz

read the last few posts, you get me confused  

I said 100% faster compared to your version running cuda 7.5 which you must admit runs like crap 
and since development effort should go toward cuda 7.5, that's why I modified the title this way  (yeah well )

But yeah compared to the version running cuda 6.5 it is "only" 25% faster. (it is also much more stable than your miner... as far as
my machine is concerned)

this will be a good thing for cuda 7.5 compilations in general - so a boost as much as 25% or more is a good boost ...

#crysx

[serg_25]

Djm one more question:

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Does it mean that it will be available only on windows as usual hicehash miner?

[djm34]

Djm one more question:

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Does it mean that it will be available only on windows as usual hicehash miner?

This was already answered, it will be available for both windows and Linux (the source as usual, I don't plan to release Linux binaries)

[serg_25]

Djm one more question:

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Does it mean that it will be available only on windows as usual hicehash miner?

This was already answered, it will be available for both windows and Linux (the source as usual, I don't plan to release Linux binaries)

yep, sorry, everything on first page
in this case, here is my donation:
0.1 BTC for you.
d269cee2424fadf090ce3ab8f0ac75669ada82db800a2b705046ab5f3fc2c2b7

Thanks for your contribution  to opensource community.

[s7icky]

sp_ stay out of my inbox i dont care what you have to say truthfully. go work on that 6% some more.....


Here u go DJM


Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000

[djm34]

Djm one more question:


If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Does it mean that it will be available only on windows as usual hicehash miner?

This was already answered, it will be available for both windows and Linux (the source as usual, I don't plan to release Linux binaries)

yep, sorry, everything on first page
in this case, here is my donation:
0.1 BTC for you.
d269cee2424fadf090ce3ab8f0ac75669ada82db800a2b705046ab5f3fc2c2b7

Thanks for your contribution  to opensource community.

Thanks a lot for your contribution
djm

[djm34]

sp_ stay out of my inbox i dont care what you have to say truthfully. go work on that 6% some more.....


Here u go DJM


Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000

thanks a lot for your contribution, however I haven't saw it and it doesn't seem to be a btc txid
djm

[s7icky]

sp_ stay out of my inbox i dont care what you have to say truthfully. go work on that 6% some more.....


Here u go DJM


Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000

thanks a lot for your contribution, however I haven't saw it and it doesn't seem to be a btc txid
djm

weird i sent it. Maybe cause i closed my client 2 sec after.

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 1/11/2016 08:39
To: DJM neo 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.10000000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00011999 BTC
Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000



https://blockexplorer.com/tx/6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64

[djm34]

sp_ stay out of my inbox i dont care what you have to say truthfully. go work on that 6% some more.....


Here u go DJM


Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000

thanks a lot for your contribution, however I haven't saw it and it doesn't seem to be a btc txid
djm

weird i sent it. Maybe cause i closed my client 2 sec after.

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 1/11/2016 08:39
To: DJM neo 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.10000000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00011999 BTC
Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000



https://blockexplorer.com/tx/6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64

ok, it is one of those... (not your fault), there are transactions which are sent with minimum amount fee and take up to a few days to validate (should be ok by the end of the pledge though... )

[Grim]

Small amount ... , I never came around to mine a neoscrypt coin but open source needs to be supported.

To: neoscrypt pledge djm 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.05000000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00001576 BTC
Net amount: -0.05001576 BTC
Transaction ID: f397dd078b4329b20abd3d88f84c0e581491a9973f52b1885514a67895cd0687-000

[s7icky]

sp_ stay out of my inbox i dont care what you have to say truthfully. go work on that 6% some more.....


Here u go DJM


Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000

thanks a lot for your contribution, however I haven't saw it and it doesn't seem to be a btc txid
djm

weird i sent it. Maybe cause i closed my client 2 sec after.

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 1/11/2016 08:39
To: DJM neo 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.10000000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00011999 BTC
Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000



https://blockexplorer.com/tx/6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64

ok, it is one of those... (not your fault), there are transactions which are sent with minimum amount fee and take up to a few days to validate (should be ok by the end of the pledge though... )

it finally went threw


i cant wait to throw this on my 980ti's <3

Whos gonna attempt the x15

[Liquid71]

Appreciate your hard work DJM and sent .1 towards the pledge. cheers

[djm34]

Small amount ... , I never came around to mine a neoscrypt coin but open source needs to be supported.

To: neoscrypt pledge djm 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.05000000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00001576 BTC
Net amount: -0.05001576 BTC
Transaction ID: f397dd078b4329b20abd3d88f84c0e581491a9973f52b1885514a67895cd0687-000

thanks a lot for your support and donation,
djm

[albysprx]

Is it for Nvidia SM 2.1 GPUs too?

[kama]

Is it for Nvidia SM 2.1 GPUs too?

+1 (dont misunderstand i mean me too asking same question to op with +1)

[djm34]

Is it for Nvidia SM 2.1 GPUs too?

+1 (dont misunderstand i mean me too asking same question to op with +1)

for the moment, 2.1 isn't supported, as the kernel uses many instruction which are available only in 3.5 and higher,
I will have a look (but not this week) and it may take some time to get something and bear in mind that even if it is possible
to make it works, it will be slow as the major speed up are coming from those instructions...

[albysprx]

Is it for Nvidia SM 2.1 GPUs too?

+1 (dont misunderstand i mean me too asking same question to op with +1)

for the moment, 2.1 isn't supported, as the kernel uses many instruction which are available only in 3.5 and higher,
I will have a look (but not this week) and it may take some time to get something and bear in mind that even if it is possible
to make it works, it will be slow as the major speed up are coming from those instructions...

ok, thanks for the look 

[ghostlander]

While the speed increase is massive, and even if it's 50% more across the board I'm only in with 0.05 (if I get numbers on other cards) because unfortunately the profitability of this miner is entirely dependent on the profitability of one coin, Feathercoin which is only going down since July.
Sure, there's Phoenixcoin, Orbitcoin, Ufocoin and Halcyon but they are completely negligible in every respect.

Today on Coinmarketcap:

#  Name  Market Cap  Price  Available Supply  Volume (24h)
77  Feathercoin $323,029  $0.002993  107,942,280 FTC  $3,407   
107  Orbitcoin  $154,408  $0.064849  2,381,043 ORB  $138

How come it's "completely negligible in every respect"? Cryptsy prices and trade volume excluded.

Good luck to djm34, I see his crowdfunding campaign goes very well.

[sp_]

Hey Dj,

Why don't you work on the ether or the x11 algo instead..

4   Ethereum Ethereum   $ 85,942,745   $ 1.13   76,189,025 ETH   $ 1,141,370   9.01
6   Dash Dash   $ 18,851,590   $ 3.07   6,136,945 DASH   $ 109,657   -4.99 %

More miners, higher profits, more donations...

[djm34]

Hey Dj,

Why don't you work on the ether or the x11 algo instead..

4   Ethereum Ethereum   $ 85,942,745   $ 1.13   76,189,025 ETH   $ 1,141,370   9.01
6   Dash Dash   $ 18,851,590   $ 3.07   6,136,945 DASH   $ 109,657   -4.99 %

More miners, higher profits, more donations...

you know not everyone are just in for the donations (and we know there isn't much to do concerning ether)
and this is totally off-topic regarding this thread...

[ldw-com]

Hey Dj,

Why don't you work on the ether or the x11 algo instead..

4   Ethereum Ethereum   $ 85,942,745   $ 1.13   76,189,025 ETH   $ 1,141,370   9.01
6   Dash Dash   $ 18,851,590   $ 3.07   6,136,945 DASH   $ 109,657   -4.99 %

More miners, higher profits, more donations...

you know not everyone are just in that for the donations (and we know there isn't much to do concerning ether)
and this is totally off-topic regarding this thread...

yeah but you would be a wealthy person ;-)

[djm34]

What do you think will happen when DJM34 will release his 25%  faster miner and everybody mine neoscrypt? Is feathercoin and the clones able to hold the massive increase in the hashrate?
No.. The difficulty will rise, and the profit will decline. Then everybody will go back to mine another more profitable algo with the sp-mod.
The only way to guarantee a profit increase is to optimize all the minable algos.
I have done this in the private miner. You can buy the private miner for 0.1BTC and verify the results yourself.

I answered you in the other thread...

feeling alone ? answering to yourself ?

Neoscrypt is used in coins that are lower than 77 on the marketcap rank. Ghostlander pointed it out in his comment:

Today on Coinmarketcap:
#  Name  Market Cap  Price  Available Supply  Volume (24h)
77  Feathercoin $323,029  $0.002993  107,942,280 FTC  $3,407   
107  Orbitcoin  $154,408  $0.064849  2,381,043 ORB  $138
How come it's "completely negligible in every respect"? Cryptsy prices and trade volume excluded.
Good luck to djm34, I see his crowdfunding campaign goes very well.

and your point is ? (before I moderate, it would be nice if you could keep your trolling to your thread )

[bensam1231]

Hey Dj,

Why don't you work on the ether or the x11 algo instead..

4   Ethereum Ethereum   $ 85,942,745   $ 1.13   76,189,025 ETH   $ 1,141,370   9.01
6   Dash Dash   $ 18,851,590   $ 3.07   6,136,945 DASH   $ 109,657   -4.99 %

More miners, higher profits, more donations...

Both of you guys should make a partnered miner and raise BTC for it then split it based on the speed improvements each of you do.

Obviously Eth probably isn't going anywhere as it's maxing out certain parts of Nvidia hardware, but x11 definitely could use some love.

It's supply and demand. Look at whatmine. Punch in your numbers, see what you can get back for increasing efficiency or hash rate. Whatever earns the most is what miners will pay for. Demand right now is high for Neoscrypt, Ethereum, Spread, and X11 if it can ever be made competitive. Miners can't control the market so they just go with wherever things go.

[sp_]

Looks like you almost have reached your goal of 2.5BTC. Just 0,44BTC left? (When counting the 0.1 (0 fee) transaction. and the 0.1btc outside)

[djm34]

Looks like you almost have reached your goal of 2.5BTC. Just 0,44BTC left? (When counting the 0.1 (0 fee) transaction. and the 0.1btc outside)

yeah, it is going rather well, I am a bit surprised myself tbh,
anyhow, thanks to all who (and will) contribute for your support
djm

[s7icky]

Looks like you almost have reached your goal of 2.5BTC. Just 0,44BTC left? (When counting the 0.1 (0 fee) transaction. and the 0.1btc outside)

i see why everyone trolls you now. You kind sir need a head slap.

[frazier34567]

Donated 0.1 BTC

Transaction cc88a3a6c85a5e3571ade13f9add39958999061bbd60a2bc65e738a5ab025cc6

[djm34]

Donated 0.1 BTC

Transaction cc88a3a6c85a5e3571ade13f9add39958999061bbd60a2bc65e738a5ab025cc6

Thanks a lot for your support,
djm

[djm34]

The pledge has already collected around 2btc in less than week, I would like to thank you all for your support, but
please continue to donate especially those who haven't donated yet, don't forget to report your txid to the
ANN. Small donation are also accepted (and actually it would be nice to see more people donating) as it is
aimed at public release. Thanks again.
Djm.

[chrysophylax]

The pledge has already collected around 2btc in less than week, I would like to thank you all for your support, but
please continue to donate especially those who haven't donated yet, don't forget to report your txid to the
ANN. Small donation are also accepted (and actually it would be nice to see more people donating) as it is
aimed at public release. Thanks again.
Djm.

mine can be tracked here mate ...

https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw&a=12&l=0 ...

not much so far - but ill keep it going ...

edit ... now on here - https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw&a=3&l=0 ...

#crysx

[bensam1231]

Cryptsy just went belly up... FYI as far as FTC prices, which was the majority of the market. I just lost a decent chunk of BTC. Writing has been on the wall for awhile now, but they closed it before I could get my coins out through a altcoin.

[ghostlander]

Cryptsy just went belly up... FYI as far as FTC prices, which was the majority of the market. I just lost a decent chunk of BTC. Writing has been on the wall for awhile now, but they closed it before I could get my coins out through a altcoin.

Not yet. Who knows if it's a part of the plan.

[sp_]

Only 0.4 BTC to go ppl. We need the opensource magic from djm34. please donate!

[tbearhere]

Djm  are you saying that a 750ti will get about 400 kh/s

thx

[djm34]

Cryptsy just went belly up... FYI as far as FTC prices, which was the majority of the market. I just lost a decent chunk of BTC. Writing has been on the wall for awhile now, but they closed it before I could get my coins out through a altcoin.

Not yet. Who knows if it's a part of the plan.

cryptsi has been under investigation by the SEC since 4 or 5months now, following GAW investigation and their participation in the selling GAW scam coin and various malpractices (like bidding against their customer etc... ). So it isn't really a surprise (not sure why people kept their coins on this exchange...), it was obvious it would go down on a rather short term...

[djm34]

Djm  are you saying that a 750ti will get about 400 kh/s

thx

I'd wish, but no, it is doing 200kh/s-208kh/s (probably a little more for some powerful 750ti brand)

[tbearhere]

Cryptsy just went belly up... FYI as far as FTC prices, which was the majority of the market. I just lost a decent chunk of BTC. Writing has been on the wall for awhile now, but they closed it before I could get my coins out through a altcoin.

Not yet. Who knows if it's a part of the plan.

cryptsi has been under investigation by the SEC since 4 or 5months now, following GAW investigation and their participation in the selling GAW scam coin and various malpractices (like bidding against their customer etc... ). So it isn't really a surprise (not sure why people kept their coins on this exchange...), it was obvious it would go down on a rather short term...

Also this.....
EDIT: Fighting over the cold wallet ?

http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/pls/jiwp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?backto=P&case_id=502015DR009881XXXXSB&begin_date=&end_date=

[tbearhere]

Djm  are you saying that a 750ti will get about 400 kh/s

thx

I'd wish, but no, it is doing 200kh/s-208kh/s (probably a little more for some powerful 750ti brand)

Ok thx
Yes I wish too...

[tbearhere]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

[djm34]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

[tbearhere]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok thank you.

Is the bottom address the one to pledge in your signature ?

[djm34]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok thank you.

Is the bottom address the one to pledge in your signature ?

yes that's the one

[tbearhere]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok thank you.

Is the bottom address the one to pledge in your signature ?

yes that's the one

Date: 1/14/2016 10:55
To: TO DJM FOR NEOSCRYPT MINER AND FOR BEGINNING OF LYRA2R2 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.05000000 BTC
Transaction ID: fdd4e74854d41fe6fe262c13d1ede1dc2f85e0deb2efdeb2fca0a9079b4c3914-000

[djm34]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok thank you.

Is the bottom address the one to pledge in your signature ?

yes that's the one

Date: 1/14/2016 10:55
To: TO DJM FOR NEOSCRYPT MINER AND FOR BEGINNING OF LYRA2R2 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.05000000 BTC
Transaction ID: fdd4e74854d41fe6fe262c13d1ede1dc2f85e0deb2efdeb2fca0a9079b4c3914-000

thanks a lot for your support,
djm

[tbearhere]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok thank you.

Is the bottom address the one to pledge in your signature ?

yes that's the one

Date: 1/14/2016 10:55
To: TO DJM FOR NEOSCRYPT MINER AND FOR BEGINNING OF LYRA2R2 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.05000000 BTC
Transaction ID: fdd4e74854d41fe6fe262c13d1ede1dc2f85e0deb2efdeb2fca0a9079b4c3914-000

thanks a lot for your support,
djm

Your welcome and thanks for the development.

[tbearhere]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok I don't know how to change that.
But your 980 has the same problem with the memory clocks..... where you able to get the proper clocking and how much did that improve your hashrate on lyre2re2 algo?
Thx

[djm34]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok I don't know how to change that.
But your 980 has the same problem with the memory clocks..... where you able to get the proper clocking and how much did that improve your hashrate on lyre2re2 algo?
Thx

quite a lot actually, because it is possible to oc the mem clock beyond nominal value, I use this command nvidia-smi.exe -i 0,1 -ac 3506,1506 (where i is the card number and ac the highest clock possible) this force the card to run in state 0

[tbearhere]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok I don't know how to change that.
But your 980 has the same problem with the memory clocks..... where you able to get the proper clocking and how much did that improve your hashrate on lyre2re2 algo?
Thx

quite a lot actually, because it is possible to oc the mem clock beyond nominal value, I use this command nvidia-smi.exe -i 0,1 -ac 3506,1506 (where i is the card number and ac the highest clock possible) this force the card to run in state 0

Great thank you. That same exact  command will work with the 980ti too won't it?
And do I have to do this once or every bat file or just on reboot?

[djm34]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok I don't know how to change that.
But your 980 has the same problem with the memory clocks..... where you able to get the proper clocking and how much did that improve your hashrate on lyre2re2 algo?
Thx

quite a lot actually, because it is possible to oc the mem clock beyond nominal value, I use this command nvidia-smi.exe -i 0,1 -ac 3506,1506 (where i is the card number and ac the highest clock possible) this force the card to run in state 0

Great thank you. That same exact  command will work with the 980ti too won't it?
And do I have to do this once or every bat file or just on reboot?

once every reboot, but it probably won't work, as it is the clock for my 980, you need to get these clock setting (nvidia-smi can find them for you, but I have forgotten the command)

[tbearhere]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok I don't know how to change that.
But your 980 has the same problem with the memory clocks..... where you able to get the proper clocking and how much did that improve your hashrate on lyre2re2 algo?
Thx

quite a lot actually, because it is possible to oc the mem clock beyond nominal value, I use this command nvidia-smi.exe -i 0,1 -ac 3506,1506 (where i is the card number and ac the highest clock possible) this force the card to run in state 0

Great thank you. That same exact  command will work with the 980ti too won't it?
And do I have to do this once or every bat file or just on reboot?

once every reboot, but it probably won't work, as it is the clock for my 980, you need to get these clock setting (nvidia-smi can find them for you, but I have forgotten the command)

Is it  --gpu-memspeed           if so I tried and didn't work.

[djm34]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok I don't know how to change that.
But your 980 has the same problem with the memory clocks..... where you able to get the proper clocking and how much did that improve your hashrate on lyre2re2 algo?
Thx

quite a lot actually, because it is possible to oc the mem clock beyond nominal value, I use this command nvidia-smi.exe -i 0,1 -ac 3506,1506 (where i is the card number and ac the highest clock possible) this force the card to run in state 0

Great thank you. That same exact  command will work with the 980ti too won't it?
And do I have to do this once or every bat file or just on reboot?

once every reboot, but it probably won't work, as it is the clock for my 980, you need to get these clock setting (nvidia-smi can find them for you, but I have forgotten the command)

Is it  --gpu-memspeed           if so I tried and didn't work.

don't remember but you need to use '-i '#cardnumber as well... (you should ask epsylon3 he knows)

[tbearhere]

Ok thx djm 

[joblo]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok I don't know how to change that.
But your 980 has the same problem with the memory clocks..... where you able to get the proper clocking and how much did that improve your hashrate on lyre2re2 algo?
Thx

quite a lot actually, because it is possible to oc the mem clock beyond nominal value, I use this command nvidia-smi.exe -i 0,1 -ac 3506,1506 (where i is the card number and ac the highest clock possible) this force the card to run in state 0

Great thank you. That same exact  command will work with the 980ti too won't it?
And do I have to do this once or every bat file or just on reboot?

once every reboot, but it probably won't work, as it is the clock for my 980, you need to get these clock setting (nvidia-smi can find them for you, but I have forgotten the command)

I believe you can set persistent mode which preserve the setting over a reboot. There have been some recent advances
so make sure you have the latest drivers.

You can also OC using nvidia-settings after setting up coolbits in Xorg.conf, Sorry, not time time to dig up the details, too busy.

[djm34]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok I don't know how to change that.
But your 980 has the same problem with the memory clocks..... where you able to get the proper clocking and how much did that improve your hashrate on lyre2re2 algo?
Thx

quite a lot actually, because it is possible to oc the mem clock beyond nominal value, I use this command nvidia-smi.exe -i 0,1 -ac 3506,1506 (where i is the card number and ac the highest clock possible) this force the card to run in state 0

Great thank you. That same exact  command will work with the 980ti too won't it?
And do I have to do this once or every bat file or just on reboot?

once every reboot, but it probably won't work, as it is the clock for my 980, you need to get these clock setting (nvidia-smi can find them for you, but I have forgotten the command)

I believe you can set persistent mode which preserve the setting over a reboot. There have been some recent advances
so make sure you have the latest drivers.

You can also OC using nvidia-settings after setting up coolbits in Xorg.conf, Sorry, not time time to dig up the details, too busy.

this nvidia-smi is for windows in that case (at least it is how I understand it... might be a bit different with linux)

[tbearhere]

Djm   Do you have a 980ti ?  If so are you able to get the memory clock up to 7 ghz as its  designed to clock at?  thx

I don't have a 980ti.
However in order to clock them to their nominal value, you need to use nvidia-smi which is located in nvidia directory.

Ok I don't know how to change that.
But your 980 has the same problem with the memory clocks..... where you able to get the proper clocking and how much did that improve your hashrate on lyre2re2 algo?
Thx

quite a lot actually, because it is possible to oc the mem clock beyond nominal value, I use this command nvidia-smi.exe -i 0,1 -ac 3506,1506 (where i is the card number and ac the highest clock possible) this force the card to run in state 0

Great thank you. That same exact  command will work with the 980ti too won't it?
And do I have to do this once or every bat file or just on reboot?

once every reboot, but it probably won't work, as it is the clock for my 980, you need to get these clock setting (nvidia-smi can find them for you, but I have forgotten the command)

I believe you can set persistent mode which preserve the setting over a reboot. There have been some recent advances
so make sure you have the latest drivers.

You can also OC using nvidia-settings after setting up coolbits in Xorg.conf, Sorry, not time time to dig up the details, too busy.

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

[antantti]

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

This has been posted here before:

1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges
2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics

[tbearhere]

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

This has been posted here before:

1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges
2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics

thx  i did nvidia-smi.exe -q and everything showed .......now tryng  your command.
EDIT:
nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 0       card 3

2 980ti's so run one command then the next correct ?

Or  nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0,3      ?

[antantti]

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

This has been posted here before:

1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges
2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics

thx  i did nvidia-smi.exe -q and everything showed .......now tryng  your command.
EDIT:
nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 0       card 3

2 980ti's so run one command then the next correct ?

nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0,1,2,3,4... for multiple cards. Works only if cards print out exactly same numbers.

[tbearhere]

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

This has been posted here before:

1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges
2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics

thx  i did nvidia-smi.exe -q and everything showed .......now tryng  your command.
EDIT:
nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 0       card 3

2 980ti's so run one command then the next correct ?

nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0,1,2,3,4... for multiple cards. Works only if cards print out exactly same numbers.

they dont so should I do it independently ?


nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 2       card 3

I got the first card but not the 2nd card ....says not supported.

-d 0,1,2,3   card  0 and 2 is the 980ti's
EDIT: Ok I got card 0 to p0 state but not card 2.......... tomorrow maybe.  
And thank you all for your help.

Christian sent this link and now I understand it.  thx
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/892842/cuda-programming-and-performance/one-weird-trick-to-get-a-maxwell-v2-gpu-to-reach-its-max-memory-clock-/

But they should be at 7 ghz.

[antantti]

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

This has been posted here before:

1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges
2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics

thx  i did nvidia-smi.exe -q and everything showed .......now tryng  your command.
EDIT:
nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 0       card 3

2 980ti's so run one command then the next correct ?

nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0,1,2,3,4... for multiple cards. Works only if cards print out exactly same numbers.

they dont so should I do it independently ?


nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 3       card 3

Yes. Now you can overclock them just like 750ti. But you need to do it again after reboot, I think persistence mode doesn't work in windows.

Sorry for OT, djm...

[djm34]

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

This has been posted here before:

1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges
2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics

thx  i did nvidia-smi.exe -q and everything showed .......now tryng  your command.
EDIT:
nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 0       card 3

2 980ti's so run one command then the next correct ?

nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0,1,2,3,4... for multiple cards. Works only if cards print out exactly same numbers.

they dont so should I do it independently ?


nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 3       card 3

Yes. Now you can overclock them just like 750ti. But you need to do it again after reboot, I think persistence mode doesn't work in windows.

Sorry for OT, djm...

it's fine with me

[lmaonade80]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but a donation gets you access to the code and then at 2.5 BTC, it gets released publicly?

EDIT: I see you're at 2.06. And while I think many people are salivating at the potential of faster code, I think people are forgetting that if its released publicly (especially on Nicehash), that advantage will disappear...

[rednoW]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but a donation gets you access to the code and then at 2.5 BTC, it gets released publicly?

EDIT: I see you're at 2.06. And while I think many people are salivating at the potential of faster code, I think people are forgetting that if its released publicly (especially on Nicehash), that advantage will disappear...

The advantage will be over red camp ))

[sp_]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but a donation gets you access to the code and then at 2.5 BTC, it gets released publicly?
EDIT: I see you're at 2.06. And while I think many people are salivating at the potential of faster code, I think people are forgetting that if its released publicly (especially on Nicehash), that advantage will disappear...

Wrong. Most people use AMD cards for altocins mining.

[djm34]

ok once week left, we are almost there !!! please don't forget to donate.
I will repost the pledge on ftc forum (once I remember my password to get there  )

ps: if someone can tell me how to post there... because I don't find how to (and I already used it...  )

[teonoaro]

The donation phase is almost close to the target level 2.5 BTC. I'm looking into this miner and would like to test it further. This is one of the timely requirement and you two djm34 and Nicehash are doing tremendous job with the miners. I'm watching this thread and looking in for the miner release. Good luck guys.

[djm34]

The donation phase is almost close to the target level 2.5 BTC. I'm looking into this miner and would like to test it further. This is one of the timely requirement and you two djm34 and Nicehash are doing tremendous job with the miners. I'm watching this thread and looking in for the miner release. Good luck guys.

Thanks, so far I have no plan for an early release (need to check a few things first and base the release on the latest sp rel)

[Pivlus]

Added 0.0495.

08185e9a018866118f1a6b342a12ca3deca9ee147eb7774690f219759873ea08

[djm34]

Added 0.0495.

08185e9a018866118f1a6b342a12ca3deca9ee147eb7774690f219759873ea08

thanks a lot for your support,
djm

[tbearhere]

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

This has been posted here before:

1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges
2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics

thx  i did nvidia-smi.exe -q and everything showed .......now tryng  your command.
EDIT:
nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 0       card 3

2 980ti's so run one command then the next correct ?

nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0,1,2,3,4... for multiple cards. Works only if cards print out exactly same numbers.

they dont so should I do it independently ?


nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 3       card 3

Yes. Now you can overclock them just like 750ti. But you need to do it again after reboot, I think persistence mode doesn't work in windows.

Sorry for OT, djm...

Sorry for messing up your thread djm  will delete all when done if you want but,

antantti I got one card to work but the other won't take the command ...I don't know why. Going to try again.

[djm34]

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

This has been posted here before:

1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges
2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics

thx  i did nvidia-smi.exe -q and everything showed .......now tryng  your command.
EDIT:
nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 0       card 3

2 980ti's so run one command then the next correct ?

nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0,1,2,3,4... for multiple cards. Works only if cards print out exactly same numbers.

they dont so should I do it independently ?


nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 3       card 3

Yes. Now you can overclock them just like 750ti. But you need to do it again after reboot, I think persistence mode doesn't work in windows.

Sorry for OT, djm...

Sorry for messing up your thread djm  will delete all when done if you want but,

antantti I got one card to work but the other won't take the command ...I don't know why. Going to try again.

you need to make sure that you using the correct parameters returned by the check_clock stuff they can be different for each card (depending on brand etc...).
This is probably the problem...

also it probably works only for high end cards...

[tbearhere]

Ok thx  but i'm a noob at this and I don't know what nvidia-smi is.
And why doesn't it work like a 750ti  it doesn't make sense.

This has been posted here before:

1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges
2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0
4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics

thx  i did nvidia-smi.exe -q and everything showed .......now tryng  your command.
EDIT:
nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 0       card 3

2 980ti's so run one command then the next correct ?

nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0,1,2,3,4... for multiple cards. Works only if cards print out exactly same numbers.

they dont so should I do it independently ?


nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1500 -i 0       card 0
 
nvidia-smi -ac 3364,1500 -i 3       card 3

Yes. Now you can overclock them just like 750ti. But you need to do it again after reboot, I think persistence mode doesn't work in windows.

Sorry for OT, djm...

Sorry for messing up your thread djm  will delete all when done if you want but,

antantti I got one card to work but the other won't take the command ...I don't know why. Going to try again.

you need to make sure that you using the correct parameters returned by the check_clock stuff they can be different for each card (depending on brand etc...).
This is probably the problem...

also it probably works only for high end cards...

And it's picking up nvidia inspector ... I just set ni to defaults  now trying again

[tbearhere]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.


Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

[djm34]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.
You made this disabled guy very happy.

Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

you welcome, you don't need to delete the posts (that put some animation on the thread )

once you have put the cards to p0 state, you can overclock them using msi afterburner or the evga counterpart.
with it, you'll be able to set both core/mem clocks to the value you want.

For my 980, I use by default a +150MHz on the mem clock (I think I have only +65MHz on the core clock, but it is already
superclocked cards... but it can support more, the 980ti can probably be clocked higher... in any case too high will cause a crash
within 5~10 minutes of running... anyhow keep an eye on the temps...

[tbearhere]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.


Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

you welcome, you don't need to delete the posts (that put some animation on the thread )

once you have put the cards to p0 state, you can overclock them using msi afterburner or the evga counterpart.
with it, you'll be able to set both core/mem clocks to the value you want.

For my 980, I use by default a +150MHz on the mem clock (I think I have only +65MHz on the core clock, but it is already
superclocked cards... but it can support more, the 980ti can probably be clocked higher... in any case too high will cause a crash
within 5~10 minutes of running... anyhow keep an eye on the temps...

Yes thank you.
And it looks like the 980ti and 980 are about the same for oc ing.  +41 on the core clock will give me 1345 on the readout of course nvidia oc sweet spot. The temperatures are running at 77c and 72c for the 2 cards. I'm setting mem to +150... it looks good on nividia inspector.

[antantti]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.
You made this disabled guy very happy.

Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

I'm happy when tbearhere is happy 

3505 x 2 = 7010 that's where that 7GHz comes from.

PS. All my 970's do at least +500 on memory, 4000 x 2 = 8000Mhz and they are happily hashing ETH 22MH each. 980ti should do more.

[serg_25]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.
You made this disabled guy very happy.

Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

I'm happy when tbearhere is happy 

3505 x 2 = 7010 that's where that 7GHz comes from.

PS. All my 970's do at least +500 on memory, 4000 x 2 = 8000Mhz and they are happily hashing ETH 22MH each. 980ti should do more.

Did you check power consumption of 970's during mining eth?

[pallas]

what ether miner are you guys using on nvidia?

[antantti]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.
You made this disabled guy very happy.

Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

I'm happy when tbearhere is happy 

3505 x 2 = 7010 that's where that 7GHz comes from.

PS. All my 970's do at least +500 on memory, 4000 x 2 = 8000Mhz and they are happily hashing ETH 22MH each. 980ti should do more.

Did you check power consumption of 970's during mining eth?

From 600W@83MH to 1000W@110MH. 5x970 + some other stuff, TDP is the limiting factor. I'm using Genoil's cuda miner.

[chrysophylax]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.
You made this disabled guy very happy.

Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

I'm happy when tbearhere is happy 

3505 x 2 = 7010 that's where that 7GHz comes from.

PS. All my 970's do at least +500 on memory, 4000 x 2 = 8000Mhz and they are happily hashing ETH 22MH each. 980ti should do more.

Did you check power consumption of 970's during mining eth?

From 600W@83MH to 1000W@110MH. 5x970 + some other stuff, TDP is the limiting factor. I'm using Genoil's cuda miner.

link please? ...

#crysx

[antantti]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.
You made this disabled guy very happy.

Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

I'm happy when tbearhere is happy 

3505 x 2 = 7010 that's where that 7GHz comes from.

PS. All my 970's do at least +500 on memory, 4000 x 2 = 8000Mhz and they are happily hashing ETH 22MH each. 980ti should do more.

Did you check power consumption of 970's during mining eth?

From 600W@83MH to 1000W@110MH. 5x970 + some other stuff, TDP is the limiting factor. I'm using Genoil's cuda miner.

link please? ...

#crysx

https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum

[tbearhere]

It worked  both clocks where the same after setting  n.i. to defaults.
Thank you antantti  and djm  sooooooo much I really appreciate what you have done.
You made this disabled guy very happy.

Do you want me to delete my posts to keep your thread clean djm?

ps I still don't understand why the clocks don't go to 7 ghz but at least the 980ti's are  in the p0 state

EDIT: djm how much oc on memory on your 980 gtx do you do for lyra2r2 ?

I'm happy when tbearhere is happy  

3505 x 2 = 7010 that's where that 7GHz comes from.

PS. All my 970's do at least +500 on memory, 4000 x 2 = 8000Mhz and they are happily hashing ETH 22MH each. 980ti should do more.

I went from +150 to +400 on memory and gained another 100 kh/s on each card on lyra2v2.
Thx

[thefix]

I just sent a small contribution to the Neoscrypt pot and sent a PM with the transaction info.

Thank you for all your work!

Nice to see things getting closer to the goal!

[djm34]

I just sent a small contribution to the Neoscrypt pot and sent a PM with the transaction info.

Thank you for all your work!

Nice to see things getting closer to the goal!

Thanks a lot for your support,
djm

ps: still not on target, please continue to donate, still one week left !!!
(for info, there were rather big donations, but small number of donations (less than 20ppl), do these 100's of neoscrypt user not donating
a thing just expect to get it for nothing ?? paid by these 20 donators    )

[ghostlander]

Well, 2+ BTC is a good donation flow anyway. I've got less than 0.05 BTC from 3 donators on NSGminer this month. May buy me a few drinks in a dodgy boozer and that's all.

[thefix]

I just sent a small contribution to the Neoscrypt pot and sent a PM with the transaction info.

Thank you for all your work!

Nice to see things getting closer to the goal!

Thanks a lot for your support,
djm

ps: still not on target, please continue to donate, still one week left !!!
(for info, there were rather big donations, but small number of donations (less than 20ppl), do these 100's of neoscrypt user not donating
a thing just expect to get it for nothing ?? paid by these 20 donators    )

It appears that many of the neoscrypt users are expecting to get it for nothing and that is unfortunate. If the 100+ users made small contributions the funding would be over in a day.

I will have some more to donate to the project in three days and encourage others that have not donated to donate now.

[sp_]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

[djm34]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

Thanks for the donation
djm

[djm34]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

what is that 0.1btc "nofee" (can't find that... ) ?

also considering the btc has decreased a lot, take 2.5btc as a lower limit... 

[sp_]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

what is that 0.1btc "nofee" (can't find that... ) ?

also considering the btc has decreased a lot, take 2.5btc as a lower limit... 

I was thinking about this transaction that was sendt without a fee. (slow confirmation). Looks like it has been confirmed now:

weird i sent it. Maybe cause i closed my client 2 sec after.
Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 1/11/2016 08:39
To: DJM neo 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Debit: -0.10000000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00011999 BTC
Net amount: -0.10011999 BTC
Transaction ID: 6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64-000

https://blockexplorer.com/tx/6c067cc8d63d22b7eb864ae71fdda93cb6cde6da33b24b9b2bba37196e2afe64

ok, it is one of those... (not your fault), there are transactions which are sent with minimum amount fee and take up to a few days to validate (should be ok by the end of the pledge though... )

[djm34]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

what is that 0.1btc "nofee" (can't find that... ) ?

also considering the btc has decreased a lot, take 2.5btc as a lower limit...  

I was thinking about this transaction that was sendt without a fee. (slow confirmation). Looks like it has been confirmed now:

yes it was confirmed long ago actually... so still missing 0.2btc
oh that's what bensam promised to give if he was getting it in advance... but now he is just waiting for the free release as usual...  

and again I want to emphasize, that as usual, it is always the same people who donate... there are about 200ppl on nicehash alone who are mining neoscrypt...  and they won't even come here to thank those who pay for them...  
(sure I shouldn't care as long as I get what I ask, but still... we all speak of community, while in fact it is dominated by a bunch of suckers whose only contribution to that so called community is to dump on the head of those who really contribute to the community...)

So thanks to those who donate and support the "cause" and "you know what" to the others  

[pallas]

And... That's why a lot of devs do private miners.

[djm34]

And... That's why a lot of devs do private miners.

I know... 

[sp_]

In the beginning 1 GHASH of neoscrypt was paying 10BTC, and now it's only paying 2.5BTC.
Djm34: If you want to earn money on your kernals you should release them when they are hot. (People will donate for an increase in the most profitable algos.) I just did 20% faster keccak, but nobody cares because it is not profitable.

[djm34]

In the beginning 1 GHASH of neoscrypt was paying 10BTC, and now it's only paying 2.5BTC.
Djm34: If you want to earn money on your kernals you should release them when they are hot. (People will donate for an increase in the most profitable algos.) I just did 20% faster keccak, but nobody cares because it is not profitable.

lol thanks for the advice... but I don't want to beg like you do every single day  

and even when it was paying 10btc (must be around the time I released the first version), I raised only around the same, so it doesn't really matter.

[bathrobehero]

The problem is (as always) that all of us here are only a tiny fraction of all miners and some miners are not even familiar with bitcointalk or they might not even speak English. And then there are miners who just don't care and don't want to donate. If those people could be taxed somehow, the devs would have much more budget that would allow them to spend more time coding which would be beneficial to everyone.

The funny thing is, that while fee based miners were discussed a lot in the past and rejected at every occassion, nicehash basically acts like the ultimate fee based miner because they do get some money off of people who never donate (while allowing lazy/plug&play miners to profit which is bad for everyone else but that's another story). So maybe nicehash should push more money towards the devs or maybe the devs should make their own multipool or something...

[ldw-com]

So maybe nicehash should push more money towards the devs or maybe the devs should make their own multipool or something...

Great idea but i believe there have been plans for this. Not from the devs directly but from other community members. + there even is an address where you can mine to. But than again, that isn't exactly what you mean.


Lots of idea's but it always ends up the same.

[djm34]

The problem is (as always) that all of us here are only a tiny fraction of all miners and some miners are not even familiar with bitcointalk or they might not even speak English. And then there are miners who just don't care and don't want to donate. If those people could be taxed somehow, the devs would have much more budget that would allow them to spend more time coding which would be beneficial to everyone.

The funny thing is, that while fee based miners were discussed a lot in the past and rejected at every occassion, nicehash basically acts like the ultimate fee based miner because they do get some money off of people who never donate (while allowing lazy/plug&play miners to profit which is bad for everyone else but that's another story). So maybe nicehash should push more money towards the devs or maybe the devs should make their own multipool or something...

or do like a few pools (which I forgot the names) were collecting a fee for the devs (that pool for primecoin).
I think we will arrive to the miner with dev fee (but again GPL discussion and so on... to never have to release the code... or after a certain delay at least)

[sp_]

Please support this opensource project guys. Just a few dollars left..

[Vita1ico]

One question, what is the hash output expected to 970 + 960?
Today I get to 970 + 960  0.950Mhs(0.600Mhs+0.350Mhs)

[sp_]

around 1.2-1.3MHASH

http://hashpower.co/site/mining  is currently paying 4BTC for 1 GHASH Day of neoscrypt.

With a 25% gain NVIDIA miners will get an advantage

[djm34]

One question, what is the hash output expected to 970 + 960?
Today I get to 970 + 960  0.950Mhs(0.600Mhs+0.350Mhs)

you are asking about card I don't have however the 25% increase seems to work well across cards,
so check what you get with the standard sp (cuda 6.5), you'll get 25% more.

[sp_]

your rig with two cards will do around 27MHASH of quark.

Quark/nicehash(sp-mod 78):                               0,0029BTC / day
Neoscrypt/hashpower.co(with the optimized miner) 0,0052BTC / day

[bensam1231]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

what is that 0.1btc "nofee" (can't find that... ) ?

also considering the btc has decreased a lot, take 2.5btc as a lower limit...  

I was thinking about this transaction that was sendt without a fee. (slow confirmation). Looks like it has been confirmed now:

yes it was confirmed long ago actually... so still missing 0.2btc
oh that's what bensam promised to give if he was getting it in advance... but now he is just waiting for the free release as usual...  

and again I want to emphasize, that as usual, it is always the same people who donate... there are about 200ppl on nicehash alone who are mining neoscrypt...  and they won't even come here to thank those who pay for them...  
(sure I shouldn't care as long as I get what I ask, but still... we all speak of community, while in fact it is dominated by a bunch of suckers whose only contribution to that so called community is to dump on the head of those who really contribute to the community...)

So thanks to those who donate and support the "cause" and "you know what" to the others  

I thought you read the thread and would realize that I lost .4BTC on Cryptsy (which is quite substantial to a small miner) and that the price of FTC is in the shitter because of it, making this pointless to purchase. Neoscrypt will have a tough time recovering unless Cryptsy comes back. Believe it or not, that .4BTC had plans, which included paying my bills and purchasing the miner from you to make more money. You don't see me dragging my ass around the ground trying to guilt people into giving me free things though.

Also when Neoscrypt goes in the shitter, the people mining are bots. Neoscrypt has always had problems with botnets mining with the CPU miner. No legitimate GPU miner mines off of Nicehash for FTC as the profits are much less.

http://hashpower.co/site/miners

2200 CPU miners, Maybe 15 people mining with GPUs.

In those PMs you also said you'd release the miner (last weekend) to all the donaters as well (not just me). I can screencap the post if people want. He wasn't even planning on doing this till I mentioned it. Low and behold people like perks!

Be remotely understanding of other peoples circumstances and don't be such a douche.

In the beginning 1 GHASH of neoscrypt was paying 10BTC, and now it's only paying 2.5BTC.
Djm34: If you want to earn money on your kernals you should release them when they are hot. (People will donate for an increase in the most profitable algos.) I just did 20% faster keccak, but nobody cares because it is not profitable.

Yes he missed his window as always. These kernels aren't going to help people nearly as much as they would've. SP's Quark kernels were hot for the spring and summer when he was releasing them too, not so much anymore. That's the way it goes. You had like 3-4 months to do this in before Cryptsy and FTC fell apart. I was being nice and didn't say anything because I figured people would just do what they want (which they did and that's why donations stopped), but either you seem clueless to the state of FTC which this miner is actually for or you actually believe this is a great investment for people right now.

We don't get to pick what's going to have a upturn as far as the exchanges goes. If you had a Eth or Spread miner that's better I would scrounge up some BTC for it. X11 is another option, but it has to improve a lot before it will be comparable to either of them. ROI currently for this kernel is negative. At .2BTC it would take me like a year to pay it back at current income levels for Neo vs +25%... but I'm not sure why I would even mine Neo as I can make more with Spread or Ethereum.

If Neo/FTC recovers and you were selling this to people for .1BTC I would consider purchasing it, but as of right now the market is a complete unknown and that's not the payment model for this specific kernel. You chose a drive over selling them to individuals. I'm sure as Nicehash is probably going to kick in a decent chunk of BTC as well, which you aren't even mentioning anymore.


BTW I'm going to copy this thread over to SPs knowing that you're going to probably delete this because you don't like people making logical arguments against you and you just like talking shit whenever you feel like it because you got the shaft (as did a lot of us as far as Cryptsy goes).

[sp_]

The feathercoin volume is picking up at bittrex. There are also alot of other coins that use the neoscrypt algo.

Name                              Amount      Diff         Block     Profit (BTC/GHASHday)
Feathercoin (neoscrypt)       80 FTC   2.493    1 052 691    4.1782
OrbitCoin (neoscrypt)        1 ORB   0.404    1 617 328    3.5813
Guncoin (neoscrypt)       200 GUN   0.103      406 761    2.6167
Phoenixcoin (neoscrypt)   50 PXC   0.115      908 569    1.5088
UFOCoin (neoscrypt)

[djm34]

The feathercoin volume is picking up at bittrex. There are also alot of other coins that use the neoscrypt algo.

Name                              Amount      Diff         Block     Profit (BTC/GHASHday)
Feathercoin (neoscrypt)       80 FTC   2.493    1 052 691    4.1782
OrbitCoin (neoscrypt)        1 ORB   0.404    1 617 328    3.5813
Guncoin (neoscrypt)       200 GUN   0.103      406 761    2.6167
Phoenixcoin (neoscrypt)   50 PXC   0.115      908 569    1.5088
UFOCoin (neoscrypt)

sp please refrain from advertising your private kernel on my thread 

[djm34]

I added 0.065 to your adress.

2.2 BTC + 0.1 outside +0.1 nofee = 2.4

Only 0.1Btc left?

what is that 0.1btc "nofee" (can't find that... ) ?

also considering the btc has decreased a lot, take 2.5btc as a lower limit...  

I was thinking about this transaction that was sendt without a fee. (slow confirmation). Looks like it has been confirmed now:

yes it was confirmed long ago actually... so still missing 0.2btc
oh that's what bensam promised to give if he was getting it in advance... but now he is just waiting for the free release as usual...  

and again I want to emphasize, that as usual, it is always the same people who donate... there are about 200ppl on nicehash alone who are mining neoscrypt...  and they won't even come here to thank those who pay for them...  
(sure I shouldn't care as long as I get what I ask, but still... we all speak of community, while in fact it is dominated by a bunch of suckers whose only contribution to that so called community is to dump on the head of those who really contribute to the community...)

So thanks to those who donate and support the "cause" and "you know what" to the others  

I thought you read the thread and would realize that I lost .4BTC on Cryptsy (which is quite substantial to a small miner) and that the price of FTC is in the shitter because of it, making this pointless to purchase. Neoscrypt will have a tough time recovering unless Cryptsy comes back. Believe it or not, that .4BTC had plans, which included paying my bills and purchasing the miner from you to make more money. You don't see me dragging my ass around the ground trying to guilt people into giving me free things though.

Also when Neoscrypt goes in the shitter, the people mining are bots. Neoscrypt has always had problems with botnets mining with the CPU miner. No legitimate GPU miner mines off of Nicehash for FTC as the profits are much less.

http://hashpower.co/site/miners

2200 CPU miners, Maybe 15 people mining with GPUs.

In those PMs you also said you'd release the miner (last weekend) to all the donaters as well (not just me). I can screencap the post if people want. He wasn't even planning on doing this till I mentioned it. Low and behold people like perks!

Be remotely understanding of other peoples circumstances and don't be such a douche.

In the beginning 1 GHASH of neoscrypt was paying 10BTC, and now it's only paying 2.5BTC.
Djm34: If you want to earn money on your kernals you should release them when they are hot. (People will donate for an increase in the most profitable algos.) I just did 20% faster keccak, but nobody cares because it is not profitable.

BTW I'm going to copy this thread over to SPs knowing that you're going to probably delete this because you don't like people making logical arguments against you and you just like talking shit whenever you feel like it because you got the shaft (as did a lot of us as far as Cryptsy goes).

You can paste and copy my pm as much as you want, I stand by it. I told you in my pm that if I had to give it to you in advance, I would do it as well for the other donator (because I don't do exception, especially for you) and waited for your answer. However, it wasn't in my original plan to make an advance release. Since you didn't reply, I went back to my original plan a release this weekend. (and since you didn't donate anything, you wouldn't even had known if I had done an advanced release  ).

Then cryptsi collapsed, ok this was predictable since at least 3 months that it was going to collapse. So if you lose any money on cryptsi that's because you don't really follow what was happening and are a bit careless.

Considering who is the douche here, I think you have a long standing of "douchiness" toward devs in general, and it is quite ironic that I become the douche in that story  

[lawrencelyl]

Here's my donation:  https://blockchain.info/tx/aabca248b23e0d63dec3a74af19d7b79f13f35453b2c00f8fc58ff972922ae50
Not a lot but hope it helps

[djm34]

Here's my donation:  https://blockchain.info/tx/aabca248b23e0d63dec3a74af19d7b79f13f35453b2c00f8fc58ff972922ae50
Not a lot but hope it helps

thanks a lot for your support  (the amount doesn't matter as far as I am concerned )
djm

[ghostlander]

around 1.2-1.3MHASH

http://hashpower.co/site/mining  is currently paying 4BTC for 1 GHASH Day of neoscrypt.

With a 25% gain NVIDIA miners will get an advantage

I don't think there will be any advantage. If a GTX 980 outputs 800KH/s, my downvolted and downclocked HD7990 does the same with a comparable or lower power consumption. I call it a fair competition.

I thought you read the thread and would realize that I lost .4BTC on Cryptsy (which is quite substantial to a small miner) and that the price of FTC is in the shitter because of it, making this pointless to purchase. Neoscrypt will have a tough time recovering unless Cryptsy comes back. Believe it or not, that .4BTC had plans, which included paying my bills and purchasing the miner from you to make more money. You don't see me dragging my ass around the ground trying to guilt people into giving me free things though.

Also when Neoscrypt goes in the shitter, the people mining are bots. Neoscrypt has always had problems with botnets mining with the CPU miner. No legitimate GPU miner mines off of Nicehash for FTC as the profits are much less.

Cryptsy's demise has been expected, though it was a bit surprising to see so much drama and bull shit. There are many people out there who have lost (or about to lose) much more than you. Yet I see no connection between the future of NeoScrypt and whatever happens to Cryptsy. There were hundreds of coins traded featuring various algos. What you say NeoScrypt has problems with CPU botnets, it's a key design feature actually. They are worse than huge ASIC farms.

[Grim]

Hey miners!

Why isn't everyone at least donating

0.01 BTC

100 people = 1 BTC


We need the devs to work for us the PEOPLE and not the farms!!!

Strange world we live in because without donating we guaranty our own future demise
if the devs stop developing for us!!

[chrysophylax]

Hey miners!

Why isn't everyone at least donating

0.01 BTC

100 people = 1 BTC


We need the devs to work for us the PEOPLE and not the farms!!!

Strange world we live in because without donating we guaranty our own future demise
if the devs stop developing for us!!

grim ...

i have a farm - actually two small ones but growing larger every month - and i have done what i can in my capacity to help along those lines also ...

the devs in general dont complain about donations for no reason ... the community at large dont donate ...

only a handful ( including you and i ) in the crypto community actually pull their heads out their backsides and donate ... which is one of the reasons that things go private ...

im looking at many other ways of getting the donation part of crypto active and of benefit - but ultimately its up to the community of miners that are involved ... and that doesnt look like its happening - apart from the handful that i mentioned ...

the dbm project ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1089744 ) ive started has potential - but it was the first part of the entire donation project that i wanted to execute ... then i needed two pools to get created and going to work with the dbm system ... but i cant setup the pools that i needed - so i require a dev that does know how to create them ... i have had help from a couple of devs previously - but their time is not as flexible - so the pools are at a standstill currently ...

to ask for donation is one thing - to entice miners to mine for the benefit of the mining community is another ...

if there is a dev that can help me create two pools under the granite umbrella - then ill be more than happy to get them setup and mining for the benefit of the devs AND the community ... as i have much bigger plans for the dbm system in conjunction with the pools ...

it IS about the small miners - but you also need to look at the fact that the majority of donation cries will fall on deaf ears ...

if that is the case - and continue to be - then farms are the ones that people will fall on to and rely on ( nicehash have already donated 1btc to this pledge as is - about 40% of the total ) - so lets work together to help the developers AND the community ...

#crysx

[djm34]

Hey miners!

Why isn't everyone at least donating

0.01 BTC

100 people = 1 BTC


We need the devs to work for us the PEOPLE and not the farms!!!

Strange world we live in because without donating we guaranty our own future demise
if the devs stop developing for us!!

I know... 

[sp_]

Hey miners!
Why isn't everyone at least donating
0.01 BTC
100 people = 1 BTC
We need the devs to work for us the PEOPLE and not the farms!!!
Strange world we live in because without donating we guaranty our own future demise
if the devs stop developing for us!!

I know... 

Too much begging from the developers. Ppl don't donate to beggars.

[ldw-com]

Hey miners!
Why isn't everyone at least donating
0.01 BTC
100 people = 1 BTC
We need the devs to work for us the PEOPLE and not the farms!!!
Strange world we live in because without donating we guaranty our own future demise
if the devs stop developing for us!!

I know... 

Too much begging from the developers. Ppl don't donate to beggars.

You're kidding right?

[thefix]

Second donation sent as promised

I sent a PM with transaction info

I encourage everyone to donate something even if its a small amount

People can do so much more when they work together!

[sp_]

Hey miners!
Why isn't everyone at least donating
0.01 BTC
100 people = 1 BTC
We need the devs to work for us the PEOPLE and not the farms!!!
Strange world we live in because without donating we guaranty our own future demise
if the devs stop developing for us!!

I know... 

Too much begging from the developers. Ppl don't donate to beggars.

You're kidding right?

Yes I am kidding. Too much begging from the miners. Please don't give them more hash for free.

[ldw-com]

Hey miners!
Why isn't everyone at least donating
0.01 BTC
100 people = 1 BTC
We need the devs to work for us the PEOPLE and not the farms!!!
Strange world we live in because without donating we guaranty our own future demise
if the devs stop developing for us!!

I know... 

Too much begging from the developers. Ppl don't donate to beggars.

You're kidding right?

Yes I am kidding. Too much begging from the miners. Please don't give them more hash for free.

Mmkay... 

[djm34]

Hey miners!
Why isn't everyone at least donating
0.01 BTC
100 people = 1 BTC
We need the devs to work for us the PEOPLE and not the farms!!!
Strange world we live in because without donating we guaranty our own future demise
if the devs stop developing for us!!

I know...  

Too much begging from the developers. Ppl don't donate to beggars.

I don't want to have to beg, I want people to donate without having to ask  

I don't want to beg, but there are still 0.23btc missing  

https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw

[chrysophylax]

Hey miners!
Why isn't everyone at least donating
0.01 BTC
100 people = 1 BTC
We need the devs to work for us the PEOPLE and not the farms!!!
Strange world we live in because without donating we guaranty our own future demise
if the devs stop developing for us!!

I know... 

Too much begging from the developers. Ppl don't donate to beggars.

I don't want to have to beg, I want people to donate without having to ask 

we ALL have to ask ... without asking - you get no answers ...

but beg? ... i dont think so ...

and its got nothing to do with pride - or btc ... its a matter of of holding yourself in a dignified manner ... and making sure that what you do - whether it be code or otherwise - is recognized and valued ...

people show value in many different ways - and respect is my ultimate form ... not money or btc or otherwise ... respect ...

from where i come from - its what you live and die for ... and the only thing that makes the difference between wanting - and getting - things done ...

#crysx

[sp_]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.
...

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

What happens if the plegde is not met? Only 4 days left to raise 0.23 btc

[ldw-com]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.
...

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

What happens if the plegde is not met? Only 4 days left to raise 0.23 btc

Charity 

[chrysophylax]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.
...

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

What happens if the plegde is not met? Only 4 days left to raise 0.23 btc

extend the cutoff time by two weeks or four ...

it would only be fair that more people could hear about this and might donate ...

after all - you have kept the code under lock and key this long - why not a few more weeks? ...

#crysx

[djm34]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.
...

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

What happens if the plegde is not met? Only 4 days left to raise 0.23 btc

extend the cutoff time by two weeks or four ...

it would only be fair that more people could hear about this and might donate ...

after all - you have kept the code under lock and key this long - why not a few more weeks? ...

#crysx

the deadline won't be extended as it is part of my agreement with nicehash. That's for sure.
(and 2 weeks to a months for 0.25btc sounds like a bad joke to me... and is rather insulting )

[chrysophylax]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.
...

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

What happens if the plegde is not met? Only 4 days left to raise 0.23 btc

extend the cutoff time by two weeks or four ...

it would only be fair that more people could hear about this and might donate ...

after all - you have kept the code under lock and key this long - why not a few more weeks? ...

#crysx

the deadline won't be extended as it is part of my agreement with nicehash. That's for sure.
(and 2 weeks to a months for 0.25btc sounds like a bad joke to me... and is rather insulting )

thats ok ...

it was a mere suggestion - not an insult djm34 ...

i dont know what the deal is that you have with nicehash - so i speak what i can suggest ...

its kool ...

#crysx

[djm34]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.
...

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

What happens if the plegde is not met? Only 4 days left to raise 0.23 btc

extend the cutoff time by two weeks or four ...

it would only be fair that more people could hear about this and might donate ...

after all - you have kept the code under lock and key this long - why not a few more weeks? ...

#crysx

the deadline won't be extended as it is part of my agreement with nicehash. That's for sure.
(and 2 weeks to a months for 0.25btc sounds like a bad joke to me... and is rather insulting )

thats ok ...

it was a mere suggestion - not an insult djm34 ...

i dont know what the deal is that you have with nicehash - so i speak what i can suggest ...

its kool ...

#crysx

I meant a month for collecting 0.25btc  
anyhow was discussing last weekend with Wolf0 regarding some possible speed increase, I guess I won't have to spend more time on that...

that time would be better spent, with the woman I love... (be true in any case actually)
 

[chrysophylax]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.
...

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

What happens if the plegde is not met? Only 4 days left to raise 0.23 btc

extend the cutoff time by two weeks or four ...

it would only be fair that more people could hear about this and might donate ...

after all - you have kept the code under lock and key this long - why not a few more weeks? ...

#crysx

the deadline won't be extended as it is part of my agreement with nicehash. That's for sure.
(and 2 weeks to a months for 0.25btc sounds like a bad joke to me... and is rather insulting )

thats ok ...

it was a mere suggestion - not an insult djm34 ...

i dont know what the deal is that you have with nicehash - so i speak what i can suggest ...

its kool ...

#crysx

I meant a month for collecting 0.25btc  
anyhow was discussing last weekend with Wolf0 regarding some possible speed increase, I guess I won't have to spend more time on that...

that time would be better spent, with the woman I love... (be true in any case actually)
 

...

and who might she be? ...

im off to bed ... with mine ...

till the morrow all ...

#crysx

[djm34]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.
...

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

What happens if the plegde is not met? Only 4 days left to raise 0.23 btc

extend the cutoff time by two weeks or four ...

it would only be fair that more people could hear about this and might donate ...

after all - you have kept the code under lock and key this long - why not a few more weeks? ...

#crysx

the deadline won't be extended as it is part of my agreement with nicehash. That's for sure.
(and 2 weeks to a months for 0.25btc sounds like a bad joke to me... and is rather insulting )

thats ok ...

it was a mere suggestion - not an insult djm34 ...

i dont know what the deal is that you have with nicehash - so i speak what i can suggest ...

its kool ...

#crysx

I meant a month for collecting 0.25btc   
anyhow was discussing last weekend with Wolf0 regarding some possible speed increase, I guess I won't have to spend more time on that...

that time would be better spent, with the woman I love... (be true in any case actually)
 

...

and who might she be? ...

im off to bed ... with mine ...

none of your business 
good night

[sp_]

The BTC price is up 10% in a few hours.

[djm34]

The BTC price is up 10% in a few hours.

the price isn't up, it just gets back to its previous value...

[sambiohazard]

I hope this is not an insulting amount

I can get that back in 10-15 days if i dont count power cost. Thanks for your work

https://blockchain.info/tx/813e7bb1620f2d05414f8dc22d2063b66773d1a9383c5750cb00b1f0ea8a87f5

Regards

Sam

[djm34]

I hope this is not an insulting amount

I can get that back in 10-15 days if i dont count power cost. Thanks for your work

https://blockchain.info/tx/813e7bb1620f2d05414f8dc22d2063b66773d1a9383c5750cb00b1f0ea8a87f5

Regards

Sam

thanks a lot for the donation,
djm

[ltc_bilic]

Although the markets are tough for small miners like me, and I don't see any reason of having this neoscrypt miner released, because of the current market conditions, I still believe that open source development it's the only way to go. So I always support ANY developer who contributes to the open source cause.
At the moment there's not much profit to be made from mining,...so here's my small contribution to the project: 9fba32055da7cb6410f5f42f3e84f8ca3dd1bc9c4126e2650f63ee33b205ff6b

Will send some more when I can. And keep up the good work djm34.

[crsminer]

I do not mine neoscrypt because it's not profitable but here's my support for this project -- https://blockexplorer.com/tx/ea38c0fa51757137599b20b982582483530df01d50655fb7d63fb4985071f154

Keep up the good work djm!

[sp_]

I am more interested in your work on lyra2v2 djm34

[sambiohazard]

@sp_ why dont you donate remaining amount so that you can build on top of his kernel & sell it

[s7icky]

@sp_ why dont you donate remaining amount so that you can build on top of his kernel & sell it

cause hes SP_.... thats a dumb question.

[djm34]

@sp_ why dont you donate remaining amount so that you can build on top of his kernel & sell it

cause hes SP_.... thats a dumb question.

to be fair, sp_ made already a donation actually (thanks to him)  

[djm34]

almost there: https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw 2.37btc

lets give a few encouragement to these shy people who haven't contributed yet.
(if you don't give for the miner, give it for all the trolling I do on bitcointalk  )

[crackfoo]

If PXC and HAL can get added to another exchange (Bitt/Polo/Bleu/Yobit/ccex) I'll fill up the remainder of the pledge on behalf of www.zpool.ca

Cheers!

[thefix]

If PXC and HAL can get added to another exchange (Bitt/Polo/Bleu/Yobit/ccex) I'll fill up the remainder of the pledge on behalf of www.zpool.ca

Cheers!

HAL was on Bittrex and delisted because of low volume and its unlikely any of those listings will happen by the deadline.

Donating a small amount on behalf of the pool would be a more realistic and respectable option in my opinion.

Thanks for stopping by!

[blzflkn]

fe03df288ee88d113d3d539b429cee33956ca0a7bedf3fda35a8037dfedf6bd6

Probably won't/can't use it since my card is slow, but here's 0.00028 that was left in my wallet.

[sp_]

2.5 BTC is now reached. Djm34 can release his miner 

[djm34]

2.5 BTC is now reached. Djm34 can release his miner 

lets wait until there is physically 2.5btc on that wallet
(actually it will be released at the planned date)

[sp_]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Are you changing the terms? Take a look what you wrote on the front page.

[djm34]

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Are you changing the terms? Take a look what you wrote on the front page.

wrote: "The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half). "
that's what is written on the front page. Not changing anything.  

ps: not going to your thread and tell you your are asking for too much donation (well actually I do   )

ps2: might release it earlier, will depend a bit if I find time earlier... but keep the donation coming, only 0.1btc to target.
(it is a min target, not a max one...  )

[crackfoo]

ps2: might release it earlier, will depend a bit if I find time earlier... but keep the donation coming, only 0.1btc to target.
(it is a min target, not a max one...  )

On behalf of www.zpool.ca here is the remainder:

https://blockchain.info/tx/7553b622985ab26815c21ab494bb32a1bcd92260f134db298e814fe48d5fbf75

Do donaters get credited in the release notes?

Cheers!

[djm34]

ps2: might release it earlier, will depend a bit if I find time earlier... but keep the donation coming, only 0.1btc to target.
(it is a min target, not a max one...  )

On behalf of www.zpool.ca here is the remainder:

https://blockchain.info/tx/7553b622985ab26815c21ab494bb32a1bcd92260f134db298e814fe48d5fbf75

Do donaters get credited in the release notes?

Cheers!

Thanks a lot for your donation.
I haven't thought to credit the donators , however I don't have anything against either
(will have to check the list of all the donators   so they can get credited properly)

What do you want exactly in the credit ? (not sure where to place that either, I could put something so it appears each time the application is launched but there are something like 30 transaction, not sure how it will look like...)

[crackfoo]

ps2: might release it earlier, will depend a bit if I find time earlier... but keep the donation coming, only 0.1btc to target.
(it is a min target, not a max one...  )

On behalf of www.zpool.ca here is the remainder:

https://blockchain.info/tx/7553b622985ab26815c21ab494bb32a1bcd92260f134db298e814fe48d5fbf75

Do donaters get credited in the release notes?

Cheers!

Thanks a lot for your donation.
I haven't thought to credit the donators , however I don't have anything against either
(will have to check the list of all the donators   so they can get credited properly)

What do you want exactly in the credit ? (not sure where to place that either, I could put something so it appears each time the application is launched but there are something like 30 transaction, not sure how it will look like...)

Just in the README? I'm find with just names like ... "crackers (www.zpool.ca)"

[s7icky]

timeline for release?

[djm34]

timeline for release?

as said previously the 24th (may-be earlier but I don't want to promise anything), but for sure for the 24th

[s7icky]

sorry ive been following this but never saw that my bad. i just setup a new 6 x 970 rig i wanna run lol

180+mhs quark mwuahahaha

[Eliovp]

Congrats for reaching the pledge dim! 

The results can be posted here: http://62.212.74.86/~mining/list/

:-)

[Liquid71]

Congrats for reaching the pledge dim! 

The results can be posted here: http://62.212.74.86/~mining/list/

:-)

+1 congrats and it's good to see the community come through

[s7icky]

f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5

[djm34]

f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5

you know, that I sleep from time to time
actually the source has been put on github yesterday (silently... as I am checking a few things in the mean time)
(I will probably also release the source of my own release, because the release of sp seems to cause several problem in performance)

[djm34]

f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5

you know, that I sleep from time to time
actually the source has been put on github yesterday (silently... as I am checking a few things in the mean time)
(I will probably also release the source of my own release, because the release of sp seems to cause several problem in performance)

The source can be found here, please have a look and report hashrate and eventual problems (it seems there are some validation problems with the 960,970)
https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt

[joblo]

Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.

Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.

[sp_]

I get no validation errors on the gtx 960.
Only on the 970. 25% of the nonces are invalid. And the accepted hashrate on the pool is lower than reported in the miner.

[djm34]

Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.

Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.

hmm... you welcome, since I wrote it 

[joblo]

I get no validation errors on the gtx 960.
Only on the 970. 25% of the nonces are invalid. And the accepted hashrate on the pool is lower than reported in the miner.

I don't get that many validation erros but the pool hash rate is lower than r74.

[joblo]

Whirlpool compile failed on first attempt on Centos 6 cuda 7.5. trying again
and will also try cuda 6.5.

Update: Failed again

x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu(2783): error: identifier "UINT32_MAX" is undefined

[djm34]

Whirlpool compile failed on first attempt on Centos 6 cuda 7.5. trying again
and will also try cuda 6.5.

Update: Failed again

x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu(2783): error: identifier "UINT32_MAX" is undefined

what exactly are you reporting ?

[joblo]

Whirlpool compile failed on first attempt on Centos 6 cuda 7.5. trying again
and will also try cuda 6.5.

Update: Failed again

x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu(2783): error: identifier "UINT32_MAX" is undefined

what exactly are you reporting ?

Something unrelated to your new kernel. I cloming it again in case of a corrupt download.

[djm34]

ok here the list of the donators I got from my pm box and browsing through that thread,
if I forgot your name (it is your fault   as I said to send me a pm),
let me know, I will add it (please just don't make me crossref everything...) :

(to be added to readme.txt and readme.md)

===== acknowledgment ========

djm34 would like to thank all the people who participated in the pledge and made that release possible:


Nicehash
antantti
crackers (www.zpool.ca)
scryptr
Liquid71
sp_
frazier34567
thefix
chrysophylax
ldw-com
Grout
serg_25
s7icky
Grim
Pivlus
lawrencelyl
sambiohazard
ltc_bilic
crsminer

========================================================

[s7icky]

f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5

you know, that I sleep from time to time
actually the source has been put on github yesterday (silently... as I am checking a few things in the mean time)
(I will probably also release the source of my own release, because the release of sp seems to cause several problem in performance)

nope ur not allowed to sleep

[djm34]

could you please try the newest version on github.
This is should use the best set of parameter depending if you are using cuda 6.5 or cuda 7.5 (since it isn't the same parameter)
problem with cpu validation should also be corrected, need some optimization as well as not all card need it...

please also report best intensity and fill up eliovp spreadsheet at http://62.212.74.86/~mining/list/

[joblo]

Whirlpool compile failed on first attempt on Centos 6 cuda 7.5. trying again
and will also try cuda 6.5.

Update: Failed again

x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu(2783): error: identifier "UINT32_MAX" is undefined

what exactly are you reporting ?

Something unrelated to your new kernel. I cloming it again in case of a corrupt download.

I just remembered I've seen this before on the same machine and only on that machine.
It started around v1.5.70. I work around it by ading a #define in the fike that fails to
compile. Probably an issue with my system.

[djm34]

Whirlpool compile failed on first attempt on Centos 6 cuda 7.5. trying again
and will also try cuda 6.5.

Update: Failed again

x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu(2783): error: identifier "UINT32_MAX" is undefined

what exactly are you reporting ?

Something unrelated to your new kernel. I cloming it again in case of a corrupt download.

I just remembered I've seen this before on the same machine and only on that machine.
It started around v1.5.70. I work around it by ading a #define in the fike that fails to
compile. Probably an issue with my system.

can't really help you with centos, try to ask epsylon3 is the expert in all kind of linux

[djm34]

ok, first release for neoscrypt: https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases

It contains exe for both cuda 6.5 and cuda 7.5 for windows (the version will pick up the best set of parameter for cuda 6.5/cuda 7.5 depending if you use cuda 6.5/cuda 7.5

[joblo]

Whirlpool compile failed on first attempt on Centos 6 cuda 7.5. trying again
and will also try cuda 6.5.

Update: Failed again

x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu(2783): error: identifier "UINT32_MAX" is undefined

what exactly are you reporting ?

Something unrelated to your new kernel. I cloming it again in case of a corrupt download.

I just remembered I've seen this before on the same machine and only on that machine.
It started around v1.5.70. I work around it by ading a #define in the fike that fails to
compile. Probably an issue with my system.

can't really help you with centos, try to ask epsylon3 is the expert in all kind of linux

Just an FYI, not asking for help, but thanks.

[s7icky]

ok, first release for neoscrypt: https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases

It contains exe for both cuda 6.5 and cuda 7.5 for windows (the version will pick up the best set of parameter for cuda 6.5/cuda 7.5 depending if you use cuda 6.5/cuda 7.5

testing now. Thank you sir!!!!!

[djm34]

ok, first release for neoscrypt: https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases

It contains exe for both cuda 6.5 and cuda 7.5 for windows (the version will pick up the best set of parameter for cuda 6.5/cuda 7.5 depending if you use cuda 6.5/cuda 7.5

testing now. Thank you sir!!!!!

don't forget to report. also, you'll get better performance when overclocked (obviously)

[sp_]

Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.

10.4% faster. This is far form the 100% that was promised...

[djm34]

Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.

10.4% faster. This is far form the 100% that was promised...

100% is from the crap which was sitting in your "special cuda 7.5" release
also the code of this morning was optimized for cuda 7.5 and not cuda 6.5 and using 6.5 was giving lower performance
now this has been solved while you were acting like a moron on your thread.

[s7icky]

[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 955
[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 948
[2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 215/215 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 216/216 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes!

[2016-01-24 12:30:36] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 206
[2016-01-24 12:30:36] accepted: 47/47 (100.00%), 202.73 kH/s yes!

[2016-01-24 12:28:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 417
[2016-01-24 12:28:55] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 400.06 kH/s yes!

[djm34]

[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 955
[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 948
[2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 215/215 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 216/216 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes!

[2016-01-24 12:30:36] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 206
[2016-01-24 12:30:36] accepted: 47/47 (100.00%), 202.73 kH/s yes!

[2016-01-24 12:28:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 417
[2016-01-24 12:28:55] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 400.06 kH/s yes!

ok looks good, is it cuda 6.5 or cuda 7.5 ? for the moment cuda 6.5 should do better on the big gun

[s7icky]

[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 955
[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 948
[2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 215/215 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 216/216 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes!

[2016-01-24 12:30:36] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 206
[2016-01-24 12:30:36] accepted: 47/47 (100.00%), 202.73 kH/s yes!

[2016-01-24 12:28:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 417
[2016-01-24 12:28:55] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 400.06 kH/s yes!

ok looks good, is it cuda 6.5 or cuda 7.5 ? for the moment cuda 6.5 should do better on the big gun

yea 6.5 is a little faster maybe 100 if that


do u think u will be able to get more out of 7.5 with a 980ti?

[maxim000]

ASUS 750Ti 2Gb GPU overclocked to 1396 mgz  - 227mh cuda 7.5 , 231mh cuda 6.5

_sp release 69 get 200mh

thanks !

[djm34]

[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 955
[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 948
[2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 215/215 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 216/216 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes!

[2016-01-24 12:30:36] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 206
[2016-01-24 12:30:36] accepted: 47/47 (100.00%), 202.73 kH/s yes!

[2016-01-24 12:28:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 417
[2016-01-24 12:28:55] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 400.06 kH/s yes!

ok looks good, is it cuda 6.5 or cuda 7.5 ? for the moment cuda 6.5 should do better on the big gun

yea 6.5 is a little faster maybe 100 if that


do u think u will be able to get more out of 7.5 with a 980ti?

can you compile it yourself ? I had to add a __syncthreads() to prevent a few card from spewing cpu validation problem,
if it is removed, it should give you already some speed increase for both cuda 6.5/cuda 7.5

(for the moment for cuda 7.5, I am still searching a few way of optimizing it).

Also as you have more memory than a 980, you could also try to use the --intensity flag to raise the number of thread, this should also increase a bit your performance.

[s7icky]

things went a little higher after running for a bit....

[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988
[2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!

[djm34]

things went a little higher after running for a bit....

[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988
[2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!

wow almost 1MH/s I should have bought one of these  (yeah well, waiting for Pascal now...)

[s7icky]

things went a little higher after running for a bit....

[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988
[2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!

wow almost 1MH/s I should have bought one of these   (yeah well, waiting for Pascal now...)

whats the default intensity it runs at
i keep getting out of memory errors when i raise it



960 went up also......


2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430
2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 419
2016-01-24 13:02:45] accepted: 107/107 (100.00%), 427.48 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:02:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 429
2016-01-24 13:02:50] accepted: 108/108 (100.00%), 427.33 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:02:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 422
2016-01-24 13:02:53] accepted: 109/109 (100.00%), 427.18 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:03:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430
2016-01-24 13:03:12] accepted: 110/110 (100.00%), 427.37 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:03:14] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060031
2016-01-24 13:03:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 432
2016-01-24 13:03:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 425
2016-01-24 13:03:19] accepted: 111/111 (100.00%), 427.50 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:03:20] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060032
2016-01-24 13:03:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 431

[djm34]

things went a little higher after running for a bit....

[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988
[2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!

wow almost 1MH/s I should have bought one of these  (yeah well, waiting for Pascal now...)

whats the default intensity it runs at
i keep getting out of memory errors when i raise it

not entirely sure...
#thread = 256 * 64 * 5 on cuda 7.5 intensity is #thread =  2^intensity (so it is between 16.47 and 16.48)
and
#thread = 256 * 64 * 4 on cuda 6.5 (probably possible to raise it here) ==> intensity = 16

[djm34]

I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

[s7icky]

I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

dope ill give you speeds !!!


cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol


edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds



[2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042
[2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU!
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!

[rednoW]

Great work, DJM!

My poor gtx750 1gb ))
start /realtime ccminer_cuda65.exe --cpu-priority 5 -a neoscrypt



First miner I see that uses bus interface load ~10% ))

[djm34]

I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

dope ill give you speeds !!!


cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol


edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds



[2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042
[2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU!
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!

the cuda 6.5 counterpart nosync is on the release as well

[djm34]

Great work, DJM!

My poor gtx750 1gb ))
start /realtime ccminer_cuda65.exe --cpu-priority 5 -a neoscrypt



First miner I see that uses bus interface load ~10% ))

looks good indeed
I am jealous of your 1gb 750, my poor 750ti wuth 2gb  gets only 200kh/s

[s7icky]

I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

dope ill give you speeds !!!


cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol


edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds



[2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042
[2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU!
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!

the cuda 6.5 counterpart nosync is on the release as well

kk testing 2 mins.  and dude i can give you access to one of my 980ti rigs if you need it to test?



6.5 no sync 980ti

[2016-01-24 13:39:43] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 989
[2016-01-24 13:39:43] accepted: 63/63 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1009
[2016-01-24 13:39:46] accepted: 64/64 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1000
[2016-01-24 13:39:47] accepted: 65/65 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 883
[2016-01-24 13:39:47] accepted: 66/66 (100.00%), 1880 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:49] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060071
[2016-01-24 13:39:49] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1003
[2016-01-24 13:39:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 853
[2016-01-24 13:39:53] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 993
[2016-01-24 13:39:53] accepted: 67/67 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:58] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1002
[2016-01-24 13:39:58] accepted: 68/68 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 995
[2016-01-24 13:39:59] accepted: 69/69 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:40:04] GPU #0: result for nonce $00C5907F does not validate on CPU!

[bobben2]

update: the miner is now released and can be found here:  https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases

Hello,

I am about to release a new version of ccminer supporting neoscrypt, it is around 25% faster than the sp/pallas version compiled with cuda 6.5
and around 100% faster when compiled with cuda 7.5

This is a co-joint effort between myself and Nicehash which will contribute to the pledge as well

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Donation will have to be made exclusively to that btc address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
(careful it is a new address, not the old one, one should already consider that 0.1btc has been donated)

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

If the pledge is successful both windows and linux version (the source) of ccminer will become available.

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Current speed of the miner:

The hashrate given in the image is for ccminer compiled with cuda 6.5, I am also planning to retune the miner with cuda 7.5
At the moment the hashrate for the 750ti is mostly unchanged while the 980's lose around 40kh/s.



Thanks in advance for your participation.  

here the link to the blockchain explorer where you can check the advancement of the pledge: https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw (+0.1btc)


ps: this thread is self moderated (assuming I have time and not in a troll mood  ), off-topic trolling won't be permitted

Thanks djm34
Up from 500 to 590 on my 970 (from sp-1.5.74 release), Cuda 6.5.

[2016-01-24 19:39:32] accepted: 70/70 (100.00%), 588.91 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 19:39:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 594 (T= 71C F= 49% C=0/0)
[2016-01-24 19:39:51] accepted: 71/71 (100.00%), 589.15 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 19:40:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 594 (T= 71C F= 49% C=0/0)
[2016-01-24 19:40:03] accepted: 72/72 (100.00%), 589.23 kH/s yes!

Also, both fan%  and temp went up, as expected.

Sent you some coin
txid  74887611da7963c0cbac2399531d2d8d41221fd009f4482c6a7d6c4f34db0378-000

[djm34]

update: the miner is now released and can be found here:  https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases

Hello,

I am about to release a new version of ccminer supporting neoscrypt, it is around 25% faster than the sp/pallas version compiled with cuda 6.5
and around 100% faster when compiled with cuda 7.5

This is a co-joint effort between myself and Nicehash which will contribute to the pledge as well

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Donation will have to be made exclusively to that btc address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
(careful it is a new address, not the old one, one should already consider that 0.1btc has been donated)

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

If the pledge is successful both windows and linux version (the source) of ccminer will become available.

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Current speed of the miner:

The hashrate given in the image is for ccminer compiled with cuda 6.5, I am also planning to retune the miner with cuda 7.5
At the moment the hashrate for the 750ti is mostly unchanged while the 980's lose around 40kh/s.


Thanks in advance for your participation. 

here the link to the blockchain explorer where you can check the advancement of the pledge: https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw (+0.1btc)


ps: this thread is self moderated (assuming I have time and not in a troll mood  ), off-topic trolling won't be permitted

Thanks djm34
Up from 500 to 590 on my 970 (from sp-1.5.74 release), Cuda 6.5.

[2016-01-24 19:39:32] accepted: 70/70 (100.00%), 588.91 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 19:39:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 594 (T= 71C F= 49% C=0/0)
[2016-01-24 19:39:51] accepted: 71/71 (100.00%), 589.15 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 19:40:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 594 (T= 71C F= 49% C=0/0)
[2016-01-24 19:40:03] accepted: 72/72 (100.00%), 589.23 kH/s yes!

Also, both fan%  and temp went up, as expected.

Sent you some coin
txid  74887611da7963c0cbac2399531d2d8d41221fd009f4482c6a7d6c4f34db0378-000

thanks a lot,
however you should get more, try to increase a bit the intensity (and try the nosync version as well) (on linux, the nosync are obtained by commenting out in cuda_neoscrypt.cu the "__syncthreads()" function)

[joblo]

Latest github

Centos 6, EVGA 750ti SC

cuda 7.5  ---> 135 KH/s
pool rate 175 KH/S !!!
works at -i 15, crashes at -i 16
no nonce errors after 5 minutes

cuda 6.5
    client: 125 KH/s client
    pool: +/ 5%
same intensity limits

SP_MOD r74 cuda 6.5 ---> 105 Kh/s
same intensity limits

The pool rate can't be faked by the miner so congratulations, 70% increase.

This is a critical milestone for ccminer and cuda 7.5. It is proof it can be more efficient
than 6.5. I much prefer your approach of more substantial increases in performance
with a limited period of exclusivity for donors. Keep up the good work.

Edit: corrected cut/paste error.

[s7icky]

Latest github

Centos 6, EVGA 750ti SC

cuda 7.5  ---> 135 KH/s
pool rate 175 KH/S !!!
works at -i 15, crashes at -i 16
no nonce errors after 5 minutes

cuda 6.5
    client: 125 KH/s client
    pool: +/ 5%
same intensity limits

SP_MOD r74 cuda 6.5 ---> 105 Kh/s
same intensity limits

The pool rate can't be faked by the miner so congratulations, 70% increase.

This is a critical milestone for ccminer and cuda 7.5. It is proof it can be more efficient
than 6.5. I much prefer your approach of more substantial increases in performance
with a limited period of exclusivity for donors. Keep up the good work.

Edit: corrected cut/paste error.

im getting 213 on my 750ti SC without -i

[antantti]

Test run cuda65.exe, both 970 and 980 up 14% from 1.5.74, thanks djm!

[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711

[Eliovp]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

[kangjooe]

not entirely sure...
#thread = 256 * 64 * 5 on cuda 7.5 intensity is #thread =  2^intensity (so it is between 16.47 and 16.48)
and
#thread = 256 * 64 * 4 on cuda 6.5 (probably possible to raise it here) ==> intensity = 16

THANK YOU djm34!!!!!  

my 970 now run @ 657 kH/s!!!!!!!!

before i'm using sp release 7.4 and get around 542 kH/s.

i'm currently using your cuda 65 version.

can you give more info the difference between standard and nosync version?

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

already submitted

[Eliovp]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

already submitted

I noticed! Already activated mate! Greatly appreciated!

You can find your card in the Nvidia section, if you hover over it you'll see your name :-)

Thx again!


Keep them coming guys! This will benefit everyone!


(Sorry for "kind of" spamming your thread Djm34) 

[djm34]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

already submitted

I noticed! Already activated mate! Greatly appreciated!

You can find your card in the Nvidia section, if you hover over it you'll see your name :-)

Thx again!


Keep them coming guys! This will benefit everyone!


(Sorry for "kind of" spamming your thread Djm34) 

it's ok, I just came from sp ccminer which is in full retard mode... so not much I can't handle here

[Eliovp]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

already submitted

I noticed! Already activated mate! Greatly appreciated!

You can find your card in the Nvidia section, if you hover over it you'll see your name :-)

Thx again!


Keep them coming guys! This will benefit everyone!


(Sorry for "kind of" spamming your thread Djm34) 

it's ok, I just came from sp ccminer which is in full retard mode... so not much I can't handle here

Haha, i noticed, i kind of stopped reading it. It's gone to far.... :p

[djm34]

not entirely sure...
#thread = 256 * 64 * 5 on cuda 7.5 intensity is #thread =  2^intensity (so it is between 16.47 and 16.48)
and
#thread = 256 * 64 * 4 on cuda 6.5 (probably possible to raise it here) ==> intensity = 16

THANK YOU djm34!!!!!  

my 970 now run @ 657 kH/s!!!!!!!!

before i'm using sp release 7.4 and get around 542 kH/s.

i'm currently using your cuda 65 version.

can you give more info the difference between standard and nosync version?

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

already submitted

the nosync refers to the command __syncthreads() which should be used when initializing the shared memory. However in some case (and some card) it isn't really needed and as it tends to slow down the kernel and removing it may increase the hashrate. however on some card it may cause some cpu validation issues.  

[kangjooe]

the nosync refers to the command __syncthreads() which should be used when initializing the shared memory. However in some case (and some card) it isn't really needed and as it tends to slow down the kernel and removing it may increase the hashrate. however on some card it may cause some cpu validation issues.  

i notice sir. already try it and it does give about 10 kH/s more than standard cuda65 version but yes it also give many cpu validation in my card.

i think i will stick with cuda 65 default version.

i sincerely thank you for your work and all the donator that make this happen


PS:
sorry i can't afford any donation, i'm doing this as a new hobby to run from the stress of my daily work for the past 8 weeks, i mine only about 4-5 hours and not every day, and only get about 0.001xxx BTC once a week on nicehash. purely to make me feel i can achieve something... even for that small amount.

[sambiohazard]

Ok i tried cuda 6.5 version as DJM said it faster. Here are my result which i will submit now to Elivop's site.

No flags/switches used, no OC. Efficiency is 99.5% for 750ti & 970. These are numbers after 1 hour run

sp rel71
750ti: 172 kh/s
970: 520 kh/s

djm 6.5

750ti: 202 kh/s(17.5%)
970: 605 kh/s(16.5%)

djm6.5nosync

750ti: +2-3kh/s
970: +10kh/s

EDIT: Forgot to thank djm34. Thanks for all your work. Last time you didn't answer my PM about mining donation i thought you really only want to sell to big miners & may be you do. Now i can see that with help of all parties in ecosystem a crowdfund can be successful. If you keep doing such crowdfunds every few months with similar improvements i think this can work.

[Liquid71]

Ok i tried cuda 6.5 version as DJM said it faster. Here are my result which i will submit now to Elivop's site.

No flags/switches used, no OC. Efficiency is 99.5% for 750ti & 970. These are numbers after 1 hour run

sp rel71
750ti: 172 kh/s
970: 520 kh/s

djm 6.5

750ti: 202 kh/s(17.5%)
970: 605 kh/s(16.5%)

djm6.5nosync

750ti: +2-3kh/s
970: +10kh/s

EDIT: Forgot to thank djm34. Thanks for all your work. Last time you didn't answer my PM about mining donation i thought you really only want to sell to big miners & may be you do. Now i can see that with help of all parties in ecosystem a crowdfund can be successful. If you keep doing such crowdfunds every few months with similar improvements i think this can work.

Agreed!!

I donated .1 not because I'll ever earn that back but to support devs, especially djm which has done a lot for ccminer.

P.S. anything worth mining with the faster miner, haven't even downloaded yet. Just mining most profitable algo's at the moment. Planning to fill some bags with FTC but for now gotta earn this months electric costs before the bill comes 

[Liquid71]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

Yes this site is/can be a great tool for all of us, thanks to the creator.

[Eliovp]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

Yes this site is/can be a great tool for all of us, thanks to the creator.

You're very welcome!

Now if everyone would keep contributing!

I'll keep it add free for sure! Nothing more irritating than a website with a bunch of adds..

[serg_25]

What i can say. another good job DJM.
my 750Ti card can make

Code:

GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 240 (T= 47C F= 32% C=1397/2750)

previously it was 200.

[djm34]

What i can say. another good job DJM.
my 750Ti card can make

Code:

GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 240 (T= 47C F= 32% C=1397/2750)

previously it was 200.

wow, that's pretty high... What kind of card is it ?

[Pivlus]

18% increase, djm34_neoscrypt compared to 1.5.74_spmod.
720 kH/s on EVGA GTX980 SC using Cuda 6.5 version. Submitted inferior result in Mining Hardware Comparison chart (540 kH/s) probably due to CPU bottleneck (I was mining argon2 on 12 threads while testing ccminer).
Thanks.

[djm34]

18% increase, djm34_neoscrypt compared to 1.5.74_spmod.
720 kH/s on EVGA GTX980 SC using Cuda 6.5 version. Submitted inferior result in Mining Hardware Comparison chart (540 kH/s) probably due to CPU bottleneck (I was mining argon2 on 12 threads while testing ccminer).
Thanks.

make sure you have enough ram or pagefile (this is required because of the pre-allocation).
which version are you using ? with the 980 you can use the __nosync version which should be faster.

It is based on the sp 78 version, actually my dev version is somewhat faster... I will try to put the binary somewhere, so a few test can be done.

You can also try to increase the intensity

[serg_25]

What i can say. another good job DJM.
my 750Ti card can make

Code:

GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 240 (T= 47C F= 32% C=1397/2750)

previously it was 200.

wow, that's pretty high... What kind of card is it ?

This one http://www.gainward.com/main/vgapro.php?id=969&lang=en
clocks you can see above.

[djm34]

What i can say. another good job DJM.
my 750Ti card can make

Code:

GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 240 (T= 47C F= 32% C=1397/2750)

previously it was 200.

wow, that's pretty high... What kind of card is it ?

This one http://www.gainward.com/main/vgapro.php?id=969&lang=en
clocks you can see above.

same as the one I have, must have lost at the chip lottery

[djm34]

Just thought about that when looking at the mining hardware comparison http://62.212.74.86/~mining/list/nvidia/index.php?algo=neo. ;
but the card showing lower performance are running windows 10.
Forgot about that since I am still runing windows 8.1 but there are major slow down on hard mem algo with windows 10.
So if you rig is for mining only, I would suggest to downgrade to a previous version.

[blzflkn]

Two issues I found so far:

1: The myr-gr algorithm doesn't seem to be working. (ccminer 65) Tried on a pool and in benchmark. Pool was all errors, benchmark didn't do anything at all.

2: With --cpu-mining, using a 2 core cpu masked with 0x3, both cores will run at ~50% on cpu priority 0 and 1... but setting it to 2,3,4, or 5 will max out one core and leave the other at zero. (lyra2v2, if that matters.)

Mining on GT 730 cuda 3.5

[djm34]

Two issues I found so far:

1: The myr-gr algorithm doesn't seem to be working. (ccminer 65) Tried on a pool and in benchmark. Pool was all errors, benchmark didn't do anything at all.

2: With --cpu-mining, using a 2 core cpu masked with 0x3, both cores will run at ~50% on cpu priority 0 and 1... but setting it to 2,3,4, or 5 will max out one core and leave the other at zero. (lyra2v2, if that matters.)

Mining on GT 730 cuda 3.5

I think you should bring the issue to sp (as I didn't touch that part of the software)

[sp_]

Looks ike this kernal is good on some cards and slow on others. Elpida? Hynix?

But not profitable. On both. Djm34 haz been trolling my thread for 6 months. A good coder,but a slow troll..

[djm34]

Looks ike this kernal is good on some cards and slow on others. Elpida? Hynix?

But not profitable. On both. Djm34 haz been trolling my thread for 6 months. A good coder,but a slow troll..

hmmm... are you lonesome tonight ?  that you come to my thread just to say that ?  
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cS5aCozhcA

 

more seriously, I don't have enough cards (and both have the same brand and memory) to tell anything about that.
However, what I think has an effect, is the OS, win10 slows down things a lot for hard mem algo from what I remember
(of the last time I installed it... I may try that soon again, but it has to pass both neoscrypt and lyra2rev2 test to stay
on my computer)

[DragonSlayer]

djm34,

What would it take to get a pledge running for lyra2rev2 release?  I keep hoping and dreaming of the day.  Thank you for all your work for the community.

[djm34]

djm34,

What would it take to get a pledge running for lyra2rev2 release?  I keep hoping and dreaming of the day.  Thank you for all your work for the community.

a long time...

[djm34]

djm34,

What would it take to get a pledge running for lyra2rev2 release?  I keep hoping and dreaming of the day.  Thank you for all your work for the community.

a long time...

that doesn't seem to be wise to run a second pledge right after this one... I mean most of the donation were from rather large donators and asking them to donate a second time in a month.... unless there were a much larger participation of the community may-be... in terms of pricing, I guess I would be happy with the same goal...

[Grim]

@ djm

well lyra2v2 is quite hot now

Considering 750ti is useless mining eth it is THE algo for 750ti rigs.

I bet you would reach ~2 btc (without nicehash), moreover lyra2v2 has more coins with higher cap compared to neoscrypt.

[sp_]

But how fast is it?

[djm34]

But how fast is it?

quite frankly, I don't remember... I haven't run it in months, but as I said, I don't plan to release it at the moment.

[djm34]

@ djm

well lyra2v2 is quite hot now

Considering 750ti is useless mining eth it is THE algo for 750ti rigs.

I bet you would reach ~2 btc (without nicehash), moreover lyra2v2 has more coins with higher cap compared to neoscrypt.

well I don't know... actually I could set an address and release whenever I feel there is enough  
(you might have to wait quite some time...) Do I sound like a scam ? 

[sp_]

I have only added 500KHASH on the 980 (sp-mod 61-git) Which algos did you rewrite? And will you make it public?

rewrote lyra2 code:

Good job.
I guess the new kernal is using more power?

yes, the 980 runs at 110% tpd and the 750ti close to 95% (on my gainward stock).
Honestly I will try to backport (if possible... not entirely obvious though, the new kernel relies on warp shuffle technique) some of the change to amd before releasing it, I don't want to create more imbalance...

[sp_]

I think you had another pic as well with 6.2 mhash on the 750ti but can't find it.

[Grim]

@ djm

well lyra2v2 is quite hot now

Considering 750ti is useless mining eth it is THE algo for 750ti rigs.

I bet you would reach ~2 btc (without nicehash), moreover lyra2v2 has more coins with higher cap compared to neoscrypt.

well I don't know... actually I could set an address and release whenever I feel there is enough  
(you might have to wait quite some time...) Do I sound like a scam ? 

nope, that's exactly how I feel you should do it


and actions speak louder than words:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 27.01.2016 13:58
To: djm34 main donation 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Debit: -0.15000000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00002906 BTC
Net amount: -0.15002906 BTC
Transaction ID: aa4743f6733b18f0f1448faf0c479634a5663071ef1adb622936129af4e23d87-000



I hope you reimburse me in case you don't release it in the next few weeks/months...  

[sp_]

My current private mod mines lyra2v2 at 5,5MHASH on the 750ti with max overclock.

And 5050 on standard clocks. (EVGA SC 750ti)

[djm34]

@ djm

well lyra2v2 is quite hot now

Considering 750ti is useless mining eth it is THE algo for 750ti rigs.

I bet you would reach ~2 btc (without nicehash), moreover lyra2v2 has more coins with higher cap compared to neoscrypt.

well I don't know... actually I could set an address and release whenever I feel there is enough  
(you might have to wait quite some time...) Do I sound like a scam ?  

nope, that's exactly how I feel you should do it


and actions speak louder than words:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 27.01.2016 13:58
To: djm34 main donation 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Debit: -0.15000000 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00002906 BTC
Net amount: -0.15002906 BTC
Transaction ID: aa4743f6733b18f0f1448faf0c479634a5663071ef1adb622936129af4e23d87-000



I hope you reimburse me in case you don't release it in the next few weeks/months...  

thanks a lot, but please wait that I set a new address (also as I said I have no plan to release it at the moment)

[djm34]

My current private mod mines lyra2v2 at 5,5MHASH on the 750ti with max overclock.

I'll ask some of my contact to check that

[sp_]

My current private mod mines lyra2v2 at 5,5MHASH on the 750ti with max overclock.

I'll ask some of my contact to check that

Depends on the cards and what memory they use.. Your neoscrypt is only doing 170-180khash on some cards and 200khash on others even if the clock setting is the same.
Could be the windows7 vs windows 8.1 problem. Or samsung/elpida/hynix memory latency differences.

[djm34]

My current private mod mines lyra2v2 at 5,5MHASH on the 750ti with max overclock.

I'll ask some of my contact to check that

Depends on the cards and what memory they use.. Your neoscrypt is only doing 170-180khash on some cards and 200khash on others even if the clock setting is the same.
Could be the windows7 vs windows 8.1 problem. Or samsung/elpida/hynix memory latency differences.

most likely related to the OS (easy to check with the spreadsheet)

[Grim]

thanks a lot, but please wait that I set a new address (also as I said I have no plan to release it at the moment)

just forward it to your new address if you ever go all the way ...

[Pivlus]

For those interested in the OS issue, I just booted off a Win 8.1 x64 drive, same rig, same settings, hash went from previous 720 kH/s (Win 10 x64) to 837 kH/s. Using ccminer-djm34-neoscrypt-65.

[Eliovp]

For those interested in the OS issue, I just booted off a Win 8.1 x64 drive, same rig, same settings, hash went from previous 720 kH/s (Win 10 x64) to 837 kH/s. Using ccminer-djm34-neoscrypt-65.

Now try Windows 10 Pro 64Bit. I believe you will go even faster. I did

[Pivlus]

For those interested in the OS issue, I just booted off a Win 8.1 x64 drive, same rig, same settings, hash went from previous 720 kH/s (Win 10 x64) to 837 kH/s. Using ccminer-djm34-neoscrypt-65.

Now try Windows 10 Pro 64Bit. I believe you will go even faster. I did

In fact, as I posted earlier, my experience was quite the opposite. I was on Win 10 Pro x64 (as posted in the Mining Hardware Comparison chart) and going back to Win 8.1 increased my hashrate. Later on I might try to revert to Win 7, unless someone in this thread has already tested and found no difference between Win 8.1 (Pro x64) and Win 7 (Ultimate x64).

[Eliovp]

For those interested in the OS issue, I just booted off a Win 8.1 x64 drive, same rig, same settings, hash went from previous 720 kH/s (Win 10 x64) to 837 kH/s. Using ccminer-djm34-neoscrypt-65.

Now try Windows 10 Pro 64Bit. I believe you will go even faster. I did

In fact, as I posted earlier, my experience was quite the opposite. I was on Win 10 Pro x64 (as posted in the Mining Hardware Comparison chart) and going back to Win 8.1 increased my hashrate. Later on I might try to revert to Win 7, unless someone in this thread has already tested and found no difference between Win 8.1 (Pro x64) and Win 7 (Ultimate x64).

Oh, that's weird. But good to know none the less. thank you for your feedback and especially for submitting @ mininghwcomparison! Greatly appreciated!!

[djm34]

For those interested in the OS issue, I just booted off a Win 8.1 x64 drive, same rig, same settings, hash went from previous 720 kH/s (Win 10 x64) to 837 kH/s. Using ccminer-djm34-neoscrypt-65.

Now try Windows 10 Pro 64Bit. I believe you will go even faster. I did

from the discussion we had on irc, I understood you were running only amd cards 

from my experience but that was right after the launch of win 10 (first install 2 or 3 days after the official win10 launch; second and last, was a month later with the release of new nvidia drivers) the performance on lyra and neoscrypt was rather bad (and gaming was laggy as well) and I preferred to go back to win 8.1. Might try again (in principle you can revert during the first month...  so far I reverted after 4 or 5 hours each time...).
However there is a cuda win10 version, I never tried it, so may-be it requires to recompile with it (?), so if someone has win10 and knows to compile, he can try that: download the cuda win10 edition and recompile with it and see what will happen.

[Eliovp]

For those interested in the OS issue, I just booted off a Win 8.1 x64 drive, same rig, same settings, hash went from previous 720 kH/s (Win 10 x64) to 837 kH/s. Using ccminer-djm34-neoscrypt-65.

Now try Windows 10 Pro 64Bit. I believe you will go even faster. I did

from the discussion we had on irc, I understood you were running only amd cards 

from my experience but that was right after the launch of win 10 (first install 2 or 3 days after the official win10 launch; second and last, was a month later with the release of new nvidia drivers) the performance on lyra and neoscrypt was rather bad (and gaming was laggy as well) and I preferred to go back to win 8.1. Might try again (in principle you can revert during the first month...  so far I reverted after 4 or 5 hours each time...).
However there is a cuda win10 version, I never tried it, so may-be it requires to recompile with it (?), so if someone has win10 and knows to compile, he can try that: download the cuda win10 edition and recompile with it and see what will happen.

True true. Was mainly referring to the fact that mining in general went a bit faster when i switched to win10. I assumed that would have been the same for Nvidia based cards.

But that seems not to be true. 

[djm34]

For those interested in the OS issue, I just booted off a Win 8.1 x64 drive, same rig, same settings, hash went from previous 720 kH/s (Win 10 x64) to 837 kH/s. Using ccminer-djm34-neoscrypt-65.

Now try Windows 10 Pro 64Bit. I believe you will go even faster. I did

from the discussion we had on irc, I understood you were running only amd cards 

from my experience but that was right after the launch of win 10 (first install 2 or 3 days after the official win10 launch; second and last, was a month later with the release of new nvidia drivers) the performance on lyra and neoscrypt was rather bad (and gaming was laggy as well) and I preferred to go back to win 8.1. Might try again (in principle you can revert during the first month...  so far I reverted after 4 or 5 hours each time...).
However there is a cuda win10 version, I never tried it, so may-be it requires to recompile with it (?), so if someone has win10 and knows to compile, he can try that: download the cuda win10 edition and recompile with it and see what will happen.

True true. Was mainly referring to the fact that mining in general went a bit faster when i switched to win10. I assumed that would have been the same for Nvidia based cards.

But that seems not to be true. 

actually memory hard algo speed went a bit down, which is in my opinion linked to the memory management in win10 (or the wdm windows driver model)

[djm34]

For those interested in the OS issue, I just booted off a Win 8.1 x64 drive, same rig, same settings, hash went from previous 720 kH/s (Win 10 x64) to 837 kH/s. Using ccminer-djm34-neoscrypt-65.

Now try Windows 10 Pro 64Bit. I believe you will go even faster. I did

from the discussion we had on irc, I understood you were running only amd cards 

from my experience but that was right after the launch of win 10 (first install 2 or 3 days after the official win10 launch; second and last, was a month later with the release of new nvidia drivers) the performance on lyra and neoscrypt was rather bad (and gaming was laggy as well) and I preferred to go back to win 8.1. Might try again (in principle you can revert during the first month...  so far I reverted after 4 or 5 hours each time...).
However there is a cuda win10 version, I never tried it, so may-be it requires to recompile with it (?), so if someone has win10 and knows to compile, he can try that: download the cuda win10 edition and recompile with it and see what will happen.

True true. Was mainly referring to the fact that mining in general went a bit faster when i switched to win10. I assumed that would have been the same for Nvidia based cards.

But that seems not to be true. 

actually memory hard algo speed went a bit down, which is in my opinion linked to the memory management in win10 (or the wdm windows driver model)

NeoScrypt is FAR from memory-hard.

still is, because of the wandering phase... (let say "mildly" memory hard )

[VikingMiner]

@Djm34,

Thanks for all the great work that you did on the miner!  I have noob question (sorry). 

It looks like with this new release that you were able to get increase the performance of the GTX 980 to 800-900 KH/s range.

I saw this post here: http://cryptomining-blog.com/4690-new-ccminer-fork-by-djm34-with-neoscrypt-and-yescrypt-support/ which shows that your CCMiner fork was hitting 1100KH/s for the GTX 980.

(pic):
http://cryptomining-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ccminer-djm-edition-yescrypt.jpg

Can you help me understand why the new miner is performing lower than your release back in May 2015?  Have the algo's increased that much?

Is it still possible to get 1100 KH/s from a GTX 980?


Again, my apologies for the noob question.  I was just about to build a GTX 980 rig, so I am trying to do my homework ahead of time to see what's the best hashrate I can get out of it.

Thanks
~VikingMiner~

[sp_]

Can you help me understand why the new miner is performing lower than your release back in May 2015?  Have the algo's increased that much?

More than one card in the rig. Run ccminer With the -q option and you will see.

[djm34]

@Djm34,

Thanks for all the great work that you did on the miner!  I have noob question (sorry).  

It looks like with this new release that you were able to get increase the performance of the GTX 980 to 800-900 KH/s range.

I saw this post here: http://cryptomining-blog.com/4690-new-ccminer-fork-by-djm34-with-neoscrypt-and-yescrypt-support/ which shows that your CCMiner fork was hitting 1100KH/s for the GTX 980.

(pic):


Can you help me understand why the new miner is performing lower than your release back in May 2015?  Have the algo's increased that much?

Is it still possible to get 1100 KH/s from a GTX 980?


Again, my apologies for the noob question.  I was just about to build a GTX 980 rig, so I am trying to do my homework ahead of time to see what's the best hashrate I can get out of it.

Thanks
~VikingMiner~

no problem  

actually what you are seeing in the jpg isn't the hashrate of one card but the sum of my 2 gtx980 which were both running at 550kh/s each, hence the hashrate you are seeing. It is much slower than in the new software, where each card are getting around 850kh/s (hence would be equivalent here to 1700kh/s for the 2 gtx980). So it is a gain of 50% compared to the one in the jpg.  

cheers,
djm

[tbearhere]

djm Someone made a youtube video of your miner.....    not me though.

New DJM34 CCminer For Neoscrypt / Feathercoin Is Awesome
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA6uvZNt674

[ghostlander]

Let's refresh this thread. I have spent some time on djm34's miner. Stripped it down to NeoScrypt only, modified for Visual Studio 2010 compatibility to produce valid binaries for Windows XP and up, added support for UTF-16, replaced some code with more appropriate, a few more tweaks, etc. Long story short, it runs 17% faster now.



That's a GTX 750 Ti @ 1400MHz shaders. It could do almost 240KH/s previously. Don't know how much big Maxwells like GTX 980 gain with it since I don't own any, so here we come to the point. Donate towards my purchase of a GTX 980 for the future development and I release my modded miner open source. The grand total is 1 BTC, however I may consider to let it go public if the donation volume exceeds 0.5 BTC. To make it fair, those who donate substantial amounts get miner binaries anyway.

1KqBw6tEWgmzoorx2PQAvr9GrbnkVWFn6M

[chrysophylax]

Let's refresh this thread. I have spent some time on djm34's miner. Stripped it down to NeoScrypt only, modified for Visual Studio 2010 compatibility to produce valid binaries for Windows XP and up, added support for UTF-16, replaced some code with more appropriate, a few more tweaks, etc. Long story short, it runs 17% faster now.



That's a GTX 750 Ti @ 1400MHz shaders. It could do almost 240KH/s previously. Don't know how much big Maxwells like GTX 980 gain with it since I don't own any, so here we come to the point. Donate towards my purchase of a GTX 980 for the future development and I release my modded miner open source. The grand total is 1 BTC, however I may consider to let it go public if the donation volume exceeds 0.5 BTC. To make it fair, those who donate substantial amounts get miner binaries anyway.

1KqBw6tEWgmzoorx2PQAvr9GrbnkVWFn6M

watched your progress ... and its paying off ...

ill test with 980ti g1 cards and the extremes also ...

we have a bit to chat about mate ... i need the linux code to compile ...

great work ...

#crysx

[s7icky]

Let's refresh this thread. I have spent some time on djm34's miner. Stripped it down to NeoScrypt only, modified for Visual Studio 2010 compatibility to produce valid binaries for Windows XP and up, added support for UTF-16, replaced some code with more appropriate, a few more tweaks, etc. Long story short, it runs 17% faster now.



That's a GTX 750 Ti @ 1400MHz shaders. It could do almost 240KH/s previously. Don't know how much big Maxwells like GTX 980 gain with it since I don't own any, so here we come to the point. Donate towards my purchase of a GTX 980 for the future development and I release my modded miner open source. The grand total is 1 BTC, however I may consider to let it go public if the donation volume exceeds 0.5 BTC. To make it fair, those who donate substantial amounts get miner binaries anyway.

1KqBw6tEWgmzoorx2PQAvr9GrbnkVWFn6M

watched your progress ... and its paying off ...

ill test with 980ti g1 cards and the extremes also ...

we have a bit to chat about mate ... i need the linux code to compile ...

great work ...

#crysx

LOL that is all.

[chrysophylax]

Let's refresh this thread. I have spent some time on djm34's miner. Stripped it down to NeoScrypt only, modified for Visual Studio 2010 compatibility to produce valid binaries for Windows XP and up, added support for UTF-16, replaced some code with more appropriate, a few more tweaks, etc. Long story short, it runs 17% faster now.



That's a GTX 750 Ti @ 1400MHz shaders. It could do almost 240KH/s previously. Don't know how much big Maxwells like GTX 980 gain with it since I don't own any, so here we come to the point. Donate towards my purchase of a GTX 980 for the future development and I release my modded miner open source. The grand total is 1 BTC, however I may consider to let it go public if the donation volume exceeds 0.5 BTC. To make it fair, those who donate substantial amounts get miner binaries anyway.

1KqBw6tEWgmzoorx2PQAvr9GrbnkVWFn6M

watched your progress ... and its paying off ...

ill test with 980ti g1 cards and the extremes also ...

we have a bit to chat about mate ... i need the linux code to compile ...

great work ...

#crysx

LOL that is all.

which means? ...

#crysx

[tbearhere]

Let's refresh this thread. I have spent some time on djm34's miner. Stripped it down to NeoScrypt only, modified for Visual Studio 2010 compatibility to produce valid binaries for Windows XP and up, added support for UTF-16, replaced some code with more appropriate, a few more tweaks, etc. Long story short, it runs 17% faster now.



That's a GTX 750 Ti @ 1400MHz shaders. It could do almost 240KH/s previously. Don't know how much big Maxwells like GTX 980 gain with it since I don't own any, so here we come to the point. Donate towards my purchase of a GTX 980 for the future development and I release my modded miner open source. The grand total is 1 BTC, however I may consider to let it go public if the donation volume exceeds 0.5 BTC. To make it fair, those who donate substantial amounts get miner binaries anyway.

1KqBw6tEWgmzoorx2PQAvr9GrbnkVWFn6M

Good job
The 980ti is the work horse ..I recommend it over the 980 gtx.

[pallas]

So this is the third pledge for a faster neoscrypt (two by djm34 and now another one, which is even more expensive).
I wonder how people, who already donated two times, feel now :-)
I released a 10% faster neoscrypt for free, I must have been crazy!!!! LoL!

[Eliovp]

So this is the third pledge for a faster neoscrypt (two by djm34 and now another one, which is even more expensive).
I wonder how people, who already donated two times, feel now :-)
I released a 10% faster neoscrypt for free, I must have been crazy!!!! LoL!

The greediness is everywhere.

(Before anyone starts, i don't need a statement of how hard everyone works.... Read that over and over again..)


It's all about the money. 

[tbearhere]

So this is the third pledge for a faster neoscrypt (two by djm34 and now another one, which is even more expensive).
I wonder how people, who already donated two times, feel now :-)
I released a 10% faster neoscrypt for free, I must have been crazy!!!! LoL!

The greediness is everywhere.

(Before anyone starts, i don't need a statement of how hard everyone works.... Read that over and over again..)


It's all about the money. 

Yes there is a person that is legionary that hasn't posted in 3/4 of a year that has in his signature  " IT'S ALL ABOUT THE GOLD " 

[ghostlander]

So this is the third pledge for a faster neoscrypt (two by djm34 and now another one, which is even more expensive).
I wonder how people, who already donated two times, feel now :-)
I released a 10% faster neoscrypt for free, I must have been crazy!!!! LoL!

Considering the amount of work involved (executable size with static linking is just 1Mb now vs. 40Mb before) and the fact that I'm not really interested in development of ccminer, and hasn't ever used it myself until recently, and have no sponsors like Nicehash, here we go. My performance improvement in absolute hash rate is high as djm34's last work (200KH/s -> 240KH/s -> 280KH/s) yet it's alright for him to ask 2.5 BTC and not alright for me to ask even 0.5 BTC?

watched your progress ... and its paying off ...

ill test with 980ti g1 cards and the extremes also ...

we have a bit to chat about mate ... i need the linux code to compile ...

great work ...

#crysx

I can share the source code with trusted people who can keep it private.

[pallas]

So this is the third pledge for a faster neoscrypt (two by djm34 and now another one, which is even more expensive).
I wonder how people, who already donated two times, feel now :-)
I released a 10% faster neoscrypt for free, I must have been crazy!!!! LoL!

Considering the amount of work involved (executable size with static linking is just 1Mb now vs. 40Mb before) and the fact that I'm not really interested in development of ccminer, and hasn't ever used it myself until recently, and have no sponsors like Nicehash, here we go. My performance improvement in absolute hash rate is high as djm34's last work (200KH/s -> 240KH/s -> 280KH/s) yet it's alright for him to ask 2.5 BTC and not alright for me to ask even 0.5 BTC?

I understood you were asking 1 BTC and with no promise to release the source.
Anyway you can do what you want, I was just thinking about the people who paid for a faster neoscrypt miner TWO times and they still do not have the faster one, and someone paying for it only one time now is faster than them :-)
I do not mine neoscrypt so I don't care, but this 3-times-pledge looks a bit ridiculous to me.
Maybe you and djm34 are the same person? :-D

[chrysophylax]

So this is the third pledge for a faster neoscrypt (two by djm34 and now another one, which is even more expensive).
I wonder how people, who already donated two times, feel now :-)
I released a 10% faster neoscrypt for free, I must have been crazy!!!! LoL!

Considering the amount of work involved (executable size with static linking is just 1Mb now vs. 40Mb before) and the fact that I'm not really interested in development of ccminer, and hasn't ever used it myself until recently, and have no sponsors like Nicehash, here we go. My performance improvement in absolute hash rate is high as djm34's last work (200KH/s -> 240KH/s -> 280KH/s) yet it's alright for him to ask 2.5 BTC and not alright for me to ask even 0.5 BTC?

watched your progress ... and its paying off ...

ill test with 980ti g1 cards and the extremes also ...

we have a bit to chat about mate ... i need the linux code to compile ...

great work ...

#crysx

I can share the source code with trusted people who can keep it private.

ok ... done ...

for the moment - thefarm is on decred ...

but i can pull a machine off for testing for a short while ...

besides - it isnt just the miner or code im after ... its the skillset ...

and ccminer / neoscrypt is only a a part of it ...

#crysx

[chrysophylax]

So this is the third pledge for a faster neoscrypt (two by djm34 and now another one, which is even more expensive).
I wonder how people, who already donated two times, feel now :-)
I released a 10% faster neoscrypt for free, I must have been crazy!!!! LoL!

Considering the amount of work involved (executable size with static linking is just 1Mb now vs. 40Mb before) and the fact that I'm not really interested in development of ccminer, and hasn't ever used it myself until recently, and have no sponsors like Nicehash, here we go. My performance improvement in absolute hash rate is high as djm34's last work (200KH/s -> 240KH/s -> 280KH/s) yet it's alright for him to ask 2.5 BTC and not alright for me to ask even 0.5 BTC?

I understood you were asking 1 BTC and with no promise to release the source.
Anyway you can do what you want, I was just thinking about the people who paid for a faster neoscrypt miner TWO times and they still do not have the faster one, and someone paying for it only one time now is faster than them :-)
I do not mine neoscrypt so I don't care, but this 3-times-pledge looks a bit ridiculous to me.
Maybe you and djm34 are the same person? :-D

there are a number of things that go awry here pallas ... especially ripoffs and uncouth devs of coins ...

you - as a respected member of the community - know this ... so i can understand your doubt ...

i too am very careful of those that ask much for little ... but ive watched ghostlander for a while now - in his threads of the coins he blatantly admits to ( which is rare these days - most uncouth devs hide behind another name ) as well as the threads he visits and integrates into ... and i have to admit - and i believe i am correct - that ghostlander seems to be one of the untapped resources this crypto industry has not adopted and has a lot to offer with the work he has put into this algo ...

i hope im not wrong - but what i have sees has proven to be true ... he seems like a genuine dev - with genuine work - and genuine intentions ...

#crysx

[ghostlander]

So this is the third pledge for a faster neoscrypt (two by djm34 and now another one, which is even more expensive).
I wonder how people, who already donated two times, feel now :-)
I released a 10% faster neoscrypt for free, I must have been crazy!!!! LoL!

Considering the amount of work involved (executable size with static linking is just 1Mb now vs. 40Mb before) and the fact that I'm not really interested in development of ccminer, and hasn't ever used it myself until recently, and have no sponsors like Nicehash, here we go. My performance improvement in absolute hash rate is high as djm34's last work (200KH/s -> 240KH/s -> 280KH/s) yet it's alright for him to ask 2.5 BTC and not alright for me to ask even 0.5 BTC?

I understood you were asking 1 BTC and with no promise to release the source.
Anyway you can do what you want, I was just thinking about the people who paid for a faster neoscrypt miner TWO times and they still do not have the faster one, and someone paying for it only one time now is faster than them :-)
I do not mine neoscrypt so I don't care, but this 3-times-pledge looks a bit ridiculous to me.

If the donations meet 1 BTC, I release everything I have: both the source code and a batch of Windows binaries, 32-bit/64-bit, CUDA 6.5/7.5, etc.
If they exceed 0.5 BTC, but don't reach 1 BTC, I may release something, but make no promises.
If they don't meet 0.5 BTC, only those who donate get the miner.

Maybe you and djm34 are the same person? :-D

I don't speak French, that's something I'm sure about

[bathrobehero]

It's very silent in here.

[djm34]

hmm... I haven't been around that thread for a while... (I don't receive notification...).
I'll read it in the morning to know what I missed
Well, I can already answer that big mystery: I am not ghostlander he is the author of neoscrypt algo btw...


ps I think I am a trusted person (says me ), I can give it a try (not really mining at all at the moment, just giving a little try on decred like everybody I guess...)

ps2: actually would probably more interested into looking into the code... just curious...

[ghostlander]

It's very silent in here.

No one seems to care to donate anything. That's alright, I haven't put high expectations on it anyway. I have a few other unrelated projects in the works and they pay well, some even in advance. I may revisit this miner later and push it a bit further if I have some time to spare.

[bathrobehero]

It's very silent in here.

No one seems to care to donate anything. That's alright, I haven't put high expectations on it anyway. I have a few other unrelated projects in the works and they pay well, some even in advance. I may revisit this miner later and push it a bit further if I have some time to spare.

I'm interested, but I think you'd better off trying with a thread on your own.

Any chance you know the hashrate of a GTX 970 with your miner?

[ghostlander]

It's very silent in here.

No one seems to care to donate anything. That's alright, I haven't put high expectations on it anyway. I have a few other unrelated projects in the works and they pay well, some even in advance. I may revisit this miner later and push it a bit further if I have some time to spare.

I'm interested, but I think you'd better off trying with a thread on your own.

Any chance you know the hashrate of a GTX 970 with your miner?

I expect about the same performance improvement give or take a couple of percent.

[calculatorduck]

I'm going to give this a try with my GTX 760. Any suggestions on the right command line to use for maximum performance?