[ANN] 1337 [MANDATORY UPDATE] 41.78% APR| POS ONLY

[nac]

Coinmarketcap shows only 18 mil of 400+mill 1337?

Very misleading

i am however debating to lower the APR % to decrease the daily supply. this will be done slowly and most likely when we reach a current supply of 700M.

700m coinbase is fast approaching, are you still planning to lower interest?

Whats the proposed interest rate? and will it be reduced when 700m is hit?

yes it will be reduced to 669% APR when we hit 750m and will keep 'halving' from there till its final 13.37% APR. this will need some planning with the exchanges etc. c-cex's owner has been very helpful so far.

are there any extra features you guys want to see in the new wallet besides multisend/stake for charity?

After halving at 750m when will it halve again? 1.5bill?

[1714886331]

1714886331

[1714886331]

1714886331

[1714886331]

1714886331

[1714886331]

1714886331

[1714886331]

1714886331

[Velvet78]

Coinmarketcap shows only 18 mil of 400+mill 1337?

Very misleading

i am however debating to lower the APR % to decrease the daily supply. this will be done slowly and most likely when we reach a current supply of 700M.

700m coinbase is fast approaching, are you still planning to lower interest?

Whats the proposed interest rate? and will it be reduced when 700m is hit?

yes it will be reduced to 669% APR when we hit 750m and will keep 'halving' from there till its final 13.37% APR. this will need some planning with the exchanges etc. c-cex's owner has been very helpful so far.

are there any extra features you guys want to see in the new wallet besides multisend/stake for charity?

After halving at 750m when will it halve again? 1.5bill?

probably a bit sooner then that. the thing is that its hard to say an exact number because all 1337 blocks have different sizes. best we can do imho is make a good estimate. also, i hope that at least the stake2play shop will be fully fuctional before the 2nd halving so people will get to spent their 1337 and so taking away some of the sell pressure.

[Velvet78]

Hey there!
Is juststake.online working? I have not taking stake in about a week with 160k coins. Support page isn't working too.

Yeah bro. im wait access to my 100k coins 2 more weeks , I guess this is just the beginning of the big game. I asked the developer what would he returned my coins , to which he replied , "I will be back" and now only wait ........))))

consider yourselves insured by me. send me a pm if there are no changes in the next few days. although this was just a beta testing phase i have to admit that their support needs some work too. rest assured, you wont lose your coins.

anyone used http://altcoinsteps.com/staySafe ? it costs only 250 STEPS one time payment. pretty cheap and the devs seem active

yes, our service is still online

*********@StaySafeServer1:~# 1337d getinfo
{
    "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g",
    "protocolversion" : 60013,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : *******
    "newmint" : *********,
    "stake" : ********,
    "blocks" : 217646,
    "timeoffset" : -1,
    "connections" : 63,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "*********",
    "difficulty" : {
        "proof-of-work" : 0.36940065,
        "proof-of-stake" : 12.38978625
    },
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1448153205,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00010000,
    "mininput" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}

great, i created an account yesterday and sent some 1337 to see how it stakes on there.

[defunctec]

Hey @Velvet78, can you tell us more about stake2play?

Are you making it?

[Velvet78]

Hey @Velvet78, can you tell us more about stake2play?

Are you making it?

I sure can. I'm currently waiting for a plugin to use on a webshop platform so i can accept 1337 payments. i already bought some nice games etc so i'll post a service thread here on BCT to get things started. im also looking for other kinds of good or services to resell so if you have some suggestions feel free to post them.

HTH

[bhokor]

Hi Velvet, could you please provide me the Minecraft server add, i would like to get in, in other order i have sent you an PM about the design question.

Stake2Play is a really great idea, is nice to see how 1337 dont stop of growth, it is the way all the altcoins should do

[Velvet78]

Hi Velvet, could you please provide me the Minecraft server add, i would like to get in, in other order i have sent you an PM about the design question.

Stake2Play is a really great idea, is nice to see how 1337 dont stop of growth, it is the way all the altcoins should do

Nice, i didnt know you also played minecraft, maybe i'll join later. the server to connect to is cityfor.me  I sent the link of the designs to a friend and im waiting for the answer. both look very nice imho! you also play games on STEAM?

[micher143]

Hey there!
Is juststake.online working? I have not taking stake in about a week with 160k coins. Support page isn't working too.

Yeah bro. im wait access to my 100k coins 2 more weeks , I guess this is just the beginning of the big game. I asked the developer what would he returned my coins , to which he replied , "I will be back" and now only wait ........))))

consider yourselves insured by me. send me a pm if there are no changes in the next few days. although this was just a beta testing phase i have to admit that their support needs some work too. rest assured, you wont lose your coins.

anyone used http://altcoinsteps.com/staySafe ? it costs only 250 STEPS one time payment. pretty cheap and the devs seem active

yes, our service is still online

*********@StaySafeServer1:~# 1337d getinfo
{
    "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g",
    "protocolversion" : 60013,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : *******
    "newmint" : *********,
    "stake" : ********,
    "blocks" : 217646,
    "timeoffset" : -1,
    "connections" : 63,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "*********",
    "difficulty" : {
        "proof-of-work" : 0.36940065,
        "proof-of-stake" : 12.38978625
    },
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1448153205,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00010000,
    "mininput" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}

great, i created an account yesterday and sent some 1337 to see how it stakes on there.

how to get the 400 k bounty?

[opmac]

Hi Dev

It looks like you keep regular updates on the coin and such. Which is great.

Nice to keep investors informed and up to date!

Thanks

[clickerz]

1337 Crypto coins has now a local home/ thread in tagalog. It is now translated to tagalog to introduced this new crypto -currency to Filipinos. Mabuhay!

Heres the Link for the local thread ==> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1410228.0

[Velvet78]

thanks to bhokor we have our own 1337 paperwallet generator. http://stake2play.com/paperwallet/

[defunctec]

thanks to bhokor we have our own 1337 paperwallet generator. http://stake2play.com/paperwallet/

Very cool!

But not as cool as this will be!

[nac]

Should really push for more exchanges get more eyes on 1337

[bhokor]

thanks to bhokor we have our own 1337 paperwallet generator. http://stake2play.com/paperwallet/

Very cool!

But not as cool as this will be!

While velvet78 fix the link you can get the paper wallet from
https://mega.nz/#!bEt2jSpK!jiY4pqx8iHsMcFH1J6E6g8rKvYsUuVsnmGPs0EAArKY, i hope community likes the design

[Velvet78]

ok guys a little update, the fork to bring down the APR to 669% is delayed till wednesday. this will give us some more time to test a few things and i can put some hardcoded nodes who are on the right chain in the wallet. sorry for the delay but for now you can still enjoy staking at 1337%/year.

[defunctec]

ok guys a little update, the fork to bring down the APR to 669% is delayed till wednesday. this will give us some more time to test a few things and i can put some hardcoded nodes who are on the right chain in the wallet. sorry for the delay but for now you can still enjoy staking at 1337%/year.

Good stuff!

Are you going to make a plan for APR decreases?

Cheers Velvet78!

[mmm01]

active dev, I'll buy and hold some of this.

[shintosai]

active dev, I'll buy and hold some of this.

same here mate gonna pay attention and buy my coin now and stake it with my wallet dev still active and willing to answer us will be going to rise up soon mate. we just need to wait.

[nac]

thanks to bhokor we have our own 1337 paperwallet generator. http://stake2play.com/paperwallet/

Very cool!

But not as cool as this will be!

Very nice paper wallet! What else will be coming from http://stake2play.com? Thanks

[TillKoeln]

Been working with Velvet most of the day on "the evil key-virus thingamajig".
Tried as I might, I couldn't get rid of the positive, and then I tried something completely insane.(after having built three different wallets)
I renamed the coin into 331337-qt and replaced any instances of 1337 in the source code with 331337.(which included the name of the registry keys written by the wallet) and recompiled the source into a qt wallet.
opened the wallet, so it wrote it's registry key and then ran malwarebytes
Guess what?........no more positive in malwarebyte.
Same wallet, same code, different name........

So, I guess that means they were flagging a simple string (1337) key label without regard to the contents of the key, which were harmless and the same as any other windows wallet registry key.
Thus it's TRUELY a false positive.

Just as a sidenote, the wallet I compiled from the github source code is 700kb+/- smaller than the wallet offered megadownloads.nz.

I don't know and can't say exactly what that 700kb is.
it might be simple differences between the two build environments,(libraries and compiler optimzation, etc,etc) but 700kb seems like an awful lot of difference.
So I can't say either pro or con with any degree of confidence whether that 700kb was a woolie-booger or not......by I do know my wallets clean.
Velvet has a copy of the new wallet I compiled, He'll probably run it through it's paces for a bit to test all the functionality, and then release it.
It still throws the false positive because it's still named 1337-qt and it still writes the 1337 registry key.....but now at least he and I know it's a false positive without any doubt.

P.S. if anyone wants to follow in my footsteps to confirm my findings......by all means, have at it, and report back.

Hey Bob

that is correct the Problem /false Positiv was just triggered by the Name 1337 inside the reg. key
this was allright cleared in the oginal ann thread.   //if i remind correct :-)

that 700kb lost size on the wallet sounds interesting maybe you are right and it has something to do with the used enviroment.
25 BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX=-mgw48-mt-s-1_55
26 BOOST_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/boost_1_55_0
27 BOOST_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/boost_1_55_0/stage/lib
28 BDB_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/db-4.8.30.NC/build_unix
29 BDB_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/db-4.8.30.NC/build_unix
30 OPENSSL_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/openssl-1.0.1h/include
31 OPENSSL_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/openssl-1.0.1h
32 MINIUPNPC_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/
33 MINIUPNPC_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/miniupnpc
34 QRENCODE_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/deps/qrencode-3.4.3
35 QRENCODE_LIB_PATH=C:/deps/qrencode-3.4.3/.libs

this are the selected Versions when i compile 1337-qt   Build on Windows.  Qt 5.2.0 //

so far. good to hear that everything works fine :-)

CBlock::SetBestChainInner          Good      blackcoin arch      
ComputeMinWork                     Good      arch                
SendMessages                       Good      NEBUCHADNEZZAR      
CTransaction::FetchInputs          Good      shrmcoin            
CTransaction::CheckTransaction     Good      blackcoin arch      
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good      blackcoin arch      
GetNextTargetRequired              Most similar shrmcoin, diff=4, codehash=639fa24760ed58774619;   Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::ConnectInputs        Good      arch                
GetTransaction                     Good      shrmcoin            
ComputeMinStake                    Good      arch                
CBlock::AcceptBlock                Good      shrmcoin            
ProcessMessage                     Most similar shrmcoin, diff=12, codehash=cbd818eb6d10fc961e90;   Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock                 Good      shrmcoin            
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor  Good      blackcoin arch      
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs     Good      blackcoin arch      
ProcessBlock                       Good      shrmcoin            
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity     Good      shrmcoin            
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority       Good      dash blackcoin arch  
CBlock::SignBlock                  Good      shrmcoin            
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool      Good      shrmcoin            
CheckProofOfWork                   Good      arch                
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust         Good      blackcoin arch      
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature        Good      arch                
CTransaction::GetValueIn           Good      blackcoin arch      
ProcessMessages                    Good      NEBUCHADNEZZAR      
CBlock::ConnectBlock               Good      shrmcoin            
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically.  As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock                Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e'  means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.

Thank you for the Review ^^