[ANN] 1337 [MANDATORY UPDATE] 41.78% APR| POS ONLY

[vella85]

You can still buy sell here too

https://coinexchange.io
https://yobit.net
https://novaexchange.com
www.cryptopia.co.nz

Yeah I mainly use Cryptopia because I can trade in LTC and Doge for 1337 coins and because most of the 1337 coins I buy come from the funds I earn from LTC and Dogecoin faucets, it makes it easier for me to use this exchange.

[1714685816]

1714685816

[1714685816]

1714685816

[1714685816]

1714685816

[1714685816]

1714685816

[Sincere_]

Anything plans for 1337 coin in 2017 I have a good amount been staking it will be nice to see what's in store

[freebitcoins4u]

Anything plans for 1337 coin in 2017 I have a good amount been staking it will be nice to see what's in store

hopefully we could swap them to the new coin which will have a greater value.
i also look for bitcoin price to fall because it will push all other altcoins price up.

[VooDooBarbie]

Feeling pretty excited about the swap... Maybe we'll see 1337 supply cut by half or more? Hopefully that would help raise the price/value once it gets released.

[Velvet78]

Happy New Year and all the best to all of you.

now to get back to work... i'll look into this issue asap. thanks to everyone for being so helpful and supportive while i was away.

I've seen this problem with lots of coins lately..

Banzai-san, i don't like minimalistic "Verify" in 1337, how about you ?
https://github.com/Velvet78/1337/blob/master/src/key.cpp#L392
compared to:
https://github.com/hyperstake/HyperStake/blob/master/src/key.cpp#L377
history:
https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/issues/100

Nice find, and thanks for the discussion link

That said.. I'm not the developer of this coin.. I only assisted Velvet with some wallet work.. So I guess it's waiting for him to address this issue..

[CryptoHobo]

Happy New Year and all the best to all of you.

now to get back to work... i'll look into this issue asap. thanks to everyone for being so helpful and supportive while i was away.

I've seen this problem with lots of coins lately..

Banzai-san, i don't like minimalistic "Verify" in 1337, how about you ?
https://github.com/Velvet78/1337/blob/master/src/key.cpp#L392
compared to:
https://github.com/hyperstake/HyperStake/blob/master/src/key.cpp#L377
history:
https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/issues/100

Nice find, and thanks for the discussion link

That said.. I'm not the developer of this coin.. I only assisted Velvet with some wallet work.. So I guess it's waiting for him to address this issue..

Welcome back and happy new year

[vella85]

Happy New Year and all the best to all of you.

now to get back to work... i'll look into this issue asap. thanks to everyone for being so helpful and supportive while i was away.

I've seen this problem with lots of coins lately..

Banzai-san, i don't like minimalistic "Verify" in 1337, how about you ?
https://github.com/Velvet78/1337/blob/master/src/key.cpp#L392
compared to:
https://github.com/hyperstake/HyperStake/blob/master/src/key.cpp#L377
history:
https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/issues/100

Nice find, and thanks for the discussion link

That said.. I'm not the developer of this coin.. I only assisted Velvet with some wallet work.. So I guess it's waiting for him to address this issue..

Welcome back dev and a Happy New Year to you and everyone in 1337 coin. Hopefully this year will be a great year for this coin and once we have the swap, hopefully it ignites this coin once again and we start to see it worth a lot more then what it is now. Any plans on when this swap will happen dev? and maybe once it's done we can start some promotional campaigns to help spread the word?

[Sincere_]

Anything plans for 1337 coin in 2017 I have a good amount been staking it will be nice to see what's in store

hopefully we could swap them to the new coin which will have a greater value.
i also look for bitcoin price to fall because it will push all other altcoins price up.

What is 1337 swapping to? And yes once Btc settles alts will boom just don't know when will Btc slow down

[Velvet78]

Happy New Year and all the best to all of you.

now to get back to work... i'll look into this issue asap. thanks to everyone for being so helpful and supportive while i was away.

I've seen this problem with lots of coins lately..

Banzai-san, i don't like minimalistic "Verify" in 1337, how about you ?
https://github.com/Velvet78/1337/blob/master/src/key.cpp#L392
compared to:
https://github.com/hyperstake/HyperStake/blob/master/src/key.cpp#L377
history:
https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/issues/100

Nice find, and thanks for the discussion link

That said.. I'm not the developer of this coin.. I only assisted Velvet with some wallet work.. So I guess it's waiting for him to address this issue..

Welcome back dev and a Happy New Year to you and everyone in 1337 coin. Hopefully this year will be a great year for this coin and once we have the swap, hopefully it ignites this coin once again and we start to see it worth a lot more then what it is now. Any plans on when this swap will happen dev? and maybe once it's done we can start some promotional campaigns to help spread the word?

thank you!

while i was away i educated myself a bit more and im able to compile my own windows wallet and even cloned some test coins to try the pre-mine on. i was planning to release w00t this weekend.

however, the issue that needs fixing has my highest attention now so i need to consult some ppl asap. its just a few lines of codes to add but at this point im being careful not to make things worse. shouldnt take too long (hopefully tomorrow)...

[PumpMyCoin]

Dear 1337 investors - Developers,

We would love to announce that your coin is currently taking the 10th place in PumpMyCoin Community public votes.
Wish you all best and good luck.







sincerely
PumpMyCoin Team
We Pump But Never Dump




www.pumpmycoin.com

[idolacchacked]

any news on c-cex fix?

[Velvet78]

any news on c-cex fix?

im testing the fix that desynct suggested on my test environments now. i really hope that will fix the issue but makes me wonder why the problems started around july last year and not sooner.

[Velvet78]

any news on c-cex fix?

im testing the fix that desynct suggested on my test environments now. i really hope that will fix the issue but makes me wonder why the problems started around july last year and not sooner.

that shit is rare, prolly only intentional chain hack (read ppc blog),
selectively affects Linux 64 clients - that's why the supposition came to mind.
the longer the chain - the more risk of encounter, may never happen at all.
i tried to find an irregular length descriptor around blocks at which anemol got stuck to no luck,
so maybe absolutely not related, though that fix is necessary anyways

i implemented the fix from https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/commit/9b40cd5b12b518a3a40d39016f30955a20ea0bf5 and it compiled fine and its synching BUT i was digging in the ppc repo and found 2 additional fixes:

https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/pull/116/commits/f301a3add0aa39c3651dcc1fbeaf49af368c38d7
https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/pull/117

seems to me those need to be implemented too to prevent forks? i checked hyp's repo an noticed presstab didnt add those

[Velvet78]

any news on c-cex fix?

im testing the fix that desynct suggested on my test environments now. i really hope that will fix the issue but makes me wonder why the problems started around july last year and not sooner.

that shit is rare, prolly only intentional chain hack (read ppc blog),
selectively affects Linux 64 clients - that's why the supposition came to mind.
the longer the chain - the more risk of encounter, may never happen at all.
i tried to find an irregular length descriptor around blocks at which anemol got stuck to no luck,
so maybe absolutely not related, though that fix is necessary anyways

i implemented the fix from https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/commit/9b40cd5b12b518a3a40d39016f30955a20ea0bf5 and it compiled fine and its synching BUT i was digging in the ppc repo and found 2 additional fixes:

https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/pull/116/commits/f301a3add0aa39c3651dcc1fbeaf49af368c38d7
https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/pull/117

seems to me those need to be implemented too to prevent forks? i checked hyp's repo an noticed presstab didnt add those

yup, the funny thing about the issue is that several coins have
different level of implementing fixes for it, and many have none,
so shit hits the fan at random, then community starts to torture dev with a lot of questions
since i'm not a c++ coder, would be nice if presstab look at 116/117 more closely,
actually there are little hidden bugs in any coin code, getting fixed only when triggered

P.S.
would be nice if anemol tested full resync with fixed version

i sent a pm to presstab about it, waiting for his reply.

@anemol: i havent committed the changes to the repo yet but ive upload the key.cpp file for you here you can try it out. https://www.dropbox.com/s/46o4h2iwlri2fsj/key.cpp?dl=0 (just replace it with the old one in 1337/src and compile)

[anemol]

I will test soon.  (but it will the last try for me)

[anemol]

Still blocking

Code:

{
    "version" : "v1.6.0.2-g",
    "protocolversion" : 60016,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 337902,
    "timeoffset" : -1,
    "connections" : 11,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "************",
    "difficulty" : {
        "proof-of-work" : 0.36940065,
        "proof-of-stake" : 74.28758668
    },
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1483543286,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00010000,
    "mininput" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}

[Velvet78]

Still blocking

Code:

{
    "version" : "v1.6.0.2-g",
    "protocolversion" : 60016,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 337902,
    "timeoffset" : -1,
    "connections" : 11,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "************",
    "difficulty" : {
        "proof-of-work" : 0.36940065,
        "proof-of-stake" : 74.28758668
    },
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1483543286,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00010000,
    "mininput" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}

thanks for trying. ive sent an email to sigmike, the person who fixed the ppc issue. maybe he can give me some advice to get this damn issue fixed once and for all. fingers crossed

[Velvet78]

ok im almost done with adding all 3 fixes but got stuck with the last part in src/test/key_test.cpp

@desynct please take a look at https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/blob/9ab59647e58aa849a2896c9213cfb5ce8a6a7bfb/src/test/key_tests.cpp#L147

where can i find the values for the different ParseHex lines?

[Velvet78]

ok im almost done with adding all 3 fixes but got stuck with the last part in src/test/key_test.cpp

@desynct please take a look at https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/blob/9ab59647e58aa849a2896c9213cfb5ce8a6a7bfb/src/test/key_tests.cpp#L147

where can i find the values for the different ParseHex lines?

wow, i need to dig to find out, more a question for sigmike time-wise,
(to me looks just like different kinds of test sigs with irregular length descriptors,
tail is the same, prolly any tail from the blockchain, and the last is an oversized sig)
btw, do you see anything irregular in block 337901..337903 tx-es ?

my friend, ive been behind my screens for 12+ hours so unless theres a pink elephant hidden in the tx-es i wouldnt be able to spot it haha. or was it a trick question?

maybe sigmike will respond if i ask him a more specific question. he doesnt seem to be very active on here but i found his email on github. maybe i can look for him on peercointalk too. not giving up.

one thing is for sure though, i wont be cloning 1337 for w00t. im thinking of straight cloning the ppc code and modify it with the right settings etc.

also, what you said earlier "actually there are little hidden bugs in any coin code, getting fixed only when triggered" is bound to give me nightmares so thnx for that

[Velvet78]

my friend, ive been behind my screens for 12+ hours so unless theres a pink elephant hidden in the tx-es i wouldnt be able to spot it haha. or was it a trick question?

maybe sigmike will respond if i ask him a more specific question. he doesnt seem to be very active on here but i found his email on github. maybe i can look for him on peercointalk too. not giving up.

one thing is for sure though, i wont be cloning 1337 for w00t. im thinking of straight cloning the ppc code and modify it with the right settings etc.

also, what you said earlier "actually there are little hidden bugs in any coin code, getting fixed only when triggered" is bound to give me nightmares so thnx for that

not a trick, i scanned them earlier but for only a 5-byte length,
now as i see 4 more shit variations i'd like very much to find a pink elephant as well,
becoz of pxi network recomposing and several other things at hand.
so we need 2 pink elephants total, i prefer female one...

i could add some checkpoints right?( that plus the 3 sig fixes from sigmike) like ppc is using here https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/blob/master/src/checkpoints.cpp#L26

and presstab is using here https://github.com/hyperstake/HyperStake/blob/master/src/checkpoints.cpp#L25

1337 doesnt have any https://github.com/Velvet78/1337/blob/master/src/checkpoints.cpp#L28

and..

Code:

getcheckpoint
{
"synccheckpoint" : "000004611c87517dfd29fe7f34bd6da2e1ad3d305ac12afe80a3229069390f68",
"height" : 0,
"timestamp" : "2014-07-25 14:15:16 UTC",
"policy" : "strict"
}

 

edit: seems 1337 is missing the command to add manual checkpoints

"// The configuration parameter 'checkpointdepth' specifies how many blocks
// should the checkpoints lag behind the latest block in auto checkpoint mode.
// A depth of 0 is the strongest auto checkpoint policy and offers the greatest
// protection against 51% attack. A negative depth means that the checkpoints
// should not be automatically generated by the checkpoint master, but instead
// be manually entered by operator via the 'sendcheckpoint' command. The manual
// mode is also the default mode (default value -1 for checkpointdepth).

but i could still add it in the source on the next release