Well i think the whole premise of the gun debate wether who is more stupid is wrong i think a better question to answer is "Who is more right". I actually think that is more constructive question to ask as people can come forth with an argument. . I think the most imortand reason why people should beable to bear arms or own a gun is to beable to defend themselfs or be able to fight back from a government if it becomes too tyranical. What i understand it is the reason the second amendment was put there in the first place .
I think the right of the american people to practice the 2nd amendment has has never had more value meaning or importance in the whole history of the American time period.
All of this is true. But the OP doesn't want a better question or a constructive argument. It's just a cowardly way to replace discussion of important matters with mere ridicule. Very Jon Stewart, as he stated.
The most ridiculous idea is that free, rugged individual Americans would care about our UK/Euroweenie cousins' worthless bien pensant opinions regarding personal liberty and the force multiplying hardware that originally won and ultimately defend it.
When they see fit to stand on their own as sovereign people instead of subjects to hereditary Monarchs, we can have a worthwhile conversation.
Meanwhile, it is an exercise in futility to attempt explaining concepts so far beyond their experience and comprehension.
All they have ever known is generations lived as serfs or vassals controlled by their owner, the Queen, and master, the State. You'd have better luck teaching quantum cosmology to a jellyfish!
Here is their ruler, resplendent in Her Royal Crown and Scepter:
"Thou Shalt Not Bear Arms, you spineless bloody peasant worm. Off with your head!"
Here is our ruler, resplendent in its Bill of Rights:
"the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"
In conclusion,
Poll
