OneTimeAccount
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:19:23 AM |
|
I would have invested yesterday but I saw some anomalies. Taking a look at ther son ticker, I discovered that the invested BTC amount increases permanently without the number of participants or exchanges changing at all. I have observed this pattern multiple times and to me it looked like a flawed BTC counter just counting up randomly forgetting to adjust the other values. Just my feeling, so I stayed away. I hope I was just wrong. https://i.imgur.com/UFsqD0J.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/Dmjlezt.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/WDex04p.png
|
|
|
|
FNetV1
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:20:04 AM |
|
does anybody already know something about the first day bonus? some calculations made?
For that we need to know how much BTC came in between 22 Feb 2016 05:52 UTC and 23 Feb 2016 05:51 UTC. Let's assume 200BTC, then your first day bonus would be YOUR CONTRIBUTION * 200000 / 200 So if 200BTC total came in, and you contributed 1BTC, you would get 1000 LISK. Correction, but the first day bonus is 1,000,000 Lisks for which Dev added an extra 200,000 to it making the total 1,200,000 and as far as I am concerned there were 790 BTC's invested on the first day, so 1,200,000 / 790 = 1518.987341772152 per BTC invested. the 790 BTC figure might not be entirely correct, I remember seeing 790 BTC when the 1st day was over, and then someone else mentioning 801 BTC a few days later making 801 BTC the worst case scenario which would be 1,200,000 Lisks / 801 BTC = 1,498.12734082397 Lisks per 1 BTC ɪ̶̷̲̅ɴ̶̷̲̅ᴠ̶̷̲̅ᴇ̶̷̲̅s̶̷̲̅ᴛ̶̷̲̅ᴇ̶̷̲̅ᴅ̶̷̲̅ donated
|
~~Ad Space Available! PM: FNetV1 with your offers~~
|
|
|
marcus1986
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:24:00 AM |
|
WTS 1000 LISK for 2,4 BTC - you can buy up to 18850 LISK. Using escrow!
Pm if you are interested!
|
|
|
|
toilet
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:24:45 AM |
|
WTS ~2800 LISK, .001 / LISK. Will definitely accept counter offers
PM me if you'd like more info. Escrow will be used, I will pay for the fees associated with such a trade
|
host of shitcoin talk
|
|
|
randomuserlisk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:26:59 AM |
|
Is there a single person from the now massive Lisk community of bagholders that can respond to the below statements? From the post: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/4af4ni/ethereums_advantages_for_bitcoin_highlight_how/What About Lisk? It's basically trying to be Ethereum, but using javascript (rather than Ethereum's clients which make a hell of a lot more sense, such as Go, C++, Python, Rust, Java, Ruby, .net). A Javascript Ethereum is a terrible idea, and even if it wasn't, why devote a whole new blockchain to it. Seems pointless, leading to some to suggest this may be an elaborate scam. I doubt it's a scam, but it does seem poorly thought out. As noted by /u/Itsaconspiracy and /u/Nevermindthequestion : The javascript is sandboxed but unrestricted. They have half a dozen rules you're supposed to follow in contracts, to avoid breaking consensus. Nothing's stopping you from putting a call to math.random() in your contract and then nobody gets the same results. Every contract runs in its own sidechain so at least you're not breaking global consensus, but contracts can call each other so it's not totally isolates easier for bugs to sneak in. For example, if someone passes the string "1" into a parameter where you're expectd either. Javascript numbers are all floating-point, so you can get rounding errors in your contracts. (It's possible that they provide a bignum library, but I don't think so, their rules for contract writers don't say "please use our bignum library.") Javascript has weak dynamic typing, so it'ing a number, and you haven't written explicit code to convert it to a number, then you can end up with the wrong answer. ("1" + 2) / 3 = 4 in Javascript. (Try it yourself online). Not to mention that the LISK contracts will be stored in plaintext, which means they'll be vastly more expensive to publish. OK, so Bitcoin focused smart contracts and LISK are bad ideas, but sometimes bad ideas win, after all, bla bla "network effect"
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:27:49 AM |
|
does anybody already know something about the first day bonus? some calculations made?
For that we need to know how much BTC came in between 22 Feb 2016 05:52 UTC and 23 Feb 2016 05:51 UTC. Let's assume 200BTC, then your first day bonus would be YOUR CONTRIBUTION * 200000 / 200 So if 200BTC total came in, and you contributed 1BTC, you would get 1000 LISK. Correction, but the first day bonus is 1,000,000 Lisks for which Dev added an extra 200,000 to it making the total 1,200,000 and as far as I am concerned there were 790 BTC's invested on the first day, so 1,200,000 / 790 = 1518.987341772152 per BTC invested. the 790 BTC figure might not be entirely correct, I remember seeing 790 BTC when the 1st day was over, and then someone else mentioning 801 BTC a few days later making 801 BTC the worst case scenario which would be 1,200,000 Lisks / 801 BTC = 1,498.12734082397 Lisks per 1 BTC ɪ̶̷̲̅ɴ̶̷̲̅ᴠ̶̷̲̅ᴇ̶̷̲̅s̶̷̲̅ᴛ̶̷̲̅ᴇ̶̷̲̅ᴅ̶̷̲̅ donated The first day bonus is 200,000 LISK. The 200,000 LISK is a share of the total of 1,200,000 LISK set aside for the "Bounty Campaign". First day bonus - 200,000 LISK Newsletter Subscribers — 200,000 LISK Facebook Likes — 100,000 LISK Twitter Followers — 200,000 LISK Signature Campaign — 200,000 LISK Translations — 300,000 LISK
|
|
|
|
mladen00
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2124
Merit: 1013
K-ing®
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:28:40 AM |
|
**please see why i have negative trust (some problems with member - KWH we honored each other ) It's not just KWH there... :smirk: oh, smaragda you give negative trust to all of us simcoin investors (well we both are lose btc on that simcoin crap) But i see last year (on NEM topic, etc) - half of year you're ok, and you dont ''shoot'' to all on forum
|
IOTA
|
|
|
Wolf Rainer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1022
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:30:23 AM |
|
Coming soon, Local List Coins http://LocalLiskCoins.comEscrow Trading of Lisk for BTC to accommodate so much demand for pre-exchange release of LISK. None is going to deposit a single penny in that shit. You fucking scammer, fat bastard.
|
|
|
|
ottobene
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:31:41 AM |
|
i login at login.lisk.io with my passfrase, but dont see any LISK on account, 0 Lisk. when they become available?
|
|
|
|
bitcoinnoisseur
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:32:08 AM |
|
When i log in to my lisk dashboard it stand 0 LISKs, transaction was succesful, got generetad keys and all. Anyone else with the same problem?
I have the same problem. I got in the ICO in the last 10 minutes. I'm also confused about which account to log into to see my balance. To enter the ICO you needed to enter an email and a password at ico.lisk.io. Then I was given an Account # and a public key. When I generated the keys I was given a new Address, a Passphrase and a new Public Key for login.lisk.io. Why are there 2 addresses and 2 passphrases/passwords? Which passphrase/password do I use to check my Lisk balance at login.lisk.io? Why would both show 0 Lisk?
|
|
|
|
rezilient
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:32:14 AM |
|
-snip-
Fuck you and your fud freshly created dummy account.
|
You don't pay enough.
|
|
|
|
randomuserlisk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:35:17 AM |
|
-snip-
Fuck you and your fud freshly created dummy account. I don't have a BTT account. I just created it here to get a response on what the ethereum subreddit post claims about lisk. So it would be appreciated if someone else could manage a more apt response other than the leashed barking dog post above.
|
|
|
|
mistercashking
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1044
Merit: 1050
@MRCASHKING
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:35:48 AM |
|
i login at login.lisk.io with my passfrase, but dont see any LISK on account, 0 Lisk. when they become available?
That's testnet. Main net hasn't launched. They say launch is 2-3 weeks.
|
|
|
|
Ghoom
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:36:46 AM |
|
And now, cross fingers...
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:38:13 AM |
|
Wow. What a "nice" crowd here.
They forgot to place a bouncer at the entrance
|
|
|
|
ottobene
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:39:53 AM |
|
i login at login.lisk.io with my passfrase, but dont see any LISK on account, 0 Lisk. when they become available?
That's testnet. Main net hasn't launched. They say launch is 2-3 weeks. Many thanks! Because i have headache about this
|
|
|
|
yubit
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:41:13 AM |
|
LskHQ, please,
DON'T ACCEPT XCR COINS FROM FUCKING BTER !!!
IT STOLE OUR MONEY!!!
|
████▄▄████████████▄▄████ ██▄██████████████████▄██ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ██▀██████████████████▀██ ████▀▀████████████▀▀████ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ |
|
|
|
brightlight
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:42:21 AM |
|
WTS 1 Lisk @ 1BTC. Send PM for details. I am selling very cheap as it will be traded for 100BTC per unit.
|
|
|
|
lordoliver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1020
expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:42:33 AM |
|
Javascript has weak dynamic typing, so it'ing a number, and you haven't written explicit code to convert it to a number, then you can end up with the wrong answer. ("1" + 2) / 3 = 4 in Javascript. (Try it yourself online).
If you want to discuss about javascript, you are right here :-) But be sure, you read more about it... The typing sense is a widely discussed thing and everything has its pros and cons. Javascript has other advantages against java. It is not overloaded, you can write your code faster, test it faster and you have callbacks. To explain that all you have to go very deep into programming. Its not done with a simple testing like that. And if you know, how to program, you can fix this by making sure your variable is, what it is supposed to be. "1" + 2 is a string concatenation, so you have to make sure, that it is no string... and you can do that also in javascript. The only difference is, that java is yelling at you already before. Thats useful for noobs. And if you want to make it sure, you can use Typescript for programming as well, wich can be transpiled easily to javascript. If you're the one that likes to be yelled at Many bigger projects do this already to have the best out of both worlds...
|
|
|
|
|