Does anyone know if the differences between Crypti and Ethereum as described below are still accurate (except now obviously I'm referring to LISK vs. Ethereum)? Specifically, this says (at least at the time) that Ethereum did not have "an in-built frontend or hosting solution". Whereas Crypti (and I assume LISK) does. Is this correct?
https://bitscan.com/articles/crypti-dapps-without-the-dollarsQ: On the surface of it, Crypti looks a lot like Ethereum - what are the differences?Crypti is a decentralised application platform, while Ethereum is a smart contract platform. Now, you may find yourself asking, what does this actually mean?
At Ethereum, there is absolutely no doubt, developers get access to a great decentralised backend system. However, I feel this is at the cost of not having an in-built frontend or hosting solution right from the beginning. This forces decentralised application developers to rely on existing third-party centralised solutions, which in our view is far from optimal.
With Crypti, the situation is completely different. Developers have access to a full-stack decentralised ecosystem, providing concrete solutions for the frontend, backend and storage layers of a truly decentralized application. Plus, as an added bonus, each dapp is distributed through our very own Dapp Store, where users can install and launch dapps from an easy-to-use interface.
Developing dapps for Crypti is very easy. Crypti dapps are written in JavaScript and are powered by the increasingly popular Node.js runtime - both of which could arguably be described as the most popular tools used to build applications for the web today. Coupled with our simple-to-understand software development kit (SDK), I feel Crypti is the best choice of platform for developing decentralised applications on the blockchain.