|
cannabanana
|
 |
May 26, 2016, 06:45:11 PM |
|
Lisk is moving to the moon and it looking price will go over $10 very soon because it has great potential and better than ETH for its wonderful secure system.
$10? Give me a break. ok, $9.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BigKush
|
|
May 26, 2016, 06:46:33 PM |
|
Lisk is moving to the moon and it looking price will go over $10 very soon because it has great potential and better than ETH for its wonderful secure system.
$10? Give me a break. if you don't trust - open up 8th month's old ethereum thread... |
|
|
|
|
|
someonesomeone
|
|
May 26, 2016, 06:46:57 PM |
|
Lisk is moving to the moon and it looking price will go over $10 very soon because it has great potential and better than ETH for its wonderful secure system.
$10? Give me a break. ok, $9.95 Works for me  |
|
|
|
|
|
somacoin
|
|
May 26, 2016, 06:48:33 PM |
|
hey, my client can't send decimal transactions but it's definitely possible as we can see here: https://explorer.lisk.io/tx/8020948997207996457 (0.101 transaction). So: how is this done? My client can't send 0.5 or similar, says invalid amount of LSK. I didn't check, but the most likely explanation that the decimal bug is an UI issue. This would mean that you can send less then 1 lisk using API call, or some other tool than official UI that uses api calls. 0.00000001 you need to add a zero 00.00000001 00.50 00.90 00.25 Very good catch. That works indeed. sending 0.9 doesn't work but written as 00.90 it does work. They should really fix that! Thanks again Bloodxtz. |
|
|
|
|
etoque
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 26, 2016, 06:49:00 PM |
|
Lisk is moving to the moon and it looking price will go over $10 very soon because it has great potential and better than ETH for its wonderful secure system.
$10? Give me a break. ok, $9.95 Works for me max will need to reajust the fee |
|
|
|
|
Nxtblg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 26, 2016, 06:51:59 PM |
|
Wow...wotta chart to wake up to!
The funny thing is, I bought some lisk at below 0.00043 but sold it for a scalper's profit. Yesterday, I unloaded all my ICO Lisk around 0.0005s levels & then went in again before I went to bed - and again, exited with only a scalper's profit. Had I held onto all my ICO LSK & that ~2200 I bought below 0.00043, I'd be sitting on about 5BTC's worth of Lisk right now.
Now here's the funny thing: when I woke up & saw Lisk battling the 0.001 level, I didn't feel anything but glad for the folks with stronger nerves. It really is nice to see LSK's performance look like ETH's when it started trading. Liks is prolly going to settle down for a time, but there's no way this coin is not going to be a success. If you held through the huge dump-tsunami - if you could hold on while being able to sleep at night instead of worrying about what the chart will look like when you wake up - you've got the nerves to hold on for the huge swing.
|
|
|
|
jt0461
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
May 26, 2016, 06:56:05 PM |
|
I cant send lisk from my wallet to poloniex? literally just does nothing when i press send, has anyone else encountered this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
May 26, 2016, 06:58:42 PM |
|
The more I think about it, the more i have the feeling that the DDoS attack might have been a blessing in disguise. I mean, the dump would have happened either way, but if everybody hat access from the beginning, it would have been faster, possibly inducing even more panic and thus, heavier.
Plus, Lisks network itself hasn't been tested, although I don't think that would have been much of an issue…
|
|
|
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:00:27 PM |
|
I cant send lisk from my wallet to poloniex? literally just does nothing when i press send, has anyone else encountered this?
click on "blockchain" on the left side, check if it is in sync with explorer.lisk.io (block height is in the box at the top) if it isn't, try login01.lisk.io, login02, and so on. I think login04 is working fine atm. otherwise, read a few pages back. yes, people have experienced this. |
|
|
|
|
vlom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1113
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:01:02 PM |
|
mhh, 12 minutes and not a single confirmation. this is slow my dear.
edit: and after login in again the transaction is gone. what the fuck?
|
|
|
|
|
|
MissionPhailed
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:01:05 PM |
|
The more I think about it, the more i have the feeling that the DDoS attack might have been a blessing in disguise. I mean, the dump would have happened either way, but if everybody hat access from the beginning, it would have been faster, possibly inducing even more panic and thus, heavier.
Plus, Lisks network itself hasn't been tested, although I don't think that would have been much of an issue…
Not to mention that the DDos-attack supressed prices for hours, widening the window of oppertunity to buy cheap lisk significantly. Sometimes buying coins when everyone is talking trash about it isn't a bad plan ... ! |
|
|
|
|
|
Laniakea
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:02:12 PM |
|
mhh, 12 minutes and not a single confirmation. this is slow my dear.
Just noticed the same... why is this? |
|
|
|
CryptoNoob1
Member
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:02:45 PM |
|
I cant send lisk from my wallet to poloniex? literally just does nothing when i press send, has anyone else encountered this?
Try this node, it has SSL and anti DOS and has live syncing with blockchain, Guaranteed to work! |
|
|
|
|
jt0461
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:02:49 PM |
|
I cant send lisk from my wallet to poloniex? literally just does nothing when i press send, has anyone else encountered this?
click on "blockchain" on the left side, check if it is in sync with explorer.lisk.io (block height is in the box at the top) if it isn't, try login01.lisk.io, login02, and so on. I think login04 is working fine atm. otherwise, read a few pages back. yes, people have experienced this. thanks, knew it had been mentioned somewhere but couldnt find the solution due to massive post volumes atm! |
|
|
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:02:57 PM |
|
mhh, 12 minutes and not a single confirmation. this is slow my dear.
Then your transaction most likely didn't get broadcast. Log out, log back in and try this: I cant send lisk from my wallet to poloniex? literally just does nothing when i press send, has anyone else encountered this?
click on "blockchain" on the left side, check if it is in sync with explorer.lisk.io (block height is in the box at the top) if it isn't, try login01.lisk.io, login02, and so on. I think login04 is working fine atm. otherwise, read a few pages back. yes, people have experienced this. |
|
|
|
|
|
bitbitch
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:03:11 PM |
|
when The DAO closes there's speculation (naturally, this is crypto) that a fair few people will check out by selling the tokens, but as i understand it that will have to be to BTC and not directly back to ETH on exchanges. ETH's price is somewhat static and i'm wondering if this is likely to tempt people to choose LSK? we might see some additional capital flow this way. is my thinking fundamentally flawed?
|
|
|
|
|
Its About Sharing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:03:18 PM |
|
The more I think about it, the more i have the feeling that the DDoS attack might have been a blessing in disguise. I mean, the dump would have happened either way, but if everybody hat access from the beginning, it would have been faster, possibly inducing even more panic and thus, heavier.
Plus, Lisks network itself hasn't been tested, although I don't think that would have been much of an issue…
Not to mention that the DDos-attack supressed prices for hours, widening the window of oppertunity to buy cheap lisk significantly. Sometimes buying coins when everyone is talking trash about it isn't a bad plan ... ! Yeah, I didn't know what to think about the DDOS attack. On the one hand it could have helped with their agenda but on the other, could have blown up in their face. Not sure. IMO - It just slowed down the coming rise and did no real harm. |
BTC = Black Swan.
BTC = Antifragile - "Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Robust is not the opposite of fragile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptorials
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:05:27 PM |
|
Sometimes buying coins when everyone is talking trash about it isn't a bad plan ... !
"Buy when there's blood in the streets, even if its your own." Baron Rothschild |
|
|
|
Its About Sharing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
|
|
May 26, 2016, 07:06:53 PM |
|
when The DAO closes there's speculation (naturally, this is crypto) that a fair few people will check out by selling the tokens, but as i understand it that will have to be to BTC and not directly back to ETH on exchanges. ETH's price is somewhat static and i'm wondering if this is likely to tempt people to choose LSK? we might see some additional capital flow this way. is my thinking fundamentally flawed?
Agreed, I've said the same thing elsewhere. Money will flow into LISK, the WAVES ICO is going to close in 5 days, so maybe it see's some from the profits. Outside of LISK, WAVES and The DAO, not sure if any other ICO's really interest me. |
BTC = Black Swan.
BTC = Antifragile - "Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Robust is not the opposite of fragile.
|
|
|
|
