malevolent
can into space
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1724
|
|
June 05, 2014, 10:38:30 PM |
|
Anyone else noticing page load/package sending times increasing a lot over the past few weeks? Trying to figure out if its activity on the site or if my ISP is having issues
It's the site's fault, or it's getting DDoS'd, I have had too many problems logging in or making trades before sudden changes in price that I decided to withdraw most of my funds a few weeks ago.
|
Signature space available for rent.
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 06, 2014, 12:35:32 AM |
|
Anyone else noticing page load/package sending times increasing a lot over the past few weeks? Trying to figure out if its activity on the site or if my ISP is having issues
It's the site's fault, or it's getting DDoS'd, I have had too many problems logging in or making trades before sudden changes in price that I decided to withdraw most of my funds a few weeks ago. its AM1 traders who have been quite emotional for the last week or so. ^^
|
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
June 06, 2014, 01:56:30 AM |
|
Anyone else noticing page load/package sending times increasing a lot over the past few weeks? Trying to figure out if its activity on the site or if my ISP is having issues
It's the site's fault, or it's getting DDoS'd, I have had too many problems logging in or making trades before sudden changes in price that I decided to withdraw most of my funds a few weeks ago. Well it was the bots previously but if I recall they fixed the API on that and increased the bandwidth That said it probably needs more capacity to deal with high activity and trading like AM today with Friedcats news Brief Answers to Shareholder Questions
|
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
kingscrown
|
|
June 06, 2014, 03:20:09 AM |
|
This doesnt seem too stabile
|
|
|
|
dyask
|
|
June 19, 2014, 09:38:02 AM Last edit: June 19, 2014, 10:58:02 AM by dyask |
|
This doesnt seem too stabile
Just tried it ... actually made .003 BTC on a quick set of trades from .4 BTC. Tried doing it a second time and the site seems to have gone down. I know the amount is tiny, it was just an experiment. Error 522 ... website is offline ... oh well. Came back in about 30 minutes ... seems down again though. Web site is too unstable ... however I did manage to make .021 off of .4 BTC. But that trade dried up.
|
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
June 21, 2014, 07:05:48 AM |
|
Anyone else trading right now? System's being real laggy
|
|
|
|
dyask
|
|
June 21, 2014, 07:48:41 AM |
|
Anyone else trading right now? System's being real laggy
Lag isn't my problem, it is the site goes offline every few minutes. Well, actually it is timing out ... so maybe that is your lag. Grrrrrr Guess I'm a year too late.
|
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
June 21, 2014, 04:41:37 PM |
|
Eh yeah - what causes that? Server being overloaded by packets? Damn APIs.
|
|
|
|
dyask
|
|
June 21, 2014, 10:56:28 PM |
|
Eh yeah - what causes that? Server being overloaded by packets? Damn APIs.
Well it does seem that some bots are operating there.
|
|
|
|
Swordsoffreedom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1135
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
June 22, 2014, 03:42:36 AM |
|
Exchange feedback/comments
Fix that API software so that the bots don't crash the server so often
Perhaps include a DRIP option for some funds that pay dividends like btct used to for different funds.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
June 22, 2014, 04:41:52 AM |
|
Actually - indexing the book values to current shares would be extremely useful too, as over time, volatility in asset prices across the exchange have made this feature virtually useless for me.
|
|
|
|
dyask
|
|
June 22, 2014, 05:37:46 AM |
|
The main problem is that there isn't enough people trading there. Of coarse the site needs to stay up for people to use it, but just the same the markets are really thin.
|
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
July 01, 2014, 11:01:06 AM |
|
The 600 call per minute limit for the API needs to be lowered. This is enough, honestly. Enough geniuses on here know how to program in php with the parameters to beat bid/ask by 1 or 10 satoshis that its now made the site completely unusable every time a live user tries to put in an order.
Cut it in half and see where that gets us.
|
|
|
|
dyask
|
|
July 01, 2014, 11:09:03 AM |
|
The 600 call per minute limit for the API needs to be lowered. This is enough, honestly. Enough geniuses on here know how to program in php with the parameters to beat bid/ask by 1 or 10 satoshis that its now made the site completely unusable every time a live user tries to put in an order.
Cut it in half and see where that gets us.
600 calls per minute?!!!! That is way too high. It should be lowered to about 60 a minute. I agree the site is now a pain in the butt to use.
|
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
July 01, 2014, 11:22:47 AM |
|
The 600 call per minute limit for the API needs to be lowered. This is enough, honestly. Enough geniuses on here know how to program in php with the parameters to beat bid/ask by 1 or 10 satoshis that its now made the site completely unusable every time a live user tries to put in an order.
Cut it in half and see where that gets us.
600 calls per minute?!!!! That is way too high. It should be lowered to about 60 a minute. I agree the site is now a pain in the butt to use. 300 per 10 minutes* Burning the old midnight oil a little too long there lol
|
|
|
|
dyask
|
|
July 01, 2014, 11:37:47 AM |
|
The 600 call per minute limit for the API needs to be lowered. This is enough, honestly. Enough geniuses on here know how to program in php with the parameters to beat bid/ask by 1 or 10 satoshis that its now made the site completely unusable every time a live user tries to put in an order.
Cut it in half and see where that gets us.
600 calls per minute?!!!! That is way too high. It should be lowered to about 60 a minute. I agree the site is now a pain in the butt to use. 300 per 10 minutes* Burning the old midnight oil a little too long there lol Okay I vote for your 300 per 10 minute limit. Something needs to be done.
|
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
July 01, 2014, 11:55:23 AM |
|
The 600 call per minute limit for the API needs to be lowered. This is enough, honestly. Enough geniuses on here know how to program in php with the parameters to beat bid/ask by 1 or 10 satoshis that its now made the site completely unusable every time a live user tries to put in an order.
Cut it in half and see where that gets us.
600 calls per minute?!!!! That is way too high. It should be lowered to about 60 a minute. I agree the site is now a pain in the butt to use. 300 per 10 minutes* Burning the old midnight oil a little too long there lol Okay I vote for your 300 per 10 minute limit. Something needs to be done. Nope, that's the current limit, and its still causing problems with the site. Either the server needs upgraded or we'd need to dial down the bots a bit. The problem is that user-initiated orders set of a chain reaction across the entire orderbook (and if you try trading BDD at all, especially EXCH...it just shits the bed).
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
July 01, 2014, 06:20:50 PM |
|
Actually the real solution would be to charge a low fee for every order placed, whether it is fulfilled or not or canceled.
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
July 01, 2014, 06:38:29 PM |
|
Actually the real solution would be to charge a low fee for every order placed, whether it is fulfilled or not or canceled.
Or just for cancellations. Or after a limit. Abuser pay, as it were.
|
|
|
|
Swordsoffreedom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1135
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
July 01, 2014, 11:22:01 PM |
|
Actually the real solution would be to charge a low fee for every order placed, whether it is fulfilled or not or canceled.
Or just for cancellations. Or after a limit. Abuser pay, as it were. Trying to recall think there was an option like that on BTCT or maybe not if so then it would be a nice feature to add to havelock
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
|