Post quality

[Aamir1]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

The quantity of characters in your post doesn't make it excellent or poor, it depends on the message in your post, if it's acceptable according to the topic then its nice and okay, but if it's off topic and not relating to the topic at all then your post is poor and doing such off topic posts will make your post quality very poor.

[numismatist]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

100 characters post doesn't always mean 'excellent / acceptable' post for a signature campaign manager (this is what you wanted to know, exactly?). You should post as you don't have a signature, means : post to contribute not to get paid by a signature campaign.

Alternatively just don't do these campaigns. The reason why they still exist eludes me, since there is a setup option for browsing the forum without Advertisements/Signatures anyways.

Advertisers should pay for views (page impressions) not for signatures that people do fade-out.

[Kprawn]

I find.. when I am faced with a wall of text, I just browse through it and skip the detail. We all have full schedules and not a lot of time to read tons of

text. In my opinion a post must be brief and to the point... Some people think quality means quantity, and they cannot be more wrong. You can

condense much of what you saying in one or two paragraphs. I like to space my post to make it easy on the eyes. {I guess that comes with old age} 

[xqus]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

100 characters post doesn't always mean 'excellent / acceptable' post for a signature campaign manager (this is what you wanted to know, exactly?). You should post as you don't have a signature, means : post to contribute not to get paid by a signature campaign.

Alternatively just don't do these campaigns. The reason why they still exist eludes me, since there is a setup option for browsing the forum without Advertisements/Signatures anyways.

Advertisers should pay for views (page impressions) not for signatures that people do fade-out.

True. I miss the days before signature campaigns. It is probably profitable for the advertisers, or else they would not do it.
Back in the days forums were not about making a profit, it was about the community. The main incentive for posting was helping, and to get enough posts to get an avatar.

[redsn0w]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

100 characters post doesn't always mean 'excellent / acceptable' post for a signature campaign manager (this is what you wanted to know, exactly?). You should post as you don't have a signature, means : post to contribute not to get paid by a signature campaign.

Alternatively just don't do these campaigns. The reason why they still exist eludes me, since there is a setup option for browsing the forum without Advertisements/Signatures anyways.

Advertisers should pay for views (page impressions) not for signatures that people do fade-out.

Yeah, but if you think about the bolded sentence... if users will post more they will generate more impressions and this is what the various sites & companies want.

[xqus]

Not if everybody ignores signatures with ads. And that is the problem with the current mechanism. There is no way the campaign managers can know how many users actually sees the signatures.

[kevinjulio]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

you mean like this ?

[arbitrage]

Quality of posts are in direct correlation with topic.
Posts must be creative and must bring positive attention.
Offensive or flaming posts are not recommended.

[CryptoYeti]

I mean when you use the account value calculators how does that make a quality from your posts.

account valua calculators is unnecesary i do say

That made me lol and I truly hope it is intended to be sarcasm.

I agree that post quality is more than simply if it is greater or less than 75 characters. If I post 75 characters of garbage I can pad my account value due to some algorithm. I could conceivably post high value < 75 character posts that when read by humans would have way more value, but would be ranked lower due to the same algorithm. Of course all else being equal, a well written higher character count post is probably more valuable than low character posts.

[avw1982]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

you mean like this ?

Dear op
To say simple, post which I replied now are low quality posts. These kind of posts will not work in the good signature campaign. They might kick the account out as well.

[redsn0w]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

you mean like this ?

Dear op
To say simple, post which I replied now are low quality posts. These kind of posts will not work in the good signature campaign. They might kick the account out as well.

Report him to the signature campaign manager, this is the best thing that you can do .

[romero121]

Post quality shows how much you have get attached with bitcoin as well how much knowledge you have in bitcoin. This will be monitored by the signature campaign moderators who Calculate the quality based on no. of characters, the way the quote relating to the question as well the way it has been expressed or put forth.

[NorrisK]

Not if everybody ignores signatures with ads. And that is the problem with the current mechanism. There is no way the campaign managers can know how many users actually sees the signatures.

The campaign managers / service owner has an indirect way of checking the effect of the signatures. Which is traffic. If the traffic increases and the bets go up (in case of gambling sites), than it shows that the campaign has an effect, even though there is no click counting.

Another method would be to check from where the traffic was directed. If it came from bitcointalk than it would be clear that the traffic was generated through the sigs.

It is very difficult to ignore signatures completely as they are quite big. If you don't actively read them, you see them all the time, engraving them in you mind. Next time you look for a service, guess what pops into your head? The stuff you've been seeing all day.

[btcdevil]

Not if everybody ignores signatures with ads. And that is the problem with the current mechanism. There is no way the campaign managers can know how many users actually sees the signatures.

The campaign managers / service owner has an indirect way of checking the effect of the signatures. Which is traffic. If the traffic increases and the bets go up (in case of gambling sites), than it shows that the campaign has an effect, even though there is no click counting.

Another method would be to check from where the traffic was directed. If it came from bitcointalk than it would be clear that the traffic was generated through the sigs.

It is very difficult to ignore signatures completely as they are quite big. If you don't actively read them, you see them all the time, engraving them in you mind. Next time you look for a service, guess what pops into your head? The stuff you've been seeing all day.

What you said is perfect answer for the Signature Campaign. That is why most of the gambling sites are still running in signature campaign, as they know the potential power of advertising. That is why in the real world also all leading brands are keeping some funds for Advertisement.

[Jamada]

I mean when you use the account value calculators how does that make a quality from your posts.

it does not, that is an estimator, it is based on your lengh i think, but is not a good indicator over all

some times good post are very short, and long post, hides no-sense

I agree with this. It is very difficult to write a short post but very meaningful. It is easy to write long post to express.

[Tyrantt]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

You can type a 500 character message and still could be rubbish if you don't even know what are you trying to say. Long message doesn't mean quality message.

[23dzmaz]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

100 characters, not out of topic, post constructive, no need spam post like thank you, only post image and etc. And if you joining signature campaign don't forget to read the rules.

[arbitrage]

As i see many believe that lower ranked members are spamming here with their signature C.
I believe this is true, but also i saw many legendary members and hero members wearing same signatures, and posting answers to ridiculous topics and replying to those spam posts , so we have acceptance of spam.
And always guilty ones are those lower members?

[Matarin]

As i see many believe that lower ranked members are spamming here with their signature C.
I believe this is true, but also i saw many legendary members and hero members wearing same signatures, and posting answers to ridiculous topics and replying to those spam posts , so we have acceptance of spam.
And always guilty ones are those lower members?

I think the quality has nothing to do with the rank of membership. They are not determined by the post quality.

[redsun114]

Always try to make a constructive and creative post. Only long post not worth. Any one can write 1000 characters also. But writing a constructive, creative and about the main topic is not easy.