☑☑☑[ANN][BSD] BitSend - online since 2014 [ Core 0.21x]

[Limx Dev]

Hello everyone,
we have extended the hosting with ChainzID for another year. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to support Bitsend to the extent I would like to. My circumstances have changed since the first post seven years ago. If someone is motivated to support the project in any way, I will do my best to assist.

[chrysophylax]

Hello everyone,
we have extended the hosting with ChainzID for another year. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to support Bitsend to the extent I would like to. My circumstances have changed since the first post seven years ago. If someone is motivated to support the project in any way, I will do my best to assist.

Hi Christian ...

It has been a long time between chats with Us Mate

Does this mean You are pulling out of Development altogether? Or focused on 1 or More Projects? Or is it something else entirely?

We could chat more anyway, but if it something more of the latter and You wish to focus on 1Specific Project at a time, We may have something to chat about. I am always on Skype and always open to a chat over what can be done).

#crysx #cwi

[elbandi]

if you want to resurrect the project, you need to find a good utility idea. simethink like: Bit=bits, Send = Send encrypted documents to destination. or anything.

[chrysophylax]

if you want to resurrect the project, you need to find a good utility idea. simethink like: Bit=bits, Send = Send encrypted documents to destination. or anything.

Resurrection ...

It's always a long shot when it comes to Long Standing Projects that have done nothing. Believe Me, I know :|

I wouldn't resurrect it, I would more like to see if Christian is willing to work alongside Us with CWI.

ElBandi - You are a VERY Long Time Veteran altogether and Your opinions matter and are always taken in high regard also, so You seriously think a resurrection of BitSend is worth the effort? Especially if Christian is more or less walking away from it?

#crysx #cwi

[Limx Dev]

if you want to resurrect the project, you need to find a good utility idea. simethink like: Bit=bits, Send = Send encrypted documents to destination. or anything.

Resurrection ...

It's always a long shot when it comes to Long Standing Projects that have done nothing. Believe Me, I know :|

I wouldn't resurrect it, I would more like to see if Christian is willing to work alongside Us with CWI.

ElBandi - You are a VERY Long Time Veteran altogether and Your opinions matter and are always taken in high regard also, so You seriously think a resurrection of BitSend is worth the effort? Especially if Christian is more or less walking away from it?

#crysx #cwi

You can write me a PM. Maybe can i help you. I like your idea to support old projects.

[Limx Dev]

Cleanup ANN

Bitsend

_

Specification Coin ██ Name: BitSend ██ Symbol: BSD ██ Core 0.21.1.0 ██ Max Supply: 34M ██ DefaultPort = 8886

____

Links ██ Github ██ Github - Releases/ Wallets ██ ChainzID Explorer ██ Coinmarketcap.com ██ Southxchange

Bitsend

__

Disclaimer: Bitsend BSD cannot take responsibility for third party providers, such as the listed exchanges, wallets, sites and pools. All links hosted on our ANN are by community members and third parties and by clicking on any of the listed links you are accepting the risks of using the third party domain and taking responsibility for any losses, damage or other issues using said domain. Crypto-currencies are inherently risky and investors and users must remain vigilant.

[chrysophylax]

if you want to resurrect the project, you need to find a good utility idea. simethink like: Bit=bits, Send = Send encrypted documents to destination. or anything.

Resurrection ...

It's always a long shot when it comes to Long Standing Projects that have done nothing. Believe Me, I know :|

I wouldn't resurrect it, I would more like to see if Christian is willing to work alongside Us with CWI.

ElBandi - You are a VERY Long Time Veteran altogether and Your opinions matter and are always taken in high regard also, so You seriously think a resurrection of BitSend is worth the effort? Especially if Christian is more or less walking away from it?

#crysx #cwi

You can write me a PM. Maybe can i help you. I like your idea to support old projects.

Will send now ...

Skype is the best contact for Me - but I'll see where You connect. I will not connect through ANY Telegram connection.

#crysx #cwi

[samspaces]

Oldie but goodie, still have a working wallet/chain. POW diff, however, is a potential problem for double spends (not that anyone cares, given the price). Perhaps fork to auxpow.

[anotherlateminer]

if you want to resurrect the project, you need to find a good utility idea. simethink like: Bit=bits, Send = Send encrypted documents to destination. or anything.

Resurrection ...

It's always a long shot when it comes to Long Standing Projects that have done nothing. Believe Me, I know :|

I wouldn't resurrect it, I would more like to see if Christian is willing to work alongside Us with CWI.

ElBandi - You are a VERY Long Time Veteran altogether and Your opinions matter and are always taken in high regard also, so You seriously think a resurrection of BitSend is worth the effort? Especially if Christian is more or less walking away from it?

#crysx #cwi

You can write me a PM. Maybe can i help you. I like your idea to support old projects.

Will send now ...

Skype is the best contact for Me - but I'll see where You connect. I will not connect through ANY Telegram connection.

#crysx #cwi

Drop me a PM if there's any way I can assist.

[chrysophylax]

if you want to resurrect the project, you need to find a good utility idea. simethink like: Bit=bits, Send = Send encrypted documents to destination. or anything.

Resurrection ...

It's always a long shot when it comes to Long Standing Projects that have done nothing. Believe Me, I know :|

I wouldn't resurrect it, I would more like to see if Christian is willing to work alongside Us with CWI.

ElBandi - You are a VERY Long Time Veteran altogether and Your opinions matter and are always taken in high regard also, so You seriously think a resurrection of BitSend is worth the effort? Especially if Christian is more or less walking away from it?

#crysx #cwi

You can write me a PM. Maybe can i help you. I like your idea to support old projects.

Will send now ...

Skype is the best contact for Me - but I'll see where You connect. I will not connect through ANY Telegram connection.

#crysx #cwi

Drop me a PM if there's any way I can assist.

Me? ...

You know where to find Me when You have free time Mate!

It's ALWAYS a Pleasure to work/chat with You

#crysx #cwi

[drays]

Folks, does anyone run version v0.21.1.0 wallet on Windows..? By some reason my wallet does not get any stable connection, whatever I try (playing with config options). Debug log shows it finds many peers, and sometimes I see it having 1 connection, but the next moment connection disappears again. It looks like connection attempts from my wallet get rejected, not sure why.

Here is what I have in debug.log:

Code:

2023-12-21T15:35:49Z init message: Done loading
2023-12-21T15:35:49Z msghand thread start
2023-12-21T15:35:49Z GUI: Platform customization: "windows"
2023-12-21T15:36:00Z Loading addresses from DNS seed 212.237.211.107
2023-12-21T15:36:00Z Loading addresses from DNS seed 188.68.39.1
2023-12-21T15:36:00Z Loading addresses from DNS seed 185.194.142.125
2023-12-21T15:36:00Z Waiting 11 seconds before querying DNS seeds.
2023-12-21T15:36:11Z Loading addresses from DNS seed 217.61.61.66
2023-12-21T15:36:11Z Loading addresses from DNS seed 66.151.242.154
2023-12-21T15:36:11Z Loading addresses from DNS seed 31.25.241.224
2023-12-21T15:36:11Z 0 addresses found from DNS seeds
2023-12-21T15:36:11Z dnsseed thread exit
2023-12-21T15:46:17Z Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer (last tip update: 630 seconds ago)
2023-12-21T15:51:25Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70084, blocks=832714, peer=1 (full-relay)
2023-12-21T15:55:40Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70086, blocks=1174570, peer=12 (full-relay)
2023-12-21T15:56:47Z Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer (last tip update: 1260 seconds ago)
2023-12-21T15:57:52Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70084, blocks=832714, peer=16 (full-relay)
2023-12-21T16:07:17Z Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer (last tip update: 1890 seconds ago)
2023-12-21T16:10:53Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70084, blocks=832714, peer=38 (full-relay)
2023-12-21T16:15:08Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70086, blocks=1174570, peer=45 (full-relay)
2023-12-21T16:17:20Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70084, blocks=832714, peer=49 (full-relay)
2023-12-21T16:17:47Z Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer (last tip update: 2520 seconds ago)
2023-12-21T16:21:34Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70086, blocks=1174570, peer=55 (full-relay)
2023-12-21T16:28:17Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70086, blocks=1174570, peer=66 (full-relay)
2023-12-21T16:28:18Z Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer (last tip update: 3151 seconds ago)
2023-12-21T16:30:13Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70084, blocks=832714, peer=72 (full-relay)

So it shows many peers, but at the same time my wallet shows 0 connection:

Code:

20:36:16

getpeerinfo


20:36:16

[
]

And the wallet does not sync, obviously..

Any idea what could be causing this?

[HarryPorter]

I am using previous version of client v.0.17.9.2 and running sometimes just to get sync with network and it works;  "current number of blocks  1382830" with date 13 dec 2023.

after seeing your post I started client and it get 2 connection with nodes with even older version of client: v0.14.2

...but thats all, client can not get more connections and synchronise to current date - it seems it doesn't work anymore

[Limx Dev]

I am using previous version of client v.0.17.9.2 and running sometimes just to get sync with network and it works;  "current number of blocks  1382830" with date 13 dec 2023.

after seeing your post I started client and it get 2 connection with nodes with even older version of client: v0.14.2

...but thats all, client can not get more connections and synchronise to current date - it seems it doesn't work anymore

The wallet version 21.1 seems to be stuck at block 1370647. It appears that other clients are disconnecting. I couldn't detect any fork.

Debug "Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer"

[drays]

I am using previous version of client v.0.17.9.2 and running sometimes just to get sync with network and it works;  "current number of blocks  1382830" with date 13 dec 2023.

after seeing your post I started client and it get 2 connection with nodes with even older version of client: v0.14.2

...but thats all, client can not get more connections and synchronise to current date - it seems it doesn't work anymore

The wallet version 21.1 seems to be stuck at block 1370647. It appears that other clients are disconnecting. I couldn't detect any fork.

Debug "Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer"

Ehm.. Just for my better understanding.

Christian, when are you wrote "Debug "Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer"", did you mean you are debugging it now, or you suggest us to debug it?
I am ok with both options, but would slightly prefer the first one

[Limx Dev]

I am using previous version of client v.0.17.9.2 and running sometimes just to get sync with network and it works;  "current number of blocks  1382830" with date 13 dec 2023.

after seeing your post I started client and it get 2 connection with nodes with even older version of client: v0.14.2

...but thats all, client can not get more connections and synchronise to current date - it seems it doesn't work anymore

The wallet version 21.1 seems to be stuck at block 1370647. It appears that other clients are disconnecting. I couldn't detect any fork.

Debug "Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer"

Ehm.. Just for my better understanding.

Christian, when are you wrote "Debug "Potential stale tip detected, will try using extra outbound peer"", did you mean you are debugging it now, or you suggest us to debug it?
I am ok with both options, but would slightly prefer the first one

I have written that to joshafest. He want to fix this problem.

...

southXchange Shutdown on January 31st 2024

SouthXchange announced shut down notification on its web page earlier today that it will stop trading and deposit on January 15th 2024 and completely shut down on Jan 31, 2024, which will be last withdraw date from its wallet. SouthXchange is our main centralized exchange for trading while

dex trading in Komodo Wallet/AtomicDEX will continue as usual.

Please be aware of this southXchange shut down event and withdraw your Cheetahcoin, Nengcoin, Dogecoin along with other coins from this exchange before the shut down date.

The full text of southXchange shut down notice:

https://southxchange.gorgias.help/en-US/important-update-regarding-southxchange-383212

[midnight_miner]

Just curious if there is still a chance this project is still going?

I have been away from crypto for a few years and looking around to see what projects have survived.

[elmo40]

nah, bro.
last block 10 days ago... it be dead.

[drays]

Its already 20 days the chain is stopped... Seems nobody mines it, so the following questions come to mind:
 - is there any pool for mining Bitsend?
 - does wallet have a capability to mine SOLO..?

[midnight_miner]

If someone could post a list of still active peers the a mining pool could be posted to keep the chain going.

I fired up my old wallet but it is a few years behind.  If the chain gets moving again there is a chance to move your coins.

Worth a try if anyone is interested.

[elmo40]

addnode=216.209.105.205
addnode=108.160.119.166
addnode=144.91.107.170
addnode=149.248.62.221
addnode=5.8.205.138
addnode=65.18.168.16
addnode=87.174.119.225