[ABUSE] Mexxer-2 ABUSE OF TRUST SYSTEM - APPEAL TO ALL THE MAIN ADMINS.

[brill2929]

I'm here to appeal against the negative red trust that mexxer-2 left on my profile.

First of all he's accusing me of promoting a ponzi scheme. I admit that i'm involved (as investor or gambler) in gambling and investor-based section games. But i DO NOT RUN nor I DO NOT ADVERTISE any of these websites.

One day (17th february) i opened a thread to make my own doubler program, but after JUST SOME HOURS i decided to CLOSE it because: i have no will to scam people, i do not know how to setup this kind of scripts, i'm not a webmaster or whatever and the most importanto fact is that NOT A SINGLE DEPOSIT was made to me for that "game". It's important to remember that "that game" even not started! I just placed a little OP in the thread and after some hours closed cause i changed my mind almost instantly.

I was trying to made easy btc but i'm a fair person and even if i'm a gambler, i'm definitely not a scammer (that's why i never started that game).

So after i saw that mexxer-2 left me a negative red trust on the 18th February i asked today why he did it.

Then he replied "cause i were advertising a ponzi scheme, don't act innocent". I told him that i wasn't promoing anything, nor advertising, nor running such business.
So he want back to the first thread of 17th February (which is a thread where the only thing written is "delete" since the time i closed it (i.e. some hours after i opened it) and left me today another negative red trust with absurd reason.

I APPEAL TO ANY HIGHER RANKED ADMIN TO CONTROL AND REVIEW MEXXER-2 OPERATIONS CAUSE HE ACTS WITHOUT THINKING TWICE.
I APPEAL TO ANY HIGHER RANKED ADMIN TO APPLY A DIFFERENT NEGATIVE TRUST REVISIONS, TO AVOID THIS KIND OF ABUSE.
I APPEAL TO ANY HIGHER RANKED ADMIN TO CHANGE THE RULES UPON AN USER CAN BE NEGATIVE TAGGED.

Here's below all the screenshots proving the abuse i'm reporting.

Thread close date:

https://i.imgur.com/5PXPvjv.png


First negative trust left by the user mexxer-2 1 day AFTER i had closed the OP.
He accuse me of "promoting/advertising a ponzi scheme".....even if i never started ANYTHING, and my OP lasted maximum 3 hours!!!!!!

https://i.imgur.com/PYHQYSg.png


So i asked him why he left me the neg trust today.

https://i.imgur.com/mAHIl82.png


Conversation continue like this before a "second neg" for free is given again!!!!

https://i.imgur.com/2f4wG1W.png


Second neg trust given for free with proper abuse of powers from this user:

https://i.imgur.com/svkjtGz.png

Is he really accusing me of editing the thread?
He cannot even read the dates?
He gave me this second neg cause i edited the thread even before the first negative? ROFL.

This forum is becoming ridicolous.


I APPEAL TO HIGHER RANKED ADMINS TO KEEP UNDER CONTROLL THOSE KIND OF USERS.

Abuses of power are really a bad thing, in real life and on internet.

Because is also see that many users that are promoting (for real) and running (for real) ponzis are noteven tagged with neg trust.,,,this makes me thinking a lot about some hidden connection between some "trusted users" and some ponzis operators...who knows?

[1714598658]

1714598658

[1714598658]

1714598658

[1714598658]

1714598658

[1714598658]

1714598658

[1714598658]

1714598658

[1714598658]

1714598658

[Lutpin]

Thread close date:

Try again.

I APPEAL TO ANY HIGHER RANKED ADMIN TO CONTROL AND REVIEW MEXXER-2 OPERATIONS CAUSE HE ACTS WITHOUT THINKING TWICE.
I APPEAL TO ANY HIGHER RANKED ADMIN TO APPLY A DIFFERENT NEGATIVE TRUST REVISIONS, TO AVOID THIS KIND OF ABUSE.
I APPEAL TO ANY HIGHER RANKED ADMIN TO CHANGE THE RULES UPON AN USER CAN BE NEGATIVE TAGGED.

Nope, nope and ehrm...nope.
Go back and study the basics of the trust system.
Once you understood it, maybe you can tell us your mistakes over here.

Because is also see that many users that are promoting (for real) and running (for real) ponzis are noteven tagged with neg trust.,,,this makes me thinking a lot about some hidden connection between some "trusted users" and some ponzis operators...who knows?

That's ridiculous and you know it.

[winspiral]

I'm now used with this...
the problem is that you can get negative trust by people who "take" you for a scammer...
an argument?
""winspiral is a scammer because the site's design is horrible...""
or
"I do not understand what he writes.""...bing...negative trust (lol)
or
even you do not run ponzi sheme ""winspiral runs and promotes a ponzi""...bing...negative trust (lol)
or you say the truth:...bing negative trust...

You have to live with...
In France we say "Mexxer-2 has "the gâchette facile" this mean he uses his gun easily (lol)

[brill2929]

Thread close date:
https://i.imgur.com/5PXPvjv.png

Try again.

http://s6.postimg.org/g2q5fnaip/Bullshit.png

Oh his friend (or its alt) is coming to defend him. Ok.

Last edited means tha i written delete that day to make the thread be deleted.

The OP anyway as closed before.

Try again, and again , and again. You.

Anyway i'm appealing tohigher ranked admin, not you. You are the same kind of person as him.

Your screenhot won't cover the ABUSE anyway.

[brill2929]

I'm now used with this...
the problem is that you can get negative trust by people who "take" you for a scammer...
an argument?
""winspiral is a scammer because the site's design is horrible...""
or
"I do not understand what he writes.""...bing...negative trust (lol)
or
even you do not run ponzi sheme ""winspiral runs and promotes a ponzi""...bing...negative trust (lol)
or you say the truth:...bing negative trust...

You have to live with...
In France we say "Mexxer-2 has "the gâchette facile" this mean he uses his gun easily (lol)

I think it's a shame cause i'm not even promoting or running anything and he keep tagging me with red neg trust.
This man is out of control. Totally out of control.
He's the representation of the wrong behind giving to much power into one single person who has the "right" of saying what's good and what's not.

Shame.

[--Encrypted--]

-snip too lonk-
Oh his friend (or its alt) is coming to defend him. Ok.

Last edited means tha i written delete that day to make the thread be deleted.

The OP anyway as closed before.

Try again, and agin , and agin. You.

Anyway i'm appealing tohigher ranked admin, not you. You are the same kind of person as him.

and the 17 06PM is the time that you created the topic. no proof there that you closed the topic within 15 minutes.

yknow I vaguely remember someone else posting just like you and demands ADMIN to LOOK and RESOLVE their issue. ring a BELL anyone?

[brill2929]

-snip too lonk-
Oh his friend (or its alt) is coming to defend him. Ok.

Last edited means tha i written delete that day to make the thread be deleted.

The OP anyway as closed before.

Try again, and agin , and agin. You.

Anyway i'm appealing tohigher ranked admin, not you. You are the same kind of person as him.

and the 17 06PM is the time that you created the topic. no proof there that you closed the topic within 15 minutes.

yknow I vaguely remember someone else posting just like you and demands ADMIN to LOOK and RESOLVE their issue. ring a BELL anyone?

i don't understand.

Who said 15 minutes? i said some hours later.

[james.lent]

-snip

i don't understand.

Who said 15 minutes? i said some hours later.

It doesn't matter if its 15 mins or a day. You still promoted a scam and later edited the thread. An example would be, if you cheated someone last year , you'll still be a cheater this year. Time doesn't change people, actions do.

[brill2929]

-snip

i don't understand.

Who said 15 minutes? i said some hours later.

It doesn't matter if its 15 mins or a day. You still promoted a scam and later edited the thread. An example would be, if you cheated someone last year , you'll still be a cheater this year. Time doesn't change people, actions do.

Ok so i'am condemned for intention and not for facts? nice way of doing here....what a shame again.

[brill2929]

-snip

i don't understand.

Who said 15 minutes? i said some hours later.

It doesn't matter if its 15 mins or a day. You still promoted a scam and later edited the thread. An example would be, if you cheated someone last year , you'll still be a cheater this year. Time doesn't change people, actions do.

Again i did not tried to cheat anyone, just opened a thread , never started the business and closed it. Is this really something to be tagged

Good to know. Is this a North korea based forum?

[james.lent]

-snip

i don't understand.

Who said 15 minutes? i said some hours later.

It doesn't matter if its 15 mins or a day. You still promoted a scam and later edited the thread. An example would be, if you cheated someone last year , you'll still be a cheater this year. Time doesn't change people, actions do.

Ok so i'am condemned for intention and not for facts? nice way of doing here....what a shame again.

Check the reference on the received feedback.

edit:

Again i did not tried to cheat anyone, just opened a thread , never started the business and closed it. Is this really something to be tagged Huh

Good to know. Is this a North korea based forum?

As i said, you started the thread with an intent to scam, so it doesnt really matter if you've started itbegan business or not. Intentions are the one that matters as it proves who you are.

[Mitchell]

I guess it's time to add Lutpin and Mexxer-2 to my trust list.

[winspiral]

-snip

i don't understand.

Who said 15 minutes? i said some hours later.

It doesn't matter if its 15 mins or a day. You still promoted a scam and later edited the thread. An example would be, if you cheated someone last year , you'll still be a cheater this year. Time doesn't change people, actions do.

(lol)
so it is with my detractors...
they have give me negative trust...remove them will not change the pain they have done to me...

I was taken for a scammer and a ponsi promoter and a ponzi runner...(all wrong of course) and then fault is done...

I am running and promoting the sames sites in my signatures...
why have I only 8 negative trust points?
1000 and 1000 people see my sites and my signature and only 8 wrong people have given me negative trust?
it's funny...

[mexxer-2]

Again i did not tried to cheat anyone, just opened a thread , never started the business and closed it. Is this really something to be tagged

Good to know. Is this a North korea based forum?

See my "policy" in my sig for promoting/running a ponzi

[Lutpin]

See my "policy" in my sig for promoting/running a ponzi

My favorite part of the thread?

who the fuck are you mutherfuker, fuk offfffff

@OP: you somehow missed to take a screenshot of that PM when making your accusations up there.
Don't worry, it happens. Good thing mexxer got it written down for you.

[--Encrypted--]

[

i don't understand.

Who said 15 minutes? i said some hours later.

you said yourself on the screenshot. DATE OF CLOSING THREAD F---- blah.

also two users posted on feb 18 saying that the "website" can't be accessed. where's the link?
and you continue to say that you closed it. well it's still open for anyone to post in.

[brill2929]

well seems your group of "trusted users" is compiacent with this mexxer 2 way of doing.

Fine, i'll leave this shit forum and spread the word about your stuff around.

If you think you did the good choice, good for you, Have a good life.

Hope someone in the future will do the same thing with you.

[Mitchell]

well seems your group of "trusted users" is compiacent with this mexxer 2 way of doing.

Fine, i'll leave this shit forum and spread the word about your stuff around.

If you think you did the good choice, good for you, Have a good life.

Hope someone in the future will do the same thing with you.

Bye. You won't be missed.

[brill2929]

In example loaning is one of the worst interest practices....as Lutpin did with Mexxer-2 some time ago isn't it?

[MagicIsMe]

So let's pretend that the part that says

"That's a shame... why are you acting like this? Are you so angry in life? Relax man..."

was not edited in even though it is not aligned to the previous paragraph and that it appears vividly clearer than the other words in this screen capture,

WHY SHOULD WE BELIEVE YOU?