Default Trust List is a Joke.Theymos Save This Forum.

[mexxer-2]

Also, for the record... I have never been involved in any gun sales on this forum.  Not as a buyer, seller, or escrow agent.

OK then, why bragging ? It is no way cool or impressive and nor this thread is bout discussing guns should be sold or not.

You're seriously delusional , you're the one who introduced the topic randomly in the first place. He's just replying

Don't mind him

Yes My Lord don't mind me. I am your dogie and will be barking for you all my life and expect you to give me one positive rating just before i die and also add me your trust list so that i could troll others with the feedback's.

You're an immature dumb guy who should not be on this forum....... is what MisterMiyagi aka you would say. Anyway, you still are making arguments about my trust list/feedbacks while yourself having incomplete knowledge of the trust system. I've made a pretty simplistic explanation of it in ejarwan's thread you know.

he's pretty well known for derailing conversations

Like talking bout guns in Reputation ?

Yep, to be exact , talking about guns and real life implications of what should be a well made arguments-driven conversation as to why I should not be in DT.

Anyway I've found two people in total who don't at all agree with tagging GC sellers, others are still iffy on the subject and would potentially change their opinion if you give them well-made arguments , me included. And as shorena earlier said:

Im still not entirely sure how to handle the gift cards, but I dont like the idea of letting carders just be for a lack of evidence.

[1715269249]

1715269249

[1715269249]

1715269249

[1715269249]

1715269249

[1715269249]

1715269249

[mexxer-2]

Did you have a look,day by day the threads about your Trust abuses is increasing .

Yep its just yours and a thread from Dorritulx who doesn't seem to understand the situation rather is joining the side for no apparent reason

Surprisingly they are not from the people who have negative tagged.

Yep, they are guys who were indirectly butthurt long time ago who feel its important to join the "witch hunt" against me and Lutpin

Also tell your puppet whywefight to read Og's post , selling accounts ==Poison to this forum.You seem to encourage it.Amazing use of DT power.

Aand another point to Miyag for derailing the conversation bravo

[Heutenamos]

This is what ,In all these threads none of my posts were a personal attack to anyone and nor to you.But you keep on abuse people calling them Dumb,immature,stupid,delusional or quoting other abusive quotes by alt accounts on DT2 and etc etc...

This is not what i could agree to and stop replying for others. Let the Nasty reply.

[whywefight]

Op went silent?? lol

[james.lent]

Op went silent?? lol

However,I need to fall down to your level to explain things because you certainly don't understand scenarios without real life implications.I think I'm done conveying what was suppose to be done way before.Its time that I use my powers as well.

Let's see how many more days you enjoy your privileges .

Probably in the process of growing a pair or something.

[Blazed]

Op went silent?? lol

However,I need to fall down to your level to explain things because you certainly don't understand scenarios without real life implications.I think I'm done conveying what was suppose to be done way before.Its time that I use my powers as well.

Let's see how many more days you enjoy your privileges .

Probably in the process of growing a pair or something.

I really doubt that OP is default trust lvl 1 for a few reasons. His typing is exactly the same as Heutenamos (they odd way he uses commas) also if he were DT1 he would have just msg me and told me who he was. I really think that Lutpin and Mexxer are doing alright so far. I think it sucks we need people who have to scam bust, but this forum is a cesspool of scammers if we do not. I am on the fence about the gift cards though. Some people do sell cheap cards and I doubt all of them are carded. If someone is offering a warranty with them...obviously carded. I have spoken with a few high-level people and had some message me about these 2 additions. Everyone agrees they are doing an alright job so far. My only advice is slow down and make sure you are right when leaving negative feedback. I am also glad the "hate crew" name is gone...that was a bit much.

I do agree that this trust system is sorta broken. I am not really sure of a good way to fix it though.

[mexxer-2]

I really doubt that OP is default trust lvl 1 for a few reasons. His typing is exactly the same as Heutenamos (they odd way he uses commas) also if he were DT1 he would have just msg me and told me who he was.

Yeah , thought it was pretty much obvious.

I am on the fence about the gift cards though. Some people do sell cheap cards and I doubt all of them are carded. If someone is offering a warranty with them...obviously carded.

Pretty much the same here but am open to any suggestions(in Ecua's thread)

So if someone offers a 30% discount then he is untrustworthy?
give me a yes or no answer

Sad you take extreme approaches at certain things, it has been repeated by EcuaMobi that he considers many factors before being suspicious of an individual. If the discount was given for
1) Unlimited period of time
2) For more than 5 GC
3) The user has a shady history

I would consider the individual to be untrustworthy if two of the criteria fit him, he always has the option of explaining .

I am also glad the "hate crew" name is gone...that was a bit much.

Blame it on the ponzi which was withholding payment because of my tag  :

That guy is deceiving people that they are going to receive their BTC back plus some amount of a return. He is also actively threatening to withhold money that he owes other people unless demands that are unrelated to him returning money are met. For these reasons I believe he is a scammer.

Removing negative trust against him will not guarantee the return of your funds, it will however potentially allow this person to steal additional money from others and potentially you either now or in the future.

I wrote a response you can send them (above). This assumes that the negative rating you left is for someone who is running a ponzi (eg is a ponzi OP and not someone wearing it's signature/ect.)

Thanks , saved me the time of writing it myself. Exactly the reason why you can count on QS when scams start popping up.

BTW we should be the "Blame team/league" or something. Blame me for pointing out the scam, Lutpin for the proofs , QS for the explanations , james for the memes retaliation , whywefight for pointing out the new types of scams and shorena for being a one-man army and *Censored by the Illuminati due to shorena replacing their banner* 

Thanks guys, for your help

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTBI51JmnF8

[james.lent]

Well, glad that this is resolved. Heutenamos MisterMiyagi please lock the thread.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

Well, glad that this is resolved. Heutenamos MisterMiyagi please lock the thread.

How did it get resolved? the hateleague members were removed from DT?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I thought OP was tspacepilot.  Am I totally wrong?

[Mickeyb]

Well, glad that this is resolved. Heutenamos MisterMiyagi please lock the thread.

How did it get resolved? the hateleague members were removed from DT?

Blazed has stated that no further action, such as removal of the accused will occur. The only thing anyone can now do is troll and-or ridicule him.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

Well, glad that this is resolved. Heutenamos MisterMiyagi please lock the thread.

How did it get resolved? the hateleague members were removed from DT?

Blazed has stated that no further action, such as removal of the accused will occur. The only thing anyone can now do is troll and-or ridicule him.

Well he is free have his opinions, if he feels the ratings are fine although everyone says otherwise then we'll just have to accept it.
Why doesnt he have an open discussion about this?

[mexxer-2]

Well he is free have his opinions, if he feels the ratings are fine although everyone says otherwise then we'll just have to accept it.
Why doesnt he have an open discussion about this?

1) If your definition of "everyone" is you , Heu, qory(random guy who appeared to vote on the poll), a suspected alt of Heu who keeps saying he is on DT and other sh*t and a bunch of random people who don't even publicly post about their vote, then yes "everyone" said otherwise.
2) This was an open discussion and that is the conclusion Blazed reached to

Edit: Anyway, enough time wasted on someone who doesn't even have a clear understanding of the trust system

[Your Point Is Invalid]

Well he is free have his opinions, if he feels the ratings are fine although everyone says otherwise then we'll just have to accept it.
Why doesnt he have an open discussion about this?

1) If your definition of "everyone" is you , Heu, qory(random guy who appeared to vote on the poll), a suspected alt of Heu who keeps saying he is on DT and other sh*t and a bunch of random people who don't even publicly post about their vote, then yes "everyone" said otherwise.
2) This was an open discussion and that is the conclusion Blazed reached to

Edit: Anyway, enough time wasted on someone who doesn't even have a clear understanding of the trust system

Ok, so only the people who publicly say something count?
Why have a poll then?

[Heutenamos]

Blazed has stated that no further action, such as removal of the accused will occur. The only thing anyone can now do is troll and-or ridicule him.

Where ?

a suspected alt of Heu who keeps saying he is on DT

How so ?

[Zeke2345]

Well he is free have his opinions, if he feels the ratings are fine although everyone says otherwise then we'll just have to accept it.
Why doesnt he have an open discussion about this?

1) If your definition of "everyone" is you , Heu, qory(random guy who appeared to vote on the poll), a suspected alt of Heu who keeps saying he is on DT and other sh*t and a bunch of random people who don't even publicly post about their vote, then yes "everyone" said otherwise.
2) This was an open discussion and that is the conclusion Blazed reached to

Edit: Anyway, enough time wasted on someone who doesn't even have a clear understanding of the trust system

Seems to be some a bit of two tier system when it comes to judgement,those that have trust and everyone else.
Maybe I am a random,sockpuppet,idiot that keeps getting his neck back in the discussion but the language that is used when refering to people like me is a bit alarming and makes me a bit queasy.
If you want to clean up the forum,please start by cleaning up the way you refer to people you view as less than. Might help break through the issue in play.

[qory]

(random guy )

Seems like a good name for me


Yes, I don't understand how trust system works. I have voted just because of these

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=891368.msg9825583#msg9825583

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=902473.msg9915515#msg9915515

[Heutenamos]

His typing is exactly the same as Heutenamos (they odd way he uses commas)

If this is true then QS is also my alt now ?

I am fairly certain that I know who the OP is and I don't think it is productive to make ad hominem attacks against the OP, as I would argue that he is probably one of the most trusted people around.

I would say that I agree that Mexxer-2 and Lutpin are strange choices for being in the Default Trust network. I would also say there is a high chance they are the same person.

I somewhat get the feeling that some people are trying to make a name for themselves as being a scam buster. They are doing this by stretching the definition of a scammer and leaving negative trust for people who probably do not have the drive nor motivation to defend their name/reputation, even though what they are accused of doing, even if true, is really not scamming.

I would note that a good number of the "Mexxer-2 and Lutpin" threads have resulted in no additional negative ratings being added to the accounts of those complaining, and in a decent number of instances the ratings have been removed. On the other hand, it was fairly rare that a rating that I left was inappropriate, and as a result very few ratings needed to be removed that I left and many of the "QS" threads resulted in additional people looking at the evidence and leaving additional ratings on those complaining.

what a serious Troll you are Blazed .

[cryptodevil]

if he feels the ratings are fine although everyone says otherwise then we'll just have to accept it.

Everyone says otherwise? Or a bunch of butthurt socks and scammers?

It is incredibly dishonest of you to refer to a handful of people who resent the process of exposing bad practice on this forum as being in the moral majority.

Maybe I am a random,sockpuppet,idiot that keeps getting his neck back in the discussion but the language that is used when refering to people like me is a bit alarming and makes me a bit queasy.
If you want to clean up the forum,please start by cleaning up the way you refer to people you view as less than. Might help break through the issue in play.

Wow. You literally have absolutely nothing of substance to counter with other than repeated tone complaints.

The OP is hiding behind a sock while making bold claims about how important he believes himself to be and you are utterly void of reasonable argument other than to repeatedly whine about how you don't like being labelled as the person you evidently are.

If you don't have anything objective to counter with then you don't get to complain.

This thread is exactly like all the other, "I don't like being held to account for my actions so I'll try and get people removed from DT instead" complaint threads.

Shit, all we need is someone to accuse Vod of being the real identity behind Lutpin and Mexxer and we'll have a full house of Bitcointalk Bollocks.

[whywefight]

Shit, all we need is someone to accuse Vod of being the real identity behind Lutpin and Mexxer and we'll have a full house of Bitcointalk Bollocks.

sssshhhhhhh.... dont tell 'em!