WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform.

[chefket]

I'm really considering waves tokens as saving money after ETH tokens. This price is quite cheap to buy and hold it for long-term period.
Do you think Waves will hit 10$ in next months? It's not too far to reach this price.

I think waves could take on a similar path as ETH (i believe waves has a much higher ROI than ETH atm). For the ETH path to happen we need more volume and since Poloniex wont add waves, the volume thing could take time. Waves is a quite safe long term investment (relative to others), waves have enough money to make their service superb and the demand for their services are huge. Waves ICO almost raised as much money as etherium, it would take a lot for a company with that much of founding to fail.

My plan is to sell off 50% of my Waves gradually between 20-50$. The other 50% i will keep for longer. I wont sell my WCT under $50 (i might even keep them forever). I like the passive income my WCT generate, if the platform become as big as i think it will, than those WCT will generate a quiet handsome passive income (dividends). I am actually holding as many WCT as i am holding Waves.

These are just my opinions. I have of course diversified in a few other coins. And dont invest with money you cannot afford to lose, if all crypto coins fail and all will be valued 0$ over a night (highly unlikely), than you shouldn't be beaten about it.

When the below features are implemented the price of waves will probably increase a lot, so look out for their releases.
1. 2FA -> Because, that is when people will really feel comfortable to move all their assets to the Waves DEX. This will increase the volume and number of transactions taking place, which will incentivize mining with waves, which will increase both the demand and the price of waves.
2. GUI Update (the GUI posted in this thread a few pages ago looks amazing) -> Because, a user-friendly and beautiful GUI will attract a lot of people and more importantly, it will be easy to market. When the GUI is done, i expect a lot of marketing capital to be spent.

And of course, more projects on waves platform will nourish and keep the platform healthy. So look out for those as well.

I find it hard to believe we still do not have 2FA lol. It literally is 3 lines of code, pretty unresponsable towards the users to let it slip...over a whole year...despite constantly being asked for.

[imbest]

https://www.facebook.com/wavesplatform/posts/626207594238057

[max.trekker]

I find it hard to believe we still do not have 2FA lol. It literally is 3 lines of code, pretty unresponsable towards the users to let it slip...over a whole year...despite constantly being asked for.

I agree . Few lines of code, yes, if using google authenticator. Unfortunately i got the impression that they want to do their own 2FA (which would req significantly much more work, time and maintenance). But one thing shouldnt rule out the other imo. If they want to do their own 2FA, then first implement google authenticator (since it will be faster, cheaper and easier) and then work on their own "more secure" 2FA.

[ekin4]

I don't want 2FA, it brings more problems than a security solution.

[max.trekker]

I don't want 2FA, it brings more problems than a security solution.

Please elaborate.

Anyhow, if you want it or not, adding it would increase the value of waves significantly. There is a reason most of the successful exchanges and all banks (where i live) and actually most of the places where you can store money uses it. A place that handles and stores money should have 2FA, it is an industry standard.

[chefket]

I don't want 2FA, it brings more problems than a security solution.

Please elaborate.

Anyhow, if you want it or not, adding it would increase the value of waves significantly. There is a reason most of the successful exchanges and all banks (where i live) and actually most of the places where you can store money uses it. A place that handles and stores money should have 2FA, it is an industry standard.

Absolutely. I can not think of a single valid reason to not have it implented months ago. As much as i love waves, i just do not want to hold more of them. Right now they are up for grabs :s

[ekin4]

Anyhow, if you want it or not, adding it would increase the value of waves significantly. There is a reason most of the successful exchanges and all banks (where i live) and actually most of the places where you can store money uses it. A place that handles and stores money should have 2FA, it is an industry standard.

Well, I don't like 2FA and I never use it in any exchanges. It must be optional, if it's a must then I don't use that site/app.
WAVES don't need 2FA to raise their price. The project sell itself already.

[Soul_eater_123]

Anyhow, if you want it or not, adding it would increase the value of waves significantly. There is a reason most of the successful exchanges and all banks (where i live) and actually most of the places where you can store money uses it. A place that handles and stores money should have 2FA, it is an industry standard.

Well, I don't like 2FA and I never use it in any exchanges. It must be optional, if it's a must then I don't use that site/app.
WAVES don't need 2FA to raise their price. The project sell itself already.

Bully for you.  It takes a minute to set up and gives you a lot more security so I'm frankly puzzled that you would be in crypto and not using, given how many hacks there have been.  Don't come crying to us when you get hacked.  Smart people use it by default, everyone else uses it after they get hacked.

[chefket]

Anyhow, if you want it or not, adding it would increase the value of waves significantly. There is a reason most of the successful exchanges and all banks (where i live) and actually most of the places where you can store money uses it. A place that handles and stores money should have 2FA, it is an industry standard.

Well, I don't like 2FA and I never use it in any exchanges. It must be optional, if it's a must then I don't use that site/app.
WAVES don't need 2FA to raise their price. The project sell itself already.

Lol dude. Imagine the news ; "WAVES NOW HAS 2FA" . People would buy in a frenzy!
The tech would get an upgrade on pair with SegWit an LN.

Nah this is about giving people the ability to secure their funds, no correlation whatsoever to the price.

[max.trekker]

Anyhow, if you want it or not, adding it would increase the value of waves significantly. There is a reason most of the successful exchanges and all banks (where i live) and actually most of the places where you can store money uses it. A place that handles and stores money should have 2FA, it is an industry standard.

Well, I don't like 2FA and I never use it in any exchanges. It must be optional, if it's a must then I don't use that site/app.
WAVES don't need 2FA to raise their price. The project sell itself already.

Yes, of course it should be optional, one thing shouldnt exclude the other . I am actually happy that there are still people out there not using 2FA, makes me less of a target. Most people wont be comfortable storing any significant amount of money in a place that dont have 2FA, im actually more comfortable storing money on an exchange like poloniex or bittrex than i am storing in waves DEX bc of 2FA, this defeats some of the purpose of their DEX service.

[max.trekker]

Anyhow, if you want it or not, adding it would increase the value of waves significantly. There is a reason most of the successful exchanges and all banks (where i live) and actually most of the places where you can store money uses it. A place that handles and stores money should have 2FA, it is an industry standard.

Well, I don't like 2FA and I never use it in any exchanges. It must be optional, if it's a must then I don't use that site/app.
WAVES don't need 2FA to raise their price. The project sell itself already.

Lol dude. Imagine the news ; "WAVES NOW HAS 2FA" . People would buy in a frenzy!
The tech would get an upgrade on pair with SegWit an LN.

Nah this is about giving people the ability to secure their funds, no correlation whatsoever to the price.

Haha, yea, not really sexy news . However, i think you are wrong. I cannot be the only one who is holding back from transferring most of my portfolio to DEX bc of lack of 2FA. More assets on waves DEX = more transactions and higher volume = increase in price of waves, all these goes hand in hand. And actually, lack of 2FA was one thing which held me back from buying more when it was at .25$ (kind of regret it now). I will still buy more buy not until a real security for the wallet is in place.

[k26969]

I'm really considering waves tokens as saving money after ETH tokens. This price is quite cheap to buy and hold it for long-term period.
Do you think Waves will hit 10$ in next months? It's not too far to reach this price.

I think waves could take on a similar path as ETH (i believe waves has a much higher ROI than ETH atm). For the ETH path to happen we need more volume and since Poloniex wont add waves, the volume thing could take time. Waves is a quite safe long term investment (relative to others), waves have enough money to make their service superb and the demand for their services are huge. Waves ICO almost raised as much money as etherium, it would take a lot for a company with that much of founding to fail.

My plan is to sell off 50% of my Waves gradually between 20-50$. The other 50% i will keep for longer. I wont sell my WCT under $50 (i might even keep them forever). I like the passive income my WCT generate, if the platform become as big as i think it will, than those WCT will generate a quiet handsome passive income (dividends). I am actually holding as many WCT as i am holding Waves.

These are just my opinions. I have of course diversified in a few other coins. And dont invest with money you cannot afford to lose, if all crypto coins fail and all will be valued 0$ over a night (highly unlikely), than you shouldn't be beaten about it.

When the below features are implemented the price of waves will probably increase a lot, so look out for their releases.
1. 2FA -> Because, that is when people will really feel comfortable to move all their assets to the Waves DEX. This will increase the volume and number of transactions taking place, which will incentivize mining with waves, which will increase both the demand and the price of waves.
2. GUI Update (the GUI posted in this thread a few pages ago looks amazing) -> Because, a user-friendly and beautiful GUI will attract a lot of people and more importantly, it will be easy to market. When the GUI is done, i expect a lot of marketing capital to be spent.

And of course, more projects on waves platform will nourish and keep the platform healthy. So look out for those as well.

I find it hard to believe we still do not have 2FA lol. It literally is 3 lines of code, pretty unresponsable towards the users to let it slip...over a whole year...despite constantly being asked for.

ETh didn't have a wallet that worked for at least a year, if not more. I remember holding on exchanges for months cause mist would not sync unless you were extremely knowledgeable about the situation.

[crimboclaus]

Somebody  convince me otherwise...

We're on a bubble and only being held up because of bitcoin's price. Any day now we are (and all alt coins) likely to tank down to half of our value.

Sasha and company are producing good stuff. Just not 50k sats worth of good stuff. I wouldn't be surprised if the price plummets back to $0.3x

[steve8143]

Somebody  convince me otherwise...

We're on a bubble and only being held up because of bitcoin's price. Any day now we are (and all alt coins) likely to tank down to half of our value.

Sasha and company are producing good stuff. Just not 50k sats worth of good stuff. I wouldn't be surprised if the price plummets back to $0.3x

Only a fool would sell now. Yes, there may be some profit taking and the price may drop a little, but do you want to be the one who sold just before the continued pump?

For me...HODL

[r1d1]

I find it hard to believe we still do not have 2FA lol. It literally is 3 lines of code, pretty unresponsable towards the users to let it slip...over a whole year...despite constantly being asked for.

I agree . Few lines of code, yes, if using google authenticator. Unfortunately i got the impression that they want to do their own 2FA (which would req significantly much more work, time and maintenance). But one thing shouldnt rule out the other imo. If they want to do their own 2FA, then first implement google authenticator (since it will be faster, cheaper and easier) and then work on their own "more secure" 2FA.

For which operations do you want to use authentication? For orders openning?

[crimboclaus]

Somebody  convince me otherwise...

We're on a bubble and only being held up because of bitcoin's price. Any day now we are (and all alt coins) likely to tank down to half of our value.

Sasha and company are producing good stuff. Just not 50k sats worth of good stuff. I wouldn't be surprised if the price plummets back to $0.3x

Only a fool would sell now. Yes, there may be some profit taking and the price may drop a little, but do you want to be the one who sold just before the continued pump?

For me...HODL

That's a super optimistic view. Not really practical.

Did you watch the market today? A bunch of very, very small offers drove the price way down

[hiddensphinx]

Somebody  convince me otherwise...

We're on a bubble and only being held up because of bitcoin's price. Any day now we are (and all alt coins) likely to tank down to half of our value.

Sasha and company are producing good stuff. Just not 50k sats worth of good stuff. I wouldn't be surprised if the price plummets back to $0.3x

Learn about Support And Resistance Reversals here - http://www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/06/supportresistancereversal.asp

[max.trekker]

I find it hard to believe we still do not have 2FA lol. It literally is 3 lines of code, pretty unresponsable towards the users to let it slip...over a whole year...despite constantly being asked for.

I agree . Few lines of code, yes, if using google authenticator. Unfortunately i got the impression that they want to do their own 2FA (which would req significantly much more work, time and maintenance). But one thing shouldnt rule out the other imo. If they want to do their own 2FA, then first implement google authenticator (since it will be faster, cheaper and easier) and then work on their own "more secure" 2FA.

For which operations do you want to use authentication? For orders openning?

Not for orders openning, that i dont need. But for login or for transferring founds away from my account.

[slap]

Despite BTC mooning, Waves is holding up very nicely.
When 2fa is integrated I will transfer the little BTC I still hold to the Waves wallet.

go waves go

[Mallyx]

I find it hard to believe we still do not have 2FA lol. It literally is 3 lines of code, pretty unresponsable towards the users to let it slip...over a whole year...despite constantly being asked for.

I agree . Few lines of code, yes, if using google authenticator. Unfortunately i got the impression that they want to do their own 2FA (which would req significantly much more work, time and maintenance). But one thing shouldnt rule out the other imo. If they want to do their own 2FA, then first implement google authenticator (since it will be faster, cheaper and easier) and then work on their own "more secure" 2FA.

For which operations do you want to use authentication? For orders openning?

Not for orders openning, that i dont need. But for login or for transferring founds away from my account.

I'm agree that 2fa & multisig should be a concern soon.
The wallet is missing some security stuff.