krile (OP)
|
|
March 24, 2016, 08:18:50 AM |
|
Clearly broken coin. Staking is not working, you can easily find out from block chain explorer. Some addresses are receiving staking coins, some do not. "DEV" is ignoring the issue with staking.
I am not ignoring anything How can you find out from the block explorer that the addresses are online and properly connected and have the wallets unlocked and staking? Please explain. The greater the amount of coins the greater the chance you will get a stake of course, but that does not mean it is impossible to get a stake with a lesser amount, a quick look through the recent blocks shows for example: This address is successfully staking with a low amount of coins: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/neva/address.dws?NLcC1cVrFdkXa8bQWScsWuSWkCCCgi5Rpg.htmEdit: If you want to stake more nobody is stoping you from buying/mining more coins and putting them to stake. Staking was never meant to be easy, the more you put at stake the greater the chance of a reward. But if you have any serious suggestions for a change in the protocol or if you found a fault in the code please let me know. That wallet is 31st among richest. Look next one 32nd https://chainz.cryptoid.info/neva/address.dws?NX2QdqErEHgtPpNoMz74ALPh9kayHhddpg.htmsame amount and no stake coins at all. And yes staking is turned on, i know bcs that is one of my wallets. And i am not the only one stating that something is wrong. No stakes for 5 days! I have sent 500 coins to another wallet, and it staked after 2 hours! Coincidence!? I do not think so. In the example you provided the balance on that address is made of many small inputs. If you create a transaction and send the whole balance to yourself (the same address or another one) you will get one large input and will probably stake the next block faster. But long term it should not make a difference in how many stakes you get. Many small inputs or one big input even out the chances of staking a block in the long term.
|
|
|
|
killdemon
|
|
March 24, 2016, 08:25:22 AM |
|
Clearly broken coin. Staking is not working, you can easily find out from block chain explorer. Some addresses are receiving staking coins, some do not. "DEV" is ignoring the issue with staking.
I am not ignoring anything How can you find out from the block explorer that the addresses are online and properly connected and have the wallets unlocked and staking? Please explain. The greater the amount of coins the greater the chance you will get a stake of course, but that does not mean it is impossible to get a stake with a lesser amount, a quick look through the recent blocks shows for example: This address is successfully staking with a low amount of coins: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/neva/address.dws?NLcC1cVrFdkXa8bQWScsWuSWkCCCgi5Rpg.htmEdit: If you want to stake more nobody is stoping you from buying/mining more coins and putting them to stake. Staking was never meant to be easy, the more you put at stake the greater the chance of a reward. But if you have any serious suggestions for a change in the protocol or if you found a fault in the code please let me know. That wallet is 31st among richest. Look next one 32nd https://chainz.cryptoid.info/neva/address.dws?NX2QdqErEHgtPpNoMz74ALPh9kayHhddpg.htmsame amount and no stake coins at all. And yes staking is turned on, i know bcs that is one of my wallets. And i am not the only one stating that something is wrong. No stakes for 5 days! I have sent 500 coins to another wallet, and it staked after 2 hours! Coincidence!? I do not think so. In the example you provided the balance on that address is made of many small inputs. If you create a transaction and send the whole balance to yourself (the same address or another one) you will get one large input and will probably stake the next block faster. But long term it should not make a difference in how many stakes you get. Many small inputs or one big input even out the chances of staking a block in the long term. You have provided example of many more inputs with 50 times smaller amount . Like i am talking to wall. Time will tell.
|
|
|
|
Neptunium
|
|
March 24, 2016, 02:59:58 PM |
|
killdemon, make sure Nevacoin's ports are port forwarded, and in the settings enable UPnP. Then send all your coins to one of your addresses.
Also if you are in the US, staking is much harder and 90% of staked blocks are orphaned. I run a second node in EU to avoid this. Btw, are you mining with a high end Nvidia GPU or bought an AMD miner? Saw you on suprnova.
|
|
|
|
Neptunium
|
|
March 24, 2016, 04:13:27 PM Last edit: March 24, 2016, 04:41:40 PM by Neptunium |
|
Refilled my NevaCoin faucet with 10NEVA. Make sure to click the ads, the current ad revenue isn't covering the costs atm. http://neva.trade/Update: Some guy abused it and took 10NEVA with proxies, fixed now.
|
|
|
|
killdemon
|
|
March 24, 2016, 06:09:04 PM |
|
killdemon, make sure Nevacoin's ports are port forwarded, and in the settings enable UPnP. Then send all your coins to one of your addresses.
Also if you are in the US, staking is much harder and 90% of staked blocks are orphaned. I run a second node in EU to avoid this. Btw, are you mining with a high end Nvidia GPU or bought an AMD miner? Saw you on suprnova.
Thank you for the reply. I am in EU. I am mining with two gtx980 with 2800MH/s. I will try what u told me.
|
|
|
|
ray88
|
|
March 25, 2016, 05:32:14 PM |
|
Hello again Neva, i have a new deal 0.05 for binaries, 0.1 for kernel patch @1252MHz which is my card's default clocks the hashrate is 2260Mh/s https://i.imgur.com/OZZSn5p.png.
|
|
|
|
ray88
|
|
March 27, 2016, 07:19:13 PM Last edit: April 07, 2016, 05:16:05 PM by ray88 |
|
Hello again Neva, i have a new deal 0.05 for binaries, 0.1 for kernel patch @1252MHz which is my card's default clocks the hashrate is 2260Mh/s https://i.imgur.com/OZZSn5p.png. Well, since my initial offer is not attracting many buyers. I have now a free version with a ~2.17-2.28x boost 10% mining fee http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=22523747399185737860 also initial offer stands so if you want to buy it its up to you. Full version will be released once 1btc is retched !
|
|
|
|
Devesh
|
|
March 27, 2016, 07:23:38 PM |
|
Nice coin i will start accumulating some before the price go up
|
|
|
|
digital_money
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 28, 2016, 07:51:07 AM |
|
No one is dumping now.
|
|
|
|
Neptunium
|
|
March 29, 2016, 05:37:36 PM |
|
No one is dumping now. Just sold mine. Although I feel the price has a higher potential, a dump from miners and the previous P2Pool (maybe a botnet) is inevitable and will drop the price to oblivion unless it's softened by demand, which doesn't look promising at this time. Not to mention the private AMD and optimized miners will have a lot to dump.
|
|
|
|
digital_money
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 31, 2016, 01:35:58 AM |
|
The net hashrate is dropping.
|
|
|
|
krile (OP)
|
|
March 31, 2016, 07:24:19 AM |
|
The net hashrate is dropping. And now its going up again
|
|
|
|
krile (OP)
|
|
March 31, 2016, 07:26:17 AM |
|
I am preparing a new update, should be out in the following week if everything goes smooth.
Did anyone notice anything that should be fixed?
Or any suggestions for additional features?
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 31, 2016, 11:05:27 AM |
|
More info about the update?
|
|
|
|
krile (OP)
|
|
March 31, 2016, 11:41:29 AM |
|
More info about the update?
Some minor fixes for now and a few added features for the daemon. I think it wont even be worthy of making a new release, just for people who run a daemon and compile from source. I am halfway on integrating "get headers first" for faster synchronization, but I think this will require more testing so it wont go live in this update...
|
|
|
|
motorhead89
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 464
Merit: 250
Wasssssup!
|
|
March 31, 2016, 06:31:43 PM |
|
|
I had my account hacked due to a weak password I was told. It has be re-secured and a stronger password implemented. Hacker was posting malware links using my account. Always use a very strong password.
|
|
|
motorhead89
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 464
Merit: 250
Wasssssup!
|
|
March 31, 2016, 06:50:42 PM |
|
|
I had my account hacked due to a weak password I was told. It has be re-secured and a stronger password implemented. Hacker was posting malware links using my account. Always use a very strong password.
|
|
|
krile (OP)
|
|
March 31, 2016, 07:15:21 PM |
|
I don't think such a coin exists. A GPU miner can always be written at some point. But with the difficulty low right now you will get good returns with a cpu with this coin.
|
|
|
|
killdemon
|
|
April 01, 2016, 06:52:34 AM |
|
I don't think such a coin exists. A GPU miner can always be written at some point. But with the difficulty low right now you will get good returns with a cpu with this coin. Yes such coin exist. It is called HODLcoin. Since day one you can mine it only with CPU(s).
|
|
|
|
DonMarco
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
April 01, 2016, 07:39:32 AM |
|
Hello I've just started to mine this SUPER coin but is it possible to mine it with AMD GPU? cuz i have some rig but can not get miner to work... CPU mining works fine but would like to mine with AMD gpu if someone can help me will be nice.
|
|
|
|
|