tobacco123
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:06:37 AM |
|
Classic is gaining some momentum and hopeful will turn into something significant.
When I look at what my client connects to, there often is one classic node but rarely two and often none. Usually there is one. Same for core 0.12.0 (what I run) Lot of nodes running 0.11.x core. I think a lot of nodes haven't decided if they want to go core 0.12.x or classic yet. I don't think it is fair to say either is gaining momentum. I think adoption comes in waves. The first wave is in and we are waiting for the next wave (bigger) to happen. If blocksize debate is going no-where, the halving will not in anywhere increase the value of bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Jet Cash
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2456
https://JetCash.com
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:10:22 AM |
|
Classic reminds me of the Black Lives Matter movement. Next we will see r/btc filled with rants of how core is racist and blockstream was responsible for 9/11
Nah! core is paedophilic - fiddling with poor innocent underage nodes. I've got a Bitcoin unlimited node in my peer list, is that gaining acceptance?
|
Offgrid campers allow you to enjoy life and preserve your health and wealth. Save old Cars - my project to save old cars from scrapage schemes, and to reduce the sale of new cars. My new Bitcoin transfer address is - bc1q9gtz8e40en6glgxwk4eujuau2fk5wxrprs6fys
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:14:12 AM |
|
instead of debating the blocksize limit, maybe we should start requiring the mining pools to mine blocks that include transactions.
|
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:19:21 AM |
|
I will upgrade my node to classic once Gavin and Brian Armstrong reveal that Core developers are working with ISIS.
|
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
AliceWonderMiscreations
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:20:18 AM |
|
instead of debating the blocksize limit, maybe we should start requiring the mining pools to mine blocks that include transactions.
Won't work, they would just add transactions that pay themselves.
|
I hereby reserve the right to sometimes be wrong
|
|
|
UngratefulTony
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:21:43 AM |
|
instead of debating the blocksize limit, maybe we should start requiring the mining pools to mine blocks that include transactions.
Instead of opining like you know what you're talking about... maybe you should research why those coinbase only/0 tx blocks are all under a minute in duration. And why that is an argument for miners setting their own soft limits on the sizes of their blocks... like they did for the last 6 years. These blocks are basically miners deciding to not shut down their farm for the first minute after a block is solved... once the previous block is verified, they will start including transactions. If bitcoin is more centralized, they could have a separate channel to include tx only they know about.
|
|
|
|
AliceWonderMiscreations
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:22:14 AM |
|
I will upgrade my node to classic once Gavin and Brian Armstrong reveal that Core developers are working with ISIS.
Actually, they are working with KAOS but Agent 99 is on it.
|
I hereby reserve the right to sometimes be wrong
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:33:55 AM Last edit: March 14, 2016, 05:58:39 AM by elokk |
|
instead of debating the blocksize limit, maybe we should start requiring the mining pools to mine blocks that include transactions.
Instead of opining like you know what you're talking about... maybe you should research why those coinbase only/0 tx blocks are all under a minute in duration. And why that is an argument for miners setting their own soft limits on the sizes of their blocks... like they did for the last 6 years. These blocks are basically miners deciding to not shut down their farm for the first minute after a block is solved... once the previous block is verified, they will start including transactions. If bitcoin is more centralized, they could have a separate channel to include tx only they know about. sounds like a shit excuse to run crap code on a pool.
|
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
UngratefulTony
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:47:23 AM |
|
instead of debating the blocksize limit, maybe we should start requiring the mining pools to mine blocks that include transactions.
Instead of opining like you know what you're talking about... maybe you should research why those coinbase only/0 tx blocks are all under a minute in duration. And why that is an argument for miners setting their own soft limits on the sizes of their blocks... like they did for the last 6 years. These blocks are basically miners deciding to not shut down their farm for the first minute after a block is solved... once the previous block is verified, they will start including transactions. If bitcoin is more centralized, they could have a separate channel to include tx only they know about. sounds like a shit excuse to run crap code on a pool. Shoulda hired you, I guess.
|
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
March 14, 2016, 05:56:58 AM |
|
I don't think we can hire anyone to save bitcoin now that Hearn has left. Time to sell and buy ethereum like a good lemming
|
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
March 14, 2016, 07:16:30 AM |
|
why we should switch to classic when core offer the same exact thing plus other bunch of useful stuff that will increase the capacity anyway
2mb is coming for core too, within one year, but it is coming, so classic is obsolete
|
|
|
|
|