Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no

[Vod]

By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.

By jumping into the ocean, there is a chance I could create a tsunami too.

That's quite a grasp, even for someone like you.

[1715035575]

1715035575

[1715035575]

1715035575

[suchmoon]

I'm making this post to redirect eyeballs from Quickseller's signature to mine. Let's have the fucking hypocrite sue me for lost revenue.

[Quickseller]

By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.

By jumping into the ocean, there is a chance I could create a tsunami too.

That's quite a grasp, even for someone like you.

http://imgur.com/a/lKccW

There is >an entire screen worth of negative ratings left by Lauda that Lauda is not even attempting to say that they are scammers but are trying to sell their signature space.

Lauda is also very inconsistent in who gets a negative rating and who gets a neutral rating as he is leaving both negative and neutral ratings for the exact same activity, that reasonably does not warrant a rating at all.

Lauda is stretching the definition of who deserves a negative rating to much farther then who even trolls leave negative ratings for (let along anyone reputable) and all of the additional people that Lauda is leaving negative ratings for generally want to sell their signature space.

[Lauda]

Chat logs are worthless and can be doctored.

But I really did tell Lauda that.

And this will be ignored by OP.

Lauda is also very inconsistent in who gets a negative rating and who gets a neutral rating as he is leaving both negative and neutral ratings for the exact same activity, that reasonably does not warrant a rating at all.

That is most certainly not the case. In order to understand, you'd have to look into the ratings rather than just make a superficial observation and jump to conclusions. All ratings are handed out on a case-by-case basis, i.e. several factors are considered (e.g. history of account, potential risk, post quality, et al.). For example, the three accounts that are being sold and have received neutral ratings did so because they are 'non-spammy' accounts (which is a rare event on its own).
FYI I'm not the only person tagging for the activates of spamming, account trading and whatnot, but you don't seem to care about those as much as you care about me.
P.S. Minifrij still got some unanswered questions that you seem to be dodging.

[tspacepilot]

Lauda is selling her signature space at elevated rates. Lauda is also leaving negative ratings for accounts most likely to wish to join signature campaigns under the guise of leaving negative ratings for spammers (not scammers), and alts of scammers without properly vetting the information. By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.

Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.

Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!).  Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts?  I dunno.

I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore.  Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?

[gorgon666]

There is not a single DAX 30 or a FTSE 100 company that will let someone "press a few buttons" regarding a transaction/decision involving themselves.

The majority of the time, the person will not even participate in the discussion regarding this kind of discussion, therefore the mere suggestion that a thread about you should be moderated is inappropriate.  

There is no solid evidence that the alleged discussion took place before to the moderation action.  

Remind me why this is relevant whatsoever? All Lauda did was move the topic to where it belonged, something that would have been done by another moderator had Lauda not. They didn't remove or censor the topic, not even obstructing it from view (as there is a trail that can be followed to find it's new location).

Lauda should not have even participated in the discussion regarding if the thread should have been moved, or where it should have been moved. By participating in the discussion, she is unduly influencing a decision that will affect her directly.

BTW the thread was complaining about the behavior of a staff member, and asking for that staff member to be removed from being staff, that sounds more like a thread for meta don't you think?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

^^^This is not a thread where alts should be piling in to artificially reinforce a position,  either.  Just sayin'.

[gorgon666]

^^^This is not a thread where alts should be piling in to artificially reinforce a position,  either.  Just sayin'.

Which alts are piling in to artificially reinforce a position?

Lauda is selling her signature space at elevated rates. Lauda is also leaving negative ratings for accounts most likely to wish to join signature campaigns under the guise of leaving negative ratings for spammers (not scammers), and alts of scammers without properly vetting the information. By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.

Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.

Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!).  Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts?  I dunno.

I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore.  Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?

Please stop posting nonsense in this thread. Just because you are writing a worthless school paper on speech analysis does not make you an expert in figuring out who is behind various online identities.

[suchmoon]

^^^This is not a thread where alts should be piling in to artificially reinforce a position,  either.  Just sayin'.

Which alts are piling in to artificially reinforce a position?

Lauda is selling her signature space at elevated rates. Lauda is also leaving negative ratings for accounts most likely to wish to join signature campaigns under the guise of leaving negative ratings for spammers (not scammers), and alts of scammers without properly vetting the information. By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.

Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.

Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!).  Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts?  I dunno.

I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore.  Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?

Please stop posting nonsense in this thread. Just because you are writing a worthless school paper on speech analysis does not make you an expert in figuring out who is behind various online identities.

You're trying too hard. The amount of butthurt exuded betrays you.

[minifrij]

By participating in the discussion, she is unduly influencing a decision that will affect her directly.

I fail to see the logic behind this. For starters, as proven by DeepSpace/Mitchell's statement, the topic would have been treated the same had Lauda not dealt with it. Secondly, I don't see how moving a topic will affect them at all. The topic was not removed from being seen, nor censored in any way. The difference being that it is categorized correctly, if anything making it easier for anyone interested to find the thread.

BTW the thread was complaining about the behavior of a staff member, and asking for that staff member to be removed from being staff, that sounds more like a thread for meta don't you think?

The thread was complaining about receiving negative trust from Lauda, for this reason it belongs in Reputation. This is the case regardless of who received or left the feedback. If the thread were about a problem with the trust system it's self, not a specific person on it, or complaining about Lauda's moderation (as this thread is, I suppose) then it would be more fitting in Meta.

[tspacepilot]

^^^This is not a thread where alts should be piling in to artificially reinforce a position,  either.  Just sayin'.

Which alts are piling in to artificially reinforce a position?

Lauda is selling her signature space at elevated rates. Lauda is also leaving negative ratings for accounts most likely to wish to join signature campaigns under the guise of leaving negative ratings for spammers (not scammers), and alts of scammers without properly vetting the information. By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.

Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.

Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!).  Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts?  I dunno.

I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore.  Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?

Please stop posting nonsense in this thread. Just because you are writing a worthless school paper on speech analysis does not make you an expert in figuring out who is behind various online identities.

You're trying too hard. The amount of butthurt exuded betrays you.

Zzzactly!

[BitcoinEXpress]

Is it just my imagination or does gorgon666 appear to also be Quickseller?



~BCX~

[tspacepilot]

Is it just my imagination or does gorgon666 appear to also be Quickseller?



~BCX~

It's not just your imagination.  gorgon666 was outed as yet another QS alt some months ago.

[SnukeySnizz]

Just because you are writing a worthless school paper on speech analysis does not make you an expert in figuring out who is behind various online identities.

My golly, does the ludite truly believe that a wundahbox can unearth a nom de guerre using this schema? This is truly the confab of a celibate in need of some peepee friction fun.

Now excuse me while I go to my motorized rollingham, for I will need to blast some fizzlebombs in revelry of the up coming nativity.

[gorgon666]

By participating in the discussion, she is unduly influencing a decision that will affect her directly.

I fail to see the logic behind this. For starters, as proven by DeepSpace/Mitchell's statement, the topic would have been treated the same had Lauda not dealt with it. Secondly, I don't see how moving a topic will affect them at all. The topic was not removed from being seen, nor censored in any way. The difference being that it is categorized correctly, if anything making it easier for anyone interested to find the thread.

BTW the thread was complaining about the behavior of a staff member, and asking for that staff member to be removed from being staff, that sounds more like a thread for meta don't you think?

The thread was complaining about receiving negative trust from Lauda, for this reason it belongs in Reputation. This is the case regardless of who received or left the feedback. If the thread were about a problem with the trust system it's self, not a specific person on it, or complaining about Lauda's moderation (as this thread is, I suppose) then it would be more fitting in Meta.

If you do not have a good enough feedback score yourself, you cannot affect others scores. This is why your feedback goes into the 'Untrusted Feedback' section, rather than the Trusted.
If you get tagged by someone on Default trust in a positive way, I believe that you can then influence trust scores yourself.

You're wrong, stop confusing people.

[suchmoon]

If you do not have a good enough feedback score yourself, you cannot affect others scores. This is why your feedback goes into the 'Untrusted Feedback' section, rather than the Trusted.
If you get tagged by someone on Default trust in a positive way, I believe that you can then influence trust scores yourself.

You're wrong, stop confusing people.

Oh come on, you can do better, that's a very shitty straw man.

I'll take the word of someone who can do this...



... over a shilly puppet any day.

[whywefight]

After all this time... glad to see this topic is still on the first page in meta...

[BitcoinEXpress]

I'm surprised Quickseller hasn't locked this thread yet.


~BCX~

[gorgon666]

^^^This is not a thread where alts should be piling in to artificially reinforce a position,  either.  Just sayin'.

Which alts are piling in to artificially reinforce a position?

Lauda is selling her signature space at elevated rates. Lauda is also leaving negative ratings for accounts most likely to wish to join signature campaigns under the guise of leaving negative ratings for spammers (not scammers), and alts of scammers without properly vetting the information. By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.

Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.

Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!).  Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts?  I dunno.

I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore.  Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?

Please stop posting nonsense in this thread. Just because you are writing a worthless school paper on speech analysis does not make you an expert in figuring out who is behind various online identities.

You're trying too hard. The amount of butthurt exuded betrays you.

This is not nonsense. This is not butthurt. He really is writing a PhD in linguistics that will end up being useless

His analysis is useless and inaccurate. He is trying to distract from the fact that Lauda is an unqualified, inept (and more) moderator that does not have any business being anywhere near authority. 

[takagari]

Is this thread still a thing?
Everyone has issues with mods.
I've moderated and been head admin of a few large forums and facebook groups (nowhere near this size..)
And regardless of what you do, people hate you.

Move on with life and try to stay out of their radar.

Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.