Be 100% clear on what fud is. Fud is not presenting facts.
Make your own fudder post. However come with some facts.
Be clear what a fudder is and provide examples of how they fud (what is fud) and add the names. Be sure to prove they have bought in and benefited from buying in at a fudded down price.
If you have some factual grounds to stand on that will stand up to investigation.... Go for it.
For example your quite biased "opinion polls" where you don't give an opportunity to disagree with your opinion without looking like a really ugly greedy pig are good examples
.
You know, sometimes it's difficult to find out what is fud, what is pump, and what's the truth behind the big pile of BS what people keep pouring here. E.g. I think the monero & co guys are right about DASH but they are just fuckin' annoying with their constant croaking about how flawed DASH is and how cool their coins are. The Rimbit and Leocoin guys are probably right when they saying that everybody can make a few bucks with their stuff, but they are also very annoying with their scammy hurray-optimistic crap.
It is not difficult to analyse the facts if you put in some time. When a person no longer presents facts to support their case either way then it can be considered dubious if their case looks unlikely. Dash was a scam. Some of the people left in it are not scammers. If their tech is flawed then I hope the truth come out that it is flawed. The tech being flawed is not the part I think makes it a scam if they really can't see the tech is flawed yet. Although if you are presenting tech to achieve something that you know it can not achieve that can be considered dishonest and scammy too.
My polls were fair. They iota tried to abuse the fact they were overly fair. The new poll shows that all those before voting it was okay to pay 3000% over ico were in fact only iota holders who were being dishonest by not posting their names in the thread. The thread was clearly not meant for iota pumpers to say they thought it was a good idea others would purchase their 130sats tokens for 3000sats? that's obvious they would.
If they put a new poll system where you could see which usernames voted for what that would be much more helpful.
You seem to constantly be defending Iota and pointing people to the iota sales threads? Yes I have looked through your post history and see you giving links out to the iota sales threads. How much did you invest either under this account or a sock puppet? what is your special interest in the token? you post history indicates you are interested in little else of late?
Perhaps monero people are trying to save people from bad tech or scam coins? If they present facts then to me that is not fudding that is merely presenting facts to substantial their rightful claims? Yes it can be annoying if over done but really dash deserves all it gets for the huge scam they pulled. You have other dashers still spamming their scam on here anyway.
People who can talk only in facts and do so without swearing or acting childish are very welcome additions to any threads that I create. However, the constant recycling of misinformation will be deleted.
If you are playing devils advocate here and have no investment/motive in iota I want to hear it from your lips right now that vicodin is now an obvious pumper for iota??
Is he and obvious pumper for iota or not?? I want to hear you say it. If you refuse to confirm based on all of his crazy price speculation threads and multiple other pump/spam threads I want to hear your reasons.
I want a simple yes or no. Do you consider his constant 1billion 10000sats top 5 threads and blatant an irresponsible pumping and shilling? on a 130sats token that is as yet without the special trinary processor, and even the DAG token is unproven in real world use on any large scale.
Yes or no?
