R9 Nano Modded Rom

[Eliovp]

Ha, it seems that it's a bit to tight for most of your nano's.

Here's a softer one.

Link: Here
No reduced core voltage, increased memory voltage (+25mV)
Stock memory clock is 550 with the option to raise to 600max.

Greetings!

[citronick]

Ha, it seems that it's a bit to tight for most of your nano's.

Here's a softer one.

Link: Here
No reduced core voltage, increased memory voltage (+25mV)
Stock memory clock is 550 with the option to raise to 600max.

Greetings!

this good for Claymore Zcash miner?

[zzzzzzzzzz]

Ha, it seems that it's a bit to tight for most of your nano's.

Here's a softer one.

Link: Here
No reduced core voltage, increased memory voltage (+25mV)
Stock memory clock is 550 with the option to raise to 600max.

Greetings!

Hi @Eliovp! Any chance of getting the last one with a modest core undervolt? It's a huge task to update all my GPUs, so I'd like to settle on the "best" zcash rom before I update them all. I'm seeing perhaps a 3% gain from your last one. With Claymore not bothering to update his linux version, us non-windows folks are looking for whatever we can squeeze out of our rigs, just trying not to get too far behind. Thanks!

[Batelk]

Ha, it seems that it's a bit to tight for most of your nano's.

Here's a softer one.

Link: Here
No reduced core voltage, increased memory voltage (+25mV)
Stock memory clock is 550 with the option to raise to 600max.

Greetings!

Hi @Eliovp! Any chance of getting the last one with a modest core undervolt? It's a huge task to update all my GPUs, so I'd like to settle on the "best" zcash rom before I update them all. I'm seeing perhaps a 3% gain from your last one. With Claymore not bothering to update his linux version, us non-windows folks are looking for whatever we can squeeze out of our rigs, just trying not to get too far behind. Thanks!

Do you mean after using the "tight" timing rom, the speed of the Claymore miner just increased 3%?

[citronick]

My Nanos are with Heliox -100mV mods and under Claymore's v4 ZEC miner.

The Nanos are running strong some cards touching 82 h/s but most runnng at 70ish h/s

Some say they can run faster at stock ROMS but with the current power savings, I am real happy at current speed.

[agente]

My Nanos are with Heliox -100mV mods and under Claymore's v4 ZEC miner.

The Nanos are running strong some cards touching 82 h/s but most runnng at 70ish h/s

Some say they can run faster at stock ROMS but with the current power savings, I am real happy at current speed.

I can reach 100 with last rom (no core undervolt) but crash every 15min (returned incorrect data).. I tried 1000/550...900/550...800/550. It's the same

[sp_]

I get 100sol/s @ 90 watt with a modded Nano bios. (an older eliopv etherum powersaver bios) (claymore 4.0)
Stable 12 hours now..

[citronick]

My Nanos are with Heliox -100mV mods and under Claymore's v4 ZEC miner.

The Nanos are running strong some cards touching 82 h/s but most runnng at 70ish h/s

Some say they can run faster at stock ROMS but with the current power savings, I am real happy at current speed.

just changed to "-i 0" and overnight I see several GPUs (Nanos and 390s) touching 100-105 H/s !

[agente]

I get 100sol/s @ 90 watt with a modded Nano bios. (an older eliopv etherum powersaver bios) (claymore 4.0)
Stable 12 hours now..

older rom was 800/250 (or 800/300). what freq do you use for 100sol?

[nanona]

Folks, with stock ROM the Nanos hash at 100 H/s with Claymore 4.0. I have undervolted core by -72mV in Trixx and they still draw 200W each (on a rig of 4, total draw from wall incl. 1820 CPU = 800W)
With -li 2 they do 75 H/s at 160W (640W total a rig of 4 incl 1820 CPU), which I prefer for my rigs, though it means quite a bit less in profit.

[Marvell1]

Folks, with stock ROM the Nanos hash at 100 H/s with Claymore 4.0. I have undervolted core by -72mV in Trixx and they still draw 200W each (on a rig of 4, total draw from wall incl. 1820 CPU = 800W)
With -li 2 they do 75 H/s at 160W (640W total a rig of 4 incl 1820 CPU), which I prefer for my rigs, though it means quite a bit less in profit.

whats -li 2

[zzzzzzzzzz]

I'm now getting 113 sols/s with a Nano, Ubuntu 16.04, amdgpu-pro 16.40, and Silentarmy v5. Who needs Claymore's 2.5%?

[Gotumoot]

Folks, with stock ROM the Nanos hash at 100 H/s with Claymore 4.0. I have undervolted core by -72mV in Trixx and they still draw 200W each (on a rig of 4, total draw from wall incl. 1820 CPU = 800W)
With -li 2 they do 75 H/s at 160W (640W total a rig of 4 incl 1820 CPU), which I prefer for my rigs, though it means quite a bit less in profit.

whats -li 2

li   low intensity mode. Reduces mining intensity, useful if your cards are overheated. Note that mining speed is reduced too.
   More value means less heat and mining speed, for example, "-li 10" is less heat and mining speed than "-li 1". You can also specify values for every card, for example "-li 3,10,50".
   Default value is "0" - no low intensity mode.

[fmz89]

heliox do you have moded bios nano for 950mhz core with lowest stable core voltage + mvddc, for zcash mining
i tried in front page but using lot of power, inst efficient, rx series has better efficiency
thanks .....

[Faxmate]

Folks, with stock ROM the Nanos hash at 100 H/s with Claymore 4.0. I have undervolted core by -72mV in Trixx and they still draw 200W each (on a rig of 4, total draw from wall incl. 1820 CPU = 800W)
With -li 2 they do 75 H/s at 160W (640W total a rig of 4 incl 1820 CPU), which I prefer for my rigs, though it means quite a bit less in profit.

What is your maximum speed at the latest Claymore V5? Have you tried the tight timing bios supplied?

[Next BillG]

Folks, with stock ROM the Nanos hash at 100 H/s with Claymore 4.0. I have undervolted core by -72mV in Trixx and they still draw 200W each (on a rig of 4, total draw from wall incl. 1820 CPU = 800W)
With -li 2 they do 75 H/s at 160W (640W total a rig of 4 incl 1820 CPU), which I prefer for my rigs, though it means quite a bit less in profit.

What is your maximum speed at the latest Claymore V5? Have you tried the tight timing bios supplied?

I tried one of the mod with tight memory timing. It seems it makes no diffierence in the Nano mining for ZCash.

[omshree]

I get 290ish w stock bios on V8, is there any better hr with modified ROMs?

[tc61]

Do you happen to have a stock r9 nano rom ...lost my hd with my orginal.

Thx

[citronick]

I get 290ish w stock bios on V8, is there any better hr with modified ROMs?

with the -100mV ones, the Nanos runs lower power and less heat, but I managed only 260-280 H/s.

with the power savings, I dont mind with lower hash.

the Nanos are easily the best performer in my small farm, followed by 390s then.... then 480s.

[Marvell1]

I get 290ish w stock bios on V8, is there any better hr with modified ROMs?

with the -100mV ones, the Nanos runs lower power and less heat, but I managed only 260-280 H/s.

with the power savings, I dont mind with lower hash.

the Nanos are easily the best performer in my small farm, followed by 390s then.... then 480s.

@citronick are those the bioses with the 300 mv undervolt ? the ones that work for eth ? or are they different i cant find the rom you are talking about ?  All my nanos
are stock around 270h/s but use a ton of power even after 100mv undervolt