RastoMan
|
|
May 11, 2016, 07:57:15 AM |
|
What is the model of the XFX card? Is that the 1015 MHz version or the 1050 Black Edition? How low is the MVDDC?
1015 version. Still at stock right now. Do you mean the stock VDDC or the MVDDC? I have the cards. I can undervolt it by -200mV and works well around 950 MHz. Both That is great effort. Are you going to release your XFX R9 390 BIOS mod soon? We are looking forward to it.
|
|
|
|
agente
|
|
May 11, 2016, 05:36:15 PM |
|
What about your experience with "intensity" in ethereum mining config? 800 core and 300 mem of course...
|
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
May 11, 2016, 07:41:25 PM |
|
That is great effort. Are you going to release your XFX R9 390 BIOS mod soon? We are looking forward to it.
As soon as i can :p Got so many things that i still have to do these days. I wouldn't mind a few days with more than 24hrs in it :p What about your experience with "intensity" in ethereum mining config? 800 core and 300 mem of course...
What exactly do you mean by that agente?
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
May 12, 2016, 01:14:43 AM |
|
just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...
.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....
134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom
OR
185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem
I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.
Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
ldw-com
|
|
May 12, 2016, 06:31:30 AM |
|
just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...
.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....
134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom
OR
185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem
I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.
Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?
Hey Citronick. Try the lower ones first. link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM. link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down. You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock. The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is. In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc. "they're all -100mV Core clock." Greetings!
|
|
|
|
Zitdadast
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 250
LTC fan 4ever
|
|
May 12, 2016, 08:11:44 AM |
|
That is great effort. Are you going to release your XFX R9 390 BIOS mod soon? We are looking forward to it.
As soon as i can :p Got so many things that i still have to do these days. I wouldn't mind a few days with more than 24hrs in it :p What about your experience with "intensity" in ethereum mining config? 800 core and 300 mem of course...
What exactly do you mean by that agente? In the Claymore miner, there is ethi setting, that determine the intensity of the mining. I think he means that.
|
|
|
|
lawrencelyl
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
May 12, 2016, 10:14:54 AM |
|
A side question, for the R9 Nano, if I'm running headless, I can't seem to view the core clock/memory clock/temperature/etc. Only able to see them with monitor attached. Is there any workaround to view them when running headless? By the way, I'm on Win10. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
ldw-com
|
|
May 12, 2016, 10:20:10 AM |
|
A side question, for the R9 Nano, if I'm running headless, I can't seem to view the core clock/memory clock/temperature/etc. Only able to see them with monitor attached. Is there any workaround to view them when running headless? By the way, I'm on Win10. Thanks.
Sounds like a driver issue, all my rigs are headless and i can monitor everything without a problem. Also Windows 10. Reinstall drivers mate. That'll probably solve it
|
|
|
|
lawrencelyl
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
May 12, 2016, 11:01:34 AM |
|
A side question, for the R9 Nano, if I'm running headless, I can't seem to view the core clock/memory clock/temperature/etc. Only able to see them with monitor attached. Is there any workaround to view them when running headless? By the way, I'm on Win10. Thanks.
Sounds like a driver issue, all my rigs are headless and i can monitor everything without a problem. Also Windows 10. Reinstall drivers mate. That'll probably solve it That's weird. I have tried to reinstall driver but still the same. Using 16.5.1 driver. I have other Nvidia cards on the same rig but I don't think that has to do with it coz I did try to remove Nvidia cards but still the same. Maybe I should try other driver versions...
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
May 12, 2016, 12:29:33 PM |
|
just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...
.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....
134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom
OR
185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem
I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.
Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?
Hey Citronick. Try the lower ones first. link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM. link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down. You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock. The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is. In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc. "they're all -100mV Core clock." Greetings! thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
May 12, 2016, 05:46:11 PM |
|
just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...
.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....
134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom
OR
185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem
I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.
Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?
Hey Citronick. Try the lower ones first. link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM. link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down. You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock. The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is. In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc. "they're all -100mV Core clock." Greetings! thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it You'll have to do crazy things to brick one Again, as i mentioned before, got 100 of those, flashed them all individually more than 3 times They're all still running at max 60 degrees
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
May 12, 2016, 06:03:28 PM |
|
just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...
.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....
134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom
OR
185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem
I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.
Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?
Hey Citronick. Try the lower ones first. link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM. link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down. You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock. The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is. In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc. "they're all -100mV Core clock." Greetings! thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it Wow 100 of these babies would be sweet..... open rig or hosted DC?
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
May 12, 2016, 06:14:24 PM |
|
just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...
.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....
134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom
OR
185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem
I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.
Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?
Hey Citronick. Try the lower ones first. link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM. link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down. You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock. The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is. In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc. "they're all -100mV Core clock." Greetings! thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it Wow 100 of these babies would be sweet..... open rig or hosted DC? Open, You can see them "here"greetings
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
May 12, 2016, 06:58:54 PM |
|
just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...
.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....
134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom
OR
185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem
I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.
Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?
Hey Citronick. Try the lower ones first. link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM. link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down. You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock. The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is. In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc. "they're all -100mV Core clock." Greetings! thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it Wow 100 of these babies would be sweet..... open rig or hosted DC? Open, You can see them "here"greetings $$$ excellent $$$
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
May 12, 2016, 07:32:37 PM |
|
ellovp - have you tried 8 x GPU setup.
I am thinking of doing this using 3 to 1 PCI riser on the 6th PCI slot.
That should get the MHs above 200MHs per rig.
Thoughts?
I am going using Claymore Dual miner for this rig.
thanks
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
May 12, 2016, 09:07:16 PM |
|
ellovp - have you tried 8 x GPU setup.
I am thinking of doing this using 3 to 1 PCI riser on the 6th PCI slot.
That should get the MHs above 200MHs per rig.
Thoughts?
I am going using Claymore Dual miner for this rig.
thanks
I haven't tried with my nano's, i have tried to use a pci hub/splitter in the past, i still have 2 of them though. Maybe i'll play with them again sooner or later. But like it is now, 6 per rig is more than enough + i would need an extra PSU.. nahh i'm fine like this :p
|
|
|
|
greaterninja
|
|
May 12, 2016, 09:52:41 PM |
|
Impressive power efficiency.
However, at this point I don't see a reason to choose Nano due to its extremely high cost.
If it were cheaper, I'd totally be game.
|
|
|
|
lawrencelyl
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
May 12, 2016, 11:58:33 PM |
|
A side question, for the R9 Nano, if I'm running headless, I can't seem to view the core clock/memory clock/temperature/etc. Only able to see them with monitor attached. Is there any workaround to view them when running headless? By the way, I'm on Win10. Thanks.
Sounds like a driver issue, all my rigs are headless and i can monitor everything without a problem. Also Windows 10. Reinstall drivers mate. That'll probably solve it I tried latest driver 16.5.2, still the same behavior. May I know which driver are you using?
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
May 13, 2016, 12:48:05 AM |
|
ellovp - have you tried 8 x GPU setup.
I am thinking of doing this using 3 to 1 PCI riser on the 6th PCI slot.
That should get the MHs above 200MHs per rig.
Thoughts?
I am going using Claymore Dual miner for this rig.
thanks
I haven't tried with my nano's, i have tried to use a pci hub/splitter in the past, i still have 2 of them though. Maybe i'll play with them again sooner or later. But like it is now, 6 per rig is more than enough + i would need an extra PSU.. nahh i'm fine like this :p I have EVGA 1600w G2, and I will work on the 8 x GPU version (246MH/s rig!!!) - I will post results soon. I am still waiting for DHL to knock on my door...
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
ldw-com
|
|
May 13, 2016, 06:29:13 AM |
|
ellovp - have you tried 8 x GPU setup.
I am thinking of doing this using 3 to 1 PCI riser on the 6th PCI slot.
That should get the MHs above 200MHs per rig.
Thoughts?
I am going using Claymore Dual miner for this rig.
thanks
I haven't tried with my nano's, i have tried to use a pci hub/splitter in the past, i still have 2 of them though. Maybe i'll play with them again sooner or later. But like it is now, 6 per rig is more than enough + i would need an extra PSU.. nahh i'm fine like this :p I have EVGA 1600w G2, and I will work on the 8 x GPU version (246MH/s rig!!!) - I will post results soon. I am still waiting for DHL to knock on my door... I don't think you'll have enough PCI power connectors to connect all 8 Gpu's.... "could be wrong though.." Anyhow, even if you do, the psu won't be able to bring enough power to all those rails. "again, could be wrong.." I tried latest driver 16.5.2, still the same behavior. May I know which driver are you using?
Try to boot with only 1 nano connected to your mobo and see what that gives you
|
|
|
|
|