Bitcoin Forum
August 15, 2018, 01:35:06 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][ARG] Argentum || A New Begining || UPDATE YOUR WALLET ||  (Read 43054 times)
mrbodz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 800
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 16, 2016, 04:01:47 PM
 #241

Best bet would have been for you to fork from Unitus and swap out the algorithms.

Ahmed
1534296906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534296906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534296906
Reply with quote  #2

1534296906
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1534296906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534296906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534296906
Reply with quote  #2

1534296906
Report to moderator
1534296906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534296906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534296906
Reply with quote  #2

1534296906
Report to moderator
IconFirm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 508


Always ask questions.


View Profile
July 17, 2016, 10:48:00 AM
 #242

Best bet would have been for you to fork from Unitus and swap out the algorithms.

Ahmed

Looks like they've taken your advice.....

Unofficial & Uncensored SYSCOIN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4748031.0
Do not trust Yobit/HitBTC/C-cex/Poloniex/WEX/KuCoin/LiveCoin scam exchanges or shady ICO's run by known scam companies like HashCoins/Ambisafe/Bountyhive etc - they WILL scam you!
Use due diligence & do research. Buy the coins, sell the coins - don't invest in stupid shit. If your questions aren't answered - don't touch it.
mrbodz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 800
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 17, 2016, 01:35:50 PM
 #243

Nice to know when youve been asked for a quote to do a job and someone else did it cheaper and made a mess of it. And now your advice is whats needed to fix a problem which shouldnt have occoured in the first place.

Ahmed
IconFirm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 508


Always ask questions.


View Profile
July 18, 2016, 10:50:37 AM
 #244

We've passed the switchover block 1840000 but it looks like nothing has changed - sha256 diff is still almost zero & all my blocks are still being rejected..... Sad

Our Dev is on it Sad

You are merge mining sha right? Can you post part of your log?

Sure, & yes I am:

Code:
2016-07-16 14:27:20 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:27:59 connect() to 192.168.1.50:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)
2016-07-16 14:28:02 connect() to 98.115.147.74:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:28:55 connect() to 107.7.28.130:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:28:55 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash d7fdf85b2c15e65ba7e5a1262dad76d4872eea5f275f0f70c8d6ebabf634b861 is not under target 000000000000d2df000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:28:58 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash 9af150c746a7662de348cf2c03782938d7ac515eff6d036a6970d2d2954f1859 is not under target 000000000000d2df000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:29:17 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000091b52e32430afd7e51033d57b03340365374dbc7e5b61b31746d  height=1840154  log2_work=60.994844  tx=2043171  date=2016-07-16 14:28:14 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:17 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:18 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:29:19 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000047382b1426d1a80c13c7243ee15f05d83358978e98250c44535f  height=1840155  log2_work=60.995072  tx=2043172  date=2016-07-16 14:29:56 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:19 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:19 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:29:27 keypool reserve 2
2016-07-16 14:29:27 keypool return 2
2016-07-16 14:29:39 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash 6c099e7aa05a22f753750cda8f46b73132152516a0d6981e1deaaf31d509b664 is not under target 000000000000d44f000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:29:47 UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000a3a9c6f2429acca37566353bc123d82b7e4ac3ba1b9ef5076cd  height=1840156  log2_work=60.995285  tx=2043173  date=2016-07-16 14:29:19 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:47 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:47 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:30:06 connect() to 192.168.1.50:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)
2016-07-16 14:30:08 connect() to 98.115.147.74:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:30:08 connect() to 62.210.149.29:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:30:15 connect() to 95.158.16.192:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)

Using latest from git on Xubuntu 64bit - hope it helps.

Dev - any updates? If you're unable to successfully implement sha256/auxpow mining please let miners know so that we can remove the wallet & free up valuable resources. Thanks.

Unofficial & Uncensored SYSCOIN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4748031.0
Do not trust Yobit/HitBTC/C-cex/Poloniex/WEX/KuCoin/LiveCoin scam exchanges or shady ICO's run by known scam companies like HashCoins/Ambisafe/Bountyhive etc - they WILL scam you!
Use due diligence & do research. Buy the coins, sell the coins - don't invest in stupid shit. If your questions aren't answered - don't touch it.
protonn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2016, 12:04:40 PM
 #245

We've passed the switchover block 1840000 but it looks like nothing has changed - sha256 diff is still almost zero & all my blocks are still being rejected..... Sad

Our Dev is on it Sad

You are merge mining sha right? Can you post part of your log?

Sure, & yes I am:

Code:
2016-07-16 14:27:20 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:27:59 connect() to 192.168.1.50:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)
2016-07-16 14:28:02 connect() to 98.115.147.74:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:28:55 connect() to 107.7.28.130:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:28:55 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash d7fdf85b2c15e65ba7e5a1262dad76d4872eea5f275f0f70c8d6ebabf634b861 is not under target 000000000000d2df000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:28:58 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash 9af150c746a7662de348cf2c03782938d7ac515eff6d036a6970d2d2954f1859 is not under target 000000000000d2df000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:29:17 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000091b52e32430afd7e51033d57b03340365374dbc7e5b61b31746d  height=1840154  log2_work=60.994844  tx=2043171  date=2016-07-16 14:28:14 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:17 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:18 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:29:19 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000047382b1426d1a80c13c7243ee15f05d83358978e98250c44535f  height=1840155  log2_work=60.995072  tx=2043172  date=2016-07-16 14:29:56 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:19 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:19 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:29:27 keypool reserve 2
2016-07-16 14:29:27 keypool return 2
2016-07-16 14:29:39 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash 6c099e7aa05a22f753750cda8f46b73132152516a0d6981e1deaaf31d509b664 is not under target 000000000000d44f000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:29:47 UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000a3a9c6f2429acca37566353bc123d82b7e4ac3ba1b9ef5076cd  height=1840156  log2_work=60.995285  tx=2043173  date=2016-07-16 14:29:19 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:47 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:47 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:30:06 connect() to 192.168.1.50:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)
2016-07-16 14:30:08 connect() to 98.115.147.74:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:30:08 connect() to 62.210.149.29:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:30:15 connect() to 95.158.16.192:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)

Using latest from git on Xubuntu 64bit - hope it helps.

Dev - any updates? If you're unable to successfully implement sha256/auxpow mining please let miners know so that we can remove the wallet & free up valuable resources. Thanks.

We'll get it fixed, I can assure you that. Will it be fixed in 2 hours, or 2 days, I can't be certain. I haven't had any reports of Scrypt auxpow not working. Once the multialgo difficulty adjustment gets fixed, I'd image aux sha will be straightened out as a result. We'll get it right.

IconFirm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 508


Always ask questions.


View Profile
July 18, 2016, 12:16:58 PM
 #246

We'll get it fixed, I can assure you that. Will it be fixed in 2 hours, or 2 days, I can't be certain. I haven't had any reports of Scrypt auxpow not working. Once the multialgo difficulty adjustment gets fixed, I'd image aux sha will be straightened out as a result. We'll get it right.

OK, but I don't see much going on in the git repo.  I'm going to remove it to make way for a different merge mined coin - I hope you get the problems fixed - but it does seem to be a very slow process.

Good luck  Wink

Unofficial & Uncensored SYSCOIN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4748031.0
Do not trust Yobit/HitBTC/C-cex/Poloniex/WEX/KuCoin/LiveCoin scam exchanges or shady ICO's run by known scam companies like HashCoins/Ambisafe/Bountyhive etc - they WILL scam you!
Use due diligence & do research. Buy the coins, sell the coins - don't invest in stupid shit. If your questions aren't answered - don't touch it.
IconFirm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 508


Always ask questions.


View Profile
July 19, 2016, 07:53:39 PM
 #247

Best bet would have been for you to fork from Unitus and swap out the algorithms.

Ahmed

It seems that Unitus & now XMY are suffering from the same issue regarding merge mining:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483515.msg15638371#msg15638371

So that's NMC, SYS, ARG, UNITUS & XMY that are now broken with merge mining since they updated their code....what's the story? If every merge mined coin updated their code this way - there would be no merged mined coins to merge mine!

Unofficial & Uncensored SYSCOIN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4748031.0
Do not trust Yobit/HitBTC/C-cex/Poloniex/WEX/KuCoin/LiveCoin scam exchanges or shady ICO's run by known scam companies like HashCoins/Ambisafe/Bountyhive etc - they WILL scam you!
Use due diligence & do research. Buy the coins, sell the coins - don't invest in stupid shit. If your questions aren't answered - don't touch it.
protonn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 19, 2016, 09:15:42 PM
 #248

Best bet would have been for you to fork from Unitus and swap out the algorithms.

Ahmed

It seems that Unitus & now XMY are suffering from the same issue regarding merge mining:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483515.msg15638371#msg15638371

So that's NMC, SYS, ARG, UNITUS & XMY that are now broken with merge mining since they updated their code....what's the story? If every merge mined coin updated their code this way - there would be no merged mined coins to merge mine!

We have a version in testing right now. Thanks for pointing this out.

ErikW79
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 24, 2016, 07:55:31 PM
 #249

Any working exchange? Cryptopia has nothing.

cryptmebro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 791
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 06:10:44 AM
 #250

Any working exchange? Cryptopia has nothing.

looks like cryptopia and coinexchange.io for now. I see orders on each site.
ErikW79
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 26, 2016, 04:49:49 AM
 #251

Added to my pool
http://91.240.86.243/
0.5% pool fee
Dead for about 1 hour not able to connect.

ErikW79
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 26, 2016, 06:30:27 AM
 #252

Any progress with sha256 mining? The only pool is gone from today..

protonn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2016, 06:49:43 PM
 #253

Any progress with sha256 mining? The only pool is gone from today..

I've just discovered a fix that looks very promising. We'll be doing a lot of testing over the next few days. Scrypt and SHA appear to be on their own diff, and block time seems to be stable. We'll need to put more hash rate on it, and examine logs etc...Lots more testing. More to follow (hopefully) soon.

ErikW79
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 28, 2016, 11:47:10 AM
 #254

Any progress with sha256 mining? The only pool is gone from today..

I've just discovered a fix that looks very promising. We'll be doing a lot of testing over the next few days. Scrypt and SHA appear to be on their own diff, and block time seems to be stable. We'll need to put more hash rate on it, and examine logs etc...Lots more testing. More to follow (hopefully) soon.

Well that is great. Thank you and waiting for more news...

cryptmebro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 791
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 28, 2016, 05:15:00 PM
 #255

Is there anyone that would like to see X11 enabled? It's already in the code (but disabled.) We can either remove it, or enable it.
IconFirm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 508


Always ask questions.


View Profile
July 28, 2016, 06:29:34 PM
 #256

I'm not against it, but think it would be better to get the original idea up & running first - the x11 could be added/enabled later if there is a demand for it?

Unofficial & Uncensored SYSCOIN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4748031.0
Do not trust Yobit/HitBTC/C-cex/Poloniex/WEX/KuCoin/LiveCoin scam exchanges or shady ICO's run by known scam companies like HashCoins/Ambisafe/Bountyhive etc - they WILL scam you!
Use due diligence & do research. Buy the coins, sell the coins - don't invest in stupid shit. If your questions aren't answered - don't touch it.
protonn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 28, 2016, 07:21:12 PM
 #257

I'm not against it, but think it would be better to get the original idea up & running first - the x11 could be added/enabled later if there is a demand for it?

I think that's a good idea since there doesn't seem to be much demand for it.

protonn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2016, 03:28:45 PM
 #258

Does anyone object to 45 seconds blocks for faster confirmations?

IconFirm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 508


Always ask questions.


View Profile
July 29, 2016, 03:39:10 PM
 #259

Does anyone object to 45 seconds blocks for faster confirmations?

What is it now & what are the pros/cons of changing it?

Unofficial & Uncensored SYSCOIN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4748031.0
Do not trust Yobit/HitBTC/C-cex/Poloniex/WEX/KuCoin/LiveCoin scam exchanges or shady ICO's run by known scam companies like HashCoins/Ambisafe/Bountyhive etc - they WILL scam you!
Use due diligence & do research. Buy the coins, sell the coins - don't invest in stupid shit. If your questions aren't answered - don't touch it.
protonn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2016, 04:01:04 PM
 #260

Does anyone object to 45 seconds blocks for faster confirmations?

What is it now & what are the pros/cons of changing it?

Now it's 32 seconds. It was supposed to be changed to 60. In testing it feels like 60 is a bit slow to confirm. 32 just seems like a little too much (2500 blocks per day on average.) 45 seems like a good median.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!