|
mrbodz
|
 |
July 16, 2016, 04:01:47 PM |
|
Best bet would have been for you to fork from Unitus and swap out the algorithms.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
IconFirm
|
|
July 17, 2016, 10:48:00 AM |
|
Best bet would have been for you to fork from Unitus and swap out the algorithms.
Ahmed
Looks like they've taken your advice..... |
|
|
|
|
mrbodz
|
|
July 17, 2016, 01:35:50 PM |
|
Nice to know when youve been asked for a quote to do a job and someone else did it cheaper and made a mess of it. And now your advice is whats needed to fix a problem which shouldnt have occoured in the first place.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
|
IconFirm
|
|
July 18, 2016, 10:50:37 AM |
|
We've passed the switchover block 1840000 but it looks like nothing has changed - sha256 diff is still almost zero & all my blocks are still being rejected.....  Our Dev is on it You are merge mining sha right? Can you post part of your log? Sure, & yes I am: 2016-07-16 14:27:20 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:27:59 connect() to 192.168.1.50:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)
2016-07-16 14:28:02 connect() to 98.115.147.74:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:28:55 connect() to 107.7.28.130:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:28:55 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash d7fdf85b2c15e65ba7e5a1262dad76d4872eea5f275f0f70c8d6ebabf634b861 is not under target 000000000000d2df000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:28:58 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash 9af150c746a7662de348cf2c03782938d7ac515eff6d036a6970d2d2954f1859 is not under target 000000000000d2df000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:29:17 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000091b52e32430afd7e51033d57b03340365374dbc7e5b61b31746d height=1840154 log2_work=60.994844 tx=2043171 date=2016-07-16 14:28:14 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:17 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:18 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:29:19 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000047382b1426d1a80c13c7243ee15f05d83358978e98250c44535f height=1840155 log2_work=60.995072 tx=2043172 date=2016-07-16 14:29:56 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:19 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:19 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:29:27 keypool reserve 2
2016-07-16 14:29:27 keypool return 2
2016-07-16 14:29:39 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash 6c099e7aa05a22f753750cda8f46b73132152516a0d6981e1deaaf31d509b664 is not under target 000000000000d44f000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:29:47 UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000a3a9c6f2429acca37566353bc123d82b7e4ac3ba1b9ef5076cd height=1840156 log2_work=60.995285 tx=2043173 date=2016-07-16 14:29:19 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:47 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:47 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:30:06 connect() to 192.168.1.50:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)
2016-07-16 14:30:08 connect() to 98.115.147.74:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:30:08 connect() to 62.210.149.29:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:30:15 connect() to 95.158.16.192:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113) Using latest from git on Xubuntu 64bit - hope it helps. Dev - any updates? If you're unable to successfully implement sha256/auxpow mining please let miners know so that we can remove the wallet & free up valuable resources. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
July 18, 2016, 12:04:40 PM |
|
We've passed the switchover block 1840000 but it looks like nothing has changed - sha256 diff is still almost zero & all my blocks are still being rejected..... Our Dev is on it You are merge mining sha right? Can you post part of your log? Sure, & yes I am: 2016-07-16 14:27:20 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:27:59 connect() to 192.168.1.50:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)
2016-07-16 14:28:02 connect() to 98.115.147.74:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:28:55 connect() to 107.7.28.130:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:28:55 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash d7fdf85b2c15e65ba7e5a1262dad76d4872eea5f275f0f70c8d6ebabf634b861 is not under target 000000000000d2df000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:28:58 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash 9af150c746a7662de348cf2c03782938d7ac515eff6d036a6970d2d2954f1859 is not under target 000000000000d2df000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:29:17 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000091b52e32430afd7e51033d57b03340365374dbc7e5b61b31746d height=1840154 log2_work=60.994844 tx=2043171 date=2016-07-16 14:28:14 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:17 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:18 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:29:19 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000047382b1426d1a80c13c7243ee15f05d83358978e98250c44535f height=1840155 log2_work=60.995072 tx=2043172 date=2016-07-16 14:29:56 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:19 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:19 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:29:27 keypool reserve 2
2016-07-16 14:29:27 keypool return 2
2016-07-16 14:29:39 ERROR: AUX POW parent hash 6c099e7aa05a22f753750cda8f46b73132152516a0d6981e1deaaf31d509b664 is not under target 000000000000d44f000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-07-16 14:29:47 UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000a3a9c6f2429acca37566353bc123d82b7e4ac3ba1b9ef5076cd height=1840156 log2_work=60.995285 tx=2043173 date=2016-07-16 14:29:19 progress=1.000000
2016-07-16 14:29:47 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2016-07-16 14:29:47 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2016-07-16 14:30:06 connect() to 192.168.1.50:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113)
2016-07-16 14:30:08 connect() to 98.115.147.74:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:30:08 connect() to 62.210.149.29:13580 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2016-07-16 14:30:15 connect() to 95.158.16.192:13580 failed after select(): No route to host (113) Using latest from git on Xubuntu 64bit - hope it helps. Dev - any updates? If you're unable to successfully implement sha256/auxpow mining please let miners know so that we can remove the wallet & free up valuable resources. Thanks. We'll get it fixed, I can assure you that. Will it be fixed in 2 hours, or 2 days, I can't be certain. I haven't had any reports of Scrypt auxpow not working. Once the multialgo difficulty adjustment gets fixed, I'd image aux sha will be straightened out as a result. We'll get it right. |
|
|
|
|
IconFirm
|
|
July 18, 2016, 12:16:58 PM |
|
We'll get it fixed, I can assure you that. Will it be fixed in 2 hours, or 2 days, I can't be certain. I haven't had any reports of Scrypt auxpow not working. Once the multialgo difficulty adjustment gets fixed, I'd image aux sha will be straightened out as a result. We'll get it right.
OK, but I don't see much going on in the git repo. I'm going to remove it to make way for a different merge mined coin - I hope you get the problems fixed - but it does seem to be a very slow process. Good luck  |
|
|
|
|
IconFirm
|
|
July 19, 2016, 07:53:39 PM |
|
Best bet would have been for you to fork from Unitus and swap out the algorithms.
Ahmed
It seems that Unitus & now XMY are suffering from the same issue regarding merge mining: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483515.msg15638371#msg15638371So that's NMC, SYS, ARG, UNITUS & XMY that are now broken with merge mining since they updated their code....what's the story? If every merge mined coin updated their code this way - there would be no merged mined coins to merge mine! |
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
July 19, 2016, 09:15:42 PM |
|
Best bet would have been for you to fork from Unitus and swap out the algorithms.
Ahmed
It seems that Unitus & now XMY are suffering from the same issue regarding merge mining: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483515.msg15638371#msg15638371So that's NMC, SYS, ARG, UNITUS & XMY that are now broken with merge mining since they updated their code....what's the story? If every merge mined coin updated their code this way - there would be no merged mined coins to merge mine! We have a version in testing right now. Thanks for pointing this out. |
|
|
|
|
ErikW79
|
|
July 24, 2016, 07:55:31 PM |
|
Any working exchange? Cryptopia has nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
cryptmebro
|
|
July 25, 2016, 06:10:44 AM |
|
Any working exchange? Cryptopia has nothing.
looks like cryptopia and coinexchange.io for now. I see orders on each site. |
|
|
|
|
|
ErikW79
|
|
July 26, 2016, 04:49:49 AM |
|
Dead for about 1 hour not able to connect. |
|
|
|
|
ErikW79
|
|
July 26, 2016, 06:30:27 AM |
|
Any progress with sha256 mining? The only pool is gone from today..
|
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
July 27, 2016, 06:49:43 PM
Last edit: July 27, 2016, 07:15:40 PM by protonn |
|
Any progress with sha256 mining? The only pool is gone from today..
I've just discovered a fix that looks very promising. We'll be doing a lot of testing over the next few days. Scrypt and SHA appear to be on their own diff, and block time seems to be stable. We'll need to put more hash rate on it, and examine logs etc...Lots more testing. More to follow (hopefully) soon. |
|
|
|
|
ErikW79
|
|
July 28, 2016, 11:47:10 AM |
|
Any progress with sha256 mining? The only pool is gone from today..
I've just discovered a fix that looks very promising. We'll be doing a lot of testing over the next few days. Scrypt and SHA appear to be on their own diff, and block time seems to be stable. We'll need to put more hash rate on it, and examine logs etc...Lots more testing. More to follow (hopefully) soon. Well that is great. Thank you and waiting for more news... |
|
|
|
|
cryptmebro
|
|
July 28, 2016, 05:15:00 PM |
|
Is there anyone that would like to see X11 enabled? It's already in the code (but disabled.) We can either remove it, or enable it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IconFirm
|
|
July 28, 2016, 06:29:34 PM |
|
I'm not against it, but think it would be better to get the original idea up & running first - the x11 could be added/enabled later if there is a demand for it?
|
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
July 28, 2016, 07:21:12 PM |
|
I'm not against it, but think it would be better to get the original idea up & running first - the x11 could be added/enabled later if there is a demand for it?
I think that's a good idea since there doesn't seem to be much demand for it. |
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
July 29, 2016, 03:28:45 PM |
|
Does anyone object to 45 seconds blocks for faster confirmations?
|
|
|
|
|
IconFirm
|
|
July 29, 2016, 03:39:10 PM |
|
Does anyone object to 45 seconds blocks for faster confirmations?
What is it now & what are the pros/cons of changing it? |
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
July 29, 2016, 04:01:04 PM |
|
Does anyone object to 45 seconds blocks for faster confirmations?
What is it now & what are the pros/cons of changing it? Now it's 32 seconds. It was supposed to be changed to 60. In testing it feels like 60 is a bit slow to confirm. 32 just seems like a little too much (2500 blocks per day on average.) 45 seems like a good median. |
|
|
|
|
