Why are all women leaders so fucking terrible...

[TECSHARE]

Read my post above. Not that tough. Women tend to be collectivists as a matter of evolutionary biology. Collectivists destroy society.

Give me a break on the altering of what you said was on my cellphone at the time and was going off memory.Its a real pain to quote, bold and even type.

Religious comment was my attempt at saying the topic is not easy to peg down unless you where religious like a few people in the thread. I know you are not religious from reading other threads.

Actually, you were right I did say that, but I was looking in the wrong place for it (my op). However that still doesn't prove your point based only on your interpretations of my statement. Your post said:

...Be a challenge to peg the issue down.

... as if it was a nearly impossible task. It's not. My response was directed at the part of you conditioned by feminists and collectivists that make you BELIEVE this is a seriously complicated subject, when in reality it is staring your right in the face but you refuse to look at it because it might be "sexist" to examine reality in public. This doesn't have anything to do with your level of intelligence, it has to do with your conditioning by society to never critically examine the behaviors of women. You interpreted it as a dig at your intelligence, but that's all it was, your interpretation. So in the future if you want to criticize my words, try criticizing what they ACTUALLY say, not what you "interpret" them to say.

Also, I noticed you didn't bother replying to any of those other points and jumped right for the most inconsequential thing. Perhaps I hit the nail on the head?

[TECSHARE]

ITT too many guys in here have been out of university for a bit too long.

One day at an average, current day math, physics or biology department would cure them of their adorably outdated misconceptions about "emotional, mother instinct-driven womenfolk".

These girls would wipe the floor with your inferior cortex before you had a chance to tip your fedora.

1. As far as I can tell no one here said women were stupid, just that they in general are poor leaders.

2. Of course women are doing well in school, the school system is designed with the female model as the default on every level. Women are outperforming boys and men in schools on EVERY LEVEL of the educational system, and outnumbering men in college, but I don't hear anyone complaining and screaming about how boys and men are being left behind. On the contrary feminists are still crying about how they are being left behind.

That's the thing about feminism, it only works one way. One set of standards for men, another set of standards for women. This is not an equality movement, it is a supremacy movement. Since men and boys are being treated as disposable tools and future violent rapists, is it any surprise that they are not performing well in the educational system that disenfranchises them?

The War Against Boys: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqOTj9NDv80

[criptix]

Read my post above. Not that tough. Women tend to be collectivists as a matter of evolutionary biology. Collectivists destroy society.

Give me a break on the altering of what you said was on my cellphone at the time and was going off memory.Its a real pain to quote, bold and even type.

Religious comment was my attempt at saying the topic is not easy to peg down unless you where religious like a few people in the thread. I know you are not religious from reading other threads.

Actually, you were right I did say that, but I was looking in the wrong place for it (my op). However that still doesn't prove your point based only on your interpretations of my statement. Your post said:

...Be a challenge to peg the issue down.

... as if it was a nearly impossible task. It's not. My response was directed at the part of you conditioned by feminists and collectivists that make you BELIEVE this is a seriously complicated subject, when in reality it is staring your right in the face but you refuse to look at it because it might be "sexist" to examine reality in public. This doesn't have anything to do with your level of intelligence, it has to do with your conditioning by society to never critically examine the behaviors of women. You interpreted it as a dig at your intelligence, but that's all it was, your interpretation. So in the future if you want to criticize my words, try criticizing what they ACTUALLY say, not what you "interpret" them to say.

Also, I noticed you didn't bother replying to any of those other points and jumped right for the most inconsequential thing. Perhaps I hit the nail on the head?

I hope it is not too hard to understand in the end it is wikipedia.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

[criptix]

ITT too many guys in here have been out of university for a bit too long.

One day at an average, current day math, physics or biology department would cure them of their adorably outdated misconceptions about "emotional, mother instinct-driven womenfolk".

These girls would wipe the floor with your inferior cortex before you had a chance to tip your fedora.

1. As far as I can tell no one here said women were stupid, just that they in general are poor leaders.

2. Of course women are doing well in school, the school system is designed with the female model as the default on every level. Women are outperforming boys and men in schools on EVERY LEVEL of the educational system, and outnumbering men in college, but I don't hear anyone complaining and screaming about how boys and men are being left behind. On the contrary feminists are still crying about how they are being left behind.

That's the thing about feminism, it only works one way. One set of standards for men, another set of standards for women. This is not an equality movement, it is a supremacy movement. Since men and boys are being treated as disposable tools and future violent rapists, is it any surprise that they are not performing well in the educational system that disenfranchises them?

The War Against Boys: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqOTj9NDv80

Cant stop rolling on the floor laughing.

21th century american. No wonder you people like trump.

[CheapYoutubeHits]

You forgot Dilma Rousseff (Brazil)

[TECSHARE]

...projection...21th century american...

Care to actually support any of your claims, or do you just prefer to throw buzzwords at me like a cudgel? It is rather convenient this method does not actually require you to understand anything you say except on a very superficial level.

P.S. It's 21st

[criptix]

...

Care to actually support any of your claims, or do you just prefer to throw buzzwords at me like a cudgel? It is rather convenient this method does not actually require you to understand anything you say except on a very superficial level.

And i though wikipedia was not hard to understand  

Btw right now you are supportingconfirming my claim ^^"

[TECSHARE]

...

Care to actually support any of your claims, or do you just prefer to throw buzzwords at me like a cudgel? It is rather convenient this method does not actually require you to understand anything you say except on a very superficial level.

And i though wikipedia was not hard to understand  

Btw right now you are supportingconfirming my claim ^^"

Look who is projecting now... Your links explain the terms, not why you think they apply to me.

I know what these terms mean, I am asking you to explain exactly what makes them attributable to me and why, but of course you can't do that can you? It is far easier to just make an assumption based on your bias and then make your claims without explaining them.

[criptix]

...

Care to actually support any of your claims, or do you just prefer to throw buzzwords at me like a cudgel? It is rather convenient this method does not actually require you to understand anything you say except on a very superficial level.

And i though wikipedia was not hard to understand 

Btw right now you are supportingconfirming my claim ^^"

Look who is projecting now... Your links explain the terms, not why you think they apply to me.

I know what these terms mean, I am asking you to explain exactly what makes them attributable to me and why, but of course you can't do that can you? It is far easier to just make an assumption based on your bias and then make your claims without explaining them.

Ok we try it once for free just for you:

You are thinking that everyone opposing your ideas and opinions is a brainwashed feminist, collectivists, socialist or communist but it contrast you are a brainwashed conservative (tea party ringing?), who is obsessed by mostly middle age thoughs which are mixed with nationalism, racial, ethnic and religious mistrust, class thinking and so on.

[BADecker]

...

Care to actually support any of your claims, or do you just prefer to throw buzzwords at me like a cudgel? It is rather convenient this method does not actually require you to understand anything you say except on a very superficial level.

And i though wikipedia was not hard to understand 

Btw right now you are supportingconfirming my claim ^^"

Look who is projecting now... Your links explain the terms, not why you think they apply to me.

I know what these terms mean, I am asking you to explain exactly what makes them attributable to me and why, but of course you can't do that can you? It is far easier to just make an assumption based on your bias and then make your claims without explaining them.

Ok we try it once for free just for you:

You are thinking that everyone opposing your ideas and opinions is a brainwashed feminist, collectivists, socialist or communist but it contrast you are a brainwashed conservative (tea party ringing?), who is obsessed by mostly middle age thoughs which are mixed with nationalism, racial, ethnic and religious mistrust, class thinking and so on.

What? Here you go telling TS (and the world) what he thinks... like you know what he thinks. You barely know what you think.

[criptix]

...

Care to actually support any of your claims, or do you just prefer to throw buzzwords at me like a cudgel? It is rather convenient this method does not actually require you to understand anything you say except on a very superficial level.

And i though wikipedia was not hard to understand 

Btw right now you are supportingconfirming my claim ^^"

Look who is projecting now... Your links explain the terms, not why you think they apply to me.

I know what these terms mean, I am asking you to explain exactly what makes them attributable to me and why, but of course you can't do that can you? It is far easier to just make an assumption based on your bias and then make your claims without explaining them.

Ok we try it once for free just for you:

You are thinking that everyone opposing your ideas and opinions is a brainwashed feminist, collectivists, socialist or communist but it contrast you are a brainwashed conservative (tea party ringing?), who is obsessed by mostly middle age thoughs which are mixed with nationalism, racial, ethnic and religious mistrust, class thinking and so on.

What? Here you go telling TS (and the world) what he thinks... like you know what he thinks. You barely know what you think.

Oh is it like that?
I always had the impression that tecshare shows his thoughts and opinions pretty clearly and i showed my thoughts and opinions regarding you people pretty clearly.

[AzibLala007]

because the women have no right to lead any country or organization.
but if women is being hurt emotionally then she will be the bad ass leader for her rivals.

[TECSHARE]

Ok we try it once for free just for you:

You are thinking that everyone opposing your ideas and opinions is a brainwashed feminist, collectivists, socialist or communist but it contrast you are a brainwashed conservative (tea party ringing?), who is obsessed by mostly middle age thoughs which are mixed with nationalism, racial, ethnic and religious mistrust, class thinking and so on.

That was your interpretation of my ideology (which happens to be incorrect BTW), not an explanation of why what I said was projection.
I used to be like you, a blind liberal fighting for the legions of "victims" the world over, then I educated myself. You haven't got a clue what my ideologies are, all you know is your knee jerk reactionary response to the ideas I present. Every statement I made I can back up why I said it in detail, including historical cases and references to other forms of these ideologies and explain why they are harmful. You can't even explain your one point about why you think I am projecting, you just reach for your cudgel again.

Thanks for proving MY point

[criptix]

Ok we try it once for free just for you:

You are thinking that everyone opposing your ideas and opinions is a brainwashed feminist, collectivists, socialist or communist but it contrast you are a brainwashed conservative (tea party ringing?), who is obsessed by mostly middle age thoughs which are mixed with nationalism, racial, ethnic and religious mistrust, class thinking and so on.

That was your interpretation of my ideology (which happens to be incorrect BTW), not an explanation of why what I said was projection.
I used to be like you, a blind liberal fighting for the legions of "victims" the world over, then I educated myself. You haven't got a clue what my ideologies are, all you know is your knee jerk reactionary response to the ideas I present. Every statement I made I can back up why I said it in detail, including historical cases and references to other forms of these ideologies and explain why they are harmful. You can't even explain your one point about why you think I am projecting, you just reach for your cudgel again.

Thanks for proving MY point

Oh right, i forgot you arent mentally able to remember your past postings although it is just 2-3 post in the past.

My response was directed at the part of you conditioned by feminists and collectivists that make you BELIEVE this is a seriously complicated subject, when in reality it is staring your right in the face but you refuse to look at it because it might be "sexist" to examine reality in public.

You are stuck in the feminist delusion that we are all the same [...]. A lot of what you are saying comes directly from "critical theory", which is just Marxism wrapped in a paper thin veil of "social science" (ie horse shit designed to push collectivism).
[...]
I come at conversations like I have spent a fuck of a lot more time studying these topics than most people

Women tend to be collectivists as a matter of evolutionary biology. Collectivists destroy society.

All the liberal loons watch shows like [...]

This is why collectivists are waging a constant battle against those who are "privileged" enough to have more intelligence, skills, wealth, etc than others so they can force them to regress to the mean, thereby elevating their own positions in comparison. This is also why women in general tend to lean toward collectivism, because they require the state to take from the individualists who have done better in order to increase their own standard of living via theft from those individuals.

the classic:

Actually, you were right I did say that, but I was looking in the wrong place for it (my op).

do you read what you post?
you think that your opinion is all that matters and everyone is brainwashed who disagree, but the truth is you are brainwashed with *(not sure if you use "in" or "with" here) your delusional perception of reality.
maybe dont read too much breitbart, dailystormer and cnn? are you a tea party member?

i just looked trough less then 10 of your last post and i really cant believe what utter bull you give from you.

and btw. im just an alt of a mod and this is all a conspiracy to remove you and your friends forever from this forum. dayum.

[TECSHARE]

do you read what you post?
you think that your opinion is all that matters and everyone is brainwashed who disagree, but the truth is you are brainwashed with *(not sure if you use "in" or with "here") your delusional perception of reality.
maybe dont read too much breitbart, dailystormer and cnn? are you a tea party member?

i just looked trough less then 10 of your last post and i really cant believe what utter bull you give from you.

and btw. im just an alt of a mod and this is all a conspiracy to remove you and your friends forever from this forum. dayum.

Congratulations, you know how to use the quote function and selectively edit my statements removing the links so people can't actually see the entirety of what I wrote. You still haven't explained WHY you have come to your conclusions. All you have done is list a bunch of quotes and then throw some more cudgels at me. This is getting boring.

[alyssa85]

There have been plenty of good female leaders. Margaret Thatcher, Elizabeth I, Boudicca. Of course all of those were British! 

[acroman08]

I don't get ..

Germany,
Ontario,
Alberta..

all sooo fail it pains me.

here in phillippines we once had an a female president it was over 30 years ago and she remove every project that the previous president was working on and that is the start of the downfall of the philippines.

[JesusHadAegis]

I don't get ..

Germany,
Ontario,
Alberta..

all sooo fail it pains me.

here in phillippines we once had an a female president it was over 30 years ago and she remove every project that the previous president was working on and that is the start of the downfall of the philippines.

Not only that, she had no political history and she was just forced there because of his husbands name. But i think some of our country men are blinded to that fact because of media manipulation by that same family. Cause during the previous time before her, the country has a smart and logical leader even comedic at times that Philippines rised economically.
sorry for the drama.

[acroman08]

I don't get ..

Germany,
Ontario,
Alberta..

all sooo fail it pains me.

here in phillippines we once had an a female president it was over 30 years ago and she remove every project that the previous president was working on and that is the start of the downfall of the philippines.

Not only that, she had no political history and she was just forced there because of his husbands name. But i think some of our country men are blinded to that fact because of media manipulation by that same family. Cause during the previous time before her, the country has a smart and logical leader even comedic at times that Philippines rised economically.
sorry for the drama.

agreed it was the of the revolution, that was the reason why she`s been elected as a president.

[requester]

I don't get ..

Germany,
Ontario,
Alberta..

all sooo fail it pains me.

here in phillippines we once had an a female president it was over 30 years ago and she remove every project that the previous president was working on and that is the start of the downfall of the philippines.

Not only that, she had no political history and she was just forced there because of his husbands name. But i think some of our country men are blinded to that fact because of media manipulation by that same family. Cause during the previous time before her, the country has a smart and logical leader even comedic at times that Philippines rised economically.
sorry for the drama.

Ya until now that same democary until today never parred with that martial law they were ones against.