[ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!

[o0o0]

i think ots funny they keep creating sub tokens. wildsharks a moron anyway he thought atoms and electrons were awesome and those are just extra shit tokens. given half the chance he’d make shark tokens to fund his own shit.... he’s just crying cause he thought buying lots of ion meant as a whale he could control direction.

i think whats more funny is these extra sub tokens being complete garbage effort to give devs more money so they dont have to get real jobs.

if ionomy sells their premine coins over this is just some other way to sell shit.

2.5 years and its stilla crap low used platform.... it could take 10 years and not be there and korvas would be stating it takes ages to make a good gaming platform...

so korvas how many years of this stagnant dev progress before you’d actual say yeah this isnt working out...?

[1714749677]

1714749677

[1714749677]

1714749677

[korvas128]

Any idea how long it takes to develop a game obliviously not if you think after 2.5 years 30 is a reasonable number.

Nice try. One game a month is what ionomy promised during the ICO and you were shilling that idea just like everything else the team tells you.

Of course it's not reasonable, it's stupid, just as all the other harebrained ideas coming out of wherever the ionomist cult congregates these days.

Considering you've been trolling here for 2.5 years.......... you already know this...... but anyway....

Your right way back in April 2016 that's what they said during ICO time the intent was to deliver 1 game a month. 4 to 6 months in they switched direction from producing simple tap games to more complex ones. The first product to spin off from this direction change is Off Road Heat which is available now. They also decided to focus on developing tools for game developers. The first game to use some of these tools is the multiplayer version of Rumble Arena which is due for release sometime this year, the single player version has been available on the app/play stores for a while now.

Actually 1 game a month is doable if that's your intent

[suchmoon]

The first product to spin off from this direction change is Off Road Heat which is available now.

Really? 

Wasn't Gravity delayed numerous times because of the "direction change"? And it still came out shit and is dead. TMOB only gets a few players because ionomy pays them. Off Road Heat doesn't even have a leaderboard online so I guess you're gonna claim it's "brilliant" but I tried it a little bit and it seems more shit than the usual ionomy shit. Less than 500 downloads on Android, I mean who could have thought that promoting a half-baked game on a race car is not the brightest idea LOL.

Actually 1 game a month is doable if that's your intent

No, that's not my intent. That was ionomy's false promise they made for the ICO. Try to keep up.

[WildShark]

This team need to develop ideas that are unique and different from the others, breathtaking erja hard from this project team will be unable to compete in the market.

Totally agree that's why many projects won't make it past a year as they are either

- Me too projects that add no value to what is already available
- Scams
- Unable to establish a business from an initial concept.
- Poorly spent their ICO money

Ionomy as a project was conceived 3 years ago. ION launched April 2016. Since then Ionomy have focused on the delivery of a business plan which was and still is a unique proposition. Soon ionomy will launch a major upgrade to their platform which delivers on that original concept I strongly suggest that before you pass judgement on ionomy you maintain a watching brief and see what this new platform as to offer  

The ionomy project has limped along for 3 years with an archaic version of the ION White Paper. When will the the revised version of the ION Improvement White Paper be available to the PUBLIC?  Shouldn't there be design information on how the team is implementing "worthless" Tokens on the ION blockchain using the ionomy ecosystem.

Some of the value being implemented by concerned ION holders for  the ION coin using some of the ION Core Team IIPs are explained at:
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility

[korvas128]

i think ots funny they keep creating sub tokens. wildsharks a moron anyway he thought atoms and electrons were awesome and those are just extra shit tokens. given half the chance he’d make shark tokens to fund his own shit.... he’s just crying cause he thought buying lots of ion meant as a whale he could control direction.

i think whats more funny is these extra sub tokens being complete garbage effort to give devs more money so they dont have to get real jobs.

if ionomy sells their premine coins over this is just some other way to sell shit.

2.5 years and its stilla crap low used platform.... it could take 10 years and not be there and korvas would be stating it takes ages to make a good gaming platform...

so korvas how many years of this stagnant dev progress before you’d actual say yeah this isnt working out...?

Ahh another long term troll reappears  selling the Pre mine  something you were harping on about 2.5 years ago. If that was the company's intent or exit plan don't you think they would have done it already especially when you consider ion in Jan almost hit $3.00

[goldart]

This team need to develop ideas that are unique and different from the others, breathtaking erja hard from this project team will be unable to compete in the market.

Totally agree that's why many projects won't make it past a year as they are either

- Me too projects that add no value to what is already available
- Scams
- Unable to establish a business from an initial concept.
- Poorly spent their ICO money

Ionomy as a project was conceived 3 years ago. ION launched April 2016. Since then Ionomy have focused on the delivery of a business plan which was and still is a unique proposition. Soon ionomy will launch a major upgrade to their platform which delivers on that original concept I strongly suggest that before you pass judgement on ionomy you maintain a watching brief and see what this new platform as to offer  

The ionomy project has limped along for 3 years with an archaic version of the ION White Paper. When will the the revised version of the ION Improvement White Paper be available to the PUBLIC?  Shouldn't there be design information on how the team is implementing "worthless" Tokens on the ION blockchain using the ionomy ecosystem.

Some of the value being implemented by concerned ION holders for  the ION coin using some of the ION Core Team IIPs are explained at:
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility

the team wanted to conform to the white paper of the ion blockchain. but the community no longer believes in this project. perhaps a new white paper will improve further development?

[suchmoon]

Ahh another long term troll reappears  selling the Pre mine  something you were harping on about 2.5 years ago. If that was the company's intent or exit plan don't you think they would have done it already especially when you consider ion in Jan almost hit $3.00

Right, they're sitting on a huge premine AND creating millions of new coins just so that they could continue to not sell them

As long as you morons keep giving them money without requiring transparency or accountability they have no reason to "exit". They can just slowly dump those IONs and keep issuing new bullshit tokens.

[korvas128]

This team need to develop ideas that are unique and different from the others, breathtaking erja hard from this project team will be unable to compete in the market.

Totally agree that's why many projects won't make it past a year as they are either

- Me too projects that add no value to what is already available
- Scams
- Unable to establish a business from an initial concept.
- Poorly spent their ICO money

Ionomy as a project was conceived 3 years ago. ION launched April 2016. Since then Ionomy have focused on the delivery of a business plan which was and still is a unique proposition. Soon ionomy will launch a major upgrade to their platform which delivers on that original concept I strongly suggest that before you pass judgement on ionomy you maintain a watching brief and see what this new platform as to offer  

The ionomy project has limped along for 3 years with an archaic version of the ION White Paper. When will the the revised version of the ION Improvement White Paper be available to the PUBLIC?  Shouldn't there be design information on how the team is implementing "worthless" Tokens on the ION blockchain using the ionomy ecosystem.

Some of the value being implemented by concerned ION holders for  the ION coin using some of the ION Core Team IIPs are explained at:
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility

the team wanted to conform to the white paper of the ion blockchain. but the community no longer believes in this project. perhaps a new white paper will improve further development?

Quite the opposite.....

At the beginning of June 5 proposals were put together for the community to review and vote on. The community voted unanimously to support all 5. For reference here they are https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf

Most of June and some of July was spent in discussion. The community doesn't live here, it can be found on discord  https://discordapp.com/invite/vuZn7gC & telegram https://t.me/joinchat/F-MxeUP480C--PaXCgVupw. Feel free to pop over and verify  

[WildShark]

Quite the opposite.....

At the beginning of June 5 proposals were put together for the community to review and vote on. The community voted unanimously to support all 5. For reference here they are https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf

Performing a "rigged" vote where half of the selected group of masternode owners DID NOT participate in the vote. If this major upgrade to the ION blockchain was properly implemented, the team's IIP should be re-written and documented to show the design and benefits of massive token transactions being maintained by the ION blockchain. You can start convincing me by providing the link to a current ION White Paper that backs your WILD statements!!!

A couple of discussions with the small "ionomy cult" struggling in the non-technical chat crowd of Discord does not make your poorly prepared proposals valid with the ION community.

Here is good example of an well written proposal - IIP-WildOnION-Node-Responsibility
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility

[korvas128]

Quite the opposite.....

At the beginning of June 5 proposals were put together for the community to review and vote on. The community voted unanimously to support all 5. For reference here they are https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf

Performing a "rigged" vote where half of the selected group of masternode owners DID NOT participate in the vote. If this major upgrade to the ION blockchain was properly implemented, the team's IIP should be re-written and documented to show the design and benefits of massive token transactions being maintained by the ION blockchain. You can start convincing me by providing the link to a current ION White Paper that backs your WILD statements!!!

A couple of discussions with the small "ionomy cult" struggling in the non-technical chat crowd of Discord does not make your poorly prepared proposals valid with the ION community.

Here is good example of an well written proposal - IIP-WildOnION-Node-Responsibility
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility

Seriously..

As you were banned from discord you missed out on all the discussion. During the consultation period everyone had the opportunity to comment irrelevant of how many ion/nodes they owned, consensus was achieved with some changes made to some of the proposals..... you never saw any of this.

Don't try and position yourself as a spokesperson for the ION community because your not. Just like me the only thing you represent is yourself.

[WildShark]

Quite the opposite.....

At the beginning of June 5 proposals were put together for the community to review and vote on. The community voted unanimously to support all 5. For reference here they are https://github.com/ionomy/iips/blob/master/ION_IIP.pdf

Performing a "rigged" vote where half of the selected group of masternode owners DID NOT participate in the vote. If this major upgrade to the ION blockchain was properly implemented, the team's IIP should be re-written and documented to show the design and benefits of massive token transactions being maintained by the ION blockchain. You can start convincing me by providing the link to a current ION White Paper that backs your WILD statements!!!

A couple of discussions with the small "ionomy cult" struggling in the non-technical chat crowd of Discord does not make your poorly prepared proposals valid with the ION community.

Here is good example of an well written proposal - IIP-WildOnION-Node-Responsibility
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility

Seriously..

... Just like me the only thing you represent is yourself.

The ION community will chill when you produce a revised "ION Improvement White Paper" that documents your poorly prepared IIPs!

Let all the Masternode Owners have a say by voting on this proposal to implement dynamic creation of smart ION Nodes using current ionomy assets in any ION WALLET functionality on the ION BLOCKCHAIN! Add incentive to "HOLD" ionomy assets!

[korvas128]

Is this the ionomy cult's effort to sell off ION and investing in new ionomy tokens?

No it's probably you selling off your nodes 

[WildShark]

This team need to develop ideas that are unique and different from the others, breathtaking erja hard from this project team will be unable to compete in the market.

Totally agree that's why many projects won't make it past a year as they are either

- Me too projects that add no value to what is already available
- Scams
- Unable to establish a business from an initial concept.
- Poorly spent their ICO money

Ionomy as a project was conceived 3 years ago. ION launched April 2016. Since then Ionomy have focused on the delivery of a business plan which was and still is a unique proposition. Soon ionomy will launch a major upgrade to their platform which delivers on that original concept I strongly suggest that before you pass judgement on ionomy you maintain a watching brief and see what this new platform as to offer  

The ionomy project has limped along for 3 years with an archaic version of the ION White Paper. When will the the revised version of the ION Improvement White Paper be available to the PUBLIC?  Shouldn't there be design information on how the team is implementing "worthless" Tokens on the ION blockchain using the ionomy ecosystem.

Some of the value being implemented by concerned ION holders for  the ION coin using some of the ION Core Team IIPs are explained at:
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility

Here is a some comments from a member of the Wild's Depot research and development team. The author wants to remain anamious in fear of the illegal ionomy Community Kangaroo Court imposing a ban on their user.

"As far as I can tell, Huey and the ion team are trying to create a second ICO, the reasons for which are a bit unclear; partially at least it seems to be mainly to boost funding for the Ion team, and perhaps partially to try and gain extra traction and interest in the ‘ionomy’. Judging from the fact that almost no one has commented on anything that’s been published about XDM, I’d be inclined to say it isn’t exactly going to be popular.

 I don’t know very much but this reeks of them disliking people who don’t agree with Huey’s direction. They’ve always been cult-y and they’ve become even more so as this project has gone on as the active participant list hasn’t really scaled up at all in two and a half years - essentially this is still the same group of ex-XPY, XPY.io holders and refugees. The fact that none of the teams official tweets ever get shared more than 30 or 40 times should be a good indication of how many people are actually engaged with ion as a ‘thing’. Not many. Rumble Arena might bring a few more in, but this isn’t going to take a chunk of the mobile gaming market and likely never will."

[WildShark]

 A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.

[suchmoon]

A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.

Geez Sharkie, why are you reposting shit that's been said here years ago? Yes, ionomy is pathetic and incompetent. Until recently here were only two people left in this thread who couldn't grasp this - you and korvas, so now it's just korvas. You're wasting your time. Nobody cares about your epiphany.

[o0o0]

A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.

Geez Sharkie, why are you reposting shit that's been said here years ago? Yes, ionomy is pathetic and incompetent. Until recently here were only two people left in this thread who couldn't grasp this - you and korvas, so now it's just korvas. You're wasting your time. Nobody cares about your epiphany.

wait im confused... wildshark was promoting and going on about increases in usd the last 12 months now he’s saying its crap... was he telling lies?

wildshark make up your mind tell us the truth were you telling lies in the past? why now saying last 12 months was bad now while posts from you in the last 12 months was good... which was it? explain yourself or lose any credibility you had.

[korvas128]

A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.

Geez Sharkie, why are you reposting shit that's been said here years ago? Yes, ionomy is pathetic and incompetent. Until recently here were only two people left in this thread who couldn't grasp this - you and korvas, so now it's just korvas. You're wasting your time. Nobody cares about your epiphany.

In Crypto the pathetic and incompetent don't last 1 year let alone 2.5 ..... nice to see over these 2.5 years your trolling evolve to accommodate    

[WildShark]

wait im confused... wildshark was promoting and going on about increases in usd the last 12 months now he’s saying its crap... was he telling lies?

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I've been busy writing an ION Improvement proposal to increase the technology on the ION blockchain. The ionomy Ecosystem White Paper is available at https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility

If you have been reading my posts, i have been commenting on  Huey and the team's effort to create more "worthless" assets (Tokens) in the ionomy ecosystem. The price of ION is falling and will continue to fall until the new ION token wallet is forced upon the ION community.

Everyone voice your opinion.. now is the time for smart ION nodes (Gamernode) to show up in the ionomy Vision...  dynamically created ION node using the current ionomy assets. Demand to the illegal ionomy Kangaroo Court a VOTE on this proposal!!!

If Dark Matter is so great, why do they not have their own blockchain to bloat with a massive amount of token transactions

[WildShark]

A member of the Wild's Depot research and development team did a bit of research. In the last 12 months the highest number of retweets of an ionomy authored tweet was 50. The highest number of likes for the same was 97. That, alongside dour usage and download rates for both TMOB and Offroad Heat should demonstrate to you how poorly ion as a business is performing. The fact that they’ve pivoted to being a crypto based gaming finance and infrastructure provider now and marginally away from being a gaming studio should also demonstrate that this is not a team that really has a sound strategy.

Geez Sharkie, why are you reposting shit that's been said here years ago? Yes, ionomy is pathetic and incompetent. Until recently here were only two people left in this thread who couldn't grasp this - you and korvas, so now it's just korvas. You're wasting your time. Nobody cares about your epiphany.

In Crypto the pathetic and incompetent don't last 1 year let alone 2.5 ..... nice to see over these 2.5 years your trolling evolve to accommodate    

Discussion from a member of the Wild's Depot Research and Development team:

the addition of smart ION Node will utilize the current assets...
https://ion.community/topic/2787/ion-improvement-proposal-wildonion-node-responsibility

a path for growth of the ION blockchain instead of going down with the other crypto projects

I have no clue to how giving away half of the available assets will make the other half worth anything

"Honestly, as such said in response, this is stuff people have been saying since the beginning of the project. There’s a million things the Ion team have done wrong, done badly or simply not done at all. Besides all this, the base idea of Ion - a crypto currency based gaming ecosystem - is and always has been a shit idea. It’s just even shitter now we’re in the middle of a massive depression in BTC price because people conflate (rightly or wrongly) all block chain projects with bitcoin and most people won’t be touching them with a barge pole for a long, long time after so many people lost out in the bubble."

[suchmoon]

In Crypto the pathetic and incompetent don't last 1 year let alone 2.5 ..... nice to see over these 2.5 years your trolling evolve to accommodate    

9k sat... 80% drop from the ICO price. What's your threshold for "utter shit"? 90%? 95%?