|
DecentralizeEconomics
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
|
|
May 05, 2016, 10:44:06 AM |
|
|
"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties." - Areopagitica
|
|
|
sofu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1085
Degenerate Crypto Gambler
|
|
May 05, 2016, 11:58:19 AM |
|
There is something very fishy going on. I'd sell BTC immediately as this is a very dangerous time. Something is happening that "they" don't want us to know.
|
|
|
|
Cryptodevises
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 05, 2016, 12:01:05 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
May 05, 2016, 12:06:20 PM |
|
Although it may turn out to be false alarm. It is still interesting to see what other high level techs will say about this double hashing and possible vulnerability.
Let's await the discussion and hope it is comprehensible even in part to the layman. It's got to be more interesting than the usual spam that clutters the main alt board.
|
|
|
|
generalizethis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
|
|
May 05, 2016, 12:14:31 PM |
|
Although it may turn out to be false alarm. It is still interesting to see what other high level techs will say about this double hashing and possible vulnerability.
Let's await the discussion and hope it is comprehensible even in part to the layman. It's got to be more interesting than the usual spam that clutters the main alt board.
Amen, and a little reminder as to why alts serve a purpose, at least the ones that didn't copy/paste BTC.
|
|
|
|
TPTB_need_war (OP)
|
|
May 06, 2016, 05:20:59 AM Last edit: May 06, 2016, 05:32:04 AM by TPTB_need_war |
|
Although it may turn out to be false alarm. It is still interesting to see what other high level techs will say about this double hashing and possible vulnerability.
Let's await the discussion and hope it is comprehensible even in part to the layman. It's got to be more interesting than the usual spam that clutters the main alt board.
Amen, and a little reminder as to why alts serve a purpose, at least the ones that didn't copy/paste BTC. Here is a few morsels of technical kryptonite for the "meme image self-masturbation" trolls[ ducks]cock-suckers to gag on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1459846.msg14766916#msg14766916So they want to play hardball... okay I know that game too... Whose cock are you sucking today boiz? Gmax? Bitalik? Sincereo? Duckefeller? Cat got your tongue or mouth too full of yummy finger-licking-good semen? The low-life anonymous scum that is here on BCT: Feel sorry for the kids. Half-Filipino......half-petrified. What kind of man talks about another man's kids on a public forum hiding behind anonymity. That isn't a man. I dare him to say that to my face. You run out of ammunition to attack my reputation with, so you involve my kids who have nothing to do with anything that is going on here on this putrefied forum.
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
May 06, 2016, 05:50:12 AM |
|
back door were only possible if you run the client with some rpc command, using the config file, but i'm sure they fixed it in the last version, maybe you are rising fud for nothing?
|
|
|
|
Hollowman338
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 06, 2016, 11:04:30 AM |
|
Should this serve as a push to move any crypto worth its salt to a quantum-resistant algorithm?
|
|
|
|
|
sockpuppet1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
May 06, 2016, 04:37:14 PM |
|
SHA256 has had many collision attacks and non were successful.
Logically it follows none will ever be successful. Apparently the data for "Craig's proof" only originated from one website http://drcraigwright.net/ which no one had verified to be officially endorsed by or owned by Craig; and that website is now apparently listed for sale on bitcointalk.org as shown below. It appears that the only proof Craig is ever documented to have provided was in the private demonstrations he did for Matonis, Gavin, and the reporters. And none of the proof from those meetings has been provided publicly. Apparently all parties were required to sign a NDA.
|
|
|
|
sockpuppet1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2016, 03:10:15 AM |
|
Whose cock are you sucking today boiz? Gmax? Bitalik? Sincereo? Duckefeller?
Hmmm. So he meant the Rockefeller of crypto... Hahaha. Where did you find that Rube Goldberg "carry the flag for our instascrew ball team" portrait of Evan Duckfeld. The facial expression is a perfect match, " Who me? I didn't do it. I'm just your puppy eyes friendly duck with a transmorgrifried beakground in finance".
|
|
|
|
sockpuppet1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
May 09, 2016, 04:09:43 AM |
|
Feel sorry for the kids. Half-Filipino......half-petrified. What kind of man talks about another man's kids on a public forum hiding behind anonymity. That isn't a man. I dare him to say that to my face. You run out of ammunition to attack my reputation with, so you involve my kids who have nothing to do with anything that is going on here on this putrefied forum. Follow-up: ...absolutely petrifying. You did it to yourselves. Now you will reap what you have sown. I am an American who doesn't share your looney European Marxism. Last time it was a million in the gas chambers. Let's see how it goes this round. Shut up and get back to work on building your copy-leftist clusterfuck. I don't associate with scum like you. I compete and overcome. Bye. Unless that is you want to say those words about my kids to my face. Otherwise we have nothing more to discuss. Enjoy your life.
|
|
|
|
Rick Storm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 09, 2016, 07:27:46 AM |
|
I think this is relevant to the question: http://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/779/hashing-or-encrypting-twice-to-increase-securityThe relevant bit: SHA-256(SHA-256(x)) was proposed by Ferguson and Schneier in their excellent book "Practical Cryptography" (later updated by Ferguson, Schneier, and Kohno and renamed "Cryptography Engineering") as a way to make SHA-256 invulnerable to "length-extension" attack. They called it "SHA-256d". ... I wouldn't be surprised if the inventors of Bitcoin used it for similar reasons.
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
May 09, 2016, 07:44:27 AM |
|
Although it may turn out to be false alarm. It is still interesting to see what other high level techs will say about this double hashing and possible vulnerability.
Let's await the discussion and hope it is comprehensible even in part to the layman. It's got to be more interesting than the usual spam that clutters the main alt board.
Amen, and a little reminder as to why alts serve a purpose, at least the ones that didn't copy/paste BTC. WOW denial much ? Read YOUR OWN post history. And the reality is your "amen" is dumb here because this has nothing to do with Altcoins. There is a separate section for Bitcoin so.. "Amen for that" @Rick Storm No problem.. just go ask Craig Wright.
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
sockpuppet1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
May 10, 2016, 05:50:23 AM |
|
I think this is relevant to the question: http://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/779/hashing-or-encrypting-twice-to-increase-securityThe relevant bit: SHA-256(SHA-256(x)) was proposed by Ferguson and Schneier in their excellent book "Practical Cryptography" (later updated by Ferguson, Schneier, and Kohno and renamed "Cryptography Engineering") as a way to make SHA-256 invulnerable to "length-extension" attack. They called it "SHA-256d". ... I wouldn't be surprised if the inventors of Bitcoin used it for similar reasons.
You did not read carefully. Try again by clicking the last link in the quote below:
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
May 10, 2016, 06:48:21 AM |
|
why people are trying so hard to make fud about bitcoin just before the halving come, is this a way to buy even more cheap coin before the next rally lol?
|
|
|
|
|