[ANN][♔] Britcoin.com | 5% annual PoS | Always on TOR [BRIT]

[VanityWallets2015]

I have advised Mo and Wil to register (at least) a UK trademark for Britcoin. Whilst the basic build of Britcoin is based on Bitcoin, all other layers of IP are effectively open to copyright (subject to the original MIT license of the software) and trademarking.

It is highly unfortunate that the UK Government and UK Fintech (which claimn to lead the world) are several years behind the adoptive curve, myself previously writing to the UK Government and Prime Minister on a previous occasion. Playing second fiddle, unfortunately should require them to "invest" in the existing blockchain of that brand/trademark or at least merge to create a powerful blockchain solution for both private and public financial scrutiny.

They should note;

- Britcoin is a brand and intellectual property of its stakeholders (and can be legally protected as such) despite having no such centralised ownership
- Brit is slang and is a non trademarked reference to a person or object from or originating from Great Britain, or for example a term used for internationals that are birth or non birth affiliated
- The legal system protects stakeholders from losses and as such Britcoin is a tangible "business" with investors subject to losses through copyright or brand infringement
- The UK Government and Bank of England can create their own "Britcoin" however cannot use Britcoin if it is registered as a trademark, the value is in the trademarked brand
- As Britcoins are as such empty assets (blocks) in a global space of operation with no single point of ownership, as with all blockchain public ledger currencies, and are not issued via a single geographical landmass it is acceptable therefore that Britcoin can be trademarked globally, despite being created in the UK

The UK Government and Bank Of England should take this post as notice that there has been previous discussion and instruction from a stakeholder to trademark "Britcoin" on behalf of it creators and stakeholders and that any steps to advance any trademark or implementation of Britcoin without subject discussion with existing stakeholders of the "Official Britcoin Blockchain" would be deemed as anti-competitive and against the open ledger blockchain for the scrutiny of public (and indeed private) financial transactions.

I would suggest that the community establishes a fund for the implementation of at least a UK Trademark. The application can be downloaded from the UK IP Office website and you can register a Trademark for up to 10 years with annual fees somewhere between £300 and £500. I would suggest that "your investor" begins this process, in particular helping to fund the registration of this brand. I would suggest consulting a trademark lawyer for an initial consultation for verification.

Great Britain is itself a democratic brand that its people adopt of free well, and as such the UK Treasury, Government and Bank Of England do not have the authority in the digital currency sector to implement the brand, it is however important to understand that the "official crown of her Majesty the Queen" cannot be displayed on anything that does not have the official Royal seal of approval, I am sure that there are severe penalties for such practices, so please be forewarned and advised.

It is likely that only whereby the Crown issues Britcoins using HM Treasury money, can the Crown be displayed to indicate a Royal seal of approval.

Great Britain of course was established by King James VI of Scotland (i think!) merging for the first time England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland under one financial centralised rule and with Scotland with the potential of becoming independent again in the future it is perhaps best that Britcoin is independent of both current UK Treasure and Finance, and remains independent of future Scottish Treasury and Finance. It is likely also that Wales and Northern Ireland will also look to seek independence from England and financial rule, further supporting the need for a DIGITAL CURRENCY THAT REPRESENTS THOSE NATIONS COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY of any one centralised financial authority allowing anyone to invest or deinvest as necessary.

Independence of financial affairs of course does not mean necessarily that any nation would seek to not participate in the brand that is Great Britain, its purely of individual identity.

It's good to see some work on this blockchain and to see it on exchanges again, I am looking forward to some news of it appearing back on Bittrex!

Good luck!!!

[1715030342]

1715030342

[1715030342]

1715030342

[VanityWallets2015]

Can someone post up details of the Britcoin genesis block and first transaction please for public record.

[jcksteve]

Britcoin goes to 2000K sats !!!!!

[leigh2k14]

Britcoin goes to 2000K sats !!!!!

Someone bought upto 5K the other day.

[leigh2k14]

I have advised Mo and Wil to register (at least) a UK trademark for Britcoin. Whilst the basic build of Britcoin is based on Bitcoin, all other layers of IP are effectively open to copyright (subject to the original MIT license of the software) and trademarking.

It is highly unfortunate that the UK Government and UK Fintech (which claimn to lead the world) are several years behind the adoptive curve, myself previously writing to the UK Government and Prime Minister on a previous occasion. Playing second fiddle, unfortunately should require them to "invest" in the existing blockchain of that brand/trademark or at least merge to create a powerful blockchain solution for both private and public financial scrutiny.

They should note;

- Britcoin is a brand and intellectual property of its stakeholders (and can be legally protected as such) despite having no such centralised ownership
- Brit is slang and is a non trademarked reference to a person or object from or originating from Great Britain, or for example a term used for internationals that are birth or non birth affiliated
- The legal system protects stakeholders from losses and as such Britcoin is a tangible "business" with investors subject to losses through copyright or brand infringement
- The UK Government and Bank of England can create their own "Britcoin" however cannot use Britcoin if it is registered as a trademark, the value is in the trademarked brand
- As Britcoins are as such empty assets (blocks) in a global space of operation with no single point of ownership, as with all blockchain public ledger currencies, and are not issued via a single geographical landmass it is acceptable therefore that Britcoin can be trademarked globally, despite being created in the UK

The UK Government and Bank Of England should take this post as notice that there has been previous discussion and instruction from a stakeholder to trademark "Britcoin" on behalf of it creators and stakeholders and that any steps to advance any trademark or implementation of Britcoin without subject discussion with existing stakeholders of the "Official Britcoin Blockchain" would be deemed as anti-competitive and against the open ledger blockchain for the scrutiny of public (and indeed private) financial transactions.

I would suggest that the community establishes a fund for the implementation of at least a UK Trademark. The application can be downloaded from the UK IP Office website and you can register a Trademark for up to 10 years with annual fees somewhere between £300 and £500. I would suggest that "your investor" begins this process, in particular helping to fund the registration of this brand. I would suggest consulting a trademark lawyer for an initial consultation for verification.

Great Britain is itself a democratic brand that its people adopt of free well, and as such the UK Treasury, Government and Bank Of England do not have the authority in the digital currency sector to implement the brand, it is however important to understand that the "official crown of her Majesty the Queen" cannot be displayed on anything that does not have the official Royal seal of approval, I am sure that there are severe penalties for such practices, so please be forewarned and advised.

It is likely that only whereby the Crown issues Britcoins using HM Treasury money, can the Crown be displayed to indicate a Royal seal of approval.

Great Britain of course was established by King James VI of Scotland (i think!) merging for the first time England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland under one financial centralised rule and with Scotland with the potential of becoming independent again in the future it is perhaps best that Britcoin is independent of both current UK Treasure and Finance, and remains independent of future Scottish Treasury and Finance. It is likely also that Wales and Northern Ireland will also look to seek independence from England and financial rule, further supporting the need for a DIGITAL CURRENCY THAT REPRESENTS THOSE NATIONS COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY of any one centralised financial authority allowing anyone to invest or deinvest as necessary.

Independence of financial affairs of course does not mean necessarily that any nation would seek to not participate in the brand that is Great Britain, its purely of individual identity.

It's good to see some work on this blockchain and to see it on exchanges again, I am looking forward to some news of it appearing back on Bittrex!

Good luck!!!

Interesting idea trademarking Brit as a legal brand.

I'm not sure if we need to? But then again i'm not up on my trademark law.

I'll talk to the investor, and report back.

[hugabase]

wish this coin will be added to other exchange site such as yobit or poloniex.

hope soon..but first, britcoin must fix about blk0001.dat !!!!!

1.save your wallet.dat
2.Windows : %APPDATA%\Britcoin
3.delete britcoin wallet roaming
4.open new wallet britcoin V3.0.0.1
5.Windows : %APPDATA%\Britcoin
6.copy new blk0001.dat [ file size 570 mb ] link download : https://firedrop.com/5db9cd048ca70e6f
7.open wallet britcoin v3.0.0.1 [ wait for sync ]
8.Windows : %APPDATA%\Britcoin
9.copy your wallet.dat
10.open wallet britcoin v3.0.0.1
11.DONE

[jcksteve]

wish this coin will be added to other exchange site such as yobit or poloniex.

hope soon..but first, britcoin must fix about blk0001.dat !!!!!

1.save your wallet.dat
2.Windows : %APPDATA%\Britcoin
3.delete britcoin wallet roaming
4.open new wallet britcoin V3.0.0.1
5.Windows : %APPDATA%\Britcoin
6.copy new blk0001.dat [ file size 570 mb ] link download : https://firedrop.com/5db9cd048ca70e6f
7.open wallet britcoin v3.0.0.1 [ wait for sync ]
8.Windows : %APPDATA%\Britcoin
9.copy your wallet.dat
10.open wallet britcoin v3.0.0.1
11.DONE

OK thank's,wait sync process now.

[jcksteve]

Consider to add Britcoin on Yobit

https://yobit.net/en/addcoin/

The best place for starting trade Brit/BTC.

To add a new coin to Yobit please you need to fill out the form below.
Payment method: YobiCode
Listing type:
• Free - 0.00 btc - no guarantee
• Premium - 0.1 btc - 4-7 business days (no guarantee in case of compilation issues)
• Exclusive - 0.5 btc - 2-3 business days + mail alert to all users (no guarantee in case of compilation issues)

[fiftyseven]

I have advised Mo and Wil to register (at least) a UK trademark for Britcoin. Whilst the basic build of Britcoin is based on Bitcoin, all other layers of IP are effectively open to copyright (subject to the original MIT license of the software) and trademarking.

It is highly unfortunate that the UK Government and UK Fintech (which claimn to lead the world) are several years behind the adoptive curve, myself previously writing to the UK Government and Prime Minister on a previous occasion. Playing second fiddle, unfortunately should require them to "invest" in the existing blockchain of that brand/trademark or at least merge to create a powerful blockchain solution for both private and public financial scrutiny.

They should note;

- Britcoin is a brand and intellectual property of its stakeholders (and can be legally protected as such) despite having no such centralised ownership
- Brit is slang and is a non trademarked reference to a person or object from or originating from Great Britain, or for example a term used for internationals that are birth or non birth affiliated
- The legal system protects stakeholders from losses and as such Britcoin is a tangible "business" with investors subject to losses through copyright or brand infringement
- The UK Government and Bank of England can create their own "Britcoin" however cannot use Britcoin if it is registered as a trademark, the value is in the trademarked brand
- As Britcoins are as such empty assets (blocks) in a global space of operation with no single point of ownership, as with all blockchain public ledger currencies, and are not issued via a single geographical landmass it is acceptable therefore that Britcoin can be trademarked globally, despite being created in the UK

The UK Government and Bank Of England should take this post as notice that there has been previous discussion and instruction from a stakeholder to trademark "Britcoin" on behalf of it creators and stakeholders and that any steps to advance any trademark or implementation of Britcoin without subject discussion with existing stakeholders of the "Official Britcoin Blockchain" would be deemed as anti-competitive and against the open ledger blockchain for the scrutiny of public (and indeed private) financial transactions.

I would suggest that the community establishes a fund for the implementation of at least a UK Trademark. The application can be downloaded from the UK IP Office website and you can register a Trademark for up to 10 years with annual fees somewhere between £300 and £500. I would suggest that "your investor" begins this process, in particular helping to fund the registration of this brand. I would suggest consulting a trademark lawyer for an initial consultation for verification.

Great Britain is itself a democratic brand that its people adopt of free well, and as such the UK Treasury, Government and Bank Of England do not have the authority in the digital currency sector to implement the brand, it is however important to understand that the "official crown of her Majesty the Queen" cannot be displayed on anything that does not have the official Royal seal of approval, I am sure that there are severe penalties for such practices, so please be forewarned and advised.

It is likely that only whereby the Crown issues Britcoins using HM Treasury money, can the Crown be displayed to indicate a Royal seal of approval.

Great Britain of course was established by King James VI of Scotland (i think!) merging for the first time England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland under one financial centralised rule and with Scotland with the potential of becoming independent again in the future it is perhaps best that Britcoin is independent of both current UK Treasure and Finance, and remains independent of future Scottish Treasury and Finance. It is likely also that Wales and Northern Ireland will also look to seek independence from England and financial rule, further supporting the need for a DIGITAL CURRENCY THAT REPRESENTS THOSE NATIONS COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY of any one centralised financial authority allowing anyone to invest or deinvest as necessary.

Independence of financial affairs of course does not mean necessarily that any nation would seek to not participate in the brand that is Great Britain, its purely of individual identity.

It's good to see some work on this blockchain and to see it on exchanges again, I am looking forward to some news of it appearing back on Bittrex!

Good luck!!!

Interesting idea trademarking Brit as a legal brand.

I'm not sure if we need to? But then again i'm not up on my trademark law.

I'll talk to the investor, and report back.

How is all that investor stuff getting on?

Trademarking something decentralised sounds like an oxymoron to me. Someone has to own a trademark. Craig Wright is essentially trolling Bitcoin right now trying to file patents for Bitcoin, this is a similar vain to be honest. And who's to say Mr Investor has everyone's best interests at heart? Surely the real Satoshi being anonymous is the only saving grace for when big establishment try and wield control of BTC, therefore trying to formalise all this and give people, organisations and government a 'target' seems rather counter intuitive.

Besides, Britcoin was the name of an exchange back in 2011, wouldn't they qualify for prior use or have existing marks?

[peterw1234]

Consider to add Britcoin on Yobit

https://yobit.net/en/addcoin/

The best place for starting trade Brit/BTC.

To add a new coin to Yobit please you need to fill out the form below.
Payment method: YobiCode
Listing type:
• Free - 0.00 btc - no guarantee
• Premium - 0.1 btc - 4-7 business days (no guarantee in case of compilation issues)
• Exclusive - 0.5 btc - 2-3 business days + mail alert to all users (no guarantee in case of compilation issues)

Would be nice to have Britcoin on Yobit I will chip in

[leigh2k14]

I have advised Mo and Wil to register (at least) a UK trademark for Britcoin. Whilst the basic build of Britcoin is based on Bitcoin, all other layers of IP are effectively open to copyright (subject to the original MIT license of the software) and trademarking.

It is highly unfortunate that the UK Government and UK Fintech (which claimn to lead the world) are several years behind the adoptive curve, myself previously writing to the UK Government and Prime Minister on a previous occasion. Playing second fiddle, unfortunately should require them to "invest" in the existing blockchain of that brand/trademark or at least merge to create a powerful blockchain solution for both private and public financial scrutiny.

They should note;

- Britcoin is a brand and intellectual property of its stakeholders (and can be legally protected as such) despite having no such centralised ownership
- Brit is slang and is a non trademarked reference to a person or object from or originating from Great Britain, or for example a term used for internationals that are birth or non birth affiliated
- The legal system protects stakeholders from losses and as such Britcoin is a tangible "business" with investors subject to losses through copyright or brand infringement
- The UK Government and Bank of England can create their own "Britcoin" however cannot use Britcoin if it is registered as a trademark, the value is in the trademarked brand
- As Britcoins are as such empty assets (blocks) in a global space of operation with no single point of ownership, as with all blockchain public ledger currencies, and are not issued via a single geographical landmass it is acceptable therefore that Britcoin can be trademarked globally, despite being created in the UK

The UK Government and Bank Of England should take this post as notice that there has been previous discussion and instruction from a stakeholder to trademark "Britcoin" on behalf of it creators and stakeholders and that any steps to advance any trademark or implementation of Britcoin without subject discussion with existing stakeholders of the "Official Britcoin Blockchain" would be deemed as anti-competitive and against the open ledger blockchain for the scrutiny of public (and indeed private) financial transactions.

I would suggest that the community establishes a fund for the implementation of at least a UK Trademark. The application can be downloaded from the UK IP Office website and you can register a Trademark for up to 10 years with annual fees somewhere between £300 and £500. I would suggest that "your investor" begins this process, in particular helping to fund the registration of this brand. I would suggest consulting a trademark lawyer for an initial consultation for verification.

Great Britain is itself a democratic brand that its people adopt of free well, and as such the UK Treasury, Government and Bank Of England do not have the authority in the digital currency sector to implement the brand, it is however important to understand that the "official crown of her Majesty the Queen" cannot be displayed on anything that does not have the official Royal seal of approval, I am sure that there are severe penalties for such practices, so please be forewarned and advised.

It is likely that only whereby the Crown issues Britcoins using HM Treasury money, can the Crown be displayed to indicate a Royal seal of approval.

Great Britain of course was established by King James VI of Scotland (i think!) merging for the first time England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland under one financial centralised rule and with Scotland with the potential of becoming independent again in the future it is perhaps best that Britcoin is independent of both current UK Treasure and Finance, and remains independent of future Scottish Treasury and Finance. It is likely also that Wales and Northern Ireland will also look to seek independence from England and financial rule, further supporting the need for a DIGITAL CURRENCY THAT REPRESENTS THOSE NATIONS COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY of any one centralised financial authority allowing anyone to invest or deinvest as necessary.

Independence of financial affairs of course does not mean necessarily that any nation would seek to not participate in the brand that is Great Britain, its purely of individual identity.

It's good to see some work on this blockchain and to see it on exchanges again, I am looking forward to some news of it appearing back on Bittrex!

Good luck!!!

Interesting idea trademarking Brit as a legal brand.

I'm not sure if we need to? But then again i'm not up on my trademark law.

I'll talk to the investor, and report back.

How is all that investor stuff getting on?

Trademarking something decentralised sounds like an oxymoron to me. Someone has to own a trademark. Craig Wright is essentially trolling Bitcoin right now trying to file patents for Bitcoin, this is a similar vain to be honest. And who's to say Mr Investor has everyone's best interests at heart? Surely the real Satoshi being anonymous is the only saving grace for when big establishment try and wield control of BTC, therefore trying to formalise all this and give people, organisations and government a 'target' seems rather counter intuitive.

Besides, Britcoin was the name of an exchange back in 2011, wouldn't they qualify for prior use or have existing marks?

I spoke with the investor today about trademarking Brit, he said it would be very difficult to do, but suggested that we register Brit as a LTD company to protect us fro the man down the road so to speak.

As for having everyone's interest at heart? He said to me only get into this project if you want to make money PERIOD! The guy is has a personal wealth of £50M, for him to take on this project, he obviously sees that it has potential. So does making money sound like he has everyone's interests at heart?

[fiftyseven]

Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.

[fiftyseven]

I spoke with the investor today about trademarking Brit, he said it would be very difficult to do, but suggested that we register Brit as a LTD company to protect us fro the man down the road so to speak.

As for having everyone's interest at heart? He said to me only get into this project if you want to make money PERIOD! The guy is has a personal wealth of £50M, for him to take on this project, he obviously sees that it has potential. So does making money sound like he has everyone's interests at heart?

That's an even weirder suggestion. A Ltd company has shareholders and directors and is a legal entity in its own right. You can't do that as a community of anonymous currency holders. Is his suggestion just for managing whatever funds are moving about during development in order to be tax efficient? I understand that from a 'Coin development consultancy business' perspective but not as a 'Britcoin Ltd' the actual coin perspective.

I think we need some clarity on what the guy will actually do for us, casting aside for a minute the rose tinted perspective of his claimed enormous wealth. Can we not hear from him?

[leigh2k14]

Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.

Are you gonna fund development and pay for exchanges and everything else that needs paying for?

There was a reason that Will7iam walked away for this project in the past, that was the lack of finances.

If the investor doesn't get his coins there will be no funding, then we'll be back to square one.

[leigh2k14]

I spoke with the investor today about trademarking Brit, he said it would be very difficult to do, but suggested that we register Brit as a LTD company to protect us fro the man down the road so to speak.

As for having everyone's interest at heart? He said to me only get into this project if you want to make money PERIOD! The guy is has a personal wealth of £50M, for him to take on this project, he obviously sees that it has potential. So does making money sound like he has everyone's interests at heart?

That's an even weirder suggestion. A Ltd company has shareholders and directors and is a legal entity in its own right. You can't do that as a community of anonymous currency holders. Is his suggestion just for managing whatever funds are moving about during development in order to be tax efficient? I understand that from a 'Coin development consultancy business' perspective but not as a 'Britcoin Ltd' the actual coin perspective.

I think we need some clarity on what the guy will actually do for us, casting aside for a minute the rose tinted perspective of his claimed enormous wealth. Can we not hear from him?

It was just a suggestion.

Do we really need to do anything? it's a "decentralized" payment network.

[fiftyseven]

Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.

Are you gonna fund development and pay for exchanges and everything else that needs paying for?

There was a reason that Will7iam walked away for this project in the past, that was the lack of finances.

If the investor doesn't get his coins there will be no funding, then we'll be back to square one.

If Brit's price continues to go up, I'd be happy to contribute BRIT for bounties as they will be worth someone's time and effort.

Finances for a coin are usually (with exception to ICOs or the 'investor plan' here) self perpetuating, if there's a good enough plan, momentum will carry it through all sorts of bounties and incentives to improve the coin.

What your post actually implies is Will7iam walked away because there was (and still is) no plan for the coin. That is all that people in our little bubble look for.

[leigh2k14]

Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.

Are you gonna fund development and pay for exchanges and everything else that needs paying for?

There was a reason that Will7iam walked away for this project in the past, that was the lack of finances.

If the investor doesn't get his coins there will be no funding, then we'll be back to square one.

If Brit's price continues to go up, I'd be happy to contribute BRIT for bounties as they will be worth someone's time and effort.

Finances for a coin are usually (with exception to ICOs or the 'investor plan' here) self perpetuating, if there's a good enough plan, momentum will carry it through all sorts of bounties and incentives to improve the coin.

What your post actually implies is Will7iam walked away because there was (and still is) no plan for the coin. That is all that people in our little bubble look for.

Are you gonna pay for 2 developers to work on this project full time?

[fiftyseven]

Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.

Are you gonna fund development and pay for exchanges and everything else that needs paying for?

There was a reason that Will7iam walked away for this project in the past, that was the lack of finances.

If the investor doesn't get his coins there will be no funding, then we'll be back to square one.

If Brit's price continues to go up, I'd be happy to contribute BRIT for bounties as they will be worth someone's time and effort.

Finances for a coin are usually (with exception to ICOs or the 'investor plan' here) self perpetuating, if there's a good enough plan, momentum will carry it through all sorts of bounties and incentives to improve the coin.

What your post actually implies is Will7iam walked away because there was (and still is) no plan for the coin. That is all that people in our little bubble look for.

Are you gonna pay for 2 developers to work on this project full time?

1. What will the developers be doing? That's what I'm missing here.

2. How long will investor man's 12k last if paying for two full time developers? Not very long at all.

[leigh2k14]

Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.

Are you gonna fund development and pay for exchanges and everything else that needs paying for?

There was a reason that Will7iam walked away for this project in the past, that was the lack of finances.

If the investor doesn't get his coins there will be no funding, then we'll be back to square one.

If Brit's price continues to go up, I'd be happy to contribute BRIT for bounties as they will be worth someone's time and effort.

Finances for a coin are usually (with exception to ICOs or the 'investor plan' here) self perpetuating, if there's a good enough plan, momentum will carry it through all sorts of bounties and incentives to improve the coin.

What your post actually implies is Will7iam walked away because there was (and still is) no plan for the coin. That is all that people in our little bubble look for.

Are you gonna pay for 2 developers to work on this project full time?

1. What will the developers be doing? That's what I'm missing here.

2. How long will investor man's 12k last if paying for two full time developers? Not very long at all.

Ask will7iam or Mo Green, they have a plan for Brit.

The 12K is just a starting point, if the project does well, then there's going more money invested into the project.

Stop trolling as your starting to annoy me.

As the marketcap grows your thinking that your coins will be devalued by 50% so your starting to winge, that's all.

[fiftyseven]

Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.

Are you gonna fund development and pay for exchanges and everything else that needs paying for?

There was a reason that Will7iam walked away for this project in the past, that was the lack of finances.

If the investor doesn't get his coins there will be no funding, then we'll be back to square one.

If Brit's price continues to go up, I'd be happy to contribute BRIT for bounties as they will be worth someone's time and effort.

Finances for a coin are usually (with exception to ICOs or the 'investor plan' here) self perpetuating, if there's a good enough plan, momentum will carry it through all sorts of bounties and incentives to improve the coin.

What your post actually implies is Will7iam walked away because there was (and still is) no plan for the coin. That is all that people in our little bubble look for.

Are you gonna pay for 2 developers to work on this project full time?

1. What will the developers be doing? That's what I'm missing here.

2. How long will investor man's 12k last if paying for two full time developers? Not very long at all.

Ask will7iam or Mo Green, they have a plan for Brit.

The 12K is just a starting point, if the project does well, then there's going more money invested into the project.

Stop trolling as your starting to annoy me.

As the marketcap grows your thinking that your coins will be devalued by 50% so your starting to winge, that's all.

I am merely asking for a plan. I have held BRIT for two years and am interested in it succeeding. Funny how questioning things that people have stated here is considered trolling.

The supply doubling is just an odd thing to do IMO. As I've said previously if there's some plan, it's better than no plan. I just haven't seen a plan!

Anyway I will literally shut up and let you guys get on with it. Whatever it is.