Monero ICO

[Redrose]

Why would they do so ? Especially for a coin which is already launched. If they do so, they would really be at the bottom.

[1715532473]

1715532473

[1715532473]

1715532473

[1715532473]

1715532473

[prettybuds]

What he means is: I wish the price of Monero would be ridiculously pumped by some sort of mechanism.  He has noticed that ICOs pump the prices of new coins very high, ergo Monero should also have an ICO.

Yes it is studid and makes no sense, but the price should be pumped somehow!

Your analysis is completely wrong.

[fortunecrypto]

I think now that Monero has flopped they could consider relaunching the network with an ICO

I mean like LISK and etc is doing, just use an existing project (in Monero's case Monero, in Lisk's case Crypti), and relaunch it with an ICO to work on the unfinished product.

That means Monero devs can attract a lot of funds and then finally finish the GUI etc

what say you,  folks?

It should be voted by stakes holders so they can make the ICO a successful one,people are quick to think that the dev just want more money from the community so they need to set up a poll to see if the community will agree on this one..

[somacoin]

I think now that Monero has flopped they could consider relaunching the network with an ICO

I mean like LISK and etc is doing, just use an existing project (in Monero's case Monero, in Lisk's case Crypti), and relaunch it with an ICO to work on the unfinished product.

That means Monero devs can attract a lot of funds and then finally finish the GUI etc

what say you,  folks?

It should be voted by stakes holders so they can make the ICO a successful one,people are quick to think that the dev just want more money from the community so they need to set up a poll to see if the community will agree on this one..

They don't need an ICO, perhaps they just need one or two capable developers.

[fortunecrypto]

I think now that Monero has flopped they could consider relaunching the network with an ICO

I mean like LISK and etc is doing, just use an existing project (in Monero's case Monero, in Lisk's case Crypti), and relaunch it with an ICO to work on the unfinished product.

That means Monero devs can attract a lot of funds and then finally finish the GUI etc

what say you,  folks?

It should be voted by stakes holders so they can make the ICO a successful one,people are quick to think that the dev just want more money from the community so they need to set up a poll to see if the community will agree on this one..

They don't need an ICO, perhaps they just need one or two capable developers.

With an ICO they can get not only two but four or five developer and a very active gui and more funds for marketing this coin so it's best in my opinion to proceed with the ICO but with community voting..

[Shrikez]

this is just too ridiculous....some random troll pops out putting monero and ICO in the same sentence, with the faulty and made up premise that "Monero has flopped"  and now people are actually discussing this like it were some kind of possibility?

I am just a random person interested in Monero but even I can tell with certainty  this is NEVER GONNA HAPPEN!

/closed

[prettybuds]

This thread is now closed.

Please continue discussing here  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1481494.0