Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 05:19:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][BXC][Bitcedi :: upto 106% Fixed deposit Interest with Encrypted Messaging]  (Read 80389 times)
lulworm (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2016, 08:28:29 PM
 #561

With the current price, i believe it will be fair to adjust bounty prices to make it worthwhile.
1715059153
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715059153

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715059153
Reply with quote  #2

1715059153
Report to moderator
1715059153
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715059153

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715059153
Reply with quote  #2

1715059153
Report to moderator
1715059153
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715059153

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715059153
Reply with quote  #2

1715059153
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715059153
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715059153

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715059153
Reply with quote  #2

1715059153
Report to moderator
1715059153
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715059153

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715059153
Reply with quote  #2

1715059153
Report to moderator
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
August 11, 2016, 05:00:23 AM
 #562

With the current price, i believe it will be fair to adjust bounty prices to make it worthwhile.

I guess you don't read thread, there is a translated OP to dutch and you still don't care to list it.
Alexgeror
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 12, 2016, 06:13:53 AM
 #563

@killerjoegreece & @Tinus please translate, I will pay 2x bounty (300 BXC), PM me with link to a thread and with your address.


Dutch Translation:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1580531.new#new

Sent 1000 BXC, dev still owe you bounty. What he is offering is a joke actually and translation must be rewarded with several thousands at current rate.
I hope you didn't use google translate, I don't understand dutch so I can't check.

I suggest to not dump at current price, wait till decent exchange when price will rise to 10K satoshi. Or just let it die. Not a big deal.
With a price of 200 sat, it should outperform capitalization Bytecoin. Do you believe it? Not mislead
Yes, after about 400 years when we reach Maximum BXC number (my own calculations, feel free to add or remove some eons  Smiley).
Meanwhile, almost all the billions of Bytecoins have mined now (most of them premined without an announcement).
Did you studied the emission curve of both coins?
I gave my direct determine that if the developer will purchase all the coins on the market in September, the coin dies in October. As you curve your help in this?
lulworm (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2016, 01:22:23 AM
 #564

With the current price, i believe it will be fair to adjust bounty prices to make it worthwhile.

I guess you don't read thread, there is a translated OP to dutch and you still don't care to list it.

Thanks, Updated Bounties, Dutch thread added to translation list.
Tinus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 169
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 15, 2016, 08:22:02 PM
 #565

With the current price, i believe it will be fair to adjust bounty prices to make it worthwhile.

I guess you don't read thread, there is a translated OP to dutch and you still don't care to list it.

Thanks, Updated Bounties, Dutch thread added to translation list.

thanks, and sent pm back Smiley
jwinterm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3024
Merit: 1103



View Profile
August 15, 2016, 08:29:30 PM
 #566

Just FYI images are not loading on the bitcedi online website for me on mobile, not at a comp right now to check if they work there.
lulworm (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2016, 09:54:14 PM
 #567

Just FYI images are not loading on the bitcedi online website for me on mobile, not at a comp right now to check if they work there.

Have you tried http://bitcedi.org
jwinterm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3024
Merit: 1103



View Profile
August 15, 2016, 10:17:45 PM
 #568

Just FYI images are not loading on the bitcedi online website for me on mobile, not at a comp right now to check if they work there.

Have you tried http://bitcedi.org

That one works. Did you just update the link in OP? I swear I clicked it from the first post earlier.
lulworm (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2016, 12:22:36 AM
Last edit: August 16, 2016, 12:44:49 AM by lulworm
 #569

Just FYI images are not loading on the bitcedi online website for me on mobile, not at a comp right now to check if they work there.

Have you tried http://bitcedi.org

That one works. Did you just update the link in OP? I swear I clicked it from the first post earlier.

It's my bad! I updated the link. we decided on the domain .org instead of the .online to be more official for marketing.
I have also contacted Bittrex on twitter to see if they'll consider listing bitcedi for it to grow.

Kindly retweet for Bittrex
https://twitter.com/Bitcedis/status/765316176419364868
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
August 16, 2016, 01:27:39 PM
 #570

Just FYI images are not loading on the bitcedi online website for me on mobile, not at a comp right now to check if they work there.

Have you tried http://bitcedi.org

That one works. Did you just update the link in OP? I swear I clicked it from the first post earlier.

It's my bad! I updated the link. we decided on the domain .org instead of the .online to be more official for marketing.
I have also contacted Bittrex on twitter to see if they'll consider listing bitcedi for it to grow.

Kindly retweet for Bittrex
https://twitter.com/Bitcedis/status/765316176419364868


Nice, perhaps Pirontech Ventures can help them to make a decision with a couple of bitcoins?
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
August 17, 2016, 07:58:22 PM
 #571

Where you can buy 1% of available supply for less than 0.03 BTC? Only on Cryptopia LOL.
javalopes
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 17, 2016, 10:58:08 PM
 #572

not now for sure the coin increased the value alot
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
August 17, 2016, 11:11:09 PM
 #573

not now for sure the coin increased the value alot

Because lack of hashrate is killing it. People dump to 80-60 satoshi. This is just stupid, you can mine shitton of coins with a single CPU if you solo mining it for 1 month.

I think there is a birth injury in Bitcedi which can stop Bittrex from listing it, the problem is improperly forked code. No one will waste human hours for code analysis of a coin with weighted price of current supply is close to 3 BTC and definitely no one will blindly list it even in isolated environment. Best what "dev" can do is to make a transparent fork and add his changes to a plain Duck/Dark/DigitalNode codebase or whatever name it has this month.
jwinterm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3024
Merit: 1103



View Profile
August 17, 2016, 11:36:19 PM
 #574

Is it too much to ask to run a diff between digitalnote and bitcedi? Doesn't almost every coin "improperly fork" and try to obscure who's code they're copying on github?

Edit: lol 1000+% spread on cryptopia Cheesy
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
August 17, 2016, 11:51:26 PM
 #575

Is it too much to ask to run a diff between digitalnote and bitcedi? Doesn't almost every coin "improperly fork" and try to obscure who's code they're copying on github?

Edit: lol 1000+% spread on cryptopia Cheesy

I just don't like
Code:
rm -rf .git && git init
. It requires to fuck with code in order to see what is actually changed.

Well maybe it's normal practice nowadays, I don't follow coins for more than a year already.
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
August 18, 2016, 04:17:14 PM
 #576

This is very interesting, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1471565.0

worm, what coin has more priority for you?

We are waiting for a response from Bittrex, did you receive anything yet?
_Django05_
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 403
Merit: 257



View Profile
August 18, 2016, 04:36:25 PM
 #577

Bitcedi or Litecred  Huh Huh

 Cool
lulworm (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
August 18, 2016, 06:14:42 PM
Last edit: August 18, 2016, 06:36:38 PM by lulworm
 #578

This is very interesting, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1471565.0

worm, what coin has more priority for you?

We are waiting for a response from Bittrex, did you receive anything yet?

@sammy007: Thanks for the concern and it only goes to show how much you are committed to the Bitcedi project just as i am.
I'm working on on Bitcedi full time, I work on Litecred when the need arises.
I'm not the only one on Litecred so there are others as well.

Bitcedi is the main project i'm working on and my avatar and sig should tell it all so yes i'm working on Bitcedi full time.

With Bittrex, they are i also sent them a dm o nt twitter yesterday with reasons why Bitcedi deserves to be on Bittrex. hoping to see the positive outcomes of this in coming days.
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
August 18, 2016, 06:27:49 PM
 #579

This is very interesting, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1471565.0

worm, what coin has more priority for you?

We are waiting for a response from Bittrex, did you receive anything yet?

@sammy007: Thanks for the concern and it only goes to show how much you are committed to the Bitcedi project just as i am.
I'm working on on Bitcedi full time, I work on Litecred when the need arises.
I'm not the only one on Litecred so there are others as well.

Bitcedi is the main project i'm working on and my avatar and sig should tell it all so yes i'm working on Bitcedi full time.

Clear difference with *Note and bitcedi just makes it easy for exchanges to do research, well not a problem, this is not first project goes this way.

I am asking because I am big Bitcedi bagholder, it took a lot of time to accumulate my stake and I wanna see to where it goes and how OP is interested in it.

I believe that Bittrex listing is very necessary for network, because miners in order to drop hashrate on a coin need something serious than Cryptopia to sell at least to pay electricity bills. Or at least some stable demand required on existing exchange, I am not so patient so I just did several market buys over a month.

PS: I have no any sell orders on cryptopia and not going to place any in a visible future. probably I will buy more to put into "staking" if there will be juicy asks, not sure yet.
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
August 18, 2016, 07:32:44 PM
 #580

Also, there is no feature-full block explorer, no way to verify transactions. It's just a list of blocks.

To attract miners I suggest to list in on coinwarz.com or whattomine.com
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!