rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 17, 2016, 02:39:15 PM |
|
you can try 1.8 version of epsylon3 i remember he ported the djm34 version in the last version of his miner
Thanks! But I will need to compile with new cuda framework installed. My old compile machine is dead now and I have no time to build new one (( Will wait for official windows binary release from tpruvot/epsylon3
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
July 17, 2016, 02:51:12 PM |
|
you can try 1.8 version of epsylon3 i remember he ported the djm34 version in the last version of his miner
Thanks! But I will need to compile with new cuda framework installed. My old compile machine is dead now and I have no time to build new one (( Will wait for official windows binary release from tpruvot/epsylon3 I compiled it with cuda 7.5 and it worked pretty fine on 1070, but it is slower on maxwell. Besides, the nanashi version is slower on all my cards.
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 17, 2016, 02:59:24 PM |
|
I compiled it with cuda 7.5 and it worked pretty fine on 1070, but it is slower on maxwell. Besides, the nanashi version is slower on all my cards.
What the max speed was you enable to get from one 1070 on neoscrypt?
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
July 17, 2016, 03:08:24 PM |
|
I compiled it with cuda 7.5 and it worked pretty fine on 1070, but it is slower on maxwell. Besides, the nanashi version is slower on all my cards.
What the max speed was you enable to get from one 1070 on neoscrypt? 1020 - 1040 Kh/s at 125 W
|
|
|
|
liquidproman (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
July 17, 2016, 03:57:02 PM Last edit: July 17, 2016, 04:16:52 PM by liquidproman |
|
thanks but why comparing the hashrate with the old djm34 version? the new one is much faster.
EDIT: according to crypto mining blog, the 1070 gets less than 900 Kh/s with this fork, I get much more with standard tpruvot's. EDIT2: someone should tell that japanese guy he's working on old stuff.
1.7.6-r10 Neoscrypt codes are based on SP's ccminer 1.5.80. New ccminer 1.8 is already known by Nanashi. https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/commit/4ca7b5a404e8acb8e863c8171beb256034f303c8https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/commit/a4196b341d74b5abeba8239da8c7125ed4fe0f82This code is roughly the same as 1.5.80. A Different point is the default intensity settings. And We checkd its Neoscrypt hashrate is not faster than 1.5.80. But 1070 seems an exception...? Anyway, Thanks for testing.
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
July 17, 2016, 08:17:29 PM |
|
Sorry Sir but I've tested both the 980ti and 970 and they are also slower. Please tell nanashi to rebase his work on latest djm34 or tpruvot (which is the same as djm but with pascal fixes which in my case are slowing down maxwells).
|
|
|
|
liquidproman (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
July 18, 2016, 12:51:55 AM |
|
Sorry Sir but I've tested both the 980ti and 970 and they are also slower. Please tell nanashi to rebase his work on latest djm34 or tpruvot (which is the same as djm but with pascal fixes which in my case are slowing down maxwells).
Faster in Neoscrypt Nanashi 1080 980 latest Tpruvot 1070 980ti 970 It looks like this. Why the difference is occurred? Nanashi reads this thread so he will consider your opinion.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
July 21, 2016, 06:03:06 AM Last edit: July 21, 2016, 06:47:30 AM by Amph |
|
with your version i'm getting 900khs sam as 1.8 from epsylon, but i see people reaching above 1MH, with same oc on same system, on linux you get,, more but i don't care about linux
so maybe something on my end, but i doubt, since all other algo are on par...
|
|
|
|
joniosbra
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
July 23, 2016, 09:08:29 PM |
|
which would be better (mhs/watts) for neoscript mining, 1070 or 1080? Tks.
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 24, 2016, 06:34:21 AM |
|
Now neoscrypt mining is good only in linux with pascal. On windows 1070 can do 1mhs only with high oc and more then 100% tdp power. Maybe you should wait for windows fix driver with new wddm mode that hope will come at Aug,2.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
July 24, 2016, 06:44:38 AM |
|
which would be better (mhs/watts) for neoscript mining, 1070 or 1080? Tks.
1080 does not scale right, too expensive without offering overall a good hash, maybe only in a few algo like lbry
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 24, 2016, 06:49:28 AM |
|
which would be better (mhs/watts) for neoscript mining, 1070 or 1080? Tks.
1080 does not scale right, too expensive without offering overall a good hash, maybe only in a few algo like lbry New types of gpu memory have a hard road to mining. HBM and GDDR5x are worse than this old good GDDR5.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
July 24, 2016, 07:47:31 AM Last edit: July 24, 2016, 08:18:18 AM by Amph |
|
which would be better (mhs/watts) for neoscript mining, 1070 or 1080? Tks.
1080 does not scale right, too expensive without offering overall a good hash, maybe only in a few algo like lbry New types of gpu memory have a hard road to mining. HBM and GDDR5x are worse than this old good GDDR5. this mean that Volta will be bad, because in the future every class of gpu will have those maybe there will be new tool to make mining good with them talking about the lyra2 algo, i think it need an optimization, if you can ask nanashi to look at it, because it's using 50% of the tdp so i suspect that the hashrate should be doubled
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
July 28, 2016, 01:59:02 PM |
|
any news on the poolside hashrate issue? thanks!
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
July 29, 2016, 12:21:37 PM |
|
any news on the poolside hashrate issue? thanks!
I fixed it myself. Not trivial.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
August 06, 2016, 06:31:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
H4gb4rd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
August 14, 2016, 11:08:06 AM Last edit: August 14, 2016, 11:22:00 AM by H4gb4rd |
|
Hi, there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
August 14, 2016, 12:19:30 PM |
|
faster for lyra2v2 or just a porting from epsylon work?
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
August 14, 2016, 07:06:18 PM |
|
It comes as sources only and requires cuda 8 toolkit to be installed (( My nvidia developer subscription is expired so I cannot download cuda 8 RC and build new nanashi version ((
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
August 14, 2016, 08:40:01 PM |
|
It comes as sources only and requires cuda 8 toolkit to be installed (( My nvidia developer subscription is expired so I cannot download cuda 8 RC and build new nanashi version (( That's weird as I wanted the sources and downloaded the windows binary instead by mistake.
|
|
|
|
|