Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 06:12:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Version 0.3.14  (Read 4062 times)
satoshi (OP)
Founder
Sr. Member
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 6610


View Profile
October 21, 2010, 04:39:27 PM
Last edit: October 21, 2010, 10:33:30 PM by satoshi
 #1

Version 0.3.14 is now available
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.3.14/

Changes:
- Key pool feature for safer wallet backup
Gavin Andresen:
- TEST network mode with switch -testnet
- Option to use SSL for JSON-RPC connections on unix/osx
- validateaddress RPC command
eurekafag:
- Russian translation
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710828745
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710828745

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710828745
Reply with quote  #2

1710828745
Report to moderator
jimbobway
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1304
Merit: 1014



View Profile
October 21, 2010, 08:02:44 PM
 #2

How does the keypool feature work and why is it safer?
jgarzik
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1091


View Profile
October 21, 2010, 08:14:19 PM
 #3

How does the keypool feature work and why is it safer?

This gives a bit of info: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1414.0

Among other things, a key pool means that you are more likely to be able to recover your wallet from an older backup.

Previously, this scenario
  • send some money
  • lost your wallet
  • restore from older backup

might result in you losing all your bitcoins, even the ones you did not send.

Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own.
Visit bloq.com / metronome.io
Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
LZ
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072


P2P Cryptocurrency


View Profile
October 22, 2010, 03:27:32 AM
 #4

  • send some money
  • lost your wallet
  • restore from older backup
No, it is not correct. It should be:
  • send some money
  • be sure got it
  • close Bitcoin
  • backup wallet
  • send some money
  • ...
  • send some money
  • lost your wallet
  • restore from older backup

My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
jgarzik
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1091


View Profile
October 22, 2010, 03:38:47 AM
 #5

  • send some money
  • lost your wallet
  • restore from older backup
No, it is not correct. It should be:
  • send some money
  • be sure got it
  • close Bitcoin
  • backup wallet
  • send some money
  • ...
  • send some money
  • lost your wallet
  • restore from older backup

No, you only need one send -- with one change transaction -- to create a problem.

Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own.
Visit bloq.com / metronome.io
Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
LZ
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072


P2P Cryptocurrency


View Profile
October 22, 2010, 03:42:35 AM
Last edit: October 22, 2010, 06:49:46 AM by lzsaver
 #6

Yes. I just wanna say that user should backup wallet only after he/she got at least one transaction in 0.3.14.

In this scenario:
  • backup wallet
  • send some money
  • keypool created
  • lost your wallet
  • restore from older backup
user will lose money in 0.3.14 too.

Added: the transaction is not required, enough to request a new address once and the pool will be created.

My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
LZ
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072


P2P Cryptocurrency


View Profile
October 22, 2010, 04:52:21 AM
Last edit: October 22, 2010, 05:33:22 AM by lzsaver
 #7

Feature request for 0.3.14.1.

I don't know how it happened, but I just clicked Send button twice.
And I made two transactions instead of one. Send button should be
disabled if I click it and enabled again if Send Coins form appeared...

I really do not know why Payment Sent window did not protect me.

My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
FreeMoney
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1014


Strength in numbers


View Profile WWW
October 22, 2010, 06:53:03 AM
 #8

Feature request for 0.3.14.1.

I don't know how it happened, but I just clicked Send button twice.
And I made two transactions instead of one. Send button should be
disabled if I click it and enabled again if Send Coins form appeared...

I really do not know why Payment Sent window did not protect me.

You must have a fast finger :-)

Hope it wasn't a big problem.

Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
LZ
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072


P2P Cryptocurrency


View Profile
October 22, 2010, 06:56:44 AM
 #9

It's OK, thanks. I sent to my another address... twice. Smiley

My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1005


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
October 22, 2010, 06:46:12 PM
 #10

Satoshi, could you tell me of what revision is this version ?

I tried diff-ing the files (from SVN and from the binary package with sources), but there seems to be some kind of binary differences in the files, and they are marked as different when doing directory compare, but diff software cannot pinpoint what are the exact differences !!

That is the weirdest thing i have seen in a long time.
Perhaps the files from the package are encoded in UTF-8, UTF-16 or something ? In SVN, they are noticeably smaller.

theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5138
Merit: 12565


View Profile
October 22, 2010, 06:55:14 PM
 #11

Satoshi, could you tell me of what revision is this version ?

I tried diff-ing the files (from SVN and from the binary package with sources), but there seems to be some kind of binary differences in the files, and they are marked as different when doing directory compare, but diff software cannot pinpoint what are the exact differences !!

That is the weirdest thing i have seen in a long time.
Perhaps the files from the package are encoded in UTF-8, UTF-16 or something ? In SVN, they are noticeably smaller.

SVN has Unix line endings, while the source in the packages has Windows line endings. The files are otherwise exactly the same.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
LZ
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072


P2P Cryptocurrency


View Profile
October 22, 2010, 09:28:14 PM
 #12

could you tell me of what revision is this version ?
It is SVN revision 171. Smiley

My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1005


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
October 22, 2010, 10:12:55 PM
 #13

could you tell me of what revision is this version ?
It is SVN revision 171. Smiley

Thanks, i already managed to get this information by looking at logs.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!