satoshi (OP)
Founder
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 7248
|
|
October 21, 2010, 04:39:27 PM Last edit: October 21, 2010, 10:33:30 PM by satoshi |
|
Version 0.3.14 is now available http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.3.14/Changes: - Key pool feature for safer wallet backup Gavin Andresen: - TEST network mode with switch -testnet - Option to use SSL for JSON-RPC connections on unix/osx - validateaddress RPC command eurekafag: - Russian translation
|
|
|
|
jimbobway
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1304
Merit: 1015
|
|
October 21, 2010, 08:02:44 PM |
|
How does the keypool feature work and why is it safer?
|
|
|
|
jgarzik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
|
|
October 21, 2010, 08:14:19 PM |
|
How does the keypool feature work and why is it safer?
This gives a bit of info: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1414.0Among other things, a key pool means that you are more likely to be able to recover your wallet from an older backup. Previously, this scenario - send some money
- lost your wallet
- restore from older backup
might result in you losing all your bitcoins, even the ones you did not send.
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
LZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072
P2P Cryptocurrency
|
|
October 22, 2010, 03:27:32 AM |
|
- send some money
- lost your wallet
- restore from older backup
No, it is not correct. It should be: - send some money
- be sure got it
- close Bitcoin
- backup wallet
- send some money
- ...
- send some money
- lost your wallet
- restore from older backup
|
My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
|
|
|
jgarzik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
|
|
October 22, 2010, 03:38:47 AM |
|
- send some money
- lost your wallet
- restore from older backup
No, it is not correct. It should be: - send some money
- be sure got it
- close Bitcoin
- backup wallet
- send some money
- ...
- send some money
- lost your wallet
- restore from older backup
No, you only need one send -- with one change transaction -- to create a problem.
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
LZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072
P2P Cryptocurrency
|
|
October 22, 2010, 03:42:35 AM Last edit: October 22, 2010, 06:49:46 AM by lzsaver |
|
Yes. I just wanna say that user should backup wallet only after he/she got at least one transaction in 0.3.14. In this scenario: - backup wallet
- send some money
- keypool created
- lost your wallet
- restore from older backup
user will lose money in 0.3.14 too. Added: the transaction is not required, enough to request a new address once and the pool will be created.
|
My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
|
|
|
LZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072
P2P Cryptocurrency
|
|
October 22, 2010, 04:52:21 AM Last edit: October 22, 2010, 05:33:22 AM by lzsaver |
|
Feature request for 0.3.14.1.
I don't know how it happened, but I just clicked Send button twice. And I made two transactions instead of one. Send button should be disabled if I click it and enabled again if Send Coins form appeared...
I really do not know why Payment Sent window did not protect me.
|
My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
|
|
|
FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
|
|
October 22, 2010, 06:53:03 AM |
|
Feature request for 0.3.14.1.
I don't know how it happened, but I just clicked Send button twice. And I made two transactions instead of one. Send button should be disabled if I click it and enabled again if Send Coins form appeared...
I really do not know why Payment Sent window did not protect me.
You must have a fast finger :-) Hope it wasn't a big problem.
|
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
|
|
|
LZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072
P2P Cryptocurrency
|
|
October 22, 2010, 06:56:44 AM |
|
It's OK, thanks. I sent to my another address... twice.
|
My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
|
|
|
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1006
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
|
|
October 22, 2010, 06:46:12 PM |
|
Satoshi, could you tell me of what revision is this version ?
I tried diff-ing the files (from SVN and from the binary package with sources), but there seems to be some kind of binary differences in the files, and they are marked as different when doing directory compare, but diff software cannot pinpoint what are the exact differences !!
That is the weirdest thing i have seen in a long time. Perhaps the files from the package are encoded in UTF-8, UTF-16 or something ? In SVN, they are noticeably smaller.
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5376
Merit: 13410
|
|
October 22, 2010, 06:55:14 PM |
|
Satoshi, could you tell me of what revision is this version ?
I tried diff-ing the files (from SVN and from the binary package with sources), but there seems to be some kind of binary differences in the files, and they are marked as different when doing directory compare, but diff software cannot pinpoint what are the exact differences !!
That is the weirdest thing i have seen in a long time. Perhaps the files from the package are encoded in UTF-8, UTF-16 or something ? In SVN, they are noticeably smaller.
SVN has Unix line endings, while the source in the packages has Windows line endings. The files are otherwise exactly the same.
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
LZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072
P2P Cryptocurrency
|
|
October 22, 2010, 09:28:14 PM |
|
could you tell me of what revision is this version ? It is SVN revision 171.
|
My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
|
|
|
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1006
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
|
|
October 22, 2010, 10:12:55 PM |
|
could you tell me of what revision is this version ? It is SVN revision 171. Thanks, i already managed to get this information by looking at logs.
|
|
|
|
|