Pawel,
Please let me know your thoughts, I would like to do what is the best for campaign and SafeDice, and I respect your opinion.
We need some adjustments, those might be wrong ones, please I am open to debate and discussion by all means.
Alex
Hi Alex.
That 75% requirement doesn't make much sense to me (or any other requirement expressed as %).
Imagine 2 participants posting with equal quality. 1st one posts only minimum required 18 posts, 14 (over 75%) of which in gambling section. 2nd participant makes 100 posts, 50 of which in gambling.
Obviously the 2nd one did much better job (assuming equal quality), but since his 50 posts in gambling section are "only" 50% of his total posts, he would be denied payment and kicked out of campaign.
Does it make sense to you?
Other scenario: imagine participant posted 18 posts (14 in gambling). Now he's massively discouraged to post in any other board (i.e. participate in constructive discussion) because for every such post he would have to make 3 in gambling section.
I'm not in favour of any fixed requirement relating to specific boards, as sometimes there simply aren't enough topics you could contribute to. So that puts some participants between choice of not getting paid and spamming.
But if you want to go that route, you should definitely go for fixed number, i'e' "minimum 7 posts in gambling section" rather than % figure.
As for this:
Bounty of 0.01 BTC for members who notify me (via PM ) about those who are not dedicated to our cause, and who are just slacking around to get by - we will eliminate these eventually and will have a 100% dedicated crew.
Can you explain what you mean by "dedicated/not dedicated to the cause"?
That sounds a bit odd to me, but maybe I just misunderstood your intentions. If you only mean reporting spammers/low quality posters, then that's fine. But the words you chose could mean something else.
Poll
