[SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version)

[Lauda]

Anyone knows how long does it take for yahoo62278 to review your posts to get off the SMAS list on his managed campaigns?

There is no fixed time-to-respond.

I sent him a PM like a week ago and still no reply. My ban was during the bitmixer campaign I think. Do I need to get off both lists or if I get off from yahoo62278's it's enough to participate on yahoo62278 managed campaigns?

It depends on whether he banned you himself or just copied your name from my list.

Do I also need to contact Lauda? Lauda asks for the round of the ban, I would need to look it up. yahoo62278 asks for something or only contacting him?

There is a long backlog of reviews that I'm hoping to clear by the end of the next week at the latest. No rush.

[1714492551]

1714492551

[1714492551]

1714492551

[1714492551]

1714492551

[1714492551]

1714492551

[jpdorn]

Great stuff. I see you guys are doing only english version, and i recommend you guys to support others languages as well; spammers have no frontier.

[neurotypical]

Anyone knows how long does it take for yahoo62278 to review your posts to get off the SMAS list on his managed campaigns? I sent him a PM like a week ago and still no reply. My ban was during the bitmixer campaign I think.

Do I need to get off both lists or if I get off from yahoo62278's it's enough to participate on yahoo62278 managed campaigns?

Do I also need to contact Lauda? Lauda asks for the round of the ban, I would need to look it up. yahoo62278 asks for something or only contacting him?

If your ban is from Bitmixer, then you will have to contact Lauda for it and also if you are on more than one list, then you will have to contact both managers. However, I think for Lauda you will have to wait for 60 days and for Yahoo maybe 30 or 60 days. You can read through the thread to know more. Also, you will have to check the thread yourself to know the round you have been banned then follow the steps that is being set in other to get off the list.

So I need to contact both is what I understand from what you are saying. But what im asking is.. does yahoo request any data? Lauda asks for the round of the ban (which I still have to look up) but does yahoo asks for something or you just contact him? because in the thread he doesn't say anything other than "contact me for a review".

It depends on whether he banned you himself or just copied your name from my list.

He probably just copied my name. I will look for the round ban later. I guess I can find this in the bitmixer signature thread.

[Lauda]

Great stuff. I see you guys are doing only english version, and i recommend you guys to support others languages as well; spammers have no frontier.

English only version? How exactly do you think we could *support other languages*, especially those that we do not speak?

So I need to contact both is what I understand from what you are saying.

Yes, but if he has copied you from my list then you should ask for a removal from mine first. Only if that succeeds, then you should go to him.

But what im asking is.. does yahoo request any data?

Not that I am aware of, no.

[jpdorn]

Great stuff. I see you guys are doing only english version, and i recommend you guys to support others languages as well; spammers have no frontier.

English only version? How exactly do you think we could *support other languages*, especially those that we do not speak?

I mean, if others languages users are included on list, because mostly spam i see are from others languages.

[Lauda]

I mean, if others languages users are included on list, because mostly spam i see are from others languages.

The list is created based off of the users that we ban from our campaigns. I can't ban people when I can't even understand their posts, can I?

[Coiner_]

That was quite the read. I have a few questions:

- Is this still active? I cross-checked the lists on the first page with yahoo's list (since his is the only one that's datestamped) and it seems Lutpin stopped updating the full list on 6/29/17 after this new name.

- @Lutpin, do you have a similar list separate from this one like yahoo and Lauda do? I read through all the pages and noticed that in all your updates, there's no mention of "... and my list". There's also nothing in your created topics and these are also still in the OP:

General:
Code:

Code:

First reply ([b]missing the list of Lutpin[/b])

[-- snip --]

Lutpin:
Code:

Code:

Upcoming

(total of 0 users)

I'm assuming you're automatically adding it the general list but I can't be sure.

- If this is still active, can you please datestamp the title like Mitchell does in this "Overview of ... Campaigns" thread?

[leps]

Why am I SMAS listed? Can someone PM the exact reasons?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Why am I SMAS listed? Can someone PM the exact reasons?

Dude, your posts are all garbage and contribute one-line slices of nothing to the threads you squatted them into.  Do you not see this?  No campaign manager would pay someone for that level of quality.  I have no part of SMAS, but I'm betting that's the reason.

[Taki]

I was blacklisted by Luptin and Lauda. I understood their rules about coming back in a wight list after 30 and 60 days of high quality posting. But how to know what date I was Blacklisted? I found that I'm blacklisted from Lauda only two days ago.

[Lauda]

I was blacklisted by Luptin and Lauda. I understood their rules about coming back in a wight list after 30 and 60 days of high quality posting. But how to know what date I was Blacklisted? I found that I'm blacklisted from Lauda only two days ago.

That information is no longer available for old bans. If you do not know when you were banned, you are likely someone who got blacklisted a while ago.

[rivoke]

I was blacklisted by Luptin and Lauda. I understood their rules about coming back in a wight list after 30 and 60 days of high quality posting. But how to know what date I was Blacklisted? I found that I'm blacklisted from Lauda only two days ago.

That information is no longer available for old bans. If you do not know when you were banned, you are likely someone who got blacklisted a while ago.

I think I'm the example

I'm really have no idea when I got into the list and once I got ask Mr/Mrs.Lauda to review my status, I just got blacklist.

Is there any specific reason behind this act ?

Anyway I'm sorry if I did a bad mistake

[Taki]

I was blacklisted by Luptin and Lauda. I understood their rules about coming back in a wight list after 30 and 60 days of high quality posting. But how to know what date I was Blacklisted? I found that I'm blacklisted from Lauda only two days ago.

That information is no longer available for old bans. If you do not know when you were banned, you are likely someone who got blacklisted a while ago.

I think I'm the example

I'm really have no idea when I got into the list and once I got ask Mr/Mrs.Lauda to review my status, I just got blacklist.

Is there any specific reason behind this act ?

Anyway I'm sorry if I did a bad mistake

I was discussing my situation with my husband which is high member ranked on the forum and friends, and I think I understood why I was called as spammer by Lauda. I really talked oftenly about my status of housewife on bitcoin and topics alike. In any case, Lauda is giving 60 days to improve comments' quality, so I will count that period from that day when Lauda said me that I'm blacklisted and after I will ask him (or her) to rewiev my posts.

[Lauda]

I'm really have no idea when I got into the list and once I got ask Mr/Mrs.Lauda to review my status, I just got blacklist.

Your incompetence is your problem.

Is there any specific reason behind this act ?

2nd review gets denied -> you are permanently blacklisted.

I was discussing my situation with my husband which is high member ranked on the forum and friends, and I think I understood why I was called as spammer by Lauda.

A high rank does not mean anything these days.

I really talked oftenly about my status of housewife on bitcoin and topics alike.

I do not care who you are nor what you do, thus you understood nothing and neither did your husband and friends (?).

In any case, Lauda is giving 60 days to improve comments' quality, so I will count that period from that day when Lauda said me that I'm blacklisted and after I will ask him (or her) to rewiev my posts.

Which will get you denied, again and permanently blacklisted. Something so simple as SMAS, and people still don't understand it. Sigh.

[Taki]

I'm really have no idea when I got into the list and once I got ask Mr/Mrs.Lauda to review my status, I just got blacklist.

Your incompetence is your problem.

Is there any specific reason behind this act ?

2nd review gets denied -> you are permanently blacklisted.

I was discussing my situation with my husband which is high member ranked on the forum and friends, and I think I understood why I was called as spammer by Lauda.

A high rank does not mean anything these days.

I really talked oftenly about my status of housewife on bitcoin and topics alike.

I do not care who you are nor what you do, thus you understood nothing and neither did your husband and friends (?).

In any case, Lauda is giving 60 days to improve comments' quality, so I will count that period from that day when Lauda said me that I'm blacklisted and after I will ask him (or her) to rewiev my posts.

Which will get you denied, again and permanently blacklisted. Something so simple as SMAS, and people still don't understand it. Sigh.

You don't follow your rules that you seted yourself!
What the hell you wrote then "If you wish to not be on this list, your post quality can be reviewed after 60 days. If the review confirms your ban, or you ask for a review before 30 days have passed, you will be blacklisted for 6 months. This excludes permanently blacklisted members that can be found in their own thread" if you don't follow that?
I was trying to talk with you and see what was the problem in my comments, but you have said you don't give such advices for free. Do you take money for your advices, really?
You are not fair. And if SMAS support you in that they are not fair as well.

[Lauda]

You don't follow your rules that you seted yourself!

I do; however, I do not have to if I do not want to. I don't have to review anyone if I do not want to, and could permanently blacklist everyone right away. By giving spammers 2 chances for reviews I am being lenient towards them.

What the hell you wrote then "If you wish to not be on this list, your post quality can be reviewed after 60 days. If the review confirms your ban, or you ask for a review before 30 days have passed, you will be blacklisted for 6 months. This excludes permanently blacklisted members that can be found in their own thread" if you don't follow that?

1 review denied -> 2nd review denied -> permanently blacklisted.

I was trying to talk with you and see what was the problem in my comments, but you have said you don't give such advices for free.

Do you realize how many people PM me per day? Let me rephrase, do you realize how many people waste my time with bullshit per day? (more specifically, a lot of the requests are bullshit, complaining, et. al.) If I were to analyze everyone's shitposting and give suggestions in my free time, a backlog (for all on-forum *obligations*) would be created that would take weeks if not months to go through. Therefore, I rarely do such a thing (e.g. maybe I have extra time, or a good day).

Do you take money for your advices, really?

I do paid consulting, but that's not relevant to SMAS. If you are complaining that someone doesn't want to do something for free for you, you being a stranger to them, then you're a self-entitled brat.

You are not fair. And if SMAS support you in that they are not fair as well.

Everyone is being treated equally, more or less, thus it is naturally fair. Whether I am too strict or not, has nothing to do with fairness.

[BingoDog]

I have the question if you could help me. I was participating in many signature campaigns and never been kicked out or warned about spaming or similar, always got the payments. Recently the sig campaign I was participating finished (a week ago) and I was looking for new ones to participate so applied to few. Today I accidentaly found out that I'm on SMAS blacklist and no one ever send me a message or something. Could it be that I was  put on the list just because I applied for the campaign? Could I get some explanation, could it be a mistake?

[Lauda]

Today I accidentaly found out that I'm on SMAS blacklist and no one ever send me a message or something.

Nobody will send you a message that you are placed on SMAS.

Could it be that I was  put on the list just because I applied for the campaign? Could I get some explanation, could it be a mistake?

I don't see why not. That's also something that I plan on doing.

[BingoDog]

Today I accidentaly found out that I'm on SMAS blacklist and no one ever send me a message or something.

Nobody will send you a message that you are placed on SMAS.

Could it be that I was  put on the list just because I applied for the campaign? Could I get some explanation, could it be a mistake?

I don't see why not. That's also something that I plan on doing.

So, it's forbidden to apply for campaigns? I don't understand.

[Lauda]

So, it's forbidden to apply for campaigns? I don't understand.

I will instantly reject anyone on my SMAS list as well as consider their attempt at applying to any campaigns that I manage (where the SMAS list is explicitly mentioned) as an attempt at cheating.