[SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version)

[Tyrantt]

Are lauda,luptin or yahoo around here? I've sent them a pm but none of them are responding...

Around, but busy. When did you send a PM?

I've sent you on December 9th, but haven't heard since so I've tried to contact luptin and yahoo. Yeah, I've figured so been waiting since.

Sometimes the average waiting time for SMAS requests for me is 14 days. Yahoo said that people on his list can no longer be removed / request removals. If you are not on Lutpin's list, which doesn't exist, then it is pointless to PM him.
I will try to get this checked before the end of the next week, but no promises.

Well I was trying to reach anyone who's involved in SMAS list. You've placed me on that list about one year ago so that's why I'm trying to contact you first. Okay, no worries, take your time.

[1715112629]

1715112629

[1715112629]

1715112629

[1715112629]

1715112629

[The Sceptical Chymist]

hello Lutpin!
I tried improving my article quality in 60 days. You can consider me to exit the SMAS list.

Have you learned how to write a sentence in English that actually makes sense?  Judging from your post here I'd say not.

Real glad CAPT DEADPOOL is permablacklisted.  That there is one of the worst shitposters I've ever seen.

[Lesbian Cow]

This is great work you are doing here fighting SPAM.

[yahoo62278]

This is great work you are doing here fighting SPAM.

This was a great idea when we introduced it. but there are so many other managers who are not paying attention to it. Obviously it is still a good program to have in place, I just wish it was universal and made a must for all managers to reference

[Lutpin]

This is great work you are doing here fighting SPAM.

This was a great idea when we introduced it. but there are so many other managers who are not paying attention to it. Obviously it is still a good program to have in place, I just wish it was universal and made a must for all managers to reference

I think we could use some fresh input, maybe theymos would even be ready to semi-cooperate on it.
The recently introduced merit system already gives users the ability to determine (not fully, but in parts) which rank another user should have.
This is a huge change from previously where only activity (-> time) determined your rank.

I see this as sign of theymos wanting to give more power to the community.
Maybe a next step would be a SMAS 2.0 with official sanction from the forum/administration?

(I might be going out on a limb here, this merit stuff has me excited for change and improvements.)

[spiker777]

I have made considerable effort to contribute to the forum, improving my English and also the quality of my posts, I have even been taking extra classes at college to work on my grammar and yet after PMing Lauda to be removed from his list all I was at first completely ignored. Then, after politely asking again to consider removing me from his list, all I got was "Stop spamming me".... No indication of what I need to do for removal, despite that fact that I applied for removal based on his OWN conditions. I sent the messages a few days apart, no doubt the amount of PMs Lauda gets it is reasonable to assume my previous message would have been buried.

I have already been kicked out of a signature campaign because I was on his SMAS list, I think I deserve a second chance. Lauda you are supposed to be someone to look up to on the forum, someone to clear up the shitposters, I understand that. However, surely you agree that people deserve second chances, and it is quite clear that I am trying, it is only fair that you give me another look over rather than condemning me forever. That isn't right.

[Lauda]

...and it is quite clear that I am trying, it is only fair that you give me another look over rather than condemning me forever. That isn't right.

You've PM'd me on the 27th of January. Then you've PM'd me again 3 days later even though I have made no updates to the SMAS list. After explicitly telling you to stop spamming me, you move over to spam via other communication channels. I'm putting you at the end of the queue due to your self-entitlement.

[tokeweed]

Hey Lauda/Yahoo/Other_Person

Epic insult.

It's so funny that someone made a meme out of that pic.  I think that's from medical website in the heart attack section.  LOL.

Somebody must have searched 'man touching heart' and picked the first pic of a guy touching his heart. 

[spiker777]

...and it is quite clear that I am trying, it is only fair that you give me another look over rather than condemning me forever. That isn't right.

You've PM'd me on the 27th of January. Then you've PM'd me again 3 days later even though I have made no updates to the SMAS list. After explicitly telling you to stop spamming me, you move over to spam via other communication channels. I'm putting you at the end of the queue due to your self-entitlement.

How did I spam you? I sent two PMs.... No doubt you get dozens of PMs per day, it was reasonable to assume my first had been buried.

If you had simply replied to my first PM, or even the second and said you would review it later, that would have been fine. You gave me no indication that had read my message, so what was I supposed to do? Self entitlement? People bite their tongue around you because you're on the default trust list, I don't see how you could think it is fair to move me to back of the list for trying to improve myself, that is a spiteful thing to do.

[Lauda]

How did I spam you? I sent two PMs.... No doubt you get dozens of PMs per day, it was reasonable to assume my first had been buried.

If you PM me more than once within 7 days about the same thing, and I didn't answer at all, and/or you're a random user, then you're spamming me.

I don't see how you could think it is fair to move me to back of the list for trying to improve myself, that is a spiteful thing to do.

Cut the bullshit. A spiteful thing to do right now would be to instantly deny you and not look back. You should be grateful that you are being given a opportunity for review (even though odds are that it will be a wasted opportunity).

[shushanika]

I have some questions regarding this :

1) So only the members registering for signature campaigns are listed here if they spam after joinignthe campaign ?

2) Is there any notification sent to the member after he gets his name listed here. I read that you do not plan to give them negative trust, so how will that member know about this.

[Lauda]

2) Is there any notification sent to the member after he gets his name listed here.

No.

I read that you do not plan to give them negative trust, so how will that member know about this.

It is their responsibility to check. SMAS supporting campaigns usually leave a link to the list. If you apply before checking, then you should be both denied and neg. rated for attempting to cheat.

[criptix]

Hi everyone,

please check this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2881374.0

[spiker777]

2) Is there any notification sent to the member after he gets his name listed here.

No.

I read that you do not plan to give them negative trust, so how will that member know about this.

It is their responsibility to check. SMAS supporting campaigns usually leave a link to the list. If you apply before checking, then you should be both denied and neg. rated for attempting to cheat.

Are you really going to deny my application for removal from your SMAS list? You are clearly setting unrealistic benchmarks for removal, hence making any addition basically permanent. I think pretty much any other signature manager would be happy with the quality of my posts, I am not an extremely technical poster, but I contribute meaningful replies to the threads I participate in.

You added me to your list for "Low quality/insubstantial/repetitive posts". Are you really trying to say that I'm still posting low quality posts? You keeping me on your list is BS, and I suspect it is simply down to the fact I called you out on it here.

[Lauda]

Are you really trying to say that I'm still posting low quality posts?

Yes, your posts are horrible.

You keeping me on your list is BS, and I suspect it is simply down to the fact I called you out on it here.

You think that you are important enough for me to care about you? Cute.

[spiker777]

Are you really trying to say that I'm still posting low quality posts?

Yes, your posts are horrible.

You keeping me on your list is BS, and I suspect it is simply down to the fact I called you out on it here.

You think that you are important enough for me to care about you? Cute.

You're the most passive aggressive member I've ever seen on this forum, the fact that you were in a position of power for so long is honestly a miracle. Now that you've been removed from the DT list, the reign of Lauda is coming to an end, and so too is your relevance on this topic. The fact that you have any degree of control over anything is honestly a tragedy, you clearly cannot be trusted to make logical decisions anymore.

You call my posts low quality, and yet they contribute meaning to the threads they were posted in. What do you expect me to do, write an essay for every single response? Post detailed technical analysis of the flaws of Blockchain? Maybe I should post a detailed psychometric analysis of your personality, I'm sure you have at least one disorder, probably narcissism.

Remove me from your list you power hungry maniac.

[Lauda]

Remove me from your list you power hungry maniac.

Have fun with that one.

[FaucetRank.com]

A guideline and set of rules should be posted by Sig. Camp. Managers for balcklisted users that how to get removed from this black list.

[DonKixot]

If you were banned? how to find out the reason for what? and is it possible to remove the ban and continue working under your account? and how can this be done?

[markdario112616]

If you were banned? how to find out the reason for what? and is it possible to remove the ban and continue working under your account? and how can this be done?

What kind of ban? Ban from joining campaigns or ban from the forum? Well, basically if you are talking about the ban from joining campaigns. Some managers do have their own thread in which they listed down users who applied on their campaigns that have low-quality posts, unconstructive and/or repetitive posts. So from that list, you will easily determine why you were ban from joining their campaigns.

NOTE: You can still join other campaigns but only to those managers who haven't blacklisted you yet.

Is it removable?

Well, for some managers, Yes. But for others, it will depend on how serious your case is.

You can still continue working on your account, A ban on joining on one of the signature campaigns won't limit you to do other things on this forum.

This is a concrete example of what I'm saying, View this Thread


If ban from the forum itself, then it's another story. If you are banned from the forum most likely you broke a rule/s. You could question it but your chance of getting un-ban is very low. Their judgment may depend on how serious your violation is. Well, if your case is plagiarism then don't bother posting and ask for forgiveness.