I say being realistic about the importance + potential of world wide adoption.
With out that they are just digital pyramid scheme tokens on centralized exchanges.
If it is not used as a currency ?
Then it isn't one
Crowd mentality too !
You have no choice but to follow the crowd.
You can try and support a coin that is mined for example..
But if they crowd / majority ignores it and dives on scammy ICO shit like Waves or ETH etc
..then what ?
Your mined coin will die in obscurity and maybe get delisted and go no where.
It's always been that way but the crowd has gotten more scammy selfish greedy & stupid / self-destructive.
EDIT:
I agree with kelsey of course as usual.
And most of you actually Miso made some good points.
I'd say the fake communities is a HUGE problem.
Having a hoard of users who bought Doge coin only to dump it for profit later..
does not make it a community.. that is a facade.
Like the ETH community charade which is purely profit driven.
You all like to just reinvent things to suit your needs.
Such as the users here redefined what FUD means.
When the actual definition is fitting and warranted ALL THE TIME !
What *was* the point ?
Finding some way to tack a "token" onto a block-chain ..for a scheme gimmick / profit ?
Or a currency that will be used as such ?
They want to be early adopters !
And don't forget Butterin admitted he dumped coins on you.. Satoshi did not.
@Shelby
sometimes your perceptions + jumping to conclusions don't add up.
The fact that something is always done a certain ways does not mean it HAS to be done that way.
There was no collective group of devs making Bitcoin on launch day ?
Of course not LOL
No one knew about the damn idea yet ahhahah
Yet you say this is like an engineering problem type thing ?
I think once again i can say your view on coding is limited.
I will tell you again i have gotten together and made big projects from scratch with other users
and some were open sourced on launch too which contradicts what you just said was "FACT"
Shelby you think you are smarter than you are sometimes.
Don't forget your *experience* is just that ..and not all encompassing.
You tend to jump to extreme conclusions based off of bits of info.
With little interest in checking of you have all the info to get the correct answer.
Like polling stats then only using 70% of the info available..
Then demanding stubbornly you have ALL the iron clad concrete answers !
My P2P and cracking experience is far more relevant than traditional coders you always talk about
yet you apparently know nothing about it..
Meaning you are as always missing a huge part of the puzzle with all your comments.
And all your comments are proclamation of some "FACTS"
..when your missing a huge amount of sample data to derive the summation.
I also think your stubborn and will not get off your ass to check what i said
You will simply plow on that you are correct with out investigating.
Shelby it's a big world out there with a lot of coders doing all kinds of things
and i am not sure how you think your the wolds authority on the issue.
..when you know only a small fraction of it.