zidorov
|
|
January 26, 2017, 08:50:38 PM |
|
Haha, a good coin for educational purposes. As a coin it's obviously a pump and dump story.
|
|
|
|
PontiacGTX
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
|
|
January 26, 2017, 08:50:59 PM |
|
I wonder if I close the miner do I lose the Pascalcoin it has mined? and i wonder why the pascal coin wallet client doesnt update how much it is on my balance?
This isn't like a pool, you need to find a block before you get any coins. Finding a block is based on luck and hashpower. what if you try to point the miner under same worker/wallet? or there is a pool?
|
▒ NOW token ▒ by ChangeNOW ▒ Get the WIN! ▒ ChangeNOW - an instant Non-custodial Exchange Service (( changenow.io ))
|
|
|
HasHe
|
|
January 26, 2017, 08:54:05 PM |
|
Pool?
Plenty of them! Check back some pages Nice to see you have come around !
|
|
|
|
cryptomined
|
|
January 26, 2017, 08:56:49 PM |
|
so with the new Nvidia miner 1.0.4, you still need to run single instances for each GPU right?
open proxy once, choose how many GPUs you want (ex. 3)
then run an instance for each device using d0 on one, d1 on other other and d2 on the other?
is there anyway to run the CUDA miner once so it uses all the GPUs?
thanks
|
|
|
|
Hurtman
|
|
January 26, 2017, 08:58:18 PM |
|
Exception at 00007FF967866874: EAccessViolation: Access violation.
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:00:46 PM |
|
Exception at 00007FF967866874: EAccessViolation: Access violation.
Let me guess you are using Nvidia gpu? Well the dev is obviously favouring AMD and don't have proper OpenCL implementation rather it is AMD specific.
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
cryptomined
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:03:22 PM |
|
Anyone else having difficulty in connecting to different nodes?
I am getting this error for all pascal nodes. And Node status shows : Alone in the world
Disconnected Remote Server: IP:pascalcoin1.dynamic-dns.net:4004 False - (no data)
make sure your time and date are syncroniszed properly... in windows use: "set time automatically" and "set time zone automatically" I was getting alone in the world and blacklisted IP until I did that.... took me 1/2 a day to figure that out, almost gave up....
|
|
|
|
thedreamer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:04:21 PM |
|
Daym. over 26KBTC traded on Poloniex alone.
|
Go Big or Go Home.
|
|
|
cryptomined
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:04:37 PM |
|
Exception at 00007FF967866874: EAccessViolation: Access violation.
Let me guess you are using Nvidia gpu? Well the dev is obviously favouring AMD and don't have proper OpenCL implementation rather it is AMD specific. your using CUDA 1.04 miner right? do you need to run single instances for each GPU? Thanks~
|
|
|
|
vingaard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1011
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:08:17 PM |
|
This is absolutely amazing... I've multiply my initial investment in 30000% !!! I love this coin
|
|
|
|
miayama
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:11:12 PM |
|
Why still no pool? Or, it can not be done?
|
|
|
|
cryptomined
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:29:05 PM |
|
yeah..I also get errors with the NVIdia miner... so its not working? only the old slower version is working?
27/01/2017 05:23:32.383 TID:00001300 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:nvidia9801 timestamp:1485465812 nonce:156909836 27/01/2017 05:24:41.763 TID:00001300 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56770: Proof of work is higher than target 27/01/2017 05:24:41.778 TID:00001300 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:nvidia9800 timestamp:1485465881 nonce:2223190032 27/01/2017 05:24:54.852 TID:00001300 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56770: Proof of work is higher than target 27/01/2017 05:24:54.874 TID:00001300 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:nvidia9800 timestamp:1485465894 nonce:3321161228 27/01/2017 05:25:42.556 TID:00001300 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56770: Proof of work is higher than target 27/01/2017 05:25:42.572 TID:00001300 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:nvidia9801 timestamp:1485465942 nonce:2373733677 27/01/2017 05:26:08.742 TID:00001300 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56770: Proof of work is higher than target 27/01/2017 05:26:08.757 TID:00001300 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:nvidia9801 timestamp:1485465968 nonce:202065450 27/01/2017 05:26:10.674 TID:00001C68 [Update] <TPCOperationsComp> New block height:56770 nOnce:1954947694 timestamp:1485465849 Operations:11 Fee:100 SafeBoxBalance:56771000000=56771000000 PoW:0000000000006F224A48F69CCDE20A1EA940BA4BFEEB4ECAFE20E46FCB2D78E5 Operations previous Safe Box hash:F10A5A4DCB1051BC36A5C9C92E1250FEE352B4DACADC2DC61528F45B98259EA6 Future old Safe Box hash for next block:2C5527A0B4170F570CC06FE5723C8D2F182BDA273AC6C33C17C6712753D526DE 27/01/2017 05:26:53.538 TID:00001300 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56771: Invalid Operations Hash 6B83B85E297082614624F28FD138A39AA89C44AEE2091832C59B87950606DABD<>E3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7852B855 27/01/2017 05:26:53.538 TID:00001300 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Invalid Operations Hash 6B83B85E297082614624F28FD138A39AA89C44AEE2091832C59B87950606DABD<>E3B0C
|
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:34:24 PM |
|
@cryptomined
No the old cuda miner also produce that error
|
|
|
|
cryptomined
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:36:13 PM |
|
@cryptomined
No the old cuda miner also produce that error
do they work then ? it is an error that effects the finding of blocks? or is it an error that doesn't matter? cause if Nvidia cant find blocks that kinda sucks Thanks for the reply
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:38:33 PM |
|
I think it does not work, if it work maybe some shares are valid but most are not
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:42:44 PM |
|
How many confirmation a block needs?
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:43:16 PM |
|
can you find blocks if node status is on "discoviring servers"? i see you need at least 5 node to have status on "running" How many confirmation a block needs?
100, 500 minutes
|
|
|
|
Joffer
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
https://i.imgur.com/uEnAdZu.png
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:43:55 PM |
|
Exception at 00007FF967866874: EAccessViolation: Access violation.
Got the same with my GTX1070. Asked in the slack channel and they say it's not supported (as of now at least), NVidia that is
|
|
|
|
dellzxd
|
|
January 26, 2017, 09:46:21 PM |
|
theres no pool already ? just solo mining ?
|
|
|
|
|