Just want you to be more careful, if you are against listening anything against you even if you re wrong/not really on spot, well then I m sorry.
I never said that, looking up there, I asked for a little time to revisit the thread, make myself another image of the situation and decide how to proceed.
Sorry for calling it as abuse, but you should be very careful because your " so called I saw it fit back then " can destroy a legendary member's account. I have no personal revenge with you mate, neither I want you to be removed or such.
Feedbacks aren't irreversible, I will continue to leave them to the best of my knowledge and belief.
If you support someone who is right does not mean you always desire a favor, do you?
Depends, you're going through length and beyond (e.g. your signature calling me out, dafuq.), it raised a question, nothing more.
Upon re-examinating the situation, the user asked for a no-collateral loan back in January (yes, that was indeed a month before I was added to DT2, I've been on DT4 that time).
The loan was supposed to be 0.3
BTC and the comment was "looking fast, no collateral.", which even now raises my first suspicon.
The next comment from the user goes as following "Im trusted member here, many peoples who offering loans know me."
Back at the time, the user had a 0 trust score and (when including untrusted feedback) a total of 1 feedback over a loan, on top, their password had been reset recently.
I still think I was right to leave the feedback back then, however, I also think I probably should have removed it a month or two later (given that the user didn't ask for further loans inbetween).
A hero member without any prior trust should not ask for loans of a size well over their accounts worth without providing any collateral. Simply being a hero doesn't make you trusted, and a basic rule of the lending section goes as following:
The rule of "No Collateral, No Loan" means that in order to get a loan you must give collateral that is equal, or preferably higher to the amount you are being loaned.
If you completely ignore this sticky and make a loan request with no collateral, without having massive trust on the forum, the chances of you getting negative trusted feedback and therefore having a Trade with Extreme Caution tag is almost 100%.
Being a hero doesn't change anything about this.
The way the user reacted to me (and others) calling them out on this was another reason why I indeed saw the need for a negative, the retaliated, insulted me in PMs and the thread.
An example of how they react can be given from one of their latest feedbacks, going like this "Make more valuable with your mouth, suck a dick!", I recall getting similar PMs and feedbacks.
tl;dr: I have revised my feedback to a neutral, given the restraint that the user does not ask for big no-collateral loans in the future.
I still don't trust this user and think they should adjust their way of dealing with others on this forum.
