btctube
|
|
November 15, 2016, 04:34:15 PM |
|
It will be good if ICONOMI team get this project on another big exchange especial Bitfinex, Poloniex will have not choice but to list it then
Currently iconomi is ranked 16 (coinmarketcap) and the largest transaction in kraken so I can say without poloniex iconomi will enter the ranks 5th in coinmarketcap It should.I can see there are hundreds of big investors coming.
|
|
|
|
puthupanth
|
|
November 15, 2016, 04:34:51 PM |
|
It will be good if ICONOMI team get this project on another big exchange especial Bitfinex, Poloniex will have not choice but to list it then
Currently iconomi is ranked 16 (coinmarketcap) and the largest transaction in kraken so I can say without poloniex iconomi will enter the ranks 5th in coinmarketcap you know i like the way you think... .... i am ranking it above ripple to be honest. just wait till fiat starts flowing in. Im betting both my nuts on that lol
|
|
|
|
|
electronicash
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1055
|
|
November 15, 2016, 05:17:44 PM |
|
Excited to participate their affiliate program. Someone asked this before so yes its confirmed they will have this feature next year. The sooner the better. We will announce our affiliate program in 2017. However, if you have any suggestions, we would be happy to hear them out.
|
|
|
|
topesis
|
|
November 15, 2016, 05:20:23 PM |
|
Can't say anything...... Interesting..... no, expected. that's the reason of NDA's. Let me spell it out for you then.... Poloniex is obviously waiting for dividends to be paid out and then they going to pump that shit to the moon..... Why always Poloniex, we have other big exchanges, ICN is not on any Chinese exchange presently, there is need to expose this project to other markets
|
|
|
|
electronicash
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1055
|
|
November 15, 2016, 05:34:34 PM |
|
Can't say anything...... Interesting..... no, expected. that's the reason of NDA's. Let me spell it out for you then.... Poloniex is obviously waiting for dividends to be paid out and then they going to pump that shit to the moon..... Why always Poloniex, we have other big exchanges, ICN is not on any Chinese exchange presently, there is need to expose this project to other markets I think the Chinese are not into these type of investment. ICN will most probably be accepted to the places like NY, Tokyo and London where fiat traders are based. Its where Forex sessions are.
|
|
|
|
ShooterXD
|
|
November 15, 2016, 05:44:55 PM |
|
Lol and some guys dump your coins. Thx guys, you make it possible, i Win my day today.
|
|
|
|
TrueAnon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:22:29 PM |
|
NDA just for an exchange addition? I find that odd............................... Is there a valid reason for this or just smoke/mirrors from the devs???
|
|
|
|
Marvintymo
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:24:19 PM |
|
NDA just for an exchange addition? I find that odd............................... Is there a valid reason for this or just smoke/mirrors from the devs???
From what I've heard this is how it's always done when an exchange adds a new addition.
|
|
|
|
petricag
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:24:50 PM |
|
There's another one about future exchanges... So what I understand is that the dev's would've wanted to list ICN on any exchange, because they promised the investor ICN will be listed on big exchanges and that is why they raised that much money among other reasons, so they got in touch with the exchanges, but those bitches from the exchanges just throw in their face an NDA to make them shut the f**uk up ... right? Probably the dev's even got threaded that the ICN will never be listed on those exchanges if they do not obey and sign the NDAs. This is the way to judge this ? ... or we should not even try to use our heads ... we just have to be true believers right ? In reality its much simpler. IF they did not made an agreement with some of the exchanges to manipulate the price they could've just come and say to us something like this ... "Hey guys we submitted the request to be listed there and there, those exchanges came with shady things so we told them to go fuck them self, its not in our reach any more to listed there, and yes we already payed the lauzy 3 BTC to have it on Bitrex, because we respect our investors, sorry for not being able to do more, but we try to stay transparent and not get involved in shady schema with the evil Polo guys". I presume now its too late, so personally I am not planing long term here, as for me its a red flag when simple things that are related to transparency are transformed in complicated NDA taped things. I hope when it gets to Polo there will be enough stupid people to pump this up to 5 USD / ICN ... sell it all, rebuy at 1 USD or less .. and so on.
|
|
|
|
petricag
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:26:51 PM |
|
NDA just for an exchange addition? I find that odd............................... Is there a valid reason for this or just smoke/mirrors from the devs???
From what I've heard this is how it's always done when an exchange adds a new addition. Nobody can force you to sign an NDA ... what do you think, Polo guys threaten the dev's if they don't sign and NDA they will not list ICN ? Really ?
|
|
|
|
boestin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:40:44 PM |
|
Guys look at the buy support @ kraken. It's starting Where is the guy with the weekly/daily chart with the red line?
|
|
|
|
CrowdFunder
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:42:26 PM |
|
Guys look at the buy support @ kraken. It's starting Where is the guy with the weekly/daily chart with the red line? Yea, he should be hired for a full time job.
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:43:28 PM |
|
There's another one about future exchanges... So what I understand is that the dev's would've wanted to list ICN on any exchange, because they promised the investor ICN will be listed on big exchanges and that is why they raised that much money among other reasons, so they got in touch with the exchanges, but those bitches from the exchanges just throw in their face an NDA to make them shut the f**uk up ... right? Probably the dev's even got threaded that the ICN will never be listed on those exchanges if they do not obey and sign the NDAs. This is the way to judge this ? ... or we should not even try to use our heads ... we just have to be true believers right ? In reality its much simpler. IF they did not made an agreement with some of the exchanges to manipulate the price they could've just come and say to us something like this ... "Hey guys we submitted the request to be listed there and there, those exchanges came with shady things so we told them to go fuck them self, its not in our reach any more to listed there, and yes we already payed the lauzy 3 BTC to have it on Bitrex, because we respect our investors, sorry for not being able to do more, but we try to stay transparent and not get involved in shady schema with the evil Polo guys". I presume now its too late, so personally I am not planing long term here, as for me its a red flag when simple things that are related to transparency are transformed in complicated NDA taped things. I hope when it gets to Polo there will be enough stupid people to pump this up to 5 USD / ICN ... sell it all, rebuy at 1 USD or less .. and so on. Cool story. Now put your money where your mouth is and sell
|
|
|
|
petricag
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:46:20 PM |
|
There's another one about future exchanges... So what I understand is that the dev's would've wanted to list ICN on any exchange, because they promised the investor ICN will be listed on big exchanges and that is why they raised that much money among other reasons, so they got in touch with the exchanges, but those bitches from the exchanges just throw in their face an NDA to make them shut the f**uk up ... right? Probably the dev's even got threaded that the ICN will never be listed on those exchanges if they do not obey and sign the NDAs. This is the way to judge this ? ... or we should not even try to use our heads ... we just have to be true believers right ? In reality its much simpler. IF they did not made an agreement with some of the exchanges to manipulate the price they could've just come and say to us something like this ... "Hey guys we submitted the request to be listed there and there, those exchanges came with shady things so we told them to go fuck them self, its not in our reach any more to listed there, and yes we already payed the lauzy 3 BTC to have it on Bitrex, because we respect our investors, sorry for not being able to do more, but we try to stay transparent and not get involved in shady schema with the evil Polo guys". I presume now its too late, so personally I am not planing long term here, as for me its a red flag when simple things that are related to transparency are transformed in complicated NDA taped things. I hope when it gets to Polo there will be enough stupid people to pump this up to 5 USD / ICN ... sell it all, rebuy at 1 USD or less .. and so on. Cool story. Now put your money where your mouth is and sell Did it already got to 5 USD / token ? Why the fuck would i sell at this price ? I risked a few BTC for gaining peanuts ?
|
|
|
|
boestin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:46:33 PM |
|
There's another one about future exchanges... So what I understand is that the dev's would've wanted to list ICN on any exchange, because they promised the investor ICN will be listed on big exchanges and that is why they raised that much money among other reasons, so they got in touch with the exchanges, but those bitches from the exchanges just throw in their face an NDA to make them shut the f**uk up ... right? Probably the dev's even got threaded that the ICN will never be listed on those exchanges if they do not obey and sign the NDAs. This is the way to judge this ? ... or we should not even try to use our heads ... we just have to be true believers right ? In reality its much simpler. IF they did not made an agreement with some of the exchanges to manipulate the price they could've just come and say to us something like this ... "Hey guys we submitted the request to be listed there and there, those exchanges came with shady things so we told them to go fuck them self, its not in our reach any more to listed there, and yes we already payed the lauzy 3 BTC to have it on Bitrex, because we respect our investors, sorry for not being able to do more, but we try to stay transparent and not get involved in shady schema with the evil Polo guys". I presume now its too late, so personally I am not planing long term here, as for me its a red flag when simple things that are related to transparency are transformed in complicated NDA taped things. I hope when it gets to Polo there will be enough stupid people to pump this up to 5 USD / ICN ... sell it all, rebuy at 1 USD or less .. and so on. I think there is a strategy behind the waiting and nda talk.. Yes you are right. For a lousy 3 btc you can trade on bittrex which btw isn't that great, but still is a fairly good exchange. If you are asking me, they are deliberately keeping icn out of exchanges like bitter, polo and so on.
|
|
|
|
mtnsaa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:47:05 PM |
|
NDA just for an exchange addition? I find that odd............................... Is there a valid reason for this or just smoke/mirrors from the devs???
From what I've heard this is how it's always done when an exchange adds a new addition. Nobody can force you to sign an NDA ... what do you think, Polo guys threaten the dev's if they don't sign and NDA they will not list ICN ? Really ? LOL, that's not how it works man. The guys fully agreed to sign a NDA before exchanges consider to add Iconomi or discuss any details. They can't say anything until a deal is made or not. This is just standard for companies so people, companies, clients don't spread sensitive information about proceeds, requirements, etc. You can't even disclose there was deal signed, how, when, etc, depending on the NDA.
|
|
|
|
petricag
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:52:32 PM |
|
LOL, that's not how it works man. The guys fully agreed to sign a NDA before exchanges consider to add Iconomi or discuss any details.
Why would you agree to sign NDA ? Do you think Polo has promised something to the Dev's ? WHY do that if you are transparent. I know what an NDA is ... usually is to protect sensitive information ... Investors do not care about any sensitive information. They just care about " NDAs require from us not to comment on our relationships with the exchanges. The listing of ICN is purely the exchange’s decision. Kraken is one of the exchanges that decided to list us for the time being. " The 2 phrases are in direct contradiction. NDAs require from you ? Than you are a party involved in the decision to list the token ... If the decision would be entirely of the exchange ... why the need of an NDA ?
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:54:46 PM |
|
LOL, that's not how it works man. The guys fully agreed to sign a NDA before exchanges consider to add Iconomi or discuss any details.
Why would you agree to sign NDA ? Do you think Polo has promised something to the Dev's ? WHY do that if you are transparent. I know what an NDA is ... usually is to protect sensitive information ... Investors do not care about any sensitive information. They just care about " NDAs require from us not to comment on our relationships with the exchanges. The listing of ICN is purely the exchange’s decision. Kraken is one of the exchanges that decided to list us for the time being. " The 2 phrases are in direct contradiction. NDAs require from you ? Than you are a party involved in the decision to list the token ... If the decision would be entirely of the exchange ... why the need of an NDA ? Maybe because polo or bittrex do not want the devs discussing when it will be listed because that is essentially insider information? Polo never announces its listing until it actually lists a coin... Why polo/bittrex do that is a different story... it is kind of shady on the exchanges end, because it would make it easy for them to profit from the insider information.
|
|
|
|
smokim87
|
|
November 15, 2016, 06:54:56 PM |
|
NDA just for an exchange addition? I find that odd............................... Is there a valid reason for this or just smoke/mirrors from the devs???
From what I've heard this is how it's always done when an exchange adds a new addition. Nobody can force you to sign an NDA ... what do you think, Polo guys threaten the dev's if they don't sign and NDA they will not list ICN ? Really ? I know, it's funny that Polo makes them sign a NDA not to say if their listing ICN or not. Is it me or does that hint to insider trading? Polo buys up ICN and when ready lists it and dumps it's ICN for instant profit along with fees. Find it stupid to have a NDA for a coin being on an exchange, I find it funny that people sign NDAs in crypto, or sign anything for that matter in the Crypto world..
|
|
|
|
|