SIGNS OF SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN

[neochiny]

I personally just base it on who manages the campaign.
If it's a well-known and trusted person, then it most likely is legit. (under the assumption of course that they won't risk their trust and standing by being involved in shady business)  
Like in my case, when I see that the Manager is Lutpin, then I basically don't have doubts about getting paid. As long as I finish the required post, I'm sure that I will get the payment due to me. Lutpin may be strict (or you could say harsh)    
But you know that he definitely won't support a campaign he has doubts on so you can be sure that everything's confirmed and good to go. Although when a campaign isn't run by someone I know, then of course some research into reputation and such is a must.

[Ryan Dugan]

After series of scam signature campaign that fails to pay its member at the end of their programme or as agreed in their T.O.S, i feel that it is necessary for us to discuss series of factors to be considered before joining a campaign though i understand clearly that all campaign their rules to get you accepted but the participants does not have any rule in order to join any signature programme making us to be a prey to some scam stars.
What are the things to watch for in a campaign before we can certify it legit or not?

What !? I thought that all paid ? I see a few alt scam coins were not paid for a small amount so the lose was not great but I never knew there so many. If the person hiring want to hire people for the signature campaign then he must use only escrow ? Then it can release on pay day ? But what if there is not enough work done by the person posting? How will you stop that escrow ? The person paying must release the coins , am I right on this ?

[shinratensei_]

Well, almost all signature campaign is legit now a days.I didn't get scammed till now.Many campaign doesn't use escrow or the Manager act as escrow so it became hard to know the campaign is legit or scam.Campaign  manager  is a fact at this situation and  he should be trusted person. I always check the history of the site, who is owner, what he did untill now.Also, I check the security purposes of the site. If I had trouble doing this I simply google it and read the review of site.

Hmmmm, what about hydromixer campaign of just yesterday? you might have been luck not to get scammed but victim of such activity never pray for it again.

And when the hibrydmixer is changed his name into hydromixer. LOL but checking a more detailed about the companies is will be a general requirement before you're wanna to putting your applied into them or joining become their participant because in this time a lot of scammers is feel promoting via sign campaign will very easy to lure a lot of bitcoins to trapped into their hole. be aware of it.

[btc-facebook]

We can see sig campaign helder determination when he want to launch sig campaign.
If they still zero trust, they must hire campaign manager or using escrow service to gather more attention since there are some sig campaign ending with scam people over a week

[lemipawa]

They have said it all but just to reiterate its important that a campaign have a good campaign manager, this is the bridge between the participants and the owner, escrow is also important as this is the person who holds the funds and most important is the funds, escrow and camp manager maybe present butbwith the absence of funds or unavailability of funds it will not work. Check as well if site is performing well.

[ruselbd]

Its best to not hurry to any mark that appears here in the administration segment. Numerous clients are eager and they go there and they think this is the best mark battle. Signature battles which are worth to join resemble the one I am wearing and numerous different marks which are here from quite a while and you will make certain they will be continuous again for quite a while to come. At the point when new mark battles show up they need to utilize escrow and to advise the assets they have allotted to the mark and the quantity of individuals they will acknowledge so any client can do his own particular figurings.

[ivanst776]

After series of scam signature campaign that fails to pay its member at the end of their programme or as agreed in their T.O.S, i feel that it is necessary for us to discuss series of factors to be considered before joining a campaign though i understand clearly that all campaign their rules to get you accepted but the participants does not have any rule in order to join any signature programme making us to be a prey to some scam stars.
What are the things to watch for in a campaign before we can certify it legit or not?

We clearly now that a campaign that does not escrow funds and does not have an experienced manager that campaign is more likely to scam.

We have seen here many campaigns, or many newbies that require something and promise that will pay in bitcoin but that does not usually happens.

But not all of them scam because there are many campaigns that they don't escrow the funds but have paid users for years.

[iv4n]

I was in one, we had luck that yahoo was manager and he took money from his pocket to give us money, but as I remember good he done that cause he returned money from escrow, he thought everything is ok and made a mistake. After that he made right decision and fix the problem.
In that moment I saw how important is to have good campaign manager, and money to be in escrow. That was only once, with other campaigns I never had any problems, everything was fine and good, probably I was lucky.

[HCP]

It really isn't that difficult, but like most things requires a little bit of effort on behalf of the user:

1. Check the campaign manager. The decent managers here don't want to taint their reputations by getting involved in a bad/scam campaign. If a well respected campaign manager is fronting the campaign, chances are it is legit.

2. Escrow. If funds are not being escrowed with a 3rd party, that is a big red flag. Ask yourself... Why is this service unwilling to front up the money for the campaign? If they don't have it free and available to pay for the campaign, they shouldn't be running the campaign/making promises they obviously can't keep.

3. Check the product/service being promoted. Is it a legit product/service in it's own right? This is a bit more of a judgement call especially with sites that are trying to use campaigns to promote themselves in the early days, but a little bit of research and investigation will help give a decent chance of recognising legitimate sites as opposed to scams.

[veleten]

the problem is full members and upper ranks are usually not that desperate to jump at the first campaign bandawgon they see-
they do research or at least check if the site+campaign look legit.
with lower ranked members it is not always the case,especially when there are limited places on a campaign
some of them post in all the new topics they could find to get enrolled.
first come first serve mentality= become a potential victim of an unscrupulous scam signature campaign

[Robertqueen2]

I didn't participate in a signature campaign which pays in Bitcoin, whereas I like to take a risk and try to get some amounts of new ICO coin, but I always visit service section and I can watch the scam and legit campaigns.
I think before to join any campaign you should look at the manager of this campaign, in some cases the name of the signature make you sure that it is legit campaign such as Bitsler or fortunejack or other well known sites.

[BitcoinSupremo]

Best signature campaign to join is not the one with the highest pay rate but the one ongoing from a lot , and I mean a lot of time. This kind of signature is time proven so you can apply without any fear there and know that you will be paid by them. People who jump to signature campaigns because of their pay rates are huge like the scam Hybridmixer campaign, they allowed high ranked members to make almost 0.01 btc per day and in my view that was a really big red flag.

[Omegasun]

Best signature campaign to join is not the one with the highest pay rate but the one ongoing from a lot , and I mean a lot of time. This kind of signature is time proven so you can apply without any fear there and know that you will be paid by them. People who jump to signature campaigns because of their pay rates are huge like the scam Hybridmixer campaign, they allowed high ranked members to make almost 0.01 btc per day and in my view that was a really big red flag.

Pay rate is the first common to be considered by all signature campaign participants, And i'm honest with that. But i always if the services providing that rate for signature campaign can handle that cost. You can easily predict it based on the days the site active and the amount totally wagered on them. But for new site that offer high rate, I totally ignore that.

[smho_16]

I like automatic payments and enrollment systems as they are easy to fit in and all you need to do is maintain a normal to high quality of posting to get paid from such signatures. I agree that a campaign manager is needed to view at your posts though as if such manager is not very present then there is a high risk that this signature starts showing a lot of spamming along the way. I like my signature which I am in as they don't accept a large number of members and this limits the spamming.

I think all signature campaigns should aim toward such management as it's very easy and very efficient.

[n691309]

I like automatic payments and enrollment systems as they are easy to fit in and all you need to do is maintain a normal to high quality of posting to get paid from such signatures. I agree that a campaign manager is needed to view at your posts though as if such manager is not very present then there is a high risk that this signature starts showing a lot of spamming along the way. I like my signature which I am in as they don't accept a large number of members and this limits the spamming.

I think all signature campaigns should aim toward such management as it's very easy and very efficient.

A bot that checks for average characters and counts the posts in specific boards is great because they can help the managers to manage better the campaign and coinmixer seems pretty good, I was before in bitmixer and had a good time too, even bots have issue sometimes like the bit-x but worth having one each campaign.

[NorrisK]

Common sense is a good one to start with. If it is a new campaign, always make sure they escrow atleast the first weeks payment, preferably with the campaign manager himself. This will make sure the first weeks gets handled smoothly.

After that, the service should basically refill the coins to the campaign manager in advance of the next week to ensure that there is always money to be paid when it is payment time.

Also, check the service. If it is a highly reputable service or a service with a lot to lose from negative press, they are not likely to scam a few campaigners for a couple of bitcoin. If it is an unknown service, they may not care and run with free advertisement.

[ricku]

The situations with signature campaign should be approached with more concern because people that works deserves to be paid as at when due but there seems not to be such complain of late.

[el kaka22]

For a new signature campaign, as per my knowledge checking of escrow with a reputed member and nature of business which is being advertised through campaign are enough concerns. Less significant things are frequency of payments, excluded boards and special requirements like post requirements in board/thread, but these are nothing to do with getting scammed by new campaigns.

[European Central Bank]

Pay rate is the first common to be considered by all signature campaign participants, And i'm honest with that.

you'd be crazy to only base who you go with because of pay. there are campaigns that are totally dependable but may pay less, but they're hard to get into and anyone abandoning them for some site no one's ever heard of promising the earth is more than likely to regret it.

[Patatas]

Pay rate is the first common to be considered by all signature campaign participants, And i'm honest with that. But i always if the services providing that rate for signature campaign can handle that cost. You can easily predict it based on the days the site active and the amount totally wagered on them. But for new site that offer high rate, I totally ignore that.

People like you are the reason why this forum has turned to a shit posting place.You shouldn't be accepted in any of the signature campaigns with that mentality.What good does your posts do to this forum's anyway ? You're a shit poster mate,be happy you're getting a few satoshi's for that.If it was not for the scam casino you're advertizing,you'd rejected by all other campaign managers.Take my advice,stop shit posting.