Cryptocurrency association to homosexuality are not acceptable!

[MysteryMiner]

I got this private message

Deleted Post
« Sent to: MysteryMiner on: Today at 11:10:23 PM »
   Reply with quoteReply with quote Remove this messageDelete
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
Do bitcoiners look like bunch of faggots and queers?

It was my reply to this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=160162.0

The thread was about bitcoin users having so called "prides" like homosexuals do. And requesting "equality" and "rights", just like the perverts do. As a strong supporter or normal people and normal relationships, I will not tolerate to be part of movement that mimics homosexuals in any way. Or accepts them as "normal" or "acceptable". I fought both homosexuals and police in censored and will do it again if the need arises http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVh5H3mAHuY

Bitcointalk is good in keeping freedom of speech and information. We can discuss many taboo issues, like the Silk Road, bank corruption, black markets or anything else related to these important questions. Censoring one users post because of his attitude towards queers and homos are not acceptable for me.

[1715413020]

1715413020

[1715413020]

1715413020

[1715413020]

1715413020

[theymos]

I agree that your post is on-topic, though the entire topic is pretty pointless. I restored your post and moved the topic to off-topic.

[hazek]

I got this private message

Deleted Post
« Sent to: MysteryMiner on: Today at 11:10:23 PM »
   Reply with quoteReply with quote Remove this messageDelete
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
Do bitcoiners look like bunch of faggots and queers?

It was my reply to this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=160162.0

The thread was about bitcoin users having so called "prides" like homosexuals do. And requesting "equality" and "rights", just like the perverts do. As a strong supporter or normal people and normal relationships, I will not tolerate to be part of movement that mimics homosexuals in any way. Or accepts them as "normal" or "acceptable". I fought both homosexuals and police in censored and will do it again if the need arises http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVh5H3mAHuY

Bitcointalk is good in keeping freedom of speech and information. We can discuss many taboo issues, like the Silk Road, bank corruption, black markets or anything else related to these important questions. Censoring one users post because of his attitude towards queers and homos are not acceptable for me.

You can discuss whatever you like, however using derogative language contributes nothing to any discussion. I admit it may have been a too harsh of a reaction from me, perhaps I should have edited your post instead of deleted it (the whole thread was ridiculous anyway). However I would urge you to keep in mind that not everyone shares your views and that this forums is not your living room. If you want to belittle, shame and bully certain people, do it within your own four walls but on a public forum which is a private property you will watch your language towards other people.

[MysteryMiner]

I totally agree that the topic was nonsense. I don't know is it plain troll topic or someone really think it is a way for cryptocurrencies to gain publicity and adoption. If so, it will be good way for cryptocurrency users look not only geeky and criminal but homo as well!

I will use the language that is appropriate to describe them. If some person is killing other people, he is killer. I can call him killer, despite word "killer" having bad meaning. If someone is having same sex action, he is either fag or queer. There really is not need to find "nicer" words for such persons. I don't need for everyone to share my views, but I hate when one view (queer view) have given advantage by censoring and deleting opposing views.

[hazek]

No one censored you. A user wrote a report and I decided he was right.


And I'm not making anything up either and I couldn't care less for guys sucking dicks, but this is what the dictionary says about the words you used:
fag·got
2 [fag-uht]
noun
Slang: Disparaging and Offensive. a male homosexual.


Gay, queer, homosexual = cool

faggot = offensive and not cool and belongs in the same category as nigger and other such derogatory words that are used mainly to belittle and verbally attack and hurt people with certain kind of dispositions for which they can't help themselves for having.


Also killer is not offensive in the least since such a person had the option to not kill and it's an awful analogy to make and I think gives people reading this pointless whining a pretty good sense of what sort of a person you are. And this will be the last I'll comment on this matter.

[repentance]

Oh the horror.  Gay people use Bitcoin.  So do furries.  So do drug users.  So do pornographers.  No doubt some paedophiles do as well.

You might want to live in a world where only white heterosexual libertarians are associated with Bitcoin but it's not the reality.  If you want to believe it is, maybe you should set up a Bitcoin sub-forum on Stormfront 'cos you don't get to control who or what Bitcoin is associated with.  I'd prefer it wasn't associated with bigotry, but your post dashes that hope.

[MysteryMiner]

Sorry, the dictionary is clearly biased. Not a good reference at all.

people with certain kind of dispositions for which they can't help themselves for having

I don't know what urges they have, but it is actions that make them homo, not desires alone. I also want to rape 15 year old girl but I will never act upon my urges to do such bad things. We are humans and we can do what is right and suppress what is wrong. They chose not only secretly engage in perversion, but they stick this in all others faces. This is when from simple ridicule of homos the things get violent.

Oh the horror.  Gay people use Bitcoin.  So do furries.  So do drug users.  So do pornographers.  No doubt some paedophiles do as well.

I don't care. They are just another nodes and anonymous tx. Probably only furries are on same level with gay people but the furries have not made moves for them being accepted as "normal" part of society and there is no laws protecting furries as exclusive group. And when I was 23 I fell in love with 16 year old girl. But she told me she is 20 and looked as such. I'm now totally pedophile by the law.

You might want to live in a world where only white heterosexual libertarians are associated with Bitcoin but it's not the reality

I'm not libertarian but share some of the views with them. I prefer the don't tell don't ask approach. If someone who is in Bitcoin wants to come out as a successful SR seller or homosexual porn distributor, it will not surprise me at all. Actually it is very likely that each of the nodes connected to me are not ordinary people at all.

[BadBear]

Sorry, the dictionary is clearly biased. Not a good reference at all.

people with certain kind of dispositions for which they can't help themselves for having

I don't know what urges they have, but it is actions that make them homo, not desires alone. I also want to rape 15 year old girl but I will never act upon my urges to do such bad things. We are humans and we can do what is right and suppress what is wrong. They chose not only secretly engage in perversion, but they stick this in all others faces. This is when from simple ridicule of homos the things get violent.

Oh the horror.  Gay people use Bitcoin.  So do furries.  So do drug users.  So do pornographers.  No doubt some paedophiles do as well.

I don't care. They are just another nodes and anonymous tx. Probably only furries are on same level with gay people but the furries have not made moves for them being accepted as "normal" part of society and there is no laws protecting furries as exclusive group. And when I was 23 I fell in love with 16 year old girl. But she told me she is 20 and looked as such. I'm now totally pedophile by the law.

You might want to live in a world where only white heterosexual libertarians are associated with Bitcoin but it's not the reality

I'm not libertarian but share some of the views with them. I prefer the don't tell don't ask approach. If someone who is in Bitcoin wants to come out as a successful SR seller or homosexual porn distributor, it will not surprise me at all. Actually it is very likely that each of the nodes connected to me are not ordinary people at all.

Wow. Homosexuality is two consenting adults doing something they want to do. Raping a girl (no matter the age) is forcing yourself on another against their will and without their consent, which is wrong in any society that values personal liberty and rights. Not even close to the same thing.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

This flamebait post is clearly working.

[greyhawk]

This is the best troll thread I've ever seen in Meta. I bow my head and ask that you please teach me, master.

[MysteryMiner]

Homosexuality is two consenting adults doing something they want to do.

This is extremely liberal viewpoint. From such viewpoint also necrophilia, sadomasochism, zoophilia and sexual cannibalism are acceptable things. Consent actions or not this does not change that same sex relationships are totally unnatural and should not be tolerated as part of society.

Raping a girl (no matter the age) is forcing yourself on another against their will and without their consent, which is wrong in any society that values personal liberty and rights. Not even close to the same thing

In my opinion raping girl is more natural, but still very wrong thing to do.

This is the best troll thread I've ever seen in Meta. I bow my head and ask that you please teach me, master.

Nothing to do with me. The "Bitcoin pride" thread author and one of forum admins made me to open this thread. They are the master trolls

[myrkul]

The "Bitcoin pride" thread author and one of forum admins made me to open this thread.

They "made" you? I assume that only a large-bore pistol pointed right at your face could force you to do something against your will, and based on your previous posts, I doubt even that would work for some things...

So who held a gun to your head and forced you to post this in here?

[MysteryMiner]

They did not "made" it by pointing gun at me and forcing to post. The "bitcoin pride" made me to post the rhetoric question about fags and someone in charge of forum made me to open this thread about censoring anti-homosexual speech.

It is very welcome that my post got restored. The homosexuals are very sensitive against criticism because they are not man enough to just ignore it. That does not mean the normal people should resort to censorship just to please few persons with deviant sexual behavior.

[myrkul]

They did not "made" it by pointing gun at me and forcing to post. The "bitcoin pride" made me to post the rhetoric question about fags and someone in charge of forum made me to open this thread about censoring anti-homosexual speech.

For someone so apparently ruggedly individualist, you seem to surrender your autonomy rather easily. Just by writing the words "bitcoin pride," for instance, seems to have turned you into a puppet, posting against your own will.

[MysteryMiner]

I admit, I surrendered my autonomy by posting as a member of this forum community. I'm addicted, I cannot resist my urges to participate there

Seriously, what is best action - speaking against something that is unacceptable or just remaining silent on the issue? If we as a people make our voices heard more often, many problems in society would not exist or will be less severe. I'm not talking about homosexuals right now.

[LeTanque]

Hmmm... it is hard to find a f*ck to give about what other people do with their penises and vaginae.

Politicians like to make inconsequential things like this the focus of debate...

[myrkul]

I admit, I surrendered my autonomy by posting as a member of this forum community. I'm addicted, I cannot resist my urges to participate there

Seriously, what is best action - speaking against something that is unacceptable or just remaining silent on the issue? If we as a people make our voices heard more often, many problems in society would not exist or will be less severe. I'm not talking about homosexuals right now.

Own your actions... "I posted in response to" instead of "They made me post."

[MysteryMiner]

Own your actions... "I posted in response to" instead of "They made me post."

My English is somewhat limited.

Hmmm... it is hard to find a f*ck to give about what other people do with their penises and vaginae.

There was no homosexuality until the homos came out with demands of equality and "protection". And I don't want to see any gay prides in my country. No strange looking people of unknown gender or half naked sadomasochists jerking off in streets.

Politicians like to make inconsequential things like this the focus of debate...

Actually politicians try to speak about homosexual problem as less as possible because about 90% of population don't like them. They try to silently pass the laws regarding homosexuals and other related things and not provoking the society. It is relevant if we and our kids will live in world where love exists or where love are reduced and redefined to include pervert sexual deviations.

[myrkul]

There was no homosexuality until the homos came out with demands of equality and "protection".

You don't see the problem with this statement?

If they didn't exist before they came out, who, then, came out?

[MysteryMiner]

There was no homosexuality until the homos came out with demands of equality and "protection".

You don't see the problem with this statement?

If they didn't exist before they came out, who, then, came out?

They were like serial killers or zoophiles. They always existed hidden from society and were not considered "normal" by people and were disliked. The homosexuals are such a small minority that their existence did not matter for people. What they do when nobody knows about it were not problem, the problem came when they came out and started to require to be accepted as normal part of society.