[ANN] eGaaS: Electronic Government as a Service

[lucky80]

Anyone know where the API documentation can be found?


Thanks

Hello sir

we dont have api documentation.... but you can contact Mr Oleg to have that ...please join here telegram.me/eGaaS

[1714146881]

1714146881

[1714146881]

1714146881

[1714146881]

1714146881

[ije07]

Hi guys

Here is the report of our team (what we have done through the time after ICO) https://medium.com/egaas/report-of-the-egaas-team-4b3a978bb6c1#.kke86zmm5

Talking about Yobit, they rejected EGS (we suggest it's because they couldn't understand the data in documents or just didn't want to understand, anyway they didn't explain the reason)

So we will try Paytopia

Oh damn even Yobit is reject egaas for listed what's wrong with egaas,i think many shitcoin can get easy to listed in yobit.I don't know what yobit think about egaas project,Well tried to listed cryptopia i hope egaas can get listed in cryptopia

Regarding, the problem Yobit refused to add egaas list on their exchanges, we do not need too to worry about it, if the exchange cryptopia want to add egaas in their markets and have to pay for the exchange egaas, but I have a good solution for the exchange egaas ..

Where teams and managers egaas, can add egaas in Mercatox exchanges, and it does not cost to register egaas in their exchange, team and developers just buying a little token Merca to add egaas in trade exchanges Mercatox ..

If seen from the report team egaas.. It looks like they are really looking good for coins egaas. already granted they do not choose mercatox.
Maybe there is a reason that makes them sluggish. I hope that these coins will go forward. Although it was slow.

[xcajun21]

'According to expert estimates and applications that are market ready now, the financial services industry can cut costs by as much as $12 Billion if the blockchain was to be fully implemented.'

[6436346346]

Anyone know where the API documentation can be found?


Thanks

Hello sir

we dont have api documentation.... but you can contact Mr Oleg to have that ...please join here telegram.me/eGaaS

I'm happy to wait until the API documentation is finished and published publicly. no rush

[FutureBitcoin]

I do not understand why you have right now need Exchange? The team has done little, the token is not enough in the network that would be adequate to trade without strong speculation, I would have offered to hold a second round of ICO without going public, and after it has somewhere to bargain, for wishing to go public this bounty hunters who want to merge their EGS quickly

How, then, to understand the words of the developers, that the negotiations with all the exchanges and the coin will soon be traded? We could be said at the outset: "We carry out a second round of ICO, then you will be trading".

[ngthteh]

same, I'm happy to wait until the API documentation is finished too

[bitcampaign]

no need to also spend money to provide VOTE, I recommend here a new trading sites MERCATOX egaas can negotiate with them if necessary, and it is absolutely free of charge for VOTE
https://mercatox.com/coins/list

[jacaf01]

I do not understand why you have right now need Exchange? The team has done little, the token is not enough in the network that would be adequate to trade without strong speculation, I would have offered to hold a second round of ICO without going public, and after it has somewhere to bargain, for wishing to go public this bounty hunters who want to merge their EGS quickly

I think your comment is disrespectful to this project and the investors, SGNLs, GOLEM, INCENT, ICONOMI, etc I can name 20 projects that got into exchange immediately after the ICO with nothing on ground. So there is nothing wrong in asking for exchanges t trade the tokens

[wrxbuzz]

I do not understand why you have right now need Exchange? The team has done little, the token is not enough in the network that would be adequate to trade without strong speculation, I would have offered to hold a second round of ICO without going public, and after it has somewhere to bargain, for wishing to go public this bounty hunters who want to merge their EGS quickly

How, then, to understand the words of the developers, that the negotiations with all the exchanges and the coin will soon be traded? We could be said at the outset: "We carry out a second round of ICO, then you will be trading".

The question is that if the dev team is imcompetent, why will we invest them with 2nd round ico? No exchange means bad operation, it may kill our money.

[Coin_trader]

traders who bought coins from the ICO as well as the bounty hunters wanted this coin to be added into an exchange to get their money or effort back, a second ICO is not an option, further develpoment can do when the coin already listed and traded at the exchanges, a coin without being on an exchange is worthless.

[cakravothy]

i think if you want to open second ico must fast, without fast , trust investor can down
because very long time added to reputable exchanger

[metropolia]

traders who bought coins from the ICO as well as the bounty hunters wanted this coin to be added into an exchange to get their money or effort back, a second ICO is not an option, further develpoment can do when the coin already listed and traded at the exchanges, a coin without being on an exchange is worthless.

You point is totally corrcet, there were many bounty campainers to help them raise money, but they don't list on exchange, ppl can't get money, next time they won't help for signature campaign.

[ipe-lab.com]

Hi people! thanks for your support! We appriciate this so much.

Dear friends, I'm almost sure that I already said that MERCATOX had rejected our application because they don't have sources now. No possibilities. It's not our blame but their.

Please, if you have any questions, ask here or write the PM

[ije07]

Hi people! thanks for your support! We appriciate this so much.

Dear friends, I'm almost sure that I already said that MERCATOX had rejected our application because they don't have sources now. No possibilities. It's not our blame but their.

Please, if you have any questions, ask here or write the PM

Currently we are waiting for information from you sir ...
If mercatox refused, please provide evidence in this thread ... just make sure
then how the continuation if not get the exchanger.
whether the project will be closed?
Please complete information sir.

[pol5]

traders who bought coins from the ICO as well as the bounty hunters wanted this coin to be added into an exchange to get their money or effort back, a second ICO is not an option, further develpoment can do when the coin already listed and traded at the exchanges, a coin without being on an exchange is worthless.

  I see more and more a matter of adding coins to exchange rests, as I understand, in a technical feature of a network of e-gas. If so, then there is a risk of even the second round of ICO, not to mention the following, with a positive result. I personally like the project. Investments investments, but trade has not been canceled. Many buy forks on the ICO for the possibility of quick money, Hold'em for years collected a little people. I would like to hear the views of developers. 

[disconnectme]

I think the idea of second ICO should not come up now, the team need to show they are capable of delivering on what was promised initially, nobody would invest into the second ICO unless there is something on ground.

[rindo]

Hi people! thanks for your support! We appriciate this so much.

Dear friends, I'm almost sure that I already said that MERCATOX had rejected our application because they don't have sources now. No possibilities. It's not our blame but their.
Please, if you have any questions, ask here or write the PM

Well Yobit,and MERCATOX has rejected eGaas and c-cex till now no one give a vote there and team doing to get crypropia no result yet but i wanted to know do you pay them for listing i mean for cryptopia ? how about novaexchange whether it has contacted them , not much choice for egaas i guess

[Ais08]

I think the idea of second ICO should not come up now, the team need to show they are capable of delivering on what was promised initially, nobody would invest into the second ICO unless there is something on ground.

True, I also like-minded with you, with the ICO first they run a lot of people to invest for this project, but if they run the ICO to-2, worrying all invetor to invest in ICO them, seeing things like this no explanation in exchange for offering themselves in exchange good ..

[nelson4lov]

I think the idea of second ICO should not come up now, the team need to show they are capable of delivering on what was promised initially, nobody would invest into the second ICO unless there is something on ground.

True, I also like-minded with you, with the ICO first they run a lot of people to invest for this project, but if they run the ICO to-2, worrying all invetor to invest in ICO them, seeing things like this no explanation in exchange for offering themselves in exchange good ..

I'm Not entirely sure about that. The Second ICO starts March 1st but with the slow development and Updates from the team, Not sure they'll get as much as they got during first ICO.

Well Yobit,and MERCATOX has rejected eGaas and c-cex till now no one give a vote there and team doing to get crypropia no result yet but i wanted to know do you pay them for listing i mean for cryptopia ? how about novaexchange whether it has contacted them , not much choice for egaas i guess

A Project like Egaas should have Little or No difficulties getting listed on Exchange. If Free listing aren't coming through, The team is capable of getting paid listing for their token.

[lenyro]

I think the idea of second ICO should not come up now, the team need to show they are capable of delivering on what was promised initially, nobody would invest into the second ICO unless there is something on ground.

True, I also like-minded with you, with the ICO first they run a lot of people to invest for this project, but if they run the ICO to-2, worrying all invetor to invest in ICO them, seeing things like this no explanation in exchange for offering themselves in exchange good ..

I'm Not entirely sure about that. The Second ICO starts March 1st but with the slow development and Updates from the team, Not sure they'll get as much as they got during first ICO.

Well Yobit,and MERCATOX has rejected eGaas and c-cex till now no one give a vote there and team doing to get crypropia no result yet but i wanted to know do you pay them for listing i mean for cryptopia ? how about novaexchange whether it has contacted them , not much choice for egaas i guess

A Project like Egaas should have Little or No difficulties getting listed on Exchange. If Free listing aren't coming through, The team is capable of getting paid listing for their token.

Are you serious and so sure that they have little or no difficulty? Actually IMO the truth is the opposite, they can hardly list the token to an exchange, many bounty players can't sell for tokens, or ICO investors.