Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 07:43:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: World federalism.  (Read 713 times)
ScoMo (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 03:50:28 PM
 #1

If we inspired people to take pride in the species they were on a huge scale as opposed to nationality, could world federalism ever arise?
1714031008
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714031008

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714031008
Reply with quote  #2

1714031008
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714031008
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714031008

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714031008
Reply with quote  #2

1714031008
Report to moderator
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003



View Profile
March 29, 2013, 04:29:49 PM
 #2

Define world federalism

ScoMo (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 04:33:31 PM
 #3

Define world federalism
A federation spanning the entire world; where independent nation states cease to exist, every current country becomes a state in the federation with a degree of power, but the central government exercises the most power.
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003



View Profile
March 29, 2013, 04:37:21 PM
 #4

Thats entirely possible, yes. But extremely scary. I'd rather work toward unifying the world under our own individual terms than one global law of fact. Whoever sits at the top of that pyramid you've described will probably not be so benevolent--after all, who will stop him? Mars?

myrkul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM


View Profile WWW
March 29, 2013, 04:38:53 PM
 #5

Define world federalism
A federation spanning the entire world; where independent nation states cease to exist, every current country becomes a state in the federation with a degree of power, but the central government exercises the most power.

Too late.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMF

BTC1MYRkuLv4XPBa6bGnYAronz55grPAGcxja
Need Dispute resolution? Public Key ID: 0x11D341CF
No person has the right to initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against another person or their property. VIM VI REPELLERE LICET
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003



View Profile
March 29, 2013, 04:48:35 PM
 #6

And of course it's based in America.  Undecided

benjamindees
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 05:26:55 PM
 #7

If you read the "Federalist Papers" and the "Anti-Federalist Papers", you can see that, under federalism, the central government is supposed to have the least power, not the most.  And the major objection to federalism among the US founders was the possibility of it growing and morphing into exactly what you describe.

Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
sounds
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100

1221iZanNi5igK7oAA7AWmYjpsyjsRbLLZ


View Profile
March 29, 2013, 06:09:05 PM
 #8

You mean like the US federal government of today?

The brilliance of the US founders was that they foresaw exactly what is happening and built as many safeguards to hobble, cripple, stifle, and frustrate the federal government in its attempts to grab unlimited power.

The checks and balances are still having some effect even today. That's impressive.

Worldwide the most beneficial setup for individual liberty is probably to have strong nations that avoid "entangling alliances" such as the IMF, UN, NATO, EU, NAFTA, Amero, ITAR, and so forth.

Strong nations that are not entangled into one another will make it difficult for any one organization to seize control of the entire world.

It would also be beneficial for individual liberty if the individual can travel relatively freely around the globe, so that when a nation is suffering from bad leadership, people can move. To be clear, nations should have immigration laws and restrictions as they see fit (and they should enforce the laws they enact – unlike the US). However, nations should not restrict emigration.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!