aleksfox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:20:16 PM Last edit: October 27, 2016, 05:42:02 PM by aleksfox |
|
I can't get this performance from silent army kernel 45.7 Sol/s with one R9 Nano 39.6 Sol/s with one RX 480
Really numbers for my RX470/R480 rig is [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=29.270 [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=28.170 [GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% sols=26.733 [GPU 3] T=-1C A=-1% sols=27.710
From SILENTARMY readme: Note: the code is currently very poorly optimized; it makes zero attempts to keep the queue of OpenCL commands full, therefore one needs to run 2 instances of SILENTARMY in parallel on the same GPU to keep it well utilized. rx470 8gb (mod bios): https://cdn-standard.discourse.org/uploads/zcash/original/1X/477ea4c2a5d0170ac502695979bc9becf1bbde79.png23+23 = ~46 (2 instances) and ~27 for inly one instance with silentarmy --nonces 1000
|
|
|
|
krnlx
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:21:39 PM |
|
I can't get this performance from silent army kernel 45.7 Sol/s with one R9 Nano 39.6 Sol/s with one RX 480
Really numbers for my RX470/R480 rig is [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=29.270 [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=28.170 [GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% sols=26.733 [GPU 3] T=-1C A=-1% sols=27.710
even this is cool. can you release what you did ?
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:27:41 PM |
|
he compiled SILENTARMY miner and run 2 instances of it
|
|
|
|
dannygroove
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:31:39 PM |
|
I can't get this performance from silent army kernel 45.7 Sol/s with one R9 Nano 39.6 Sol/s with one RX 480
Really numbers for my RX470/R480 rig is [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=29.270 [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=28.170 [GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% sols=26.733 [GPU 3] T=-1C A=-1% sols=27.710
Nonetheless, great work
|
|
|
|
MinermanNC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:37:45 PM |
|
weird, I'm running a rig with 4 gpus, 3 x 290 and 1 x 390. When hashing It shows gpu 0 and gpu 1 at 9.8 sols. AND gpu 3 and 4 at 16.5 each. Any reason why this mite be? lol
also testing a CPU on Nicehash/miner and getting 17.23 sols AMD 8320 7 cores mining......
|
*BTC: 1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
eXtremal (OP)
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:52:21 PM |
|
I can't get this performance from silent army kernel 45.7 Sol/s with one R9 Nano 39.6 Sol/s with one RX 480
Really numbers for my RX470/R480 rig is [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=29.270 [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=28.170 [GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% sols=26.733 [GPU 3] T=-1C A=-1% sols=27.710
From SILENTARMY readme: Note: the code is currently very poorly optimized; it makes zero attempts to keep the queue of OpenCL commands full, therefore one needs to run 2 instances of SILENTARMY in parallel on the same GPU to keep it well utilized. rx470 8gb (mod bios): 23+23 = ~46 (2 instances) and ~27 for inly one instance with silentarmy --nonces 1000 You a right: [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=20.456 (ST/INV/DUP): 10x 0ch(0/0/0) [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=20.300 (ST/INV/DUP): 6x 0ch(0/0/0)
Really 40 sol/s on RX470. But this silent army code sometimes crashes (after 20-30 minutes work), need a bat file for auto restarting
|
|
|
|
|
cantwinX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:59:55 PM |
|
Hi i'm a noob too mining. can anyone help me with the config for my 980 GTX? I try to change amd too Nivida in the config file but it dont work out
|
|
|
|
Hanacerty
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:02:17 PM |
|
I can't get this performance from silent army kernel 45.7 Sol/s with one R9 Nano 39.6 Sol/s with one RX 480
Really numbers for my RX470/R480 rig is [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=29.270 [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=28.170 [GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% sols=26.733 [GPU 3] T=-1C A=-1% sols=27.710
From SILENTARMY readme: Note: the code is currently very poorly optimized; it makes zero attempts to keep the queue of OpenCL commands full, therefore one needs to run 2 instances of SILENTARMY in parallel on the same GPU to keep it well utilized. rx470 8gb (mod bios): 23+23 = ~46 (2 instances) and ~27 for inly one instance with silentarmy --nonces 1000 Has anybody tried more than 2 instances? Will the three instances faster than the 2 instances as suggested?
|
|
|
|
tutorialevideo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1161
Merit: 1001
Don`t invest more than you can afford to lose
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:05:23 PM |
|
If you have linux with AMD GPUs, share his benchmark results ./silentarmy --nonces 100 RX 470 Nitro 4 GB Elpida custom rom for ETH. Total 195 solutions in 8405.1 ms (23.2 Sol/s)
|
|
|
|
aleksfox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:06:08 PM |
|
I can't get this performance from silent army kernel 45.7 Sol/s with one R9 Nano 39.6 Sol/s with one RX 480
Really numbers for my RX470/R480 rig is [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=29.270 [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=28.170 [GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% sols=26.733 [GPU 3] T=-1C A=-1% sols=27.710
From SILENTARMY readme: Note: the code is currently very poorly optimized; it makes zero attempts to keep the queue of OpenCL commands full, therefore one needs to run 2 instances of SILENTARMY in parallel on the same GPU to keep it well utilized. 23+23 = ~46 (2 instances) and ~27 for inly one instance with silentarmy --nonces 1000 You a right: [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=20.456 (ST/INV/DUP): 10x 0ch(0/0/0) [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=20.300 (ST/INV/DUP): 6x 0ch(0/0/0)
Really 40 sol/s on RX470. But this silent army code sometimes crashes (after 20-30 minutes work), need a bat file for auto restarting Yes..i have some crashes too... Really looking forward to when you release a new version Has anybody tried more than 2 instances? Will the three instances faster than the 2 instances as suggested?
No. Slower.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:06:35 PM |
|
Anybody with a R9 290 or R9 280X or Radeon 7970 can run that SilentArmy miner?
|
|
|
|
Anamixxx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:09:47 PM |
|
hi,
I search in this thread but nothing
Anyone know how configure this gpu miner for suprnova?
|
|
|
|
aleksfox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:14:10 PM Last edit: October 27, 2016, 06:34:01 PM by aleksfox |
|
hi, how configure this gpu miner for suprnova?
it's impossible I hope that will be possible later.
|
|
|
|
TheKoolaider
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:20:36 PM |
|
Will this eventually have support for stratum? The miner works fine, but trying to go on Suprnova.cc test does not work.
|
|
|
|
AtlasONo
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:20:41 PM |
|
Windows 7 x64 with some antiquated 5800 and 6800 series cards. Error compiling program from digitH. Frontend phase failed compilation. Error: Creating kernel digitH failed!
|
|
|
|
jenifive
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:20:55 PM |
|
How to mine Zcash solo?
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:34:45 PM |
|
Any results for R9 380 4gb cards ? Silentarmy and eXtremal im curious about both.
|
|
|
|
jack0m
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 2044
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:37:34 PM |
|
How is it installed with a NVIDIA card on Ubuntu? Does it require CUDA proprietary drivers? Should we get them from some extra repository?
|
Money is a hoax. Debt is slavery. Consumerism is toxic.
|
|
|
jenifive
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:49:16 PM |
|
R7 370 x2 all working fine with ethereum mining
Why i getting error with one GPU when mining zcash? And why only 6.3 sol for GPU?
madPrimeMiner-v1.1 ClientName = 'MINE' ClientID = 342422441 InstanceID = 4324234412 Address = 'zthTb2ToG5kuAc11Ni6NxoYjoxQdEr2XvST7XEdLvmHG9k7kotEcwYCaAn1SH4zRdPoXn 9kNeFm8CQok9SNtNgn8d9WcdTK' found platform[0] name = 'AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing' <info> found 2 devices Using device 0 as GPU 0 Using device 1 as GPU 1 OpenCL error: -11 at /build/xpmclient/src/opencl.cpp:163 OpenCL error: -48 at /build/xpmclient/src/zcash/zcashgpuclient.cpp:181 OpenCL error: -48 at /build/xpmclient/src/zcash/zcashgpuclient.cpp:181 threads: 8192, work size: 256 ZCash GPU miner thread 0 started threads: 8192, work size: 256 Connecting to frontend: coinsforall.io:6668 ... ZCash GPU miner thread 1 started Connecting to bitcoin: coinsforall.io:60200 ... Connecting to signals: coinsforall.io:60201 ... Work received: height=3053 diff=84351.174 latency=280ms OpenCL error: -48 at /build/xpmclient/src/zcash/zcashgpuclient.cpp:112 OpenCL error: -48 at /build/xpmclient/src/zcash/zcashgpuclient.cpp:378 GPU 1 found share Share accepted. [GPU 0] crashed! [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=5.810 GPU 0: core=-1MHz mem=-1MHz powertune=-1 fanspeed=-1 GPU 1: core=-1MHz mem=-1MHz powertune=-1 fanspeed=-1 (ST/INV/DUP): 1x 0ch(0/0/0) Work received: height=3054 diff=75731.33 latency=46ms [GPU 0] crashed! [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=5.847 (ST/INV/DUP): 1x 0ch(0/0/0) GPU 1 found share Share accepted. [GPU 0] crashed! [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=6.146 (ST/INV/DUP): 2x 0ch(0/0/0) GPU 1 found share Share accepted. GPU 1 found share Share accepted. [GPU 0] crashed! [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=6.298 (ST/INV/DUP): 4x 0ch(0/0/0) [GPU 0] crashed! [GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=6.328 (ST/INV/DUP): 4x 0ch(0/0/0) GPU 1 found share Share accepted.
|
|
|
|
|