[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

[LoyceV]

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet.
I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this.

[1714095506]

1714095506

[Lauda]

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet.
I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this.

Correct. You can't derive a list of all addresses from a HD wallet unless you have the seed/master private key.

Hey Lauda, why didn't you make this thread self-moderated? We could have avoided all of the drama  .

Hahahahahahahahaha I'm sorry I just had to say that hahahahaha. I crack myself up .

Do not dare to say that I did not warn you in time.

[Gunthar]

and what is your point? so i used the wrong wording? i was very honest here? i said that my account was chr_sty and i lost or DEFAULTED it? either way admitted before you said any of that but my posts are being deleted not sure why? to make it look as if i'm being dishonest? cause i am not. and as you said i have no control of that account so not sure what i am even defending here? obviously i am not using two accounts?

So are you so honest to repay the loan you took from me?

PS: let's not hijack this thread, we can continue in PM or on my lending thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1448684.msg14650403#msg14650403

[Lauda]

Accounts Connected: feryjhie, anshar, restu001, goco, fathur01, thono, Aesara, kusumadewi, TECHNO55, nandaltc, bayu614, idzaldy (Alts of Candystripes)

Could you find exact TXs linking them together? Shouldn't be too hard considering the number of transactions. I've added them to OP.

Accounts connected: Farma, OrangeII, Dr.Osh, hawkins, Mr.grin, CyberKuro

Looks like a severe signature campaign abuser. The literacy on those accounts seems similar.

[Chris!]

Do not dare to say that I did not warn you in time.

I don't recall the warning, could you quote it for me? hehehehehehehehe*snicker*

Accounts connected: Farma, OrangeII, Dr.Osh, hawkins, Mr.grin, CyberKuro

Looks like a severe signature campaign abuser. The literacy on those accounts seems similar.

I've tagged them. Obviously I'm not DT1/2 but it's a start.

Edit: He had been cheating giveaways so I hope someone DT1/2 feels that it's untrustworthy and tags him too.

[Timelord2067]

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet.
I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this.

I think I've missed a couple of posts, are we talking about these types of wallets https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/4bd7a02ff825365c/addresses not being proof enough of connections?

[Chris!]

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet.
I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this.

I think I've missed a couple of posts, are we talking about these types of wallets https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/4bd7a02ff825365c/addresses not being proof enough of connections?

I just wasn't sure if the wallets were accurate. So if I make an HD wallet and use this website it should show all of the addresses, right? A normal wallet (non-HD wallet) would just show 1 address. So a paper wallet for example. Have you seen false-positives from these wallet addresses?

[Lauda]

So if I make an HD wallet and use this website it should show all of the addresses, right?

No. Read my previous post:

As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet.
I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this.

Correct. You can't derive a list of all addresses from a HD wallet unless you have the seed/master private key.

The only problem with that website is that it can create a false positive (e.g. wallets from a singular service). One should either be careful with wallets that show hundreds/thousands of addresses, or find the exact transaction link between a group of addresses (which takes some time and analysis).

[Sweeet]

Accounts connected: Sweeet123 is my alt

Though already noticed, Snailmen BumbleBeeTC Pierre11 are more alts of Candystripes.

Miscellaneous: Both these don't need proof it has already been proved, and for my alt I don't think I should need proof for that

[botany]

pooya87 and Herbert2020 are alts

i want to join:
Name:    Herbert2020
Posts:    96
Activity:    96
Position:    Member
Bitcoin address:    17BNV46UocHmtuCnsSx4BYCJKiLfwstt8E

Web Archive

i would like to join this camp (also sent in pm):
Name:   pooya87
Posts:   285
Activity:   112
Position:   Member
Bitcoin address:   1BYjkgEqCwWcAii2GnGqsd1MRmqiku4MLL

Web Archive

Addresses linked here
https://blockchain.info/tx/07c3499eefb30c1b01d1778951c3eb77f19b00e81b00cf727df3bbf5a23ec45b

[Avirunes]

Accounts Connected: feryjhie, anshar, restu001, goco, fathur01, thono, Aesara, kusumadewi, TECHNO55, nandaltc, bayu614, idzaldy (Alts of Candystripes)
ferjhie is not connected with Candystripes anymore. Knightkon is the owner of account-ferjhie now as the previous holder defaulted the loan. (Check my original post to view signed message from knightkon)

feryjhie and fathur01 connected with bictoinsatu@gmail.com .

The bets are settled since yesterday and the issue is fixed.

can you proces my withdrawal from account bitcoinsatu@gmail.com

http://archive.is/PBCMt#selection-3685.0-3685.21

GIVE ME TOO email: BITCOINSATU@GMAIL.COM

http://archive.is/9IU30#selection-3043.0-3043.21



https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/f45da607ca5fcbba931296cf9e2d1221eaaa0a8c177e7a8fe56b7a30cf39c042

Code:

1NSK1RaYsCeSKgSmNQckgdbgLT19FMVEzZ	0.000189    BTC	
1Ce3btPofYZptFxu3fkFJFef4eaUV9JXYH	0.00003     BTC
1JPxhCP6QDpT896Hxpj5keg33sAR6FFcmn     0.00174115  BTC

So in my previous post here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17117023#msg17117023., 1NSK1RaYsCeSKgSmNQckgdbgLT1FMVEzZ was used by fathur01. So this clears out that fathur01 is also alt of Candystripes


fathur01  and user orryde are connected with orryde@yahoo.com

PLEASE REPLY MT EMAIL SIR

My email : orryde@yahoo.com

thank you

http://archive.is/o9MQ1

Username : orryde
My email : orryde@yahoo.com
I hope i get it

http://archive.is/LNB1V

[Chris!]

Accounts connected: [BTC ]onFIRE(no space), kompeni


Proof:

8th tweet https://twitter.com/btconfire/status/741654803202244608

Archive

tweet 11 july 2015
type : twitter
link :
https://twitter.com/btconfire/status/619823972016783360
https://twitter.com/btconfire/status/619823918937804801
https://twitter.com/btconfire/status/619823849576660992
bitcoin address : 1D53GvfHhuvxKsCJZLPX91oPppkWDRdqNM

Archive


"Addresses":

Code:

 https://twitter.com/btconfire

Miscellaneous:


There are/were many other connections+ this is a hacked account (confirmed by BadBear). It's hard to tell who the accounts are in control of now.

[shorena]

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet.
I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this.

I think I've missed a couple of posts, are we talking about these types of wallets https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/4bd7a02ff825365c/addresses not being proof enough of connections?

I stated a few posts back that I will not accept a link to that page as proof for connections between addresses. Id like to be able to verify the information. Linking to walletexplorer makes it easy for the accuser and tedious for the verifier. I prefer the SHA-2 way, difficult to find, easy to verify. Others on DT might see this differently, its just my personal view.

[Quickseller]

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet.
I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this.

Wrong. You can't derive a list of all addresses from a HD wallet unless you have the master public key/xpubkey.

FIFY

[Timelord2067]

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet.
I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this.

Wrong. You can't derive a list of all addresses from a HD wallet unless you have the master public key/xpubkey.

FIFY

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=FIFY

acronym used in message boards, meaning "Fixed it for ya". Most often used in quoting another posters work and slightly changing it.

Poster 1 "I really enjoyed 'Brokeback Mountain!'"

Poster 2: "<Poster_1>I really enjoy gay sex with cowboys!</Poster_1> FIFY!

So obviously the Alt calling itself quickseller has modified one of the posts above, (but that's not to say they don't like gay sex with cowboys...)

...not that there's anything wrong with that - Seinfield...

[Timelord2067]

I stated a few posts back that I will not accept a link to that page as proof for connections between addresses. Id like to be able to verify the information. Linking to walletexplorer makes it easy for the accuser and tedious for the verifier. I prefer the SHA-2 way, difficult to find, easy to verify. Others on DT might see this differently, its just my personal view.

You mean like how two Alts will create PGP Keys withing days of each-other as proof they are Alts?  

That kind of thing?

[DarkStar_]

I just got a PM craZyLovE0916 asking for a loan. Username seems really familiar to someone else (can't remember the name), but they asked for loans with useless collateral and had RedPaint™. No solid proof, but I'm guessing there is a high chance.

Supposedly, the Cloverdale account was sold and no longer owned by stiffbud.

<image>

Can you copy / paste the URL included in the message please?

It linked to my report.

[abhishek.g]

Lauda=Lutpin=Yahoo=Actmyname=Avirunes 
I guess there are many more .

[Lauda]

Lauda=Lutpin=Yahoo=Actmyname=Avirunes

 

Here, I'll help you with the investigation: Lauda -> Lutpin.

So obviously the Alt calling itself quickseller has modified one of the posts above

The correction isn't even valid. Looks like someone doesn't know what a root seed is (such discussion would be off-topic though).

Accounts Connected: feryjhie, (Alts of Candystripes)
-snip-

This looks like it is no longer the case. According to the trust rating left by knightkon, they are now in possession of that account.

[Timelord2067]

Accounts connected: [BTC]onFIRE, kompeni

(snippy snippy)

Hi Chris! I took a different path to yours after that PM we were both sent the other day, my results for [BTC]onFIRE are over Yonder: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179091.msg17148774#msg17148774 if you'd like to cast an eye over my results? There was about a dozen Alts I was able to identify to add onto the nearly 20 others I'd previously identified:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg14394021#msg14394021
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg14404685#msg14404685
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg14404849#msg14404849
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg14405568#msg14405568

(I'll get around to tally up all the UID's etc shortly)