[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

[Coiner_]

[-- snip --]

Wow, I just stumbled upon this:



What is that supposed to mean?

How is my post you quoted there passing off your work as mine? By all means, quote/link to the post you made your own connection between those accounts so it can be compared.

Edit: On the off-chance that you refuse to provide that quote and attempt to deflect like you did before, I went ahead and found it myself.

My post:

Accounts Connected:

bL4nkcode and bL4nkcode01

Proof:

Essentially the same unique username and registered within 24 hrs of each other. bL4nkcode(01) is used interchangeably for his Twitter and Steemit username, and it's part of his PGP key details.

Twitter here, Steemit here and PGP key here (second code block).

Addresses:

Code:

1BL4NKZBsNpYkqUHfQfgdTJTQebmE8ieFf
16ZogW9nq1v2pXaGDTH9BPeHkTEZewFVhA

Second address here.

Miscellaneous:

Twitters: bL4nkcode01

Yours:

Accounts Connected:

bL4nkcode01, bL4nkcode

Proof:

Not really much to go on except the registration date being some 36 hours apart and the zero-one being registered *before* the no-number UID.

Date Registered:    10 February 2016, 11:24:27 bL4nkcode01 u=763931 http://archive.is/3mKIS

Date Registered:    12 February 2016, 01:17:03 bL4nkcode u=765632 http://archive.is/igJWW

Is that almost entirely vapid "connection" what you claim I'm passing off as mine? And I'd like evidence for the other "people's" works I've passed off as mine.

[1714797760]

1714797760

[1714797760]

1714797760

[Timelord2067]

I take it Alt-Buster is actually Al Pacino Jr  

http://archive.is/3YsN8

What did you base this assumption on?

It's a question, not a statement...

[trinaldao]

waorana
Proof : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2218298.msg22961457#msg22961457
Always join Multi account in same Bounty : https://etherscan.io/address/0x507B69C7185dA5568F20aAc0CE78FB61d7A85561#tokentxns (http://archive.is/8ECYg)


marcripto
Proof : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2218298.msg22965793#msg22965793
Always join Multi account in same Bounty : https://etherscan.io/address/0xDb5F5Ffc9d185D70c92358D6F7c49980410a7AAC#tokentxns (http://archive.is/XVhMY)


Archive : http://archive.is/Kor63 Line #266 #267

[subSTRATA]

dunno if this one's been listed already, havent really kept up.

clby (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1080891)
Ubey (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=945766)
Hx352 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1082031)

same sellygg shop link and skype ( https://selly(dot)gg/@UbersHF | skype: ubers.hf)

clby posting selly link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2097233.msg20959287#msg20959287 | http://archive.is/vbbp2
ubey posting selly and skype: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1821425.msg20155523#msg20155523 | http://archive.is/xgvrq
hx352 posting selly and skype: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2048226.msg20409999#msg20409999 | http://archive.is/WTPQM

[Coiner_]

[-- snip --]

Wow, I just stumbled upon this:



What is that supposed to mean?

How is my post you quoted there passing off your work as mine? By all means, quote/link to the post you made your own connection between those accounts so it can be compared.

Edit: On the off-chance that you refuse to provide that quote and attempt to deflect like you did before, I went ahead and found it myself.

My post:

Accounts Connected:

bL4nkcode and bL4nkcode01

Proof:

Essentially the same unique username and registered within 24 hrs of each other. bL4nkcode(01) is used interchangeably for his Twitter and Steemit username, and it's part of his PGP key details.

Twitter here, Steemit here and PGP key here (second code block).

Addresses:

Code:

1BL4NKZBsNpYkqUHfQfgdTJTQebmE8ieFf
16ZogW9nq1v2pXaGDTH9BPeHkTEZewFVhA

Second address here.

Miscellaneous:

Twitters: bL4nkcode01

Yours:

Accounts Connected:

bL4nkcode01, bL4nkcode

Proof:

Not really much to go on except the registration date being some 36 hours apart and the zero-one being registered *before* the no-number UID.

Date Registered:    10 February 2016, 11:24:27 bL4nkcode01 u=763931 http://archive.is/3mKIS

Date Registered:    12 February 2016, 01:17:03 bL4nkcode u=765632 http://archive.is/igJWW

Is that almost entirely vapid "connection" what you claim I'm passing off as mine? And I'd like evidence for the other "people's" works I've passed off as mine.

To demonstrate the absurdity of TimeLord's claim, here are a few cases I remembered where the same thing has happened and no one was inane enough to tag them as being "so lazy and passing off people's works as [theirs]":

- Lutpin telling whywefight he connected accounts that were already connected
- Guess who...  
- zazarb telling Lutpin he connected accounts that were already connected

And did I mention that adorable threat to me in parentheses?

dunno if this one's been listed already, havent really kept up.

[-- snip --]

You better find out if it's already listed or you're gonna get a rating making the absurd claim that you're "so lazy" and passing off people's works as yours.

[actmyname]

To demonstrate the absurdity of TimeLord's claim, here are a few cases I remembered where the same thing has happened and no one was inane enough to tag them as being "so lazy and passing off people's works as [theirs]":

- Lutpin telling whywefight he connected accounts that were already connected
- Guess who...  
- zazarb telling Lutpin he connected accounts that were already connected

You seem quite butthurt. In only the Timelord post did he disregard the feedback - to which after 7 minutes he made the second post reflecting upon his mistake. Seems like he didn't exactly 'pass off people's works as theirs'. In comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) and TL posted 28 minutes later about your repeat connection.You can always disregard their feedback.

[Coiner_]

To demonstrate the absurdity of TimeLord's claim, here are a few cases I remembered where the same thing has happened and no one was inane enough to tag them as being "so lazy and passing off people's works as [theirs]":

- Lutpin telling whywefight he connected accounts that were already connected
- Guess who...  
- zazarb telling Lutpin he connected accounts that were already connected

You seem quite butthurt.

I can see how it would appear so.

In only the Timelord post did he disregard the feedback - to which after 7 minutes he made the second post reflecting upon his mistake. Seems like he didn't exactly 'pass off people's works as theirs'.

Nor did I, Lutpin or whywefight.

In comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) and TL posted 28 minutes later about your repeat connection.

Which I acknowledged a few minutes later.

You can always disregard their feedback.

It's appropriately under the "Untrusted feedback" section and I didn't know it was there until a few days ago which is why I'm posting about it now. AFAICS I'll eventually have to archive this page.

[Coiner_]

I had my suspicions that this claim - "in comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) - was patently false and as expected, it was.

Not only did I not make 6 posts after my connection, I didn't make a single post until after TM pointed out I made a repeat connection and that was me acknowledging it (image links to relevant Latest posts page):



I had to zoom out since it won't fit my screen without needing to scroll horizontally.

[actmyname]

I had my suspicions that this claim - "in comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) - was patently false and as expected, it was.

But it's not.

#1063
#1068

A single post suffices, with edits when you have new additions.

Not only did I not make 6 posts after my connection

Never said that you made 6 posts after. Read my quote again: "In comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) and TL posted 28 minutes later about your repeat connection."

That sentence follows chronologically. You made 6 consecutive posts. Then, 28 minutes after your last post, TL posted about the repeat connection.

[Coiner_]

I had my suspicions that this claim - "in comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) - was patently false and as expected, it was.

But it's not.

#1063
#1068

A single post suffices, with edits when you have new additions.

I was just starting out and having read through (and continue to read) several pages of this and the previous "Known alts" thread, see nothing wrong with posting each connection on its own (there's the added and probably not too significant advantage of knowing each post references one connection). It was after stumbling on Avirunes' (IIRC) multiple use of the [ hr..] tag in a single connection post that I started posting more in one which I now usually do if:

- I find more than one when hunting
- there's no new post after my connection
- there was an error in the initial post and I have another one to add

Not only did I not make 6 posts after my connection

Never said that you made 6 posts after. Read my quote again: "In comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) and TL posted 28 minutes later about your repeat connection."

That sentence follows chronologically. You made 6 consecutive posts. Then, 28 minutes after your last post, TL posted about the repeat connection.

To you maybe but your use of the word "consecutive" and how you compared it to TM's posting - "In only the Timelord post [...] to which after 7 minutes he made the second post reflecting upon his mistake [...] In comparison..." made it appear like you were claiming I made 6 posts after making my repeat connection and unlike him, didn't acknowledge my mistake as fast as he did or in the next post.

[Timelord2067]

You seem quite butthurt. In only the Timelord post did he disregard the feedback - to which after 7 minutes he made the second post reflecting upon his mistake. Seems like he didn't exactly 'pass off people's works as theirs'. In comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) and TL posted 28 minutes later about your repeat connection.You can always disregard their feedback.

Heh - I'd forgotten about this one:

Oh FUbotherCK, I didn't check the feedback for xavTrot6 and x_Molotov I could have saved myself some time...

FUNot to worry eh?CK

Admittedly I came about my conclusion from a different direction if I recall.

In any case, all this for a couple of lines of neutral feedback?  Why so Butt Hurt ^TM?

Now this:

is worthy of a Sontarian Opera... (or, is it Klingon?  I can never quite remember... )

A whole thread of its own dedicated to Lutpin when he slapped girlbtc.com (who's URL has expired BTW) with Negative Trust for copying their work wholesale.

• Not on the DT
• Plenty of Butt Hurt ^TM over a trivial matter
• One thread started and one other thread hijacked

I see from your trust wall you've slapped thirteen alts with trust, ten negative and three neutral, yet, you don't have single piece of feed back given to you, except mine...

Could this just be an exercise to maintain a clean slate?

[Coiner_]

You seem quite butthurt. In only the Timelord post did he disregard the feedback - to which after 7 minutes he made the second post reflecting upon his mistake. Seems like he didn't exactly 'pass off people's works as theirs'. In comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) and TL posted 28 minutes later about your repeat connection.You can always disregard their feedback.

Heh - I'd forgotten about this one:

Oh FUbotherCK, I didn't check the feedback for xavTrot6 and x_Molotov I could have saved myself some time...

FUNot to worry eh?CK

Admittedly I came about my conclusion from a different direct if I recall.

Assuming you're saying what I think you're saying, so did I.

In any case, all this for a couple of lines of neutral feedback?  Why so Butt Hurt ^TM?

It's neutral, sure, and untrusted, even better but the absurd accusations (and that threat) in it is what got me posting here.

Now this:

[-- snip --]

I see from your trust wall you've slapped thirteen alts with trust, ten negative and three neutral, yet, you don't have single piece of feed back given to you, except mine...

Could this just be an exercise to maintain a clean slate?

Meh, I've read quite a few funny threads on BCT (the girlbtc one above included) and the trust pages (reread when I discovered that "Show ratings" button-as-a-link) of most of the alt-hunters here so I know it's gonna happen sooner or later. I'm expecting to log in one of these days and be met with a significant red. I thought it would happen with abishek and co but it didn't so it'll probably happen when I'm done researching my current 30+ alt accounts ring and start tagging them.

[Lauda]

I've updated the table with everything that I found credible enough up until this last page as I got exhausted¹. It seems that we will soon run out of space here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17067583#msg17067583.
[1]:

* Lauda takes a sip of whiskey.

[Coiner_]

I've updated the table with everything that I found credible enough up until this last page as I got exhausted¹. It seems that we will soon run out of space here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17067583#msg17067583.
[1]:

* Lauda takes a sip of whiskey.

If you're not feeling too tired you should merge the Hardtime and Gildarts rows. Like I said before, they're the alts of the same person. I was well on my way to hunting all of it down but stumbled on this page, specifically posts like this, this and this which link them together.

BTW, is there a way to find out if a member that's not on this list is banned from BCT?

[Lauda]

If you're not feeling too tired you should merge the Hardtime and Gildarts rows. Like I said before, they're the alts of the same person. I was well on my way to hunting all of it down but stumbled on this page, specifically posts like this, this and this which link them together.

I'm already dead, but I've done what you've asked of me.

BTW, is there a way to find out if a member that's not on this list is banned from BCT?

No. The purple coloring was used back when I was a staff member, as I could trivially see whether someone was banned or not. I have request for the rank 'Banned' in Meta once, as advised by theymos, but he never ended up doing anything about that.

[AlehandroTheGreat]

Accounts Connected: AlehandroTheGreat, XCoint

Proof: Both joined the same Twitter Campaign (Opus). Xcoint sended his Bounty Tokens to AlehandroTheGreat ETH Adresse.

AlehandroTheGreat Addresse:

Code:

0x52364f6c07d05b05b23136f3f520ce9b724d6d9f

XCoint Addresse:

Code:

0xa3b2a484a3be6eb11ce3e4d1e1837ef32b2fe996

Etherscan Link

Opus Twitter Campaign Link

Twitter Spreadsheet Archive


Also in this Post Xcoint used AlehandroTheGreat Profilelink:

Bitcointalk Post
Archive
Screenshot AlehandroTheGreat
Screenshot XCoint

Xcoint is my real friend from my real life, and we are not doing anything bad.... He simply have not got ETH on his address and he asked me to withdraw his coins..... WTF? AM I Doing something not allowed? I even can make photo me with him, It is so stupid to make such decisions only because one transaction lol ,  We are working on the same job and are knowing each other in the real life, also I tell him about bounties and he started to do it.... what wrong with that?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

^^Sorry, that was a dumb move on your part.  If you've read this thread or any other ones, like in the scam accusations section, you'd know that users are--fairly or not--connected by their addresses.  Having your picture taken with another person won't prove anything.  So suck it up, because that's the consequence of your actions.  Your friend somehow couldn't get his own address but could participate?  That doesn't make a lot of sense.

[AlehandroTheGreat]

^^Sorry, that was a dumb move on your part.  If you've read this thread or any other ones, like in the scam accusations section, you'd know that users are--fairly or not--connected by their addresses.  Having your picture taken with another person won't prove anything.  So suck it up, because that's the consequence of your actions.  Your friend somehow couldn't get his own address but could participate?  That doesn't make a lot of sense.

what? My friend have not got ETH on his address and ask to withdraw coins? what? What this topic is even about?? Massons topic? WTF? But what prove that transaction? That one person send to another couple bux? You guys have a lot of time I think.....
You can check ip adresses on this forum and other sites lol, even gmails..... but also I do not know why I need somebody anything to prove..... You are doing stupid anarchy without any proofs lol

Edited: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2298568.msg23331175#msg23331175 - hope it will help

[Coiner_]

If you're not feeling too tired you should merge the Hardtime and Gildarts rows. Like I said before, they're the alts of the same person. I was well on my way to hunting all of it down but stumbled on this page, specifically posts like this, this and this which link them together.

I'm already dead, but I've done what you've asked of me.

Great!

BTW, is there a way to find out if a member that's not on this list is banned from BCT?

No. The purple coloring was used back when I was a staff member, as I could trivially see whether someone was banned or not. I have request for the rank 'Banned' in Meta once, as advised by theymos, but he never ended up doing anything about that.

That would be just wonderful. They can even use a dead/ancient looking coin under the names here:



to make it jive with the rest. I hope they're saving it for the new forum. Maybe the old thread needs a bump?

Edit: Did a quick search and found this. It seems bump is even less useful than I initially assumed.

[Coiner_]

^^Sorry, that was a dumb move on your part.  If you've read this thread or any other ones, like in the scam accusations section, you'd know that users are--fairly or not--connected by their addresses.  Having your picture taken with another person won't prove anything.  So suck it up, because that's the consequence of your actions.  Your friend somehow couldn't get his own address but could participate?  That doesn't make a lot of sense.

what? My friend have not got ETH on his address and ask to withdraw coins? what? What this topic is even about?? Massons topic? WTF? But what prove that transaction? That one person send to another couple bux? You guys have a lot of time I think.....
You can check ip adresses on this forum and other sites lol, even gmails..... but also I do not know why I need somebody anything to prove..... You are doing stupid anarchy without any proofs lol

Edited: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2298568.msg23331175#msg23331175 - hope it will help

Really? Just hold on.


Hunting for your other alts (and there are quite a few) has finally given me something on sherilyn that should stick.

Accounts Connected:

sHeRiLyN1618 and orryde

Proof:

ahmadansharr FB account is used by orryde here which sHeRiLyN1618 uses here.

Addresses:

Code:

0x96c0a020fe377fa4bb1607b02a9715063e2ffe60
1LASoJDQP4d8HMTv8o68D4RLhjysydH58p

Miscellaneous:

Going by the trust rating left by Timelord on orryde's account, sHeRiLyN1618 is actually yet another alt of Quickseller.