Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 08:27:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 59 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Custom RAM Timings for GPU's with GDDR5 - DOWNLOAD LINKS - UPDATED  (Read 155460 times)
ray_saeed
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 87
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 09, 2017, 11:55:05 PM
 #101

I am interested in purchasing custom Elpida and Samsung roms for XMR mining with  Nitro+ RX 470 OC cards (4GB and 8GB). If you have stable custom roms available please message me with a quote. Thanks.

dude,for free i will help you out.im mining with xfx rx470 4gb black's with elpida. all 24 at doing 28.3mhs on eth and 110ish watts each.

Thanks for the offer buddy Smiley.  I am getting around 28 mhs in ETH and getting around 700 h/s in XMR. These cards are undervolted, with clocks @ 1100/1950 and 1500 straps. Was reading about some folks getting upto 900 h/s while mining monero and was interested in getting similar results.
1715588856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715588856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715588856
Reply with quote  #2

1715588856
Report to moderator
1715588856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715588856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715588856
Reply with quote  #2

1715588856
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
avirdoz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1191
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 10, 2017, 12:19:58 AM
 #102

I am interested in purchasing custom Elpida and Samsung roms for XMR mining with  Nitro+ RX 470 OC cards (4GB and 8GB). If you have stable custom roms available please message me with a quote. Thanks.

dude,for free i will help you out.im mining with xfx rx470 4gb black's with elpida. all 24 at doing 28.3mhs on eth and 110ish watts each.

Thanks for the offer buddy Smiley.  I am getting around 28 mhs in ETH and getting around 700 h/s in XMR. These cards are undervolted, with clocks @ 1100/1950 and 1500 straps. Was reading about some folks getting upto 900 h/s while mining monero and was interested in getting similar results.

900H/s is a vanity hashrate - it's absolute max and not efficient. 825 - 875 is probably real.
What about eth h/r with this custom timings?
LoneRangir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 615
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 10, 2017, 12:31:31 AM
 #103

Do you visualize or simulate your timing parameter changes, or make them and test them live?
ray_saeed
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 87
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 10, 2017, 01:02:54 AM
 #104

I am interested in purchasing custom Elpida and Samsung roms for XMR mining with  Nitro+ RX 470 OC cards (4GB and 8GB). If you have stable custom roms available please message me with a quote. Thanks.

dude,for free i will help you out.im mining with xfx rx470 4gb black's with elpida. all 24 at doing 28.3mhs on eth and 110ish watts each.

Thanks for the offer buddy Smiley.  I am getting around 28 mhs in ETH and getting around 700 h/s in XMR. These cards are undervolted, with clocks @ 1100/1950 and 1500 straps. Was reading about some folks getting upto 900 h/s while mining monero and was interested in getting similar results.

900H/s is a vanity hashrate - it's absolute max and not efficient. 825 - 875 is probably real.

I would be willing to buy in that range as long as it is stable.
xneoenx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 10, 2017, 01:11:52 AM
 #105

Do you visualize or simulate your timing parameter changes, or make them and test them live?

I usually make them and test them live, but I know some depend on the values of others, so I often adjust for that.

God damn it. I have been flashing at least 15+ times trying all values, where the hell is RAS2RAS Jesus god damn it. Each flash takes like 6 minutes, Flash => Restart => Test @ 2000 => Restart => Test @ 2100. On and on for the past 5 days now. Best part is, each HEX string I do it on paper. FUN! Best I have is 800, at 1160, 2120. But then again, based only on if it runs without crashes. Trying to get those ones first and then work backwards to see how it wokrs as I dont think I know which of these timings even matter, or if all do.

Trying to go about it theoretically without knowing how the algo works, is like finding a needle in a haystack,  thats somewhere in the ocean.

I think ETH is more dependant on speed vs timings no? Im sure we can optimize it, but the pay off wont be much I dont think. 1 - 4% gains? XMR is where the money is 20% gains for a good strap.
Metroid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 353


Xtreme Monster


View Profile
February 10, 2017, 03:33:07 AM
 #106


900H/s is a vanity hashrate - it's absolute max and not efficient. 825 - 875 is probably real.

I have been playing with Elpida (EDW4032BAB) 0.85v memory and clock for a day or so, so far I reached 820 h/s on XMR, It needs a lot of work yet, low share difficult rejection rate is around 10% which is bad, memory error is low, need time to improve, it has been fun, after this will be time to play with Hynix.

BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
Eliovp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
February 10, 2017, 08:08:04 AM
 #107


900H/s is a vanity hashrate - it's absolute max and not efficient. 825 - 875 is probably real.

I have been playing with Elpida (EDW4032BAB) 0.85v memory and clock for a day or so, so far I reached 820 h/s on XMR, It needs a lot of work yet, low share difficult rejection rate is around 10% which is bad, memory error is low, need time to improve, it has been fun, after this will be time to play with Hynix.

Got an Elpida 470 4G, best card i've got, does 850h xmr, 30eth, 280zcash without a hickup.

I always thought Hynix would be the better performer but i was wrong. (i'm talking about 470 Hynix, 480's do a shitload better, 850 without a problem..)
And there's a serious difference in Hynix quality.

If you have Elpida's, be glad, they are in my opinion the best ones out there!

Samsung is very decent as well, got my 480 8G's at 800 (can easily do 840-850 as well) core clock 1100, mem 2050 and an undervolt of -120mV vddc.

So in the 80 watt range Smiley

Metroid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 353


Xtreme Monster


View Profile
February 10, 2017, 08:50:27 AM
 #108


900H/s is a vanity hashrate - it's absolute max and not efficient. 825 - 875 is probably real.

I have been playing with Elpida (EDW4032BAB) 0.85v memory and clock for a day or so, so far I reached 820 h/s on XMR, It needs a lot of work yet, low share difficult rejection rate is around 10% which is bad, memory error is low, need time to improve, it has been fun, after this will be time to play with Hynix.

Got an Elpida 470 4G, best card i've got, does 850h xmr, 30eth, 280zcash without a hickup.

I always thought Hynix would be the better performer but i was wrong. (i'm talking about 470 Hynix, 480's do a shitload better, 850 without a problem..)
And there's a serious difference in Hynix quality.

If you have Elpida's, be glad, they are in my opinion the best ones out there!

Samsung is very decent as well, got my 480 8G's at 800 (can easily do 840-850 as well) core clock 1100, mem 2050 and an undervolt of -120mV vddc.

So in the 80 watt range Smiley

Good to hear, there a lot things to test, I have been busy today and probably it will take me few days to get back testing. Yeah on XMR at 0.85v 90 watts, on eth 110 watts. Electricity is a big deal, always keen on performance per watt more than anything and custom timings can help with my quest.

BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
niko2004x
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 10, 2017, 08:59:13 AM
 #109

Some experimental results.
It seems ~900h/s is a practical limit for Ubuntu 15.04 + fglrx + claymore xmr miner + r9 390 (with H5GC4H24AJR)
at core clock 1135 and any mem clock begining from 1100.
900h/s is relatively easy to obtain with timings tweaking with almost any mem clock starting from 1100,
above 900h/s i had no success.
dallase
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 10, 2017, 03:35:34 PM
 #110


900H/s is a vanity hashrate - it's absolute max and not efficient. 825 - 875 is probably real.

I have been playing with Elpida (EDW4032BAB) 0.85v memory and clock for a day or so, so far I reached 820 h/s on XMR, It needs a lot of work yet, low share difficult rejection rate is around 10% which is bad, memory error is low, need time to improve, it has been fun, after this will be time to play with Hynix.

Got an Elpida 470 4G, best card i've got, does 850h xmr, 30eth, 280zcash without a hickup.

I always thought Hynix would be the better performer but i was wrong. (i'm talking about 470 Hynix, 480's do a shitload better, 850 without a problem..)
And there's a serious difference in Hynix quality.

If you have Elpida's, be glad, they are in my opinion the best ones out there!

Samsung is very decent as well, got my 480 8G's at 800 (can easily do 840-850 as well) core clock 1100, mem 2050 and an undervolt of -120mV vddc.

So in the 80 watt range Smiley


Is this claymore 9.7 windows?   I have a elpida running 1100/2050 and its barely over 700 on sgminer.   




Eliovp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
February 10, 2017, 04:02:09 PM
 #111


900H/s is a vanity hashrate - it's absolute max and not efficient. 825 - 875 is probably real.

I have been playing with Elpida (EDW4032BAB) 0.85v memory and clock for a day or so, so far I reached 820 h/s on XMR, It needs a lot of work yet, low share difficult rejection rate is around 10% which is bad, memory error is low, need time to improve, it has been fun, after this will be time to play with Hynix.

Got an Elpida 470 4G, best card i've got, does 850h xmr, 30eth, 280zcash without a hickup.

I always thought Hynix would be the better performer but i was wrong. (i'm talking about 470 Hynix, 480's do a shitload better, 850 without a problem..)
And there's a serious difference in Hynix quality.

If you have Elpida's, be glad, they are in my opinion the best ones out there!

Samsung is very decent as well, got my 480 8G's at 800 (can easily do 840-850 as well) core clock 1100, mem 2050 and an undervolt of -120mV vddc.

So in the 80 watt range Smiley


Is this claymore 9.7 windows?   I have a elpida running 1100/2050 and its barely over 700 on sgminer.   


Nope - he doesn't run Win anymore, I don't think, and I think it's on sgminer.

That's correct,

In other words, run it on windows and you'll most likely get better results..

Greetings!

bughatti
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 10, 2017, 04:08:41 PM
 #112

anyone in this thread working on a good rom for the sapphire 480 nitro + 4gb elpida that is steady?
Eliovp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
February 10, 2017, 05:26:57 PM
 #113

anyone in this thread working on a good rom for the sapphire 480 nitro + 4gb elpida that is steady?

Got one for that card yeah.

Performance is as you expect it to be.

Awesome  Cool

:p

niko2004x
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 02:55:23 PM
 #114

When trying to test new timings on rx 480 (with Samsung K4G80325FB) encountered following unexpected (at least for me)
behavior using Ubuntu 16.04 with amdgpu drivers from stock 4.9.0-rc3 kernel.
If timings in 2000 strap is too tight on rx 480 then system hard crash at boot with 'Fatal error during GPU init mining' error.
Happens at driver loading stage before major os components startup so hardware reset required.

But too tight timings in 2000 strap on rx 470 (with Hynix H5GC4H24AJR) do not lead to crash at boot.
Card is visible by lspci but do not work at 2000 mclk as expected.

WFT?
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2017, 04:48:26 PM
 #115

My custom timings for 470 8GB Nitro+ OC (11256-02-20G) - Samsung mem

For the powersaver guy :
(1126/2100 @ -120mV)




For normal usage guy :
(1300/2100 @ -100mV)


SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
Eliovp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2017, 05:04:16 PM
 #116

My custom timings for 470 8GB Nitro+ OC (11256-02-20G) - Samsung mem

For the powersaver guy :
(1126/2100 @ -120mV)

https://i.imgur.com/ILSqPVT.jpg


For normal usage guy :
(1300/2100 @ -100mV)

https://i.imgur.com/g4AZZqz.jpg

Congrats, you have a card that won the sillicon lottery...

You do realize that 98 out of 100 cards like that can't handle -100mV while running 1300 core??

Try this on a 6xGPU rig.. and while NOT using claymore.. if you can do that, i will say: Congratulations to you sir.

doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2017, 05:10:23 PM
 #117

My custom timings for 470 8GB Nitro+ OC (11256-02-20G) - Samsung mem

For the powersaver guy :
(1126/2100 @ -120mV)

https://i.imgur.com/ILSqPVT.jpg


For normal usage guy :
(1300/2100 @ -100mV)

https://i.imgur.com/g4AZZqz.jpg

Congrats, you have a card that won the sillicon lottery...

You do realize that 98 out of 100 cards like that can't handle -100mV while running 1300 core??

Try this on a 6xGPU rig.. and while NOT using claymore.. if you can do that, i will say: Congratulations to you sir.

Why do you think that 1300 is much when the def clock is 1266 ?  Roll Eyes

Also why not claymore ? Not enough power hungry? Better sgminer ? Why?

Also im running a 5xGPU rig with -120mV for weeks now on ETH (145mhs)...

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
avirdoz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1191
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 12, 2017, 07:01:50 PM
 #118

My custom timings for 470 8GB Nitro+ OC (11256-02-20G) - Samsung mem

For the powersaver guy :
(1126/2100 @ -120mV)




For normal usage guy :
(1300/2100 @ -100mV)

Did you check what power usage from the wall with "powersaver guy"?
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2017, 07:12:27 PM
 #119

I checked it now for you:

Idle : 105w from wall
Working : Hash ~ 807 H/s, VDDC : 0.8938 V, 197w from wall

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
avirdoz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1191
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 12, 2017, 07:14:05 PM
 #120

I checked it now for you:

Idle : 105w from wall
Working : Hash ~ 807 H/s, VDDC : 0.8938 V, 197w from wall

Thanks and nice results.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 59 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!