faxxer
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:12:32 PM |
|
Why in the new pascal lite wallet, it showing 0 block but in my miner already showing 2 block found.?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
zdeni82
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:12:41 PM |
|
I get this error NO BLOCKCHAIN: Invalid last block time
|
|
|
|
jc12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:12:42 PM |
|
Oh well, it was worth a try to throw some CPUs at it but the GPUs are getting all the blocks.
|
|
|
|
fikihafana
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:15:28 PM |
|
Oh well, it was worth a try to throw some CPUs at it but the GPUs are getting all the blocks.
yea i know right, it sucks huh
|
|
|
|
J@soN
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:16:29 PM |
|
all i see is one miner there.fuck invalid block time shit
|
|
|
|
mtwelve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1009
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:17:17 PM |
|
Unless there's an improvement from pascal 2 to pascal, I honestly do not see the reason why there should be a clone of it besides a quick cash grab from the inevitable PND if I'm being real with you guys. Can someone explain?
With pool software readily available, distribution should work better than with PASC1, where in the last few weeks only those with really big rigs were able to mine a block due to diff being very high and no pool being available. All this could be fixed with a hard fork and some software development. I don't see the justification to split and make a new clone. We saw what happened with ETH when it split off into two currencies.
|
|
|
|
eule
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:17:45 PM Last edit: February 02, 2017, 11:05:17 AM by eule |
|
Miners: CPU & AMD https://sourceforge.net/projects/pascalcoin/files/ ( maybe tweakable with pascal.cl from https://pasc.suprnova.cc/sgminer-5.5.0-pascal-1-windows-amd64.zip ) NVIDIA: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=826901.0Unless there's an improvement from pascal 2 to pascal, I honestly do not see the reason why there should be a clone of it besides a quick cash grab from the inevitable PND if I'm being real with you guys. Can someone explain?
With pool software readily available, distribution should work better than with PASC1, where in the last few weeks only those with really big rigs were able to mine a block due to diff being very high and no pool being available. All this could be fixed with a hard fork and some software development. I don't see the justification to split and make a new clone. We saw what happened with ETH when it split off into two currencies. The damage is done though, only the big guys stand a change in getting more than a few PASC. Re: NO BLOCKCHAIN Invalid time: I set my Windows clock two minutes forward and the error disappeared, not sure what's going on.
|
|
|
|
zdeni82
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:19:18 PM |
|
all i see is one miner there.fuck invalid block time shit
His is taking all the blocks
|
|
|
|
Oakey22
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:19:54 PM |
|
I get this error NO BLOCKCHAIN: Invalid last block time
I am getting this too
|
|
|
|
adaseb (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:20:07 PM |
|
No idea why we are getting the invalid time when during the testnet it ran fine.
Maybe the blocks are too close together, when the difficulty goes higher it will get better, I know that the original PascalCOin had this -negative time issue also.
|
|
|
|
|
Oakey22
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:21:47 PM |
|
No idea why we are getting the invalid time when during the testnet it ran fine.
Maybe the blocks are too close together, when the difficulty goes higher it will get better, I know that the original PascalCOin had this -negative time issue also.
Are you even a coder or is this a direct copy?
|
|
|
|
J@soN
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:23:45 PM |
|
check your wallet sync or not. my wallet show NO BLOCKCHAIN. damn well i guess this is fair.
|
|
|
|
axlroses
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:23:52 PM |
|
any tutorial how to solo mining?
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:24:31 PM |
|
Miners: CPU & AMD https://sourceforge.net/projects/pascalcoin/files/ (maybe tweakable with pascal.cl from https://pasc.suprnova.cc/sgminer-5.5.0-pascal-1-windows-amd64.zip ) NVIDIA: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=826901.0Unless there's an improvement from pascal 2 to pascal, I honestly do not see the reason why there should be a clone of it besides a quick cash grab from the inevitable PND if I'm being real with you guys. Can someone explain?
With pool software readily available, distribution should work better than with PASC1, where in the last few weeks only those with really big rigs were able to mine a block due to diff being very high and no pool being available. All this could be fixed with a hard fork and some software development. I don't see the justification to split and make a new clone. We saw what happened with ETH when it split off into two currencies. The damage is done though, only the big guys stand a change in getting more than a few PASC. Re: NO BLOCKCHAIN Invalid time: I set my Windows clock two minutes forward and the error disappeared, not sure what's going on. how to use the nvidia miner? don't tell me you need java shit...
|
|
|
|
Oakey22
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:25:30 PM |
|
dead?
|
|
|
|
zdeni82
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:26:21 PM |
|
i got alone in the world
Dev probably shutdown the nodes
|
|
|
|
snook
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:26:31 PM |
|
now do you see why so many were pulling for the cpu only mining. I count 3-4 miners will all blocks.
|
|
|
|
|
Yaremi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1126
|
|
February 01, 2017, 09:26:45 PM |
|
Nvidia miner Error: invalid device function Nvidia 780
|
|
|
|
|