Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[u9y42]

I am a little new at the signature campaign.  My wife is a newbie and is asking about joining a signature campaign too.  Is it allowed to have 2 users from the same IP address in signature campaigns? I just want to make sure we don't get banned if she joins one.

Well, the forum itself poses no such restriction: you're free to create and use however many accounts as you wish (with or without paid signatures), provided you (or those sharing your IP) don't spam, or break other basic forum rules.

However, some signature campaigns do explicitly prohibit users from joining with more than one account, and will ban (from their campaign) and deny payment to anyone caught (or believed to have been caught) doing so - although, simply having the same IP as another user is probably not enough for someone to act on, but I could be wrong.

[1715000499]

1715000499

[1715000499]

1715000499

[1715000499]

1715000499

[Lutpin]

However, some signature campaigns do explicitly prohibit users from joining with more than one account, and will ban (from their campaign) and deny payment to anyone caught (or believed to have been caught) doing so - although, having the same IP as another user is probably not enough for someone to act on, but I could be wrong.

How would a signature campaign manager get access to the IP addresses of the users in the campaign, in order to connect two accounts in that way and kick them for the reason of multi-accounting?

[u9y42]

However, some signature campaigns do explicitly prohibit users from joining with more than one account, and will ban (from their campaign) and deny payment to anyone caught (or believed to have been caught) doing so - although, having the same IP as another user is probably not enough for someone to act on, but I could be wrong.

How would a signature campaign manager get access to the IP addresses of the users in the campaign, in order to connect two accounts in that way and kick them for the reason of multi-accounting?

Perhaps through campaigns like YoBit, that require campaign participants to visit their site?

[Lutpin]

Perhaps through campaigns like YoBit, that require users to visit their site?

Didn't think about them (not a big fan either), but with VPNs and stuff, that could lead to alot of mishits IMO.
Nobody would start banning on that basis.

[u9y42]

Perhaps through campaigns like YoBit, that require users to visit their site?

Didn't think about them (not a big fan either), but with VPNs and stuff, that could lead to alot of mishits IMO.
Nobody would start banning on that basis.

I agree - precisely why I said what I did.

[Pitchblackroom]

However, some signature campaigns do explicitly prohibit users from joining with more than one account, and will ban (from their campaign) and deny payment to anyone caught (or believed to have been caught) doing so - although, having the same IP as another user is probably not enough for someone to act on, but I could be wrong.

How would a signature campaign manager get access to the IP addresses of the users in the campaign, in order to connect two accounts in that way and kick them for the reason of multi-accounting?

Perhaps through campaigns like YoBit, that require campaign participants to visit their site?

Exactly, But unless the user was smart enough to hide his IP between each site. But then again, it would be a lot of work to track down that person in general. However if there were people who spammed a lot...

[ABCbits]

However, some signature campaigns do explicitly prohibit users from joining with more than one account, and will ban (from their campaign) and deny payment to anyone caught (or believed to have been caught) doing so - although, having the same IP as another user is probably not enough for someone to act on, but I could be wrong.

How would a signature campaign manager get access to the IP addresses of the users in the campaign, in order to connect two accounts in that way and kick them for the reason of multi-accounting?

Perhaps through campaigns like YoBit, that require campaign participants to visit their site?

Exactly, But unless the user was smart enough to hide his IP between each site. But then again, it would be a lot of work to track down that person in general. However if there were people who spammed a lot...

I think it's useless to track down person who use multiple accounts, it take times & patience.
It's better to make signature campaign rules strict because most person who use multiple accounts can't make constructive and long post.

[Bitinity]

Update from LuckyBTCcasino :
The sign campiagn will be paused after next week payment.

UPDATE

We have some good and bad news: bad news first, LuckyBtcCasino campaign will be on pause after your next payment. There are a few problems with the site and updates that need to be taken care of before we continue for campaign 2.0.

Leading on to the good news, I have been told we will continue back as soon as the updates are complete and fixes made.

Sorry about this guys but I have gave you as much notice as possible on this.

Any questions I am here.

[Lutpin]

OneHash.com paid their first round, and can either be moved to A or CFNP (only one open spot, might be taken soon).

-> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361815.msg13938507#msg13938507

[Nomad88]

I have a question regarding payments on the table. Are these prizes per post or total payment when you reach minimum post number that is requared. Your help will be appreciated.

[n691309]

I have a question regarding payments on the table. Are these prizes per post or total payment when you reach minimum post number that is requared. Your help will be appreciated.

Every campaign has it own rules, so some require you to reach the minimum some does not have minimum.

[Lutpin]

I have a question regarding payments on the table. Are these prizes per post or total payment when you reach minimum post number that is requared. Your help will be appreciated.

Check the "Term" column in the simple table on top. You'll find something like "type/period lengh" for each campaign.

Are these prizes per post?

Yes, for campaigns labled "post".

Are these prizes total payment when you reach minimum post number that is required?

Yes, for campaigns labled "fixed".

[treeguard]

new campaign opened here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1371057.new#new

[wadili89]

Betbtc max post in a day is changed from 12 to 6, "Since tomorrow we will change max posts per day from 12 to 6." : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1312719.msg13917708#msg13917708

[u9y42]

Here's one more campaign: the Free Tipster Competition signature campaign.

This is the Simple Table entry (I don't know if the name will fit, so feel free to change it to Tipster Competition, or something like it):

PNYC

|

Free Tipster Competition

|

fixed/weekly

|

0.015

|

0.015

|

0.015

|

0.015

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

15/w

|

x

|

Y

|

Code:

[table][tr]
[td][i][color=orange]PNYC[/color][/i][/td][td]|[/td]
[td][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1371799.0]Free Tipster Competition[/url][/td][td]|[/td]
[td]fixed/weekly[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.015[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.015[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.015[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.015[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]15/w[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td][b]Y[/b][/td][td]|[/td]
[/tr][/table]

And the Detailed Information:

Free Tipster Competition (Thread)
Payment period: Weekly
Payment method: Will be paid to your Bitcoin address.
Minimum posts: 15 posts per week.
Maximum posts: -
Payments:  F/S/H/L: 0.015BTC per week.
Escrow: Yes, DirectBet.eu.
Miscellaneous: Posts must be made in the Gambling Forum (excluding the Games and rounds, and Investor-based games sub-forums). 8 of the 15 posts must be made in Tipster related threads. A maximum of 4 posts per day will count towards the campaign requirements. Double posts will count as one post only.

Code:

[b]Free Tipster Competition [/b] ([url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1371799.0]Thread[/url])
[i]Payment period:[/i] Weekly
[i]Payment method:[/i] Will be paid to your Bitcoin address.
[i]Minimum posts:[/i] 15 posts per week.
[i]Maximum posts:[/i] -
[i]Payments:[/i]  F/S/H/L: 0.015[BTC] per week.
[u][i]Escrow[/i][/u]: Yes, DirectBet.eu.
[i]Miscellaneous:[/i] Posts must be made in the Gambling Forum (excluding the Games and rounds, and Investor-based games sub-forums). 8 of the 15 posts must be made in Tipster related threads. A maximum of 4 posts per day will count towards the campaign requirements. Double posts will count as one post only.

[Lutpin]

This is the Simple Table entry (I don't know if the name will fit, so feel free to change it to Tipster Competition, or something like it):

It would be the longest name in the table. How about DirectBet.eu?
Also, there are no funds in escrow, if they are held by the runners behind the campaign.

[u9y42]

This is the Simple Table entry (I don't know if the name will fit, so feel free to change it to Tipster Competition, or something like it):

It would be the longest name in the table. How about DirectBet.eu?

Hmm, that wouldn't be right; DirectBet is only the competition's sponsor.

[Lutpin]

Hmm, that wouldn't be right; DirectBet is only the competition's sponsor.

Fixed campaigns are also listed with their payout per term, not with their payout per post.

[u9y42]

Hmm, that wouldn't be right; DirectBet is only the competition's sponsor.

Fixed campaigns are also listed with their payout per term, not with their payout per post.

Ah, you're right - thanks for pointing it out.

[Nomad88]

I have a question regarding payments on the table. Are these prizes per post or total payment when you reach minimum post number that is requared. Your help will be appreciated.

Every campaign has it own rules, so some require you to reach the minimum some does not have minimum.

Perhaps each campaign provider is explaining their rules better on their own topic. I will check it out then. Thank you for your respond.