Is Satoshi Nakamoto an A.I.?

[loreykyutt05]

What kind of thinking is that of cause no one will believe if you said that the creator of bitcoin is an A.I ,Blockchain is very advanced that new kind of thinking is needed for it to works and only some few "real" human individuals are capable of that thinking , It is just like you're telling to use that the creator of google,Facebook,twitter,car,microwave oven was all created by an A.I ! Foolish to think is it ? that's how you look like when you ask questions like this.

[1714860100]

1714860100

[1714860100]

1714860100

[1714860100]

1714860100

[margarete11]

Satoshi nakamoto is not an A.I and he will never become one ! He was a real person and A.I has no capacity to invent something from a literally an invention  , It requires creative mind and a good team so that the output will be astonishing just like bitcoin is ! Bitcoin will never be created by an A.I it was a product of different mind and ideas ! Satoshi nakamoto is not just a person I think but it is a group of person hiding in a one person name !

[requester]

Satoshi nakamoto is not an A.I and he will never become one ! He was a real person and A.I has no capacity to invent something from a literally an invention  , It requires creative mind and a good team so that the output will be astonishing just like bitcoin is ! Bitcoin will never be created by an A.I it was a product of different mind and ideas ! Satoshi nakamoto is not just a person I think but it is a group of person hiding in a one person name !

Poster of the thread is not talking about if satoshi is AI he is talking about the if satoshi had used AI to wrtie those 31000 line of code to make bitcoin. Its not that big task to write 31000 line of code for an extreme programmer and AI of such type had still been not developed that could write code.

[neochiny]

Couldn't Satoshi Nakamoto be an A.I. Bitcoin's implementation was certainly complex involving 31,000 lines of code. Bitcoin was probably created by an A.I. What do you guys think?

So according to you every complicated code longer that 31,000 lines of code is that advanced that humans cant grasp it?
First of all, lines of code is silly measurement, it literally doesn't prove anything, certainly isn't benchmark of awesomeness.
Windows 7 operating system is estimated to has 40 million lines of code, but Vista (older system) had more than 50 million lines of code.
So tell me which system is superior? The one with the more lines of code?

Normally the answer would be Windows Vista(50 Million lines of codes), but if the answer is
Windows 7(40 Million lines codes) does this mean that the qualities(or is it called in another name?)
of the codes on each operating system are different?

I'm just curious about this!

[20kevin20]

Impossible. Someone has to code that A.I., so even if it was an A.I. someone made it, so someone made Bitcoin. Why do you tuink that it was created by a robot..? It's manmade, not something impossible to recreate. Satoshi Nakamoto probably isn't even a single man, but a group of coders.

[Slark]

Couldn't Satoshi Nakamoto be an A.I. Bitcoin's implementation was certainly complex involving 31,000 lines of code. Bitcoin was probably created by an A.I. What do you guys think?

So according to you every complicated code longer that 31,000 lines of code is that advanced that humans cant grasp it?
First of all, lines of code is silly measurement, it literally doesn't prove anything, certainly isn't benchmark of awesomeness.
Windows 7 operating system is estimated to has 40 million lines of code, but Vista (older system) had more than 50 million lines of code.
So tell me which system is superior? The one with the more lines of code?

Normally the answer would be Windows Vista(50 Million lines of codes), but if the answer is
Windows 7(40 Million lines codes) does this mean that the qualities(or is it called in another name?)
of the codes on each operating system are different?

I'm just curious about this!

Lines of code are not good measurement for anything other than which code is lengthier.
You can have more sophisticated code compressed into smaller package.

Beside AFAIK bitcoin source code had 3000 lines of code, not 30k (according to gmaxwell) at the very beginning.
Now, after updates, bitcoin's code is over 100k lines.

[IamNotAnonymous]

You people are busy  debating about whether Satoshi is an  AI ?
Here is the clues; AI does not mean only Artificial Intelligence. It also refer as American Intelligence. Now I am here to let you know that Satoshi Nakamoto is a Moniker. This is the first voice of Satoshi, " I am Satoshi Nakamoto; I am a Robot; I am not alone; I have a twin brother .........> " now think who that Moniker is ?

[Vlad2Vlad]

You people are busy  debating about whether Satoshi is an  AI ?
Here is the clues; AI does not mean only Artificial Intelligence. It also refer as American Intelligence. Now I am here to let you know that Satoshi Nakamoto is a Moniker. This is the first voice of Satoshi, " I am Satoshi Nakamoto; I am a Robot; I am not alone; I have a twin brother .........> " now think who that Moniker is ?

Can we have another clue?  There's only one twin of Satoshi in crypto and that's Thomas.

[Decoded]

The thing is that currently, as far as we know, Satoshi could very much be an AI, But definitely from the future. We do not have the capabilities for an AI of this complexity. Even if the NSA or some either quiet organisation has a supercomputer, I really still doubt it.

[rvbtccom]

hello , About Nakamoto did not disclose any personal information when discussing technical matters. They provided some commentary on banking and fractional reserve lending. On his P2P Foundation profile as of 2012, Nakamoto claimed to be a 37-year-old male who lived in Japan, but some speculated he was unlikely to be Japanese due to his use of perfect English and his bitcoin software not being documented or labelled in Japanese. 

[realm]

If he is I would be very eager to meet his developers. Microsoft could use them too, they would need some help with Tay 

[syndria]

I dont believe AI can be smart like this. AI can be good but not in this way in this century.

I suppose you haven't watched Person of Interest have you? The downfall of the human race will be caused by the uprising of the machines. The current trend is to put automation in almost any device around us and connecting everything in the Internet of Things but what will happen when they turn against us? Some food for thought I guess. Skynet might turn out to be real after all 

Not yet and first time to heard it. When i googled it i get a american science fiction crime drama television series. i get your point but this is too far to the reality human will not let that to happen.

[Herbet Fry]

Couldn't Satoshi Nakamoto be an A.I. Bitcoin's implementation was certainly complex involving 31,000 lines of code. Bitcoin was probably created by an A.I. What do you guys think?

Someone had to have programmed the idea of bitcoin into the AI for it to have come up with that idea in the first place.
Also 32k of code is not really that much I'm pretty sure of that. You must habe watched too much anime before typing this post.

[IamNotAnonymous]

You people are busy  debating about whether Satoshi is an  AI ?
Here is the clues; AI does not mean only Artificial Intelligence. It also refer as American Intelligence. Now I am here to let you know that Satoshi Nakamoto is a Moniker. This is the first voice of Satoshi, " I am Satoshi Nakamoto; I am a Robot; I am not alone; I have a twin brother .........> " now think who that Moniker is ?

Can we have another clue?  There's only one twin of Satoshi in crypto and that's Thomas.

Thomas Nasakioto is not the twin brother of Satoshi Nakamoto. Thomas Nasakioto is a clone of Satoshi Nakamoto himself.

[FlamingFingers]

hello , About Nakamoto did not disclose any personal information when discussing technical matters. They provided some commentary on banking and fractional reserve lending. On his P2P Foundation profile as of 2012, Nakamoto claimed to be a 37-year-old male who lived in Japan, but some speculated he was unlikely to be Japanese due to his use of perfect English and his bitcoin software not being documented or labelled in Japanese. 

What does "unlikely to be Japanese due to his use of perfect English" mean?!!
I know of a Japanese woman who is around 40 years old, and she speaks more than perfect English. Do they even know the meaning of the word "bilingual"?
Besides, if someone wanted to make an international product/website/invention/whatever, what language would be appropriate for people all around the world to understand that thing? Of course, English. It's number 1, an international language that everyone is trying to learn, and it's much, much easier to be learnt.

I am not saying that he is Japanese, but rejecting the thought based on those speculations is simply absurd.

[SaShiRaJaVu]

I read some of satoshi posts and I don't think its A.I. At the same time I can't imagine what man on earth can restrain oneself from touching such fortune that satoshi has. And it will be conveniently for A.I. to invent Bitcoin to take control of men finances because it doesn't understand dollars

What if he is a genius and has the wealth to back it up,and what if rather than the amount of publicly known coins he might have mined a lot more like the rest of the early miners and might have made a good fortune and left the initial coins alone. One thing everyone accepts is that he is a genius.

[pda713]

I read some of satoshi posts and I don't think its A.I. At the same time I can't imagine what man on earth can restrain oneself from touching such fortune that satoshi has. And it will be conveniently for A.I. to invent Bitcoin to take control of men finances because it doesn't understand dollars

What if he is a genius and has the wealth to back it up,and what if rather than the amount of publicly known coins he might have mined a lot more like the rest of the early miners and might have made a good fortune and left the initial coins alone. One thing everyone accepts is that he is a genius.

I say non-AI, as I can relate to this individual. I've lost a devastating amount of funds that while in the past were worth just a few hundred, they could comfortably retire my entire family now... all by losing access to keys.

Or perhaps a new anonymous 1% and it is all an NWO scheme, keeping them anonymous yet still owning a major portion of funds available to the world.

[wpd]

31000 line of code is not a big task for any programmers because I am just a moderate level programmer and writing 1000 to 2000( or may be more then that ) line of code is daily time table so I think writing 31000 line for a revolutionary technology is not behind our imagination. its possible to do that may he had some assistance or if he was alone then also writing 31000 line would hardly 1 month and for logics and algorithms and testing I will give him 1 year to write those and I think its enough

I don't think he's saying that 31,000 lines is too much for a human; he's saying that it's not too much for a computer. With that aside, I don't think that there are AI's capable of writing that kind of complex code, especially when bitcoin was created in 2008. Do you know if there are code-writing AI's yet? Because I feel that logic itself is too complex for an AI to create even a fizzbuzz program, or something else simple.

[pda713]

31000 line of code is not a big task for any programmers because I am just a moderate level programmer and writing 1000 to 2000( or may be more then that ) line of code is daily time table so I think writing 31000 line for a revolutionary technology is not behind our imagination. its possible to do that may he had some assistance or if he was alone then also writing 31000 line would hardly 1 month and for logics and algorithms and testing I will give him 1 year to write those and I think its enough

I don't think he's saying that 31,000 lines is too much for a human; he's saying that it's not too much for a computer. With that aside, I don't think that there are AI's capable of writing that kind of complex code, especially when bitcoin was created in 2008. Do you know if there are code-writing AI's yet? Because I feel that logic itself is too complex for an AI to create even a fizzbuzz program, or something else simple.

thegrid.io

[Creepings]

The thing is that currently, as far as we know, Satoshi could very much be an AI, But definitely from the future. We do not have the capabilities for an AI of this complexity. Even if the NSA or some either quiet organisation has a supercomputer, I really still doubt it.

Well Satoshi Nakamoto invented bitcoin lets just put a period to that. We are currently using bitcoin and noone really ask a permission to the inventor. I think if satoshi nakamoto is an AI then thank you.